That is the sole reason people approach the local strongman; and the strongman delivers instant justice and becomes stronger. This is part of the design
@@desiintrovert6497 yeah bro, I am very well aware of that infact it's a common sense that every awared nationite understands ke if bloody the public is not happy with the administration then which Nation is going to say anything good about it.
I love Karan for his confrontation of the matters with the interviewee. He doesn’t keep silent and let things pass as other interviewers do. Kudos Karan! I wish you were on TV shows as well
Karan, reminds me of the BBC, Hard talk interviews by Sebastian Coe. His research is thorough and is preloaded with best questions to explore the thought process of his subject. I really like you the way you are.
Mr singhvi shud do this interview with the same questions, in hindi for the mango people of this country to understand how they are being thugged by the so called temples of justice @thewire if your reading this please do so
A very crucial interview... Singhvi sir seems reluctant to speak facts..We the people feel that he must be at nothing but constitutional side.. Because we have trust/ faith on him.. respect him... will see what happens only time will tell by which side he standby. Karan Sir is always at his best.. Under all circumstances.
Only in this history of India A judge under Women harrassment passed himself an order he is innocent , for that great favour he did lot of favors ! History and world will judge him one day
It was a pleasure to listen to this fruitful discussion between a senior journalist and a senior lawyer - both of them on top of their respective fields - on the most topical issue facing the country today, which is of judicial integrity. Great arguments from both sides.
@@DK-td8te I would rather not believe it. Judge's with integrity still exists, but as Singhavi mentions the intellectual capacity of giving rightful, quick and judicious judgement is lessened out in recent times. Hence the CJI is such an important post, being the ultimate authority to dispense justice should be carefully chosen. The seniority rule sucks.
@@johnm9567 Supreme Court is one of the Democratic institution in India with fully undemocratic process. Full of nepotism, this whole process of judge selection should be streamlined with ZERO manual intervention, judges should be assigned points right from trial court and security & Integrity clearance should be done before each promotion. Judges with highest point should be only allowed for higher courts. Current ruling party has made a mockery of CJI and supreme court , why a PM, President,Hone minister go to Arun Mishra's granddaughter mundan ceremony ? These incidents have destroyed people's faith in judiciary . God bless this country .
I know it too well. My family has suffered for decades, with one case to another. I still believe in the system, even if takes my child to get justice in cases from his grandfathers time with a long time having passed. God help the country. Jai hind!
I just love how Karan is through in his research and asks questions which actually strike the chord. Always look forward to your interviews. Please keep'em coming.
The interviewe answers were not straight, he kept dodging and KT had to bring him back to the question. KT kept reminding him the question throughout the interview.
Stop blaming quantity for poor justice in India. Why no high caste hindu complains about the broken Indian judicial system? Problem is the lack of quality. There are less than 9% judges of good reasonable quality like Justice Murlidharan. Most judges, like police, doctors, professors are hindu rashtar extremists who don't want to preserve the secular credentials of India. If mohan bhagwat is openly carrying out hindu rashtar extremism then who do you blame besides the executive, judiciary, isn't it?
Coming to issue of declining judicial decline I share the concern of both Mr Thapar and Mr Singhvi. A fearless and independent judiciary is must for right check and balances in a functioning democracy. There are genuine doubt emerging oflate sadly.
Good to know there are real journalists in India like the Wire and Thapar. Two points: Wire should allow for free commentary on their discussion boards - What does it say when you fight dictatorships but are dictatorial on your own comment board? And Thapar, don't interrupt the interviewee so much, we are here to listen to the interviewee's thoughts (subject to some constraints) not just yours.
Mr Singhvi was careful enough to avoid coming under the 'contempt of court' lens when he refrained from words which Mr Thapar wanted him to acknowledge.
If India have removed jury process in its judiciary, then why judge choose between Right & Proper gives an edge to Singhvi. Tricky & matter of deep thought. Good peice.
Mr. SHangvi put the blame the retired judges and he is not taking the present judges who are more govt.oriented, and gave long loop and time to govt. The riots in Delhi happened is mainly ineffectiveness of HC or SC
Perhaps Mr Singhvi is trying to be diplomatic about the SC. I am amazed how you keep the interviewee on to the point and making sure the right answer is given. Now, SC is going through adhoc scheduling as a norm, I am equally amazed on that as well. Thanks again Karan for bringing the best.
