Jinnah was a strong nationalist and ambassador of hindu muslim unity in the beginning, but in a later stage,after Lahore resolution was passed,the sole purpose of his life was to partition of India and creation of Pakistan. Dr.Istiaq Ahmad has established this fact in his book,while Ayesha Jalal argued that till the end Jinna did not want partition. But Dr.Istiaq Ahmed defeated her argument beyond doubt.
It is misconception that Jinah was nationalist and ambassador of Hindu Muslim unity he was selfish opportunist and greedy of power. Jinnah was the founder of split the Indian nation on the basis of religious hate . The whole politics of Mr. Jinnah was based on religious hate against Hindu and Sikh peoples. Peoples. Thanks.
From 53:10 a typical Pakistani Mindset starts , Don't balme Jinha for deaths in whole video ,But Criticism only on Indian politicians. According to you If You blame Gandhi ,Nehru,Patel for some things ,but protect so called qayade e azam everywhere 😒
He played . During Moplah riot , Noakhali killings , Direct Action Day , Calcutta killing what was the statement of Gandhi for Hindus just read about that . Gandhi & Neheru are the pioneers of Muslim appeasement politics (in the name of Secularism) in India
@@ayushmankar4100 Mountbatten sent Gandhi to Bengal calling him as his one-man army economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/gandhi-the-one-man-army-behind-the-great-calcutta-miracle/articleshow/102718993.cms?from=mdr
Gandhi played a negative communal card. He didn't ever criticise the Muslims for their atrocities on Hindus. Neither in Mooplah nor in Noakhali or after the Direct Action Day killings in then Calcutta. He was a coward in that respect.
Wounds of a Nation The midnight hour brought no dream, But rivers of blood in a broken stream. A crescent’s shadow, sharp and cold, Split hearts and lands, both young and old. Once brothers shared a sacred soil, Now burned in hatred’s fevered toil. Fields of wheat turned graves of despair, For greed had poisoned the very air. Jinnah’s voice, with its silvered sting, Promised peace, yet clipped the wing. Lines on maps, drawn in haste, Carved through lives, laid to waste. Lahore wept, Delhi mourned, Homes abandoned, families torn. The train of death, its ghastly tale, Carried whispers of a humanity’s fail. Children cried in fear’s embrace, Mothers prayed for a safer place. What god, they asked, would demand this pain, For borders etched in death’s refrain? And still the fire rages on, In memories of the land they’d gone. A legacy of a choice once made, In blood-stained history, cruelly played. Jinnah's dream, some say, was bright, But darkness followed his chosen fight. A lesson carved in every heart, That unity, once broken, tears apart. So hear the cries of those who bled, Remember the tears that were silently shed. Let not ambition’s cruel decree, Ever divide the roots of a shared tree.
Very nice video. Really appreciate Zeeshan Ali’s point of view. Partition is a fact of history and while we can only now only discuss and imagine ‘what if’ India remained united, ‘we can’ still improve relations between the two nations. Like Zeeshan expressed in a another video, it is tragic today, that the British who divided the subcontinent can still move freely across countries, while we the inheritors of a shared heritage can only struggle to see the ‘other side’.
From India love to the world love human being Pakistan people are original brothers parents sisters peacefully life with kind regards Pakistan people are original heart of India ❤❤
Honest and engaging discussion, the expert is well read and puts the information in a nice manner. Master Tara Singh didn’t take Mr. Jinnah’s bait after there was massacre of Sikhs in some areas of Punjab, and he decided to be with India…..
In a nutshell, Jinnah wanted an enclave exclusively for Muslims in India, which India never agreed. Imagine, down the road, the Muslims would demand a separate country & the compensation India would have to give, had this occurred. Thanks partition actually benefited India 70 yrs down the road.
Jinnah cloaked his ambition in the guise of minority rights but wielded religion as a divisive weapon, fracturing India's soul for political gain. While Gandhi walked among the wounded, fasting for peace, Jinnah orchestrated partition from the safety of his mansion, leaving millions to bleed for his "vision." Gandhi sought unity through sacrifice; Jinnah chose division through fear. History may distort their legacies, but the blood-stained borders of 1947 indict Jinnah’s pragmatism as moral bankruptcy. True leaders heal; Jinnah tore apart.
