Hi, appreciate your 'straight to the point' tutorials! One question, I'm finding that when I brainstorm, some of my further control actions are being repeated, for instance 'locate appropriate fire extinguishers according to localised risk' could go in both my Hazardous Substances section or Fire section - so do I simply duplicate the same control on each occasion, or do I make a reference such as 'See X section regarding [the same control measure]? Thanks!
@@CompassaeLearning Is there a risk of writing too many 'further actions'? I think the Nebosh example has a maximum of eight or so, but some of my hazards warrant at least 15!! Would it impress an examiner or just make a rod for my own back/make more work (unneccesarily)? Thanks
Your actions need to bring the risk down to as low a level as is reasonably practicable. I would not invent work for the sake of it. But if the workplace is seriously lacking in controls, then a lot of actions may be justified.@@grahamroe8299
Hi, is there a way of having someone check if you've missed anything out befor you submit the NG2? I'm worried that because it's the first one i've done, it won't be perfect and i'd be gutted to fail on a small piece of info missed. Thanks
Sir your efforts are invaluable and I really appreciate you. Keep it up.
I have applied for NEBOSH and will sit in the coming exam at 18 Jan.Sir kindly make a detailed video on N/ IG2 Risk Assessment which will help us.
Hi, appreciate your 'straight to the point' tutorials! One question, I'm finding that when I brainstorm, some of my further control actions are being repeated, for instance 'locate appropriate fire extinguishers according to localised risk' could go in both my Hazardous Substances section or Fire section - so do I simply duplicate the same control on each occasion, or do I make a reference such as 'See X section regarding [the same control measure]? Thanks!
Nothing wrong with a little duplication where needed.
@@CompassaeLearning Is there a risk of writing too many 'further actions'? I think the Nebosh example has a maximum of eight or so, but some of my hazards warrant at least 15!! Would it impress an examiner or just make a rod for my own back/make more work (unneccesarily)? Thanks
Your actions need to bring the risk down to as low a level as is reasonably practicable. I would not invent work for the sake of it. But if the workplace is seriously lacking in controls, then a lot of actions may be justified.@@grahamroe8299
Hi, is there a way of having someone check if you've missed anything out befor you submit the NG2? I'm worried that because it's the first one i've done, it won't be perfect and i'd be gutted to fail on a small piece of info missed. Thanks
Not through your course provider. Perhaps you could find an examiner through LinkedIn. But I’d be careful of going public in case you get reported.