+Sonny Rosén Lozada racism literally means generalizing based on race, stereotype is a way of generalizing. Doesn't mean you have to be offended, I agree, it's not offensive, but it is racist. sorry for nitpicking
It said defeat, but he didn't get a loss for it. If you listen to him at the end of the video he says "It doesn't count, I was 7-1 before and I'm still 7-1"
I once tied a mill rogue, who coldlight oracle'ed us both too far into fatigue. It was really funny. And a little depressing, since I thought I had won, despite getting a really unfortunate pair of burned cards.
I think it was instinctive for any player to armor up automatically as a Warrior in late-game, so it's slightly forgivable. But you are correct, *armoring up at 21 life cost him the game* (Baron Geddon brought life down to (21+2)-(7+2)=14, so Mortal Strike could only do 4 dmg, and 6 total dmg with the weapon instead of 8) He could not have predicted the Farseer restoring health, but nonetheless, it was critical at that point to ensure Mortal Strike could do the maximum 6 damage, as it's a surprise spell, and no one plays around it in arena. That card was basically the win condition, as any taunt, if played, would regard charge/weapons being useless
immanuel ericson As I said previously, *"He could not have predicted the Farseer restoring health"*. But he could control the amount of damage Mortal Strike would do next turn (as far-fetched as that is, it cost him the win!). So I believe in that situation, it was a mistake not to calculate health and maximize MS dmg, although it is totally forgivable. Even without the Farseer, it is not inconceivable that Kripp would have lost (though he didn't of course). If ANY taunt was played by the mage, it would stop lethal (makes the 2/1 weapon useless for hero dmg, so *the Mage at 5 health would live at 1HP with the 4 dmg Mortal Strike*). If Questing was also played and survived due to taunt, Kripp would then have a much higher chance of losing (although the most likely situation would still be a draw without any charge/direct dmg spells from the Mage). Anyway, the point here is that the control of the result is in the hands/top-deck of the Mage, instead of yourself as the Warrior. This should not happen, especially since it could be avoided.
I suppose the chance that he wouldn't have gotten to 12 or less HP was bigger than the extra 2 armor being a deciding factor for his survival, even if he was playing a Mage. I don't really know about that, ofc we know since we've seen the outcome but I don't see people trying to get low hp on purpose against mages even if they are using such cards. I.E. Warlock have the lowest win rate against mages for a reason.
well when a mommy and daddy kripp love each other very much they make the salt intertwine and from the ashes of a desecrated city forms a babby kripperino
Blizzard: -Okay, We just finished working on the defeat and victory animations. Should we get working on the tie animation?" -Tie screen? Who the hell is gonna tie in a turn based game?! -Well sir it is technically possible to tie if you use abilities that hit all characters -Those damn nerds will do anything to try and break the game...Sigh, Fine just play the same defeat animation for tie games. Maybe we will add the tie animation in a expansion
+Akper Yapim because mortal strike needs him to be below 12 health to deal 6 damage, while he had 14 health at the time which would've dealt only 4 damage instead. its not that hard to read a card description u know...
Mike Byrne Nope, with the Farseer, the Mage was down to 8 health, and the 2/1 weapon + a 6 dmg Mortal Strike would have done it. Armoring up did in fact cost him the win in this instance
Mike Byrne Please watch it again and do the math again. If he didnt armor up he wouldnt have to use the weapon for the adventurer (which he had to do, because he was exact 2 hp too high for mortal strike, because he did armor up last turn) -> 2 extra dmg with 6 from the mortal -> 8 dmg. (but he couldnt know that ofc)
Natedagreat0101 Aah, you're right. I misunderstood the mechanics of mortal strike, I thought it did 6 damage if the opponent was at 12 or less. Thanks.
The Mortal Strike card only deals 6 damage with 12 health or less...he had 14 health before attacking the questing adventurer. So no, he didn't have lethal.
Why didnt he mortal strike baron geddon after he hit questin adventurer with the weapon? mortal strike was killing geddon thus giving him higher chance of surviving. that try on draw was too risky.
