Hold Multiple Parts With NO CLAMPS! | Fixture Friday 16 | Pierson Workholding

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024

Комментарии • 59

  • @GoughCustom
    @GoughCustom 3 года назад +10

    Love that you called this 'knifemaker style' fixturing lol. I have been machining G10 composite handle scales for my knives using this exact method for quite a few years. I have had ZERO issues with this style of clamping and it lets me produce handle scales where every single dimensional feature is done in one operation which is pretty amazing! I'm cutting the material to thickness and machining the underside features and clamping features in OP1 then I mount them to a pallet which is held onto the main fixture using Pitbull clamps in order to machine everything else in OP2. Works fantastically well!
    I don't have any features that are dimensionally critical on the backside, so I just use 2x 1/4-20 SHCS to hold them down and roughly position them on the pallet.
    Keep up the great videos Jay!
    -Aaron

  • @billstrahan4791
    @billstrahan4791 3 года назад +4

    I am so happy to see Fixture Friday! I learn something each time and I’d love to see this type of thing every single Friday!! One can wish. :)

  • @wst2663
    @wst2663 3 года назад +14

    I really want to work there for the summer just once. I feel like I’d learn so much and have my mind blown even if I was just an operator

  • @DarkAeroInc
    @DarkAeroInc 3 года назад +4

    Great video! With those feeds/speeds you can really crank through some parts. We will need to upgrade machines soon. 😎

    • @texasermd1
      @texasermd1 3 года назад

      Tormach to a Haas perhaps. 🤔

    • @Factory400
      @Factory400 3 года назад

      Just get that plane flying!!!!
      I will make CNC parts for you. I will design and build electronics for you. I just want to build a Dark Aero myself. Loving your approach to design and engineering.

  • @kchigley5309
    @kchigley5309 3 года назад +44

    Something not mentioned, but is a great idea that it looks like you've used: It appears that the dowel holes in the part are offset slightly from the centerline of the threaded hole. Poke yoke...it can't be loaded backwards :)

    • @hydrusje
      @hydrusje 3 года назад +3

      Well spotted! I didn't notice that.

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад +10

      Great eye indeed!

    • @boomintahoe9398
      @boomintahoe9398 3 года назад +4

      Aka anti-load. Coming from a CNC Machinist myself.

  • @thedarkpill3590
    @thedarkpill3590 2 года назад

    Very useful video, thanks! You are sharing a lot of 'proprietary' knowledge, much appreciated!

  • @PM.al.whatmough
    @PM.al.whatmough 3 года назад

    Love your content Jay, keep it up!!!

  • @roguecnc788
    @roguecnc788 2 года назад

    Great video as always Jay

  • @ArthurField
    @ArthurField 3 года назад

    Love your mindset man, thanks for sharing!

  • @mcgoogoo
    @mcgoogoo 3 года назад

    Always a legend

  • @chauvinemmons
    @chauvinemmons 3 года назад

    Oh I got one Pink panther insulation that hasn't been sintered yet.
    Heat shields for gas turbine engines.
    We would literally hold it in our hand wherever you touched it if you blew Air at it but where your fingers were would fall out.
    The parts we made were big thin and complex.

  • @TrPrecisionMachining
    @TrPrecisionMachining 3 года назад

    very good video

  • @MrNicknikolov
    @MrNicknikolov 3 года назад

    Would love to get into making more high density fixtures but most parts I am making (job shop) seem to either not have the quantity to offset the cost in the fixtures, or not lend themselves to a palletized design. excited for the day I get the right job to do so though!

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад +1

      I made a video for guys just like you: ruclips.net/video/02V6X-9bZyI/видео.html

  • @Todestelzer
    @Todestelzer Год назад

    4:50 can’t you use in Programm probing to compensate for the shift?

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  Год назад +1

      Sure, you can probe each part, but probing makes for ridiculously long cycle times.

  • @CNC_Soup
    @CNC_Soup 3 года назад

    Ok now i understand. The threaded hole is part of the design and functuon of the valve, not designed just to hold it, right?

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад

      Correct. The threaded hole is for a cap to seal the cylinder. The two holes next to it are for fixturing only.

  • @dtm8073
    @dtm8073 10 месяцев назад

    @6:28 Awesome video but I don't like how the operator just picks up the fixture and loads it in the machine without wiping the bottom of it.

  • @metaltradesolutionsllc5274
    @metaltradesolutionsllc5274 3 года назад +13

    I'm a seasoned machinist and didn't really learn anything new but I watched the whole video. The way you can simply explain more complex topics is excellent. I wish I could communicate this well. Jay, are you naturally this good of a teacher or did you have to work at it?

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад +9

      Thank you. Like any skill, I have to practice my on-camera communication. I am definitely not a natural.