1916 se 1945 tak Sir Chhotu Ram bhi bahut bade role mai thai, lekin unke chapter ko jaan bhuj kar nikal diya gya, but unke kamo ko mitaya nahi ja payega. #sirchhoturam
@@beinline2278muslman sarhan to darde hindu darde ghor. Mukk giya dona da jhagrha nikal piya koi hor.... Baba bulle shah apni kaafiyo me hindu Muslims ke jhagrhe kahani sunate hai.... Woh kiya hai
@@beinline2278 ever heard of Chatrapati shivaji, Chatrapati Sambhaji, Maharana Pratap, Sikh Gurus? Why do you think they troubled them selves? Out of sheer boredom?
I would suggest u read Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed, your own Pakistani scholar and understand the real issue.. very clearly Jinnah is one of central pieces moving and crafting a partition. In hindsight thankful…looking at Pakistan of today specially its political and military class no regrets. But your people are nice that’s whom we miss
Britishers were compelled to leave India by FDR (USA) in exchange for military help to UK during WWII. USA already had plans to expand its influence and end British empire's influence.
Lord Mount Batton had put forward the offer of primeministership to Jinnah Sahib. Mr Jinnah replied , "Oh, it must be the cunning Gandhi." It was obvious that he could be thrown out by Hindu majority at any time.
Yes 1936 Congress govt of Congress frightened Muslims of north India and deep into psyche of Muslims , forced to think over the counter strategy and cabinet mission plan seemed close to satisfy their aspirations but the option of leaving the loose federation was categorically rejected by Nehru which forced Jinnah to withdraw his approval for the plan but no any solid guarantees could be offered by congress thus no option was left for Jinnah except to revive his earlier demand of Pakistan so failure to stop division of India solely lies on the shoulders of congress leaders
Zeeshan says he is waiting for ishtiaqs book whereas ishtiaq.ahmed has been doing interviews on his published book on jinnah for months now. Zeeshan is a islamic and jinnah apologist and that is fine.
Partition was an excellent Idea by Zinnah and Mountbatten, Only blunder was done by Gandi and Nehru, they didn't implemented it in totality and complete transfer of population couldn't realised. The result of which Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh are still facing religious hatred and atrocities because of being non muslims and on the other hand remaining muslims are flourishing in India and dreaming of Islamisation of the country. ACTUALLY, MOULANA AZAD WAS MORE VISIONARY AND CUNNING THAN ZINNAH, HE WAS THINKING OF USURPING OF WHOLE SUB CONTINENT AND WAS NOT HAPPY WITH ZINNAH THAT HE AGREED WITH MERE TWO PIECES OF THE LAND. SO HE DELIBERATELY STOPPED MUSLIMS IN INDIA FOR ANOTHER PARTITION OR COMPLETE TAKE OVER, WHICH THEY ARE TRYING THEIR BEST.
@@theworld9394He is right Muslim in 1947 after partition 8.6% now 17% double in size In numbers 3.21 cr muslims now 25 crore + It's 7 time population growth Hindus from 25 crore to 100 cr 4 time population increase
@@ajitdesai-i1v population growth doesn't mean actual growth. Tell me how many muslims are there on key positions in your army, government and administration.
@@hamzasohail5150 bahut hain list kam pad jayegi Hindu dharm dekhkar kiski Kimat nahi karta Father of indian nuclear programme homi bhabha parsi relegion Biggest company of india TATA parsi Founder of ISRO vikarm sarabhai jain relegion Greatest army general Sam maneksha parsi Leuitant general altaf hassnain Are list di toh Kam pad jayegi Shahrukh Salman Aamir Khan ko star hindus ne banaya hain Muslims in india didn't want modern education Madarasa teaching se kya progress karenge Chandrayan 3 ka lander ka main engineer muslim hain India is secular because Hindu majority
@@hamzasohail5150 bahut hain 4 time president Huye education ministers Bahut badi list hain As per indian constitution anybody can became anything Pakistan me koi non-muslim president army chief nhi bn skta You are headache for world and vassal state of USA Muslims doesn't want to progress and go madarassa education
Nice to hear you podcast like always. Can he elaborate a bit more about Kahuta and RSS in partation. As i am from Kahuta so curious to know more about it.
Lord Wavel complained to Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan Tiwana C.M. ABOUT Sir Chhotu Ram's fiery speech in Panipat inviting JATs to burn crops keep Wheat only enough for their families if they don't get a adequate price. CM said: He would do that if he said so. MATTER CAME TO A COMPLETE HALT. Barrister M.S.Dahiya Bhatgamia Garhwale, Canada.