Does it irritate anyone else that Mortal Strike, a Rare card, needs a situational trigger in order to be on par with Fireball, a basic? There's few 'strictly better' cards in Hearthstone, since there's a lot of situational advantages (or certain minion types primarily in the case of neutrals) yet this is one of the most direct comparisons. The cases in which Mortal Strike could be considered better than Fireball are extremely narrow, while the cases of it being weaker or simply on par are much more common. I think it has been ignored too long.
well in theory the weapons balance out the weaker direct damage. Maybe execute should work on players below 20% health like in the mmo (at least that's how it was before i left) So if you get down to 6 you can be executed. Also warriors had spell reflect in the mmo, so maybe mortal strike is pre-nerfed to take that into account when spell reflect is added to hearthstone...
I've tied in ridiculous style. I'm down to 1 hp, opponent has 3 in a rouge vs rouge and they have Ragnaros on the field. I top deck abombanation. Dagger up, poke the rogue and play it. Next turn the enemy rogue just says well played and ends turn. Then Ragnaros purges the abomb! It was brilliant
+Attack Ruby You are talking about him armoring up the turn before? Nigga, he was trying to survive. He had 21 HP left, in anyone's mind you are safe enough to armor up. He may have had an opportunity for lethal, but he didn't "miss" it.
warsong commander used to be even more broken?! the first nerf to 3- attack charge was needed alright BUT WHAT THE HELL WAS BLIZZARD THINKING WITH THE LAST NERF?!
+TheSilverShadow 200 One of the cards in the Warsong/Patron combo had to be nerfed, and they didn't want to nerf a card that people had paid money for, because then they're getting a different card than they paid for.
TheSilverShadow 200 Yeah, I don't like it either. Add that to the fact that Warsong commander is in the basic warrior deck, so the basic deck lost any synergy it may have had. It'll make it harder for people to get into the game
I once lost a game in arena versus a warlock, who turned the game (slightly) and ended up killing himself and taking me with him. +spell damage hellfire. It's a shame I got a loss for it.
I don't understand all this "Missed Lethal" talk. If you know exactly the cards that your opponent has and know exactly what you're going to draw or not draw, and what they are going to draw or not draw. Then it's easy to know to not armor up. If he didn't armor there, he loses to about 12 different neutral healing, removal or direct damage cards. Any one of which the mage could have drawn that turn.
I have had 1tie game myself. End of the game, I had nothing. I bluffed the priest I was playing by saying Good Game, like I was certain to win on my turn. Not sure what cards he used but the effect killed both of us. Lol
Just happened to me now. I had Uther of the Ebon Blade 5 armor 6 health. Opponent had only 1 health. She attacked with a 11 attack minion. I had an eye for an eye. It said defeat and I thought it's because that my character blew up first. However, I didn't lose any stars. It was weird. Then I came to here lol.
WHERE IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF TURN 1 MILLHOUSE MANASTORM --> ENEMY PLAYS FORCE OF THE NATURE AND SOUL OF THE FOREST? Where is it? Cmon, it has HIT in the twitch chat.... where is it???
Why Dont you play Magic the Gathering Kripp? I visualize you to have the perfect mind to "master" such game and abtain the fun out of it. Give it a try, if you already did, do it some more!
Great vid. I think you should submit this info to Blizz. They need to create a feature that recognises a tie so it doesn't just plainly say you were defeated. If that happened in constructed, you'd lose a star? Wouldn't be good as you didn't actually lose. Speaking of cards that help the enemy, I got healed for +6 two turns in a row by the enemy Metrognome's minion once, was lucky to capture it. It's on my channel if you're interested, first episode of my epic wins series.
At the end of the video he said he was 7-1 before, and after the match he's still 7-1. So I'm guessing it should do the same thing in contructed and give you neither a win nor a loss.
Olof Wikmark I just hope the fact it comes up "defeat" won't trigger the loss of a star. I'd love to organise a game or games (in case it can't happen right away even if staged) to test this and it would be valuable data to collect. I don't have anywhere near the resources to put it together or test it. Maybe it's an idea for Kripp?
i had a tie in the first 50 games i played against a paladin, he had 1 hp and the secret that deals hp to your opponent, and i had 1 hp aswell, and with no heal i just went for it
My only tied game was using mad bomber with me at 2 hp and my opponent at 1 with 3 total other minions on the field total I had a different way to win but I thought it would be more fun.