    • @tacticool22
      @tacticool22 2 года назад

      You do a great job

  • @cobraframebuilding
    @cobraframebuilding 3 года назад +5

    Love the videos. Let's give the Rotovise some more love on this channel! I have the PPS and the Rotovise, and though they're both great products, the Rotovise is 100x more useful to *my* parts and part volumes. I think the PPS is really a winner with 3-axis work at volumes over 1000x per year, and almost nothing I make sees that volume at this time. But the Rotovise with the serrated jaws is transformative for reducing operations, still getting a solid number of parts in the machine at once, no custom fixturing expenses or time for each new setup, and it's also invaluable for prototyping and one-off work. If you do lower or medium volume work the Rotovise is a massive win, even if you don't need multi-axis -- just having more vises in the machine is great. Used in tandem with a Stop-loc ruler, you can't beat it for op1 mill work.

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад

      Thanks Joe! You bring up a lot of great points we'll be sure to cover in future videos.

  • @ataylorblocker92
    @ataylorblocker92 3 года назад +2

    Nice fixturing setups. Me likey

  • @capnthepeafarmer
    @capnthepeafarmer 3 года назад +3

    I know an operator that can do quick change overs very fast, it's an ABB IRB4600 robot 😁😁

  • @christianheidt5733
    @christianheidt5733 Год назад +1

    Would have been nice to see it running 😞

  • @nubius1972
    @nubius1972 2 года назад +5

    Start using metric system instead. Inch is ridiculous and makes no sense.

  • @jonivanart
    @jonivanart 2 года назад +1

    I love watching these videos. I own a 1970 Bridgeport and even though I wouldn't be able to use all of this system. I offset my work with a 3D printer so it helps tremendously!! 👌 I hope to eventually grow my business enough to get a CNC and I will definitely give you a call to put in some orders. 😉

  • @MakeTechPtyLtd
    @MakeTechPtyLtd 3 года назад +1

    Jay, well done. Great advice! Beautiful product.
    -Ken

  • @SMCca
    @SMCca 3 года назад +1

    One tip for people still using the standard part-in-vise and having troubles with op2 mismatch or part damage from overclamping due to unskilled labor or operator error... use inexpensive torque wrenches and specify settings in your setup sheets.

  • @QurttoRco
    @QurttoRco 9 месяцев назад

    I mean if you run part like this then you get a multi pallet machine, worked with brother twin pallet myself love it, such a quick machine

  • @jodygwiinn1233
    @jodygwiinn1233 8 месяцев назад

    Use a paint market on vise draw line to tighten vise to consistant torq

  • @RippenSXS
    @RippenSXS 3 года назад +1

    Is it fixture sunday now?

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад +1

      Sure, why not. You can always wait 5 days to watch if it makes you feel better :)

  • @NeoQJ
    @NeoQJ 3 года назад

    Just had my own CNC today, although it’s a router, but I think similar method can be apply. Thanks for sharing 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

  • @glenndwyer5786
    @glenndwyer5786 5 месяцев назад

    Love the whole range, when you go from shop made fixters and vice work to a custom pallet system it opens up so much more,if you think out side the box

  • @HudsonLighting
    @HudsonLighting 3 года назад

    It's Soo lean, so perfect

  • @aaronward3882
    @aaronward3882 3 года назад

    I use this method to machine mold components. Best accuracy and accessibility!

  • @hampfi747
    @hampfi747 3 года назад

    Great video. Very interesting ideas!
    So are you just machining the bottom features to clamp the part in op20?
    Why not machine the complex corner rounding features in op10 and then clamp the parts with softjaws for op20? I think that would be easier then screwing the parts again and you can safe the excess operations. Also if you mount the op20 clamps on the same tombstone as the op10 parts you could safe the other pallet completely and take out 4 finished parts ever time the setup is run.

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад +1

      Give the video a second watch. We don't want to use a vise because of the problems I mentioned. First operation also handles 4 faces so the 5 axis machine is ideal and high-density workholding is perfect for the second op.

  • @TheMoonlightCraftsman
    @TheMoonlightCraftsman 3 года назад

    What’s the process to get rid of the threads after you don’t need them anymore?

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад +1

      The threads in this component are part of the design. We need them! :)

  • @kingkasma4660
    @kingkasma4660 3 года назад +1

    how heavy are the pallets?

    • @PiersonWorkholding
      @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад +1

      8x12x1½ - 13.75 lbs
      8x16x1½ - 17.37 lbs
      10x12x1½ - 17.25 lbs
      10x16x1½ - 23.00 lbs

    • @kingkasma4660
      @kingkasma4660 3 года назад +1

      @@PiersonWorkholding you guys really need a metric version. But good product

    • @kingkasma4660
      @kingkasma4660 3 года назад

      @@mooreevair I know how to convert, but it's still only 2 countrys left these old measurements

    • @mooreevair
      @mooreevair 3 года назад

      @@kingkasma4660 I'm American and use metric and standard every day son

    • @kingkasma4660
      @kingkasma4660 3 года назад

      @@mooreevair sure thats the thing America is one of the two only countrys using more than metric.

  • @PiersonWorkholding
    @PiersonWorkholding  3 года назад +1

    ✅ Tired of making 1 part at a time? 👉 bit.ly/39HCcPp