The main problem was that the public was not included and informed about the partition and all decisions were made by Hindu and Muslim politicians. And why that time politicians never knew that partition will create heavy problems like Riots, murders, kidnaping, rapes, robbery, blood partition etc
Lets not forget that violence was a near constant and increasing in frequency and intensity from the 1920s. The British started the divide but the division found great traction among even poor people who had no role and participation in the political process. The violence was present even when ML and Congress were working together and calling out for peace and cooperation. Rather than leaders driving the narrative, the conditions on the ground was leading the politicians towards these fateful decisions. I think any other decision such as making Jinnah PM would only have postponed but not averted the outcome. It is not sustainable to keep a people together when they have started thinking of themselves in separate national terms. Even if the leaders had gotten along and preserved a united India, eventually a divisive figure would have arrived and torn the country apart. A real life example of this wold be former Yugoslavia. A likely alternative outcome could have been multiple states with mixed populations like Punjab and Bengal thus avoiding a transfer of population. Unfortunately, in multi ethnic and multi religious societies, nationalism is inherently violent as it requires definition of the core group in permanent opposition/incompatibility with out groups and the myths that go along with it. I think this is what played out in the subcontinent.
Nehru's socialism was one of the big problems for muslim leaders, and one, that tipped the scales in favour of partition, as most of the Muslim league leaders came from large land owning families and they were'nt very keen on playing the socialist ball. & In fact, the imposition of land sealing act shortly after independence in India proved their fears very true. Nehru's socialism was also a huge cause of concern for the British, as this would mean India would likely align itself with USSR after the independence, and hence partition would have also ensured the protection of British interests in the region in Great game.
Personally, I think Partition was a RIGHT decision. But there should have been 100% transfer of population. Hence, freedom for all, including Hindus, after 1400 yrs of unnecessary troubles. We will get freedom again. One final struggle will come. We will be free.
دنیا کا کوئی بھی تنازعہ ہو، سیاسی ایجنڈا، جنگ، اسلام پسندوں کی سرگرمیاں، خالصتانی، ماؤ نواز، ہجومی تشدد، مذہبی جنون، ذات پرستی، دہشت گردی، فسادات، سرحد پرستی، دراندازی، محبت جہاد، جنگ۔ اسے ختم کرنا چاہتے ہیں، یہاں ایک تجویز ہے۔ اقوام متحدہ کے زیر کنٹرول دنیا کی زمین کو تمام مذاہب کی آبادی کے تناسب سے تقسیم کریں، مثلاً عیسائیت دنیا کا 30+%، اسلام 20+%، قدیم مذاہب 15+%، الحاد 15+%، دیگر مذاہب 20%، اس طرح، دنیا کی زمین کی 100% تقسیم مذہب کے تناسب سے ہونی چاہیے۔ تمام مذاہب کے لوگ اپنی الاٹ کی گئی زمین پر آباد ہوں گے اور آنے والی نسلیں بھی پرامن اور خوشگوار زندگی گزار سکیں گی۔ جتنے مذاہب، جتنے ممالک۔
ایک پرانے بابا تھے راز داں کہتے ھیں گاندھی نےکہاتھا مسلمان آزادی کی لڑاٸ میں ھمارت ساتھ لڑے انہس انکا حق دو مگر ۔۔۔۔نہں دیا ا نہیں مسلمانوں کے ووٹ بنک سے ڈر تھا ۔
Angrez partition 1857 se hi chahta tha. They realised that the unity of Hindus and Muslims as in 1857 was a dangerous thing so they started a systematic division. They encouraged the Hindus to get English education (although it was only for low clerical position) and made them get alienated from their heritage. They influenced some Muslim ulema who discouraged the Muslims from getting educated and the British would not employ them and slowly they became poorer and poorer. The British were also responsible for destroying the courtesan system and labelling them and pushing them into the flesh trade. Before 1857, these women held large properties and paid some of the highest amounts of tax. But since they had given help and shelter to the soldiers and others against the British, the British set about confiscating their lands and properties and punishing them. There is an old map of 1858 or so which has the divided India into Hindustan, Pakistan and Princistan. The name Pakistan was decided long ago. The British left a festering wound in the subcontinent.
Despite Jinna's likely early death, the British did not postpone the talks and allowed partition to be a reality. Within 3 months of partition Jinna died in Pakistan.