Say that to Ur Father and see T response... Judges R guilty too... U Don't hv T proper judgement to understand... People R way more smarter than an Average Indian like U... If U finding difficult to understand... Comment (Most Welcome) Or Else Shut Up (Trash is not required)🇮🇳 has a lot of it 🙂
When a dumb can't speak on the point about the repetitive negligence of Courts, rather deliberately divert from the main point what Karan asked, how would you not expect someone to counter that ?
Must appreciate Abhishek singhvi's clarity of thought.. He never let Mr.thapar put words into his mouth. Also, why the heck karan kept interrupting Mr.singhvi? Its like he wasn't interested in what abhishek has to say but instead he Interviewed singhvi like whether agrees with his opinions or not..
Karan Thapar is right in saying the Present CJI Hon'ble S. A.Bobde not giving immediate priority the Two Important Cases pertaining to Article 370 and CAA. Because, the Common Man doesn't know much about Supreme Court and Functioning Hurdles and above all these things The Law of the Land. For him he thinks of Political implications and problems faced by people in the Country is important. When such High Profile cases not taken, people's reaction Will always will be like this. But, the Judges should not get disappointed or get frustrated on such things. For them Law and Constitution are of Paramount importance and should not care about such reactions. But, fortunately the Majority of knowledgeable people have very good faith in our Judiciary. It is in the hands of Judges to deliver.
Mr. Karan, I admire your interviews and I get why you would want to interrupt someone. So that you don't forget to question someone on what they just said. But the constant interruption does no favours to the audience. I think this is the second time I'm pointing it out. Please let the interviewee speak without interrupting them.
I hope the women that manu banged was appointed on the supreme court bench and is still on the bench. What i learned from that scandal is women dont need beauty or intelligence but a hole to progress in life.
There are places where the interviewer wasn't allowed to ask the complete question or rebuttal and vice versa. Definitely two head strong people trying to not budge easily ✌️✌️
Mr. Singhvi makes a nuanced argument about interpretation of 'morality' mentioned in Article 26 of the Constitution. His argument is that this morality mentioned in the Article cannot be decided by subjective opinions judges. While constitutional morality may not have a place while interpreting plain words of an article, morality as mentioned in the article definitely needs to be interpreted as something. It's indeed a difficult question to answer as morality is inherently subjective in nature. The question then arises is whether there is something called 'objective morality'. It would be interesting to see what the Supreme Court does after hearing the arguments now that the matter has been referred to a higher bench. J. Nariman has stated in his judgment declining the review that there are no arguments made which were not made earlier when the main petition was decided. Therefore, there was no occasion to re-hear the case.
This clearly reflects the fear among the judges and the lawyer of the fasist govt. But appart from that it is a fascinating conversa -tion of two grate intalectuals. Hatsoff to Karan Thaper.
almost 100 years ago, my great grandfather (during British India) used to tell his family that in India you should stay away from politician, police and judiciary....if you get dragged, do outside settlement but never interact with the three...it seems that nothing has changed...instead, it has become worse....
Mainstream media implications on the courts' judgments cannot be denied. Mr. Singvi did not comment on this statement made by himself in his own book. What an irony?
SC targeted Harsh Mander that he criticised SC which is not yet judged at the same time very many important cases like art 370 CAA NPR NRC is pending months together but people say the delay is very much on higher side but SC isn't bothered so it's time for SC to think of their acts that's should also matters to everyone .
Chief Justice is not concerned about the hate remarks/speeches of Kapil Mishra, Union home Minister and other associates that incited severe violence and genocide attempts across North East Delhi. He rather wants clarification on Mr. Harsh Mandar's statement
Constitutional morality is paramount to the execution of fair trials. I am not sure why Mr. Singhvi disagrees with this objective claim? Is this against the tenets of the Indian Constitution?
Defamation cases ,Fake News , and investments in Media should be dealt at SC level and give judgment in 48 hrs ,so that many peddlers like the Thappars and NDTV and India Today will be closed and these peddlers will be put in Tihad ASAP
The nation is experiencing worst sociopolitical and socioeconomic circumstances that have potentially biased the opinions of the great intellectuals like Mr. Singhvi....
