This is a great lesson for this fool interviewer,when you are interviewing such a smart and well versed man,who knows his job to a T,and seem to be very ethical ,you need to ask smart questions and leave the US and EU agenda at home.Paul literally took his belt off and spank you like a kid.
Like most interviewers, This man was backed up by a team, off set, who fed him questions through an ear piece. Mr. Corcoran made his entire team look childish.
Do you think the interviewer was running an anti Russian agenda ???.......He would rather pay 25% more , and buy American LNG , Obviously he's not in business
The Gazprom guy did well to answer the question. The reporter seemed to ask alot of loaded questions but it just made the good answers sound more convincing
Russia with east europe is global super power russia with Germany is the only thing that scares USA empire so its imperative to separate russia and europe Rule EAST EUROPE to keep Europe down and Russia out
@@geoeconomics3067 No East European country is "with Russia"! All East European i.e. former Warsaw Pact Countries joined NATO and the EU to protect themselves from Russian influence. If they did not join NATO and the EU they would all be sharing the same fate as the Ukraine today, that is, impoverishment and Russian interference and a kleptocratic state. Can you blame the Ukrainians for wanting something better than they have under Russia!
@@aon10003 The data is even lower (20%) for 2019 & 2020. EU countries are building LNG capacity as a backstop in case one of the transit countries have a conflict with Russia leading to interruption in gas supplies. Also in case they need extra volumes they cannot acquire immediately and can source from the LNG spot market.
Nord Stream 1 and 2 will make natural gas up to 30% cheaper than liquified natural gas from the United States via fracking. That's the real reason why the U.S. fiercely opposes both projects along with Turk Stream, which is less known, but just as successful as Nord Stream. inexpensive and reliable delivery will be a huge bonus for Russia and a vital energy source for Germany and other European countries. This is a win - win deal for Europe and Russia.
Gas is simply cheaper in the long run AND it is lower in carbon footprint! It is up to the hypocrites consumers who they want to get their energy from. They can simply buy more expensive, higher carbon footprint LNG simply for political hostility and bullying. Europe is more than welcome to reduce energy consumption and lay waste the pipelines. It is moronic to accuse Gazprom of trying to squeeze out competition.
Is this what the western world call an interview these days? Biased, anti-russian interview. Apparently the interviewer has zero understanding of demand and supply. Gazprom can construct all the Nord Streams they want, but if the receiving end doesn't want it then gazprom loses, so gazprom has to give the EU a competitive price. How can a so called interviewer believe that gas via gas lines can be worse than LNG?
An articulated businessman and a mini Pompeo as a biased prosecutor. A very sad affair. Mini Pompeo is obviously nervous and pissed off. A giant step for Europekind!
This is the actual problem of the world. The interviewer just proved the whole vindictiveness behind some groups fight for overall control of everything, eventhough they lied about fairer economic and markets competition. The guy interviewed is a morally independent seasoned businessman who made the interviewer and cohorts' agenda looked childish and on a loosing ground.
Gazprom is the worlds largest producer and supplier of natural gas. There's money to be made with them. I'm in. I working on aquiring 2000 shares. The money I'll make will pay for my home heating oil for ever winter season. Go Gazprom.
I had to stop the video. This is a classic example when a biased interviewer with a political agenda interviews a much, much more intelligent person and embarrasses himself grossly in the process.
Ha. I'm with the pipeline guy. As a customer, I'm cool buying from the folks providing the best products at the best prices backed up by the best service. Shout out Adam Smith.
This is a great lesson for this fool interviewer,when you are interviewing such a smart and well versed man,who knows his job to a T,and seem to be very ethical ,you need to ask smart questions and leave the US and EU agenda at home.Paul literally took his belt off and spank you like a kid.
The inverter has a anti-Russia byes
What a childish interviewer.I thought his next question would be "When did you last hit your wife ?"
Cheers
Couldn't agree more!!! Hell, I could have done this interview better!!!
Like most interviewers, This man was backed up by a team, off set, who fed him questions through an ear piece. Mr. Corcoran made his entire team look childish.
Not difficult to discern that the interviewer is fixated on finding fault rather than benefits of the Nordstream2 project
Do you think the interviewer was running an anti Russian agenda ???.......He would rather pay 25% more , and buy American LNG , Obviously he's not in business
I like the way Paul school the host. He appears to have agenda but Paul not buying it. Good job Paul.
The Gazprom guy did well to answer the question.
The reporter seemed to ask alot of loaded questions but it just made the good answers sound more convincing
The agenda of the interviewer is to attack te project by all means possible, but he has been left looking like a fool.
Russia with east europe is global super power
russia with Germany is the only thing that scares USA empire
so its imperative to separate russia and europe
Rule EAST EUROPE to keep Europe down and Russia out
Even he who seems to an angry and jelousy person. May be he has in connection with any inteligence service department.