I live in the place from where British rule started. Do you know Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose ? Do you know Azad Hind Fauz ? I can tell you more than 60% of Muslims never supported the Pakistan proposal. Ispahani and Adamjee gave funds to the Muslim league. Both Jinnah and Gandhi were Gujaratis. So just chill.
Karl Marx has also written some articles about India where he has exposed Indian kings and analysed British exploitation along with figures and budgets for india.
No they did not clear your concepts, they completely distorted the facts. This long haired id-io-t from Lahore is not a historian. He is speaking out of his a-s-s. False equivalence. Read books, don't listen to Paki fake youtubers.
No all wrong, fake narrative. False equivalence. Jinnah was a dirt bag. India is a secular nation. India mein 1000s muslim ladkiyon ka forcible conversion nahin hota. Do not compare India with a disease called Pakistan.
Jinnah offered a blank cheque to Master Tara Singh. Well, let us look at Ahmadias. Pakistan resolution was drafted by an Ahmadia. Creation of Pakistan was supported by Ahmadias. And we know where Ahmadias stand today. Sikhs escaped this fate.
😯😯😯... 🤔🤔🤔... 😢😢😢... 🌹🌹🌹... Very sad very goood and very informative GUPPP SHUPPP... Lekin aik baaat aaap bataaana bhoool gaye k baqol Jinaaah Saaab Pakistaaan mainay aor meray Type writer na banaaaya hay aor may Moslim aksariat par Hindostaaan k mosalmanooon ko qurbaaan kar rahaaa hooon ??? A kaaash aisaaa na hotaaa ???
Sar aap lagta hai aapane cabinet mission ke bare mein Puri jankari nahin liye. Teen tarah ke state banae gaye the unmen se 10 varsh pakshat alag hone ka Adhikar Diya gaya tha jiski vajah se Muslim bahul ilake Pakistan ki taraf ho sakte the yah Jawaharlal Nehru ko aashram ka thi akaalee mishan yojana mein bhaarat ko teen samudaayon mein vibhaajit karane kee baat thee: grup e (hindoo bahul kshetr) grup bee (muslim bahul pashchimee kshetr) grup see (muslim bahul poorvee kshetr) neharoo ko yah dar tha ki is desh kee ekata aur akhandata mein khatara paida ho sakata hai, kyonki muslim leeg kee is yojana ka upayog karake deshon ko vibhaajit kiya ja sakata hai.
Jinnah was a strong nationalist and ambassador of hindu muslim unity in the beginning, but in a later stage,after Lahore resolution was passed,the sole purpose of his life was to partition of India and creation of Pakistan. Dr.Istiaq Ahmad has established this fact in his book,while Ayesha Jalal argued that till the end Jinna did not want partition. But Dr.Istiaq Ahmed defeated her argument beyond doubt.
Later Jinnah call for Direct Action Day which was one of the biggest massacre in the history of India.
Jinnah was a monster.
The moment he said Jinnah didn't want partition i stopped watching this 😅
Tere baap nein bataya thaa yeh tujhe? Suuar khane waala, anrezon ka pichwada chatne waala sick aadmi thaa Jinnah.
It is misconception that Jinah was nationalist and ambassador of Hindu Muslim unity he was selfish opportunist and greedy of power. Jinnah was the founder of split the Indian nation on the basis of religious hate . The whole politics of Mr. Jinnah was based on religious hate against Hindu and Sikh peoples. Peoples. Thanks.
@@civilmonk1166 Agree with your point of view. From Pakistan.
Clement Attlee, British PM (1945-51), told in interview, that they had to leave India because of Netaji Subhas and Azad Hind Fauj
Two science school students discussing rocket science. Their source of information is web series, as if they don't have history books.
Web series is based on book
Very true.. The depth of discussion is shallow.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
From 53:10 a typical Pakistani Mindset starts , Don't balme Jinha for deaths in whole video ,But Criticism only on Indian politicians.
According to you If You blame Gandhi ,Nehru,Patel for some things ,but protect so called qayade e azam everywhere 😒
responsibility sb pe ati hai all politicians and british as well
We Muslims and Hindus need to accept both politicians as their independence create and also take repsonsibility of both politicians mistake..
The best way to satisfy you is that Indian and Pakistan historians shall sit together and discuss....