When Madras High court was built and during the opening of the court , keys was given to English judges , they refused to take it in their hands and ask him.to put down and then they took it because they told him he may be accused of corruption in construction of the court that was the integrity of English judges
Judge saving judges from T rules breaken.. He says unintentionally being said by Justice Mishra.. Maybe than unintentionally in t same manner he might hv passed several wrong Judgements🤣🤣(off course unintentionally) ...Later when he retires will think on Y he did it (wat an answer Abhishek Shingvi) 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 Desh Sankat Mai Hai Mitro😅😅
सुप्रीम कोर्ट से आजकल कोई भी फैसला सत्ताधारी दल के खिलाफ नहीं आता है, सिर्फ प्रशंसा ही सुनाई देती है सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जज से। नागरिक अधिकारों से अधिक कार्यपालिका को तरजीह दी जाती है। इससे लगता है की कोर्ट की स्वायत्ता बस दिखावे के लिए है। इन हालातों में आम आदमी सुप्रीम कोर्ट से न्याय की अपेक्षा भला कैसे करे?
It seems Mr. Singhvi is contradicting his own book, or if else he writes something and believes something, both are different from each other . What I attained from this interview is that i came to know the real Abhisheik Singhvi. Karan as always your great and dominated the entire interview. Thanks
It is quite unfortunate for the people of India as they don't have suitable advocates or judges to deal the cases fully upto last seven judges benches. The cases are not exhausted till that level. For example EVM hacking case is not exhausted till seven judges bench just like Ayodhya issue. As a result BJP came to power without proper mandate. The farmers iof amaravathi have gone to international court as they are not getting justice in Indian courts. Why parties and advocates are not filing review petitions in supreme Court till all levels are exhausted. Why they are not utilising human rights commissions as their voting rights are criminalised and not able to vote properly and supreme Court is not allowing the VVPat slips counting. Why these parties and advocates are not filing international court to do justice in EVM tampering as there is sufficient evidence to prove manipulation in voting machines.
Karan Thapar why you interviewed this person? He gave a certificate to the present CJI that court was not compromised under his stewardship. Who is he to gave certificates. What is the basis of his opinion.
I think these courts are also or partly like Godi Media. Take the matter of CAA first Even the killing of Delhi could have avoided. We call these judges as highly learned with lot wisdom.
Abhishek Manu Singhvi the Writer. Abhishek Manu Singhvi the Politician. Abhishek Manu Singhvi the Advocate. All three are three different individuals they aren’t same friends.
On the topic of there not being enough judges, everything cannot grow at geometric speed like the population, specially things which require time to develop, e.g. highly skilled professionals in medicine, engineering, law, accounting, etc. who grow in numbers at an arithmetic rate. And so now we're suffering.
One of those disappointing interviews from Mr. Thapar, where all he is trying to do is put words into the mouth of the guest, to get something controversial or sensational out of the interview. Despite being a highly learned and experienced journalist, you obviously don't succeed with those tricks in front of an advocate, that too with somebody of the stature of Mr. Abhishek Singhvi. An advocate is very chary of using irresponsible words for both praise and criticism. He is a practising advocate at probably the zenith of his career. You can't expect him to thrash the Supreme Court and all the judges left right and center, just to comply with the interpretations of the interviewer. I had wished this interaction to be so much more fruitful and interesting.
It is really beautiful to see that karan thapar is doing so many interviews, i always look forward to your interviews sir.
Kudos.
The Wire should upload audio of these interviews on podcast platforms like Soundcloud and Castbox.
Or use RUclips premium. :)
@@swayamsiddha2324 p₩0₩
p
to get justice in India is a painful & heartbreaking process. Deal outside court is much easier
Every1 knows that in India... Corrupt Police👮🏾 Bharmastra... Tarik pe Tarik popularity just won't Go🤣🤣
That is why goondas Or dons dawn as the judge when such matters come out.
@@paulamrana8981 even Pakistan people are trolling India hving BJP 😠the nation reputation is put to stack by this party 😣
That is the sole reason people approach the local strongman; and the strongman delivers instant justice and becomes stronger. This is part of the design
@@desiintrovert6497 yeah bro, I am very well aware of that infact it's a common sense that every awared nationite understands ke if bloody the public is not happy with the administration then which Nation is going to say anything good about it.