I have played hearth stone for around 1-2 weeks and I did tie a match. My only option was to tie it with a flamestrike so I did. Funny game, migth even put some money in to it. Tying to find the best money to gold way of getting wings. I think I will buy the first three wings for gold then pay for the last two with cash. Think this is the best money for gold way to do it. Both on Naaxramas and BRM
i had a tie before XD i think i was useing pally and this guy buffed up a monster to 22 attack and we both had like 20hp and i used a secret which does the same attack dmg to other player and we both end up dieing
sahoyap I must have woken up on the wrong side of the bed this morning but if he just went for the face with his weapon he would have won and he wouldnt have been able to kill barren with just the mortal strike because it would only do 4, I'm really confused right now.
+kostadin kaloqnov i actually also wondered how braindead kripp was, but then i realized that the mortal strike only deals 6 dmg when under 12 hp and he was at 14 hp when he attacked the questor which made it impossible for him to win by axing face and mortal strike-ing
no only kripp can, becouse he knows how to count from 1 to 16 so he use his super mind to understand about how to get a tie becouse this game is NOT a 1 only way using cards. it s choosing cards ( for all donks who think this is real.... they are even more stupid sarcastic.....)
Am I the only one that had a tie by playing my opinion the worst paladin class card ever which is eye for an eye.i was just trying it for the first time and I had a tie .WTF!!!
david dyg tøttrup well technically he did miss lethal by armoring up... the turn before that if he didn't armor up is life point would have went to 12 letting him mortal strike for 6 instead of 4 and finish with weapon... He would have been a real hearthstone master planning for that though
![[Hearthstone] Undeserving Hearthstone Win](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cRwxQfnTW5c/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] Undeserving Hearthstone Win](/img/tr.png)
![Who Wrote a Short Story That Seriously Disturbed a Teacher? | Dirty Laundry x Smosh [Full Episode]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bvHAy_rKoEI/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] Kripp's First Arena Game](/img/1.gif)
I don't know why this is considered a tie, Geddon clearly won
Thai game.
A game with a happy ending.
Luraza Hahaha
Luraza that was both racist and hilarious
Quiet Lamb not racist, just stereotyping sorta. i'm from thailand and i'm not offended
+Sonny Rosén Lozada racism literally means generalizing based on race, stereotype is a way of generalizing.
Doesn't mean you have to be offended, I agree, it's not offensive, but it is racist.
sorry for nitpicking
lusteraliaszero so for example if i say that most white people have blonde hair, i am a racist?
generalizing and racism is not the same thing
Well that was disappointing, ties are so rare they should have something awesome happen, not just give both players a loss... wtf
He didnt actually get a loss added to his arena lives.
It said defeat, but he didn't get a loss for it. If you listen to him at the end of the video he says "It doesn't count, I was 7-1 before and I'm still 7-1"
Something like AWESOME MEGA HIGH FIVE SYNERGY and give both 5 packs.
Xeryyn In my opinion that's even worse, then literally NOTHING happened... It's like the match never happened.
Ninami Boring maybe. but otherwise you open up for all kinds of potential abuse. Were there is an option to exploit there are people to use it
Youngerino Kripperino
"Risk it." lol
I had that happen playing a warlock who hellfired at end killing both of us. It doesn't count as a loss luckily.
I once tied a mill rogue, who coldlight oracle'ed us both too far into fatigue. It was really funny. And a little depressing, since I thought I had won, despite getting a really unfortunate pair of burned cards.
If you hadn't armored up you would have beeen able to kill him but that was very tricky to see in advance.
How is anybody supposed to know the future in that fasion
I think it was instinctive for any player to armor up automatically as a Warrior in late-game, so it's slightly forgivable. But you are correct, *armoring up at 21 life cost him the game* (Baron Geddon brought life down to (21+2)-(7+2)=14, so Mortal Strike could only do 4 dmg, and 6 total dmg with the weapon instead of 8)
He could not have predicted the Farseer restoring health, but nonetheless, it was critical at that point to ensure Mortal Strike could do the maximum 6 damage, as it's a surprise spell, and no one plays around it in arena. That card was basically the win condition, as any taunt, if played, would regard charge/weapons being useless
Crystalgem Yeah how are you supposed to expect a mage with 3 health restoration
immanuel ericson
As I said previously, *"He could not have predicted the Farseer restoring health"*. But he could control the amount of damage Mortal Strike would do next turn (as far-fetched as that is, it cost him the win!). So I believe in that situation, it was a mistake not to calculate health and maximize MS dmg, although it is totally forgivable.