Typical Indian mindset blames Jinnah for everything😅
mahatma Gandhi never played religion card. He, Nehru, Sardar were imprisoned by Britishers. Zinah and Muslim League never went to jail
He played . During Moplah riot , Noakhali killings , Direct Action Day , Calcutta killing what was the statement of Gandhi for Hindus just read about that . Gandhi & Neheru are the pioneers of Muslim appeasement politics (in the name of Secularism) in India
@@ayushmankar4100 Mountbatten sent Gandhi to Bengal calling him as his one-man army economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/gandhi-the-one-man-army-behind-the-great-calcutta-miracle/articleshow/102718993.cms?from=mdr
@@KoshikPatel and what he said their to persicuted Bengali Hindus that also you should see .
Jinnah was an intelligent and expensive lawyer of endia that time. He was wise, man. Not fool
Gandhi played a negative communal card.
He didn't ever criticise the Muslims for their atrocities on Hindus. Neither in Mooplah nor in Noakhali or after the Direct Action Day killings in then Calcutta.
He was a coward in that respect.
With love from India❤ to our people beyond the border
Always wanted to hear the perspective of our neighbors about the Freedom and Partition. Very informative and good insights
Wounds of a Nation
The midnight hour brought no dream,
But rivers of blood in a broken stream.
A crescent’s shadow, sharp and cold,
Split hearts and lands, both young and old.
Once brothers shared a sacred soil,
Now burned in hatred’s fevered toil.
Fields of wheat turned graves of despair,
For greed had poisoned the very air.
Jinnah’s voice, with its silvered sting,
Promised peace, yet clipped the wing.
Lines on maps, drawn in haste,
Carved through lives, laid to waste.
Lahore wept, Delhi mourned,
Homes abandoned, families torn.
The train of death, its ghastly tale,
Carried whispers of a humanity’s fail.
Children cried in fear’s embrace,
Mothers prayed for a safer place.
What god, they asked, would demand this pain,
For borders etched in death’s refrain?
And still the fire rages on,
In memories of the land they’d gone.
A legacy of a choice once made,
In blood-stained history, cruelly played.
Jinnah's dream, some say, was bright,
But darkness followed his chosen fight.
A lesson carved in every heart,
That unity, once broken, tears apart.
So hear the cries of those who bled,
Remember the tears that were silently shed.
Let not ambition’s cruel decree,
Ever divide the roots of a shared tree.
This man's name should be added in new edition of Murder Of History book
Added.
Well said.
Very nice video. Really appreciate Zeeshan Ali’s point of view. Partition is a fact of history and while we can only now only discuss and imagine ‘what if’ India remained united, ‘we can’ still improve relations between the two nations. Like Zeeshan expressed in a another video, it is tragic today, that the British who divided the subcontinent can still move freely across countries, while we the inheritors of a shared heritage can only struggle to see the ‘other side’.
We don't want any relationship with Pakistan
From India love to the world love human being Pakistan people are original brothers parents sisters peacefully life with kind regards Pakistan people are original heart of India ❤❤
Excellent objective analysis of real history. We need more of such discussions to unlearn history taught in our schools based on fudged curriculum.
Honest and engaging discussion, the expert is well read and puts the information in a nice manner. Master Tara Singh didn’t take Mr. Jinnah’s bait after there was massacre of Sikhs in some areas of Punjab, and he decided to be with India…..
And Sikhs still regret that day
Like they are regretting in napakistan...their woman get converted to Islam forcefully and you say you would have treated sikhs well..what a joke
@@freedomfighter695 how ?
In a nutshell, Jinnah wanted an enclave exclusively for Muslims in India, which India never agreed. Imagine, down the road, the Muslims would demand a separate country & the compensation India would have to give, had this occurred. Thanks partition actually benefited India 70 yrs down the road.
India will be a super power if it is not divided.. but unfortunately they cut us into pieces, but we are united by our cultures and traditions.
Jinnah cloaked his ambition in the guise of minority rights but wielded religion as a divisive weapon, fracturing India's soul for political gain. While Gandhi walked among the wounded, fasting for peace, Jinnah orchestrated partition from the safety of his mansion, leaving millions to bleed for his "vision." Gandhi sought unity through sacrifice; Jinnah chose division through fear. History may distort their legacies, but the blood-stained borders of 1947 indict Jinnah’s pragmatism as moral bankruptcy. True leaders heal; Jinnah tore apart.
A
😊❤
1916 se 1945 tak Sir Chhotu Ram bhi bahut bade role mai thai, lekin unke chapter ko jaan bhuj kar nikal diya gya, but unke kamo ko mitaya nahi ja payega. #sirchhoturam
He was a great leader in punjab.