I love Karan for his confrontation of the matters with the interviewee. He doesn’t keep silent and let things pass as other interviewers do. Kudos Karan! I wish you were on TV shows as well
He was on CNN as of 2019...but then the complete boycott of him by the ruling party was hurting the channel...so he had to resign
Think of loya , all judges will be afraid only
Karan, reminds me of the BBC, Hard talk interviews by Sebastian Coe.
His research is thorough and is preloaded with best questions to explore the thought process of his subject.
I really like you the way you are.
He shouldn't interrupt so much - it's irritating.
He eats godi media in breakfast
Mr singhvi shud do this interview with the same questions, in hindi for the mango people of this country to understand how they are being thugged by the so called temples of justice
@thewire if your reading this please do so
Spot On... Mango people Medium of communication Hindi... Hire translator's and upload T video
Don't insult the sweet fruit please.
@@hanifhearts 🤣🤣🤣
A very crucial interview... Singhvi sir seems reluctant to speak facts..We the people feel that he must be at nothing but constitutional side.. Because we have trust/ faith on him.. respect him... will see what happens only time will tell by which side he standby.
Karan Sir is always at his best.. Under all circumstances.
Only in this history of India A judge under Women harrassment passed himself an order he is innocent , for that great favour he did lot of favors ! History and world will judge him one day
....wow what a superb combination.... KUDOS KARAN..!!!
" SINGHVI ...with DEVIL'S-LAWYER "
It was a pleasure to listen to this fruitful discussion between a senior journalist and a senior lawyer - both of them on top of their respective fields - on the most topical issue facing the country today, which is of judicial integrity. Great arguments from both sides.
Lawyer and judges are two side of same coin. Both can't be trusted at all....
@@DK-td8te I would rather not believe it. Judge's with integrity still exists, but as Singhavi mentions the intellectual capacity of giving rightful, quick and judicious judgement is lessened out in recent times. Hence the CJI is such an important post, being the ultimate authority to dispense justice should be carefully chosen. The seniority rule sucks.
@@johnm9567 Supreme Court is one of the Democratic institution in India with fully undemocratic process. Full of nepotism, this whole process of judge selection should be streamlined with ZERO manual intervention, judges should be assigned points right from trial court and security & Integrity clearance should be done before each promotion. Judges with highest point should be only allowed for higher courts.
Current ruling party has made a mockery of CJI and supreme court , why a PM, President,Hone minister go to Arun Mishra's granddaughter mundan ceremony ?
These incidents have destroyed people's faith in judiciary . God bless this country .
@@DK-td8te I fully agree with you.
I know it too well. My family has suffered for decades, with one case to another. I still believe in the system, even if takes my child to get justice in cases from his grandfathers time with a long time having passed. God help the country. Jai hind!
People like you are roadblock in the judicial improvement...
You seem to be messiah, eh..
This is called legends
Singhvi ji is very much confident that he will make his point given the less time to speak by Karan ji
The judicial system is not as much as expectations of the people of the country.
I just love how Karan is through in his research and asks questions which actually strike the chord. Always look forward to your interviews. Please keep'em coming.
The interviewe answers were not straight, he kept dodging and KT had to bring him back to the question. KT kept reminding him the question throughout the interview.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
Justice hurried is justice buried.
Salute to you Mr. Karan Thapar.
Mr. Singhvie is juggling with words!
The court will attend CAA cases only after cessation of protests... What an irony!
Stop blaming quantity for poor justice in India. Why no high caste hindu complains about the broken Indian judicial system? Problem is the lack of quality. There are less than 9% judges of good reasonable quality like Justice Murlidharan. Most judges, like police, doctors, professors are hindu rashtar extremists who don't want to preserve the secular credentials of India. If mohan bhagwat is openly carrying out hindu rashtar extremism then who do you blame besides the executive, judiciary, isn't it?
Coming to issue of declining judicial decline I share the concern of both Mr Thapar and Mr Singhvi. A fearless and independent judiciary is must for right check and balances in a functioning democracy. There are genuine doubt emerging oflate sadly.