Even without the Farseer, it is not inconceivable that Kripp would have lost (though he didn't of course). If ANY taunt was played by the mage, it would stop lethal (makes the 2/1 weapon useless for hero dmg, so *the Mage at 5 health would live at 1HP with the 4 dmg Mortal Strike*). If Questing was also played and survived due to taunt, Kripp would then have a much higher chance of losing (although the most likely situation would still be a draw without any charge/direct dmg spells from the Mage).
Anyway, the point here is that the control of the result is in the hands/top-deck of the Mage, instead of yourself as the Warrior. This should not happen, especially since it could be avoided.
I suppose the chance that he wouldn't have gotten to 12 or less HP was bigger than the extra 2 armor being a deciding factor for his survival, even if he was playing a Mage.
I don't really know about that, ofc we know since we've seen the outcome but I don't see people trying to get low hp on purpose against mages even if they are using such cards.
I.E. Warlock have the lowest win rate against mages for a reason.
Babby's first tie.
How is babby formed?
well when a mommy and daddy kripp love each other very much they make the salt intertwine and from the ashes of a desecrated city forms a babby kripperino
Where's the 1 hp warlock vs warrior win? That was just hilarious.
I was expecting both that, and the warlock vs mage on the same arena run :D
Please upload those! =p
I've had one tie game before in constructed, when I we were both at 5 health i used holy fire to his face, and I had auchenai soulpriest out. LOL
Jinx Why do you play HS?
+Amariucai Cosmin It could have been a situation where he was dead no matter what, so playing for a draw is the better option?
3930 gold...hmm well played I have 60..
Same. lol
40 bitches
0
Why doesn't he use them though?
What's the point in saving gold???
Blank when a new expansion comes out you can mass buy packs for free, play arena whenever you want to, or buy extra content (naxxramas wings)
"When you tie a mage with warrior with no weapons, it should be a victory!"
it's crazy to me that he called it that early. like i get the math but he sees it so quickly. some fucking bobby fischer shit.
no you are just thick. lolz wafflecopters etc. ;p
I think being a participant in the game and having as many hours as he has helps... a lot.
Blizzard:
-Okay, We just finished working on the defeat and victory animations. Should we get working on the tie animation?"
-Tie screen? Who the hell is gonna tie in a turn based game?!
-Well sir it is technically possible to tie if you use abilities that hit all characters
-Those damn nerds will do anything to try and break the game...Sigh, Fine just play the same defeat animation for tie games. Maybe we will add the tie animation in a expansion
6:30 why not mortal strike face and use weapon? finish?
+Akper Yapim because mortal strike needs him to be below 12 health to deal 6 damage, while he had 14 health at the time which would've dealt only 4 damage instead. its not that hard to read a card description u know...
Angelzdawn Didn't realise he was above 12 hp. You don't have to be so punishing you know..but I appreciate the response.
Akper Yapim I'm not sure I see how that was punishing, there were no insults, he just said you can read the card descriptions, which is true.
so0meone Well there was an good amount of intentional rudeness. It's just inference.
Seen this on the stream but it's too good to miss :D
Kripp plays a combo every turn, and the mage just responds with 1 removal spell +creep/class active. It feels really unfair
Kripp had lethal if he didn't armored up that turn at 5:11, so his mortal strike would deal 6 instead of 4
did you not watch the rest of the video? mage healed for 3. can't do lethal damage when opponent has 10 hp and you can only do 8 damage. maths!
cant you math? he would deal 6 damage with mortal strike + 2 from weapon AND he would take another 2 from baron gedon. Remove your comment silly boy
Mike Byrne
Nope, with the Farseer, the Mage was down to 8 health, and the 2/1 weapon + a 6 dmg Mortal Strike would have done it. Armoring up did in fact cost him the win in this instance
Mike Byrne Please watch it again and do the math again. If he didnt armor up he wouldnt have to use the weapon for the adventurer (which he had to do, because he was exact 2 hp too high for mortal strike, because he did armor up last turn) -> 2 extra dmg with 6 from the mortal -> 8 dmg. (but he couldnt know that ofc)
But you are assuming only the damage that is on the field. If the guy had say two fireballs in his hand he would be dead.