@@geoeconomics3067 No East European country is "with Russia"! All East European i.e. former Warsaw Pact Countries joined NATO and the EU to protect themselves from Russian influence. If they did not join NATO and the EU they would all be sharing the same fate as the Ukraine today, that is, impoverishment and Russian interference and a kleptocratic state. Can you blame the Ukrainians for wanting something better than they have under Russia!
@@rumchjoe
wrong
stop watching TV brainwashed slave who rules eurasia commands the World
-
mackinder
@@rumchjoe
they will get Greece Bulgaria fastest shrinking countries in the world
Paul Corcoran is smart and polite beyond words - teinei politeness
If this Simon call himself journalist then I am Superman!
Hello Syperman.
If he is a journalist than I am God
Interesting thing I learned from this video is that the 2017 EU LNG used capacity was at a measly 25%. Wow.
He probably took The worst month.
@@aon10003 The data is even lower (20%) for 2019 & 2020. EU countries are building LNG capacity as a backstop in case one of the transit countries have a conflict with Russia leading to interruption in gas supplies. Also in case they need extra volumes they cannot acquire immediately and can source from the LNG spot market.
@@magellanmax Or maybe they count the Ukraine route who nobody in their right mind use. Because of theft.
What ! this is disgraceful...if I was the guy being interviewed I would have got up and walk out of this interview. The guy is embarrassing.
10yr old interviewer,...hope he learned something
Why would President Putin call him ? He has bigger issues to deal than calling someone working in this pipeline project
Disgusting interview filled with innuendo.
But Paul Corcoran stood his ground well.
Nord Stream 1 and 2 will make natural gas up to 30% cheaper than liquified natural gas from the United States via fracking. That's the real reason why the U.S. fiercely opposes both projects along with Turk Stream, which is less known, but just as successful as Nord Stream. inexpensive and reliable delivery will be a huge bonus for Russia and a vital energy source for Germany and other European countries. This is a win - win deal for Europe and Russia.
It seems to me this channal is pay by the USA.
Gas is simply cheaper in the long run AND it is lower in carbon footprint! It is up to the hypocrites consumers who they want to get their energy from. They can simply buy more expensive, higher carbon footprint LNG simply for political hostility and bullying.
Europe is more than welcome to reduce energy consumption and lay waste the pipelines. It is moronic to accuse Gazprom of trying to squeeze out competition.
Is this what the western world call an interview these days? Biased, anti-russian interview. Apparently the interviewer has zero understanding of demand and supply. Gazprom can construct all the Nord Streams they want, but if the receiving end doesn't want it then gazprom loses, so gazprom has to give the EU a competitive price. How can a so called interviewer believe that gas via gas lines can be worse than LNG?
An articulated businessman and a mini Pompeo as a biased prosecutor. A very sad affair. Mini Pompeo is obviously nervous and pissed off. A giant step for Europekind!
Paul excellent job, Hey Simon get a new job
This is the actual problem of the world. The interviewer just proved the whole vindictiveness behind some groups fight for overall control of everything, eventhough they lied about fairer economic and markets competition. The guy interviewed is a morally independent seasoned businessman who made the interviewer and cohorts' agenda looked childish and on a loosing ground.
Gazprom is the worlds largest producer and supplier of natural gas. There's money to be made with them. I'm in. I working on aquiring 2000 shares. The money I'll make will pay for my home heating oil for ever winter season. Go Gazprom.
This interviewer certainly has an agenda. It appears to be to discredit the project at all costs. Very biased journalism.
Why European Union so coward to USA?
Russia will prevail and enjoy the justice they deserve
I had to stop the video. This is a classic example when a biased interviewer with a political agenda interviews a much, much more intelligent person and embarrasses himself grossly in the process.
This interviewer is a joke, trying to push his agenda 😜
what a managed interviewer.... totally with one eye seeing...
Extremely biased host ,with clear intentions of painting a dark picture of Russia
Lol. " we are a pipeline company not a gas company" line had me goin there. Such a nice straight forward reply to such a question😂😂😂
Ну хоть один адекватно описал ситуацию, спасибо Пол. Respect you, Paul.
Ignorance and arrogance in one package.
This guy is so good
Simon you should ask Trump these questions?
If this interview is for real, it is absurd! The interviewer seems only concerned that Ukraine will not get money for allowing the gas to pass thru.
Too much biased questions.
why the title "Under Pressure?" dont make any sense
because of gas pipeline
Ha.
I'm with the pipeline guy.
As a customer,
I'm cool buying from the folks providing the best products at the best prices backed up by the best service.
Shout out Adam Smith.
the only thing awkward was the interviewer, car crash tv or fake news as it happen's ,seem's to be the trend at the moment sadly.
The ukraine disruptions occurred in the russian donbas zones to create the crisis that made their nordstream pipes marketable.
God. This interviewer is so bad. How old is he??? So biased.
Under pressure with Mr Arse
This guy interviewed looks like a Mafiosi
haha
You are pro people interest,mr. Journalist ? Seems not really !
You take politically this gas pipiline !
What a disaster interviewer. All bias and hypocrite.
lol