Good to know there are real journalists in India like the Wire and Thapar. Two points: Wire should allow for free commentary on their discussion boards - What does it say when you fight dictatorships but are dictatorial on your own comment board? And Thapar, don't interrupt the interviewee so much, we are here to listen to the interviewee's thoughts (subject to some constraints) not just yours.
I don't believe Mr. Sanghvi is the author of his own book.
Excellent
Karan thappar is a real gem who can't be bowed down!! Well worsed in his field and a roaring lion when on work!!
Mr Singhvi was careful enough to avoid coming under the 'contempt of court' lens when he refrained from words which Mr Thapar wanted him to acknowledge.
Karan thapar watching ur interview is a treat!!
Rohit Priyadarshi - of course 👍👍
If India have removed jury process in its judiciary, then why judge choose between Right & Proper gives an edge to Singhvi. Tricky & matter of deep thought. Good peice.
Exciting to hear point of view of judge on his system...
Admire your interviewing skills sir Thappar
Sorry he is lawyer
Mr. SHangvi put the blame the retired judges and he is not taking the present judges who are more govt.oriented, and gave long loop and time to govt. The riots in Delhi happened is mainly ineffectiveness of HC or SC
Perhaps Mr Singhvi is trying to be diplomatic about the SC. I am amazed how you keep the interviewee on to the point and making sure the right answer is given. Now, SC is going through adhoc scheduling as a norm, I am equally amazed on that as well. Thanks again Karan for bringing the best.
Amazing interview
Interviewee is probably trying to avoid being charged with contempt, trying to tone down everything he's written!
Where was the interviewee? All I heard was Thapar interrupting, gave up on the interview very early on.
He's entitled to that. One needs to be careful when being candid.
@@AuditorInvestor And they accuse him of being harsh to Modi about the 2002 Gujrat question 😂😂😂
That's ok. The message is important
I am simple person, i see manu Singhvi and i click 😂
OMG ☺️😂😝
Stop interrupting Mr.Thapar, viewers do not gain access to the full breadth of the interviewee's thoughts after a preceding question.
Say that to Ur Father and see T response... Judges R guilty too... U Don't hv T proper judgement to understand... People R way more smarter than an Average Indian like U... If U finding difficult to understand... Comment (Most Welcome) Or Else Shut Up (Trash is not required)🇮🇳 has a lot of it 🙂
When a dumb can't speak on the point about the repetitive negligence of Courts, rather deliberately divert from the main point what Karan asked, how would you not expect someone to counter that ?
This is the loudest wire interview i have seen so far
Karan's volume was kept unnaturally higher
Don't want to be unpopular by judges, where is Justice and professional conduct
Interviews of Mr. Thapar are a wealth of knowledge👍🏼
Must appreciate Abhishek singhvi's clarity of thought.. He never let Mr.thapar put words into his mouth. Also, why the heck karan kept interrupting Mr.singhvi? Its like he wasn't interested in what abhishek has to say but instead he Interviewed singhvi like whether agrees with his opinions or not..
Karan Thapar is right in saying
the Present CJI Hon'ble S. A.Bobde
not giving immediate priority the
Two Important Cases pertaining to
Article 370 and CAA. Because, the
Common Man doesn't know much
about Supreme Court and Functioning
Hurdles and above all these things The
Law of the Land. For him he thinks
of Political implications and problems
faced by people in the Country is important. When such High Profile
cases not taken, people's reaction
Will always will be like this. But, the
Judges should not get disappointed
or get frustrated on such things.
For them Law and Constitution are
of Paramount importance and should
not care about such reactions. But,
fortunately the Majority of knowledgeable people have very
good faith in our Judiciary. It is
in the hands of Judges to deliver.
Mr. Karan, I admire your interviews and I get why you would want to interrupt someone. So that you don't forget to question someone on what they just said. But the constant interruption does no favours to the audience. I think this is the second time I'm pointing it out. Please let the interviewee speak without interrupting them.
I hope the women that manu banged was appointed on the supreme court bench and is still on the bench.
What i learned from that scandal is women dont need beauty or intelligence but a hole to progress in life.
There are places where the interviewer wasn't allowed to ask the complete question or rebuttal and vice versa.