Master Tara Singh communal nahi the, woh partition nahi chahte the
Well said and love u
well unki bato se to kuch aur he lagta tha
You did not find any reference to Direct Action Day and Noakhali anywhere. What a student of history.
53:12
Best leeedrs sardaar patil singh❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
"Angrez aane ke pehle Hindustan mein koi Hindu Muslim fasad hamey nazar nahi aata."
Kya historian banega re tu.. 😂😂😂
Apko ata h nazar???
@@beinline2278muslman sarhan to darde hindu darde ghor. Mukk giya dona da jhagrha nikal piya koi hor.... Baba bulle shah apni kaafiyo me hindu Muslims ke jhagrhe kahani sunate hai.... Woh kiya hai
@@beinline2278ever heard of maharana pratap, chatrapati shivaji, his son chatrapati Sambhaji, sikh gurus?
@@beinline2278 ever heard of Chatrapati shivaji, Chatrapati Sambhaji, Maharana Pratap, Sikh Gurus? Why do you think they troubled them selves? Out of sheer boredom?
Muhgals jabardasti hinduon ko convert krke muslim bnate the tb kya sab sahi tha ?
I would suggest u read Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed, your own Pakistani scholar and understand the real issue.. very clearly Jinnah is one of central pieces moving and crafting a partition. In hindsight thankful…looking at Pakistan of today specially its political and military class no regrets. But your people are nice that’s whom we miss
bhai g iske elawa bhi kai logo ne booka likhi hai ap woh bhi parh lo, ya apko sirf woh cheez he parhni hai jisko ap mante ho, ajeeb
History never stops amazing us. Very deep discussion.🎉🎉🎉
Britishers were compelled to leave India by FDR (USA) in exchange for military help to UK during WWII. USA already had plans to expand its influence and end British empire's influence.
I am from India. Great neutral analysis.
Lord Mount Batton had put forward the offer of primeministership to Jinnah Sahib. Mr Jinnah replied , "Oh, it must be the cunning Gandhi."
It was obvious that he could be thrown out by Hindu majority at any time.
Tumhe pakistan Mubarak, khush raho ! We thank Sardar patel & Gandhi ji that India got rid of 25 crore radicalised human bombs .
@@dharmendrasingh-sm7hmyes! Thank god we r noting all having to drink cow urine for our health!
Why you are justifying the partition now?,we have accepted it . We have no qualm , we are happy with what we have.
It is a discussion of convenience hiding more than what it reveals. Freedom at Midnight has been quoted choosingly.
Yes 1936 Congress govt of Congress frightened Muslims of north India and deep into psyche of Muslims , forced to think over the counter strategy and cabinet mission plan seemed close to satisfy their aspirations but the option of leaving the loose federation was categorically rejected by Nehru which forced Jinnah to withdraw his approval for the plan but no any solid guarantees could be offered by congress thus no option was left for Jinnah except to revive his earlier demand of Pakistan so failure to stop division of India solely lies on the shoulders of congress leaders
Is pure video me is khitte ki Janmajaat majority ki Ray ki Kisi ne Parwah nahi ki.. Bas yahi resion hai ki me partition ke favor me hu .. 👁️👁️😎
Fantastic channel really loved your work and research,
Zeeshan says he is waiting for ishtiaqs book whereas ishtiaq.ahmed has been doing interviews on his published book on jinnah for months now. Zeeshan is a islamic and jinnah apologist and that is fine.
Partition was an excellent Idea by Zinnah and Mountbatten, Only blunder was done by Gandi and Nehru, they didn't implemented it in totality and complete transfer of population couldn't realised. The result of which Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh are still facing religious hatred and atrocities because of being non muslims and on the other hand remaining muslims are flourishing in India and dreaming of Islamisation of the country.
ACTUALLY, MOULANA AZAD WAS MORE VISIONARY AND CUNNING THAN ZINNAH, HE WAS THINKING OF USURPING OF WHOLE SUB CONTINENT AND WAS NOT HAPPY WITH ZINNAH THAT HE AGREED WITH MERE TWO PIECES OF THE LAND.
SO HE DELIBERATELY STOPPED MUSLIMS IN INDIA FOR ANOTHER PARTITION OR COMPLETE TAKE OVER, WHICH THEY ARE TRYING THEIR BEST.