What record did his warlock deck get yesterday?
was it recorded in an hurricane ?
+moonorc nope, kripp was just downloading a shit tonne of nugget porn
Kripp, will you play the one week Nemesis race?
9-3 - a reality.
Armor up misplay is real. You messed up Kripp.
I got a tie game today too xD the rogue hit me when we were both at 1 and I had an eye for an eye for up and we both lost/won:P
It wasn't a draw
Baron Geddon won
One problem with kripp videos, title says Tie Game, the tie game is like a 10 second clip, yet the video is 8:31
wow what a game! interesting stuff, thanks for posting
Anyone with a brain knows Kripp will be playing Warlords of Draenor come spring/summer. The nerd won't miss that for anything.
WoW is still king.
gay fanboy
Andrew Jizzad
says the guy watching the same videos of his idol that I do
have fun with your p2w ingameshop bro
Andrew Jizzad didnt realize buying pets was pay2win
Warchief Thrall The moral support is op brah ;)
1:07 skipp would've wanted to do so
Didn't Kripp have lethal at 6:48? He could've mortal striked which does 6 damage then attacked into the mage instead of the QA and won the game...
Natedagreat0101 Aah, you're right. I misunderstood the mechanics of mortal strike, I thought it did 6 damage if the opponent was at 12 or less. Thanks.
First tie game for me was thanks to eye for an eye
if I got this correctly, a tie (e.g. mutual defeat) counts as neither a win, nor a loss for any of the players involved? Good to know :)
wtf kripp had lethal..
The Mortal Strike card only deals 6 damage with 12 health or less...he had 14 health before attacking the questing adventurer. So no, he didn't have lethal.
Nope
ok i will have to correct u all. He had chat lethal. Sherlock's job here is done.
Freakin' Chat legal. I hate/love you Guys. I'm never sure if you're trolling or actually shouting legal, without knowing shit.
Marius Masevicius
I'm going to have to correct you and say that he had comment
section lethal.
Why didnt he mortal strike baron geddon after he hit questin adventurer with the weapon? mortal strike was killing geddon thus giving him higher chance of surviving. that try on draw was too risky.
Because Kripp was curious. Also, this is beta, so it's good to try out weird shit whenever you can.
Does it irritate anyone else that Mortal Strike, a Rare card, needs a situational trigger in order to be on par with Fireball, a basic? There's few 'strictly better' cards in Hearthstone, since there's a lot of situational advantages (or certain minion types primarily in the case of neutrals) yet this is one of the most direct comparisons. The cases in which Mortal Strike could be considered better than Fireball are extremely narrow, while the cases of it being weaker or simply on par are much more common.
I think it has been ignored too long.
well in theory the weapons balance out the weaker direct damage. Maybe execute should work on players below 20% health like in the mmo (at least that's how it was before i left) So if you get down to 6 you can be executed.
Also warriors had spell reflect in the mmo, so maybe mortal strike is pre-nerfed to take that into account when spell reflect is added to hearthstone...
4:44 what does that random voice say?
I've tied in ridiculous style. I'm down to 1 hp, opponent has 3 in a rouge vs rouge and they have Ragnaros on the field. I top deck abombanation. Dagger up, poke the rogue and play it. Next turn the enemy rogue just says well played and ends turn. Then Ragnaros purges the abomb! It was brilliant
Could it not also happen with Abomination? .
My sides when that name.
Who plays CoC?
I play alot with my cock
+Mewyabe Goddamn demon cat :I
Once had eye for an eye tie.
LMAO spontaneous combustion!
did your headset go bad? its all black and shit
idk if it was a tie it was his card that lead to the tie so it might have counted towards him
not uncomon on constructed i think , i've had some draws, especially playing warlock Hellfire :D
i had a tie game once in lite the first month of plaing hs, a hell fire poped and and both heros died and i didnt loose or gain a star (in ranked)
kripp missed lethal.