Definitely two head strong people trying to not budge easily ✌️✌️
Empty vessels make loud noises- applies to Karan Perfectly
The essence of justice is radically defeated.
How does morality a subjective attribute, Mr. Singhvi? Please clarify.
Mr. Singhvi makes a nuanced argument about interpretation of 'morality' mentioned in Article 26 of the Constitution. His argument is that this morality mentioned in the Article cannot be decided by subjective opinions judges. While constitutional morality may not have a place while interpreting plain words of an article, morality as mentioned in the article definitely needs to be interpreted as something. It's indeed a difficult question to answer as morality is inherently subjective in nature. The question then arises is whether there is something called 'objective morality'. It would be interesting to see what the Supreme Court does after hearing the arguments now that the matter has been referred to a higher bench. J. Nariman has stated in his judgment declining the review that there are no arguments made which were not made earlier when the main petition was decided. Therefore, there was no occasion to re-hear the case.
Kiran, allow Mr Singhvi to reply in full.
The enveloped statements of Mr. Singhvi are self-explanatory.
Karan raises highly pertinent question that does not get a proper response!
This clearly reflects the fear among the judges and the lawyer of the fasist govt. But appart from that it is a fascinating conversa -tion of two grate intalectuals. Hatsoff to Karan Thaper.
Having faith doesn't Give Justice Always 🧐
here you have a copy of Arnab
This was heated..🔥🔥
It was very interesting & informative. And Mr. Singhvi did Justice with the questions posed to him.
almost 100 years ago, my great grandfather (during British India) used to tell his family that in India you should stay away from politician, police and judiciary....if you get dragged, do outside settlement but never interact with the three...it seems that nothing has changed...instead, it has become worse....
Mainstream media implications on the courts' judgments cannot be denied. Mr. Singvi did not comment on this statement made by himself in his own book. What an irony?
SC targeted Harsh Mander that he criticised SC which is not yet judged at the same time very many important cases like art 370 CAA NPR NRC is pending months together but people say the delay is very much on higher side but SC isn't bothered so it's time for SC to think of their acts that's should also matters to everyone .
Chief Justice is not concerned about the hate remarks/speeches of Kapil Mishra, Union home Minister and other associates that incited severe violence and genocide attempts across North East Delhi. He rather wants clarification on Mr. Harsh Mandar's statement
Sold..⚖️
That's what I was waiting for somebody to say, Mr. Karan Thapar speaks more than the interviewee..
*18:38** JOURNALISM AT IT'S BEST!*
It would have been so much better if sir karan thapar would have allowed Dr. Singhvi to complete his statements after every question asked to him .
Hi Karan, please allow him to answer. I hate too much of interventions. But over all I like most of your interviews.
Singhvi is a practicing SC lawyer, he can not criticize present SC judges.
Singhvi is holding back....just beating around the bush
WHY MODI GOVT NOT ENCOUNTER OWAISI BROS AND GOONS BECAUSE THEY R FROM BJP THATS WHY MODI NOT TAKING ANY ACTION ON OWAISI BROS
Constitutional morality is paramount to the execution of fair trials. I am not sure why Mr. Singhvi disagrees with this objective claim? Is this against the tenets of the Indian Constitution?
Defamation cases ,Fake News , and investments in Media should be dealt at SC level and give judgment in 48 hrs ,so that many peddlers like the Thappars and NDTV and India Today will be closed and these peddlers will be put in Tihad ASAP
The nation is experiencing worst sociopolitical and socioeconomic circumstances that have potentially biased the opinions of the great intellectuals like Mr. Singhvi....
Indian SC# Majoritarian# Justice???
LOL. Mr. Thappar must have been thinking how disastrous this interview might have been. But it is not.
Mr. Singhvi is a defender of the faith that he himself has critically objected in his own book. This is the powerful impact of the RSS magnet.
When Madras High court was built and during the opening of the court , keys was given to English judges , they refused to take it in their hands and ask him.to put down and then they took it because they told him he may be accused of corruption in construction of the court that was the integrity of English judges
Indian Judges don't even closely match 😔
Judge saving judges from T rules breaken.. He says unintentionally being said by Justice Mishra.. Maybe than unintentionally in t same manner he might hv passed several wrong Judgements🤣🤣(off course unintentionally) ...Later when he retires will think on Y he did it (wat an answer Abhishek Shingvi) 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Desh Sankat Mai Hai Mitro😅😅
They are arguing like friends, may be they are!