Lol you need an access to the education
@@theworld9394He is right
Muslim in 1947 after partition 8.6% now 17% double in size
In numbers
3.21 cr muslims now 25 crore +
It's 7 time population growth
Hindus from 25 crore to 100 cr
4 time population increase
@@ajitdesai-i1v population growth doesn't mean actual growth. Tell me how many muslims are there on key positions in your army, government and administration.
@@hamzasohail5150 bahut hain list kam pad jayegi
Hindu dharm dekhkar kiski Kimat nahi karta
Father of indian nuclear programme homi bhabha parsi relegion
Biggest company of india TATA parsi
Founder of ISRO vikarm sarabhai jain relegion
Greatest army general Sam maneksha parsi
Leuitant general altaf hassnain
Are list di toh Kam pad jayegi
Shahrukh Salman Aamir Khan ko star hindus ne banaya hain
Muslims in india didn't want modern education
Madarasa teaching se kya progress karenge
Chandrayan 3 ka lander ka main engineer muslim hain
India is secular because
Hindu majority
@@hamzasohail5150 bahut hain 4 time president
Huye education ministers
Bahut badi list hain
As per indian constitution anybody can became anything
Pakistan me koi non-muslim president army chief nhi bn skta
You are headache for world and vassal state of USA
Muslims doesn't want to progress and go madarassa education
मे तो मनुष्य हैँ इसको इतिहास की जानकारी तो है मगर ये मजबूर है जानकारी छुपाने के लिए
The book is well researched and well written don't comment on this. True History.❤😢
13:01 who said that ??
Nice to hear you podcast like always.
Can he elaborate a bit more about Kahuta and RSS in partation. As i am from Kahuta so curious to know more about it.
Lord Wavel complained to Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan Tiwana C.M. ABOUT Sir Chhotu Ram's fiery speech in Panipat inviting JATs to burn crops keep Wheat only enough for their families if they don't get a adequate price. CM said: He would do that if he said so. MATTER CAME TO A COMPLETE HALT. Barrister M.S.Dahiya Bhatgamia Garhwale, Canada.
Brother you never talk about the killing of innocent Punjabis
Don't forget Mr. Kashmir that what goes around comes around
The main problem was that the public was not included and informed about the partition and all decisions were made by Hindu and Muslim politicians. And why that time politicians never knew that partition will create heavy problems like Riots, murders, kidnaping, rapes, robbery, blood partition etc
16:39 How do you come to this conversation about Mount Betain
Very good 🎉
14:44 kyu ?
History what a topic u hv chosen very nice and sensitive bt should not be biased
Lets not forget that violence was a near constant and increasing in frequency and intensity from the 1920s. The British started the divide but the division found great traction among even poor people who had no role and participation in the political process. The violence was present even when ML and Congress were working together and calling out for peace and cooperation. Rather than leaders driving the narrative, the conditions on the ground was leading the politicians towards these fateful decisions. I think any other decision such as making Jinnah PM would only have postponed but not averted the outcome. It is not sustainable to keep a people together when they have started thinking of themselves in separate national terms. Even if the leaders had gotten along and preserved a united India, eventually a divisive figure would have arrived and torn the country apart. A real life example of this wold be former Yugoslavia. A likely alternative outcome could have been multiple states with mixed populations like Punjab and Bengal thus avoiding a transfer of population. Unfortunately, in multi ethnic and multi religious societies, nationalism is inherently violent as it requires definition of the core group in permanent opposition/incompatibility with out groups and the myths that go along with it. I think this is what played out in the subcontinent.
Good Analysis
Nehru's socialism was one of the big problems for muslim leaders, and one, that tipped the scales in favour of partition, as most of the Muslim league leaders came from large land owning families and they were'nt very keen on playing the socialist ball. & In fact, the imposition of land sealing act shortly after independence in India proved their fears very true.
Nehru's socialism was also a huge cause of concern for the British, as this would mean India would likely align itself with USSR after the independence, and hence partition would have also ensured the protection of British interests in the region in Great game.
Informative video
very informative video zeeshan bhai
Personally, I think Partition was a RIGHT decision. But there should have been 100% transfer of population.
Hence, freedom for all, including Hindus, after 1400 yrs of unnecessary troubles.
We will get freedom again. One final struggle will come. We will be free.