Nope
+Agbayani993 Yes, if he had not armored up, the mortal strike would have gained the +2 damage and 6+2 is 8 (mortal strike + weapon)
+Attack Ruby You are talking about him armoring up the turn before? Nigga, he was trying to survive. He had 21 HP left, in anyone's mind you are safe enough to armor up. He may have had an opportunity for lethal, but he didn't "miss" it.
I did this early on in the beta on Warlock with Hellfire and it actually /did/ give me the loss even though we both died.
Basically both of you get the lost message and not just you.
That fact that you had lethal if you had just attacked the face with your weapon makes me sad
if he had attacked face with weapon, his mortal strike would only deal 4 damage not 6, so it was the same outcome either way.
Wait, you've really NEVER had a tie game before? O.o That's quite surprising coming from you.
warsong commander used to be even more broken?! the first nerf to 3- attack charge was needed alright
BUT WHAT THE HELL WAS BLIZZARD THINKING WITH THE LAST NERF?!
+TheSilverShadow 200 One of the cards in the Warsong/Patron combo had to be nerfed, and they didn't want to nerf a card that people had paid money for, because then they're getting a different card than they paid for.
ik but its not even playable now
TheSilverShadow 200 Yeah, I don't like it either. Add that to the fact that Warsong commander is in the basic warrior deck, so the basic deck lost any synergy it may have had. It'll make it harder for people to get into the game
well you should just play basic mage if you are playing basic but thats right
TheSilverShadow 200 Well yeah, but maybe I have a warrior quest and no warrior cards.
Looks like they didn't plan for a draw since it said defeat(probably on both screens)
I once lost a game in arena versus a warlock, who turned the game (slightly) and ended up killing himself and taking me with him. +spell damage hellfire. It's a shame I got a loss for it.
I don't understand all this "Missed Lethal" talk. If you know exactly the cards that your opponent has and know exactly what you're going to draw or not draw, and what they are going to draw or not draw. Then it's easy to know to not armor up. If he didn't armor there, he loses to about 12 different neutral healing, removal or direct damage cards. Any one of which the mage could have drawn that turn.
I have had 1tie game myself. End of the game, I had nothing. I bluffed the priest I was playing by saying Good Game, like I was certain to win on my turn. Not sure what cards he used but the effect killed both of us. Lol
Your insane arena "ratings" make me think of how terrible I must be at it.
Just happened to me now. I had Uther of the Ebon Blade 5 armor 6 health. Opponent had only 1 health. She attacked with a 11 attack minion. I had an eye for an eye.
It said defeat and I thought it's because that my character blew up first. However, I didn't lose any stars. It was weird.
Then I came to here lol.
Love hearthstone videos
Waow all the draws happens by Baron gaddon I had a with Baron too :D
Hi
WHERE IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF TURN 1 MILLHOUSE MANASTORM --> ENEMY PLAYS FORCE OF THE NATURE AND SOUL OF THE FOREST?
Where is it? Cmon, it has HIT in the twitch chat.... where is it???
thanks for sharing!
Why Dont you play Magic the Gathering Kripp? I visualize you to have the perfect mind to "master" such game and abtain the fun out of it. Give it a try, if you already did, do it some more!
Great vid. I think you should submit this info to Blizz. They need to create a feature that recognises a tie so it doesn't just plainly say you were defeated. If that happened in constructed, you'd lose a star? Wouldn't be good as you didn't actually lose.
Speaking of cards that help the enemy, I got healed for +6 two turns in a row by the enemy Metrognome's minion once, was lucky to capture it. It's on my channel if you're interested, first episode of my epic wins series.
At the end of the video he said he was 7-1 before, and after the match he's still 7-1. So I'm guessing it should do the same thing in contructed and give you neither a win nor a loss.
Olof Wikmark They already recognize it, so it would be still good to adjust the visuals so it doesnt display "Deafeat" in such case.
Olof Wikmark
I just hope the fact it comes up "defeat" won't trigger the loss of a star. I'd love to organise a game or games (in case it can't happen right away even if staged) to test this and it would be valuable data to collect. I don't have anywhere near the resources to put it together or test it. Maybe it's an idea for Kripp?
MPAH1981 Well, in arena it doesn't result in a loss. I assume your stars would stay the say
technically if you didn't win, you lost. A tie is definitely not winning.
I wonder if he could have won the game by killing baron, leaving himself with 13 and a 2/2.