Thapar cannot bully the person being interviewed. He should learn interviewing from Rajat Sharma or BBC s Hard Talk. They get more truth out.
She
The judiciary has lost autonomy and ability to produce fair judgments? Mr. Singhvi denies this statement.
this time you forgot to hit the thumbs up for yourself
Great does not mean good
SC has reduced itself to Khap panchayat .Lost credibility.No one is expecting justice from the judiciary only judgement but they should come earliar.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट से आजकल कोई भी फैसला सत्ताधारी दल के खिलाफ नहीं आता है, सिर्फ प्रशंसा ही सुनाई देती है सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जज से। नागरिक अधिकारों से अधिक कार्यपालिका को तरजीह दी जाती है। इससे लगता है की कोर्ट की स्वायत्ता बस दिखावे के लिए है। इन हालातों में आम आदमी सुप्रीम कोर्ट से न्याय की अपेक्षा भला कैसे करे?
It seems Mr. Singhvi is contradicting his own book, or if else he writes something and believes something, both are different from each other .
What I attained from this interview is that i came to know the real Abhisheik Singhvi. Karan as always your great and dominated the entire interview. Thanks
Why compare years and months of a and b judicial regimes.
Only a knowledgeable and patient person can tolerate a rude person like thapar
courts are under pressure by media and media is under pressure by whom?
Why should judges worrying about popularity...it’s not a beauty contest. 7:41
It is quite unfortunate for the people of India as they don't have suitable advocates or judges to deal the cases fully upto last seven judges benches. The cases are not exhausted till that level. For example EVM hacking case is not exhausted till seven judges bench just like Ayodhya issue.
As a result BJP came to power without proper mandate.
The farmers iof amaravathi have gone to international court as they are not getting justice in Indian courts.
Why parties and advocates are not filing review petitions in supreme Court till all levels are exhausted. Why they are not utilising human rights commissions as their voting rights are criminalised and not able to vote properly and supreme Court is not allowing the VVPat slips counting. Why these parties and advocates are not filing international court to do justice in EVM tampering as there is sufficient evidence to prove manipulation in voting machines.
Karan Thapar why you interviewed this person? He gave a certificate to the present CJI that court was not compromised under his stewardship. Who is he to gave certificates. What is the basis of his opinion.
I respect Dr Singhvi but I completely disagree with him on the Sabarimala views of his.
I beg to disagree with you.. In Sabrimala the menstruating women are not allowed because of tradition with some reason, there is no discrimination.
I think these courts are also or partly like Godi Media. Take the matter of CAA first Even the killing of Delhi could have avoided. We call these judges as highly learned with lot wisdom.
Long pending of huge cases but all are paid full from tax payers money stop salary of judiciary.
Abhishek Manu Singhvi the Writer. Abhishek Manu Singhvi the Politician. Abhishek Manu Singhvi the Advocate.
All three are three different individuals they aren’t same friends.
On the topic of there not being enough judges, everything cannot grow at geometric speed like the population, specially things which require time to develop, e.g. highly skilled professionals in medicine, engineering, law, accounting, etc. who grow in numbers at an arithmetic rate. And so now we're suffering.
Karan on fire again . Sadly, Mr Singhvi has been constantly taking the back seat on his statements..
Please make a separate channel of *The Wire English*
Kudos to Karan Thapar!
Karan was interrupting too much here. Unbearable.
I love this show.
One of those disappointing interviews from Mr. Thapar, where all he is trying to do is put words into the mouth of the guest, to get something controversial or sensational out of the interview. Despite being a highly learned and experienced journalist, you obviously don't succeed with those tricks in front of an advocate, that too with somebody of the stature of Mr. Abhishek Singhvi. An advocate is very chary of using irresponsible words for both praise and criticism. He is a practising advocate at probably the zenith of his career. You can't expect him to thrash the Supreme Court and all the judges left right and center, just to comply with the interpretations of the interviewer.
I had wished this interaction to be so much more fruitful and interesting.
50 hearings a day that's too much.