I thought the name of the video was "The Game" LOL
ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ WELL MET or PEACEFUL PROTESTヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ
i had a tie in the first 50 games i played against a paladin, he had 1 hp and the secret that deals hp to your opponent, and i had 1 hp aswell, and with no heal i just went for it
6:47 why you don't finish him 8-6-2=0
My only tied game was using mad bomber with me at 2 hp and my opponent at 1 with 3 total other minions on the field total I had a different way to win but I thought it would be more fun.
My friend died in a draw against quad baron geddon
I have played hearth stone for around 1-2 weeks and I did tie a match. My only option was to tie it with a flamestrike so I did. Funny game, migth even put some money in to it. Tying to find the best money to gold way of getting wings. I think I will buy the first three wings for gold then pay for the last two with cash. Think this is the best money for gold way to do it. Both on Naaxramas and BRM
Sindre Eide You can't tie with a flame strike
JC Lee ye sorry I did say I was new to the game. I did mean to say Hellfire and not Flamestrike
JC Lee of cause u can. with Bombs of Dr.boom actic on both sides hitting your boms and your killing him aswell
Axel Foley where the fuck did you learn to spell
ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ WELL MET ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ
It looked legal.
Kripp, it's because he caused the tie. If you had kill both people, you would win
Got this allot with warlock, had too many hellfires.
IF YA AIN'T FIRST, YER LAST!
why not execute legendary...
Geddon wasn't damaged
ironically enough, if didnt armour he wouldve won
be funny if he had witch doctor
i had tie BUT i've lost somehow (me and enemy blow up)
yeh tie=loss
poppiscraft not precisely, my enemy's baron geddon once blew us both up, I had a loss message, but I still was at 5:2, same as before that match
Do you mean arena?
if you tie game in arena, you don't get a win or a lose, since its a tie but on the screen in your game it says you lose.
k
Garm grumps
steven gee Yes.
I tied in my first ever Arena game
i had a tie before XD i think i was useing pally and this guy buffed up a monster to 22 attack and we both had like 20hp and i used a secret which does the same attack dmg to other player and we both end up dieing
I tied yesterday stupid warlock used hell fire
one not does simply
read the top line wrong
ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ PORNHUB
It says defeat so...
12-3 is possible...
he had lethal????
He had 13 dmg on table plus hero power = 14 and Baron geddon for ending turn + 2 = 16 so yes he had lethal :)
sahoyap no, I'm talking about krip
sahoyap I must have woken up on the wrong side of the bed this morning but if he just went for the face with his weapon he would have won and he wouldnt have been able to kill barren with just the mortal strike because it would only do 4, I'm really confused right now.
Techen Murrz Nah, mortal strike only does 6 when the warrior has less than 12 hp. Either way, it was a tie.
snerd8 ohh i thought it was the enemy that needed to have 12 or less, my bad ._.
u missed lethal krip :p
+kostadin kaloqnov i actually also wondered how braindead kripp was, but then i realized that the mortal strike only deals 6 dmg when under 12 hp and he was at 14 hp when he attacked the questor which made it impossible for him to win by axing face and mortal strike-ing
MrPlatypuss i thought it deals 6 dmg when you are on 14 or less :D
REEP
saw trump get one of these with a warlock and hellfire the other day aha
Geddon wins!
F A T A L I T Y
I've had many tie games.
no only kripp can, becouse he knows how to count from 1 to 16
so he use his super mind to understand about how to get a tie
becouse this game is NOT a 1 only way using cards. it s choosing cards
( for all donks who think this is real.... they are even more stupid
sarcastic.....)
TL;DR
Huwarf BC:CK
he missed leathel
XIcoIX fathel no he didnt
Vice Versa if he would not have armored up last turn he would have had lethal.
Am I the only one that had a tie by playing my opinion the worst paladin class card ever which is eye for an eye.i was just trying it for the first time and I had a tie .WTF!!!
Could have 2 on if he went all face
no draw, gaim sux!
lol the legendary won lol
u missed lethal at 6:45
oh wait no u dont
david dyg tøttrup well technically he did miss lethal by armoring up... the turn before that if he didn't armor up is life point would have went to 12 letting him mortal strike for 6 instead of 4 and finish with weapon... He would have been a real hearthstone master planning for that though