Very good video 🎉❤🎉❤
geez i wish this had subtitles i love gandhi mountbatten was a fool and jinnah i know little about i could have learned alittle here
Very good vedio
I love your podcast thanks for detailed conversation love from india
دنیا کا کوئی بھی تنازعہ ہو، سیاسی ایجنڈا، جنگ، اسلام پسندوں کی سرگرمیاں، خالصتانی، ماؤ نواز، ہجومی تشدد، مذہبی جنون، ذات پرستی، دہشت گردی، فسادات، سرحد پرستی، دراندازی، محبت جہاد، جنگ۔ اسے ختم کرنا چاہتے ہیں، یہاں ایک تجویز ہے۔ اقوام متحدہ کے زیر کنٹرول دنیا کی زمین کو تمام مذاہب کی آبادی کے تناسب سے تقسیم کریں، مثلاً عیسائیت دنیا کا 30+%، اسلام 20+%، قدیم مذاہب 15+%، الحاد 15+%، دیگر مذاہب 20%، اس طرح، دنیا کی زمین کی 100% تقسیم مذہب کے تناسب سے ہونی چاہیے۔ تمام مذاہب کے لوگ اپنی الاٹ کی گئی زمین پر آباد ہوں گے اور آنے والی نسلیں بھی پرامن اور خوشگوار زندگی گزار سکیں گی۔ جتنے مذاہب، جتنے ممالک۔
Kindly make a podcast of Neta ji Subash Chand Bose
Yank Hamry Maoshrti Uoollom Idhar b khalat ha kia kia jocks hoy hamary SATH beeeeeeee khiar Qisa mukhtsar we are happy AND proud to be Pakistani ❤❤❤
Informative
Baalwala sir g ko bohat names yad hain itni yadasht Waly aksar bal k bagher hoty hain but he is with strong hairs
😂😂😂
Believe it or not bt India got independence only because of Subhas Chandra Bose.
😅
4:33 a rose between two thrones, must be Quaid’s wit not a blunder 😂
ایک پرانے بابا تھے راز داں کہتے ھیں گاندھی نےکہاتھا مسلمان آزادی کی لڑاٸ میں ھمارت ساتھ لڑے انہس انکا حق دو مگر ۔۔۔۔نہں دیا ا نہیں مسلمانوں کے ووٹ بنک سے ڈر تھا ۔
Kar leya ❤
Great knowledge of history 😂 awesome podcast
21:13 web series name ?
Freedom at midnight on SonyLiv
Hi
Partition was result of violation of Lucknow Pact by Motilal Nehru and Subhash Chandra Bose
Angrez partition 1857 se hi chahta tha. They realised that the unity of Hindus and Muslims as in 1857 was a dangerous thing so they started a systematic division. They encouraged the Hindus to get English education (although it was only for low clerical position) and made them get alienated from their heritage. They influenced some Muslim ulema who discouraged the Muslims from getting educated and the British would not employ them and slowly they became poorer and poorer. The British were also responsible for destroying the courtesan system and labelling them and pushing them into the flesh trade. Before 1857, these women held large properties and paid some of the highest amounts of tax. But since they had given help and shelter to the soldiers and others against the British, the British set about confiscating their lands and properties and punishing them. There is an old map of 1858 or so which has the divided India into Hindustan, Pakistan and Princistan. The name Pakistan was decided long ago. The British left a festering wound in the subcontinent.
Despite Jinna's likely early death, the British did not postpone the talks and allowed partition to be a reality. Within 3 months of partition Jinna died in Pakistan.
Please addtimestamps
Father of pakistan were
Ghandi,nehru
I live in the place from where British rule started. Do you know Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose ? Do you know Azad Hind Fauz ? I can tell you more than 60% of Muslims never supported the Pakistan proposal. Ispahani and Adamjee gave funds to the Muslim league. Both Jinnah and Gandhi were Gujaratis. So just chill.
Karl Marx has also written some articles about India where he has exposed Indian kings and analysed British exploitation along with figures and budgets for india.
seems like reading the script of sony's "freedom at midnight" with tweaks at jinnah's part.
Respected, Kindly study books of Mr Tariq Ali.
Thank you clearing our Concepts
No they did not clear your concepts, they completely distorted the facts. This long haired id-io-t from Lahore is not a historian. He is speaking out of his a-s-s. False equivalence. Read books, don't listen to Paki fake youtubers.
Horrible truth...thanks sir
❤❤❤❤❤
Sir mera aik sawal h k qauid e azam or laiqat ali khan ko alcohol addiction m dekhaya gia kia ye sahi tha
100%
Ham sandwich (pork) bhi khata tha wo
Sharabi b tha apne dost ki beti lekar bhag gea 😂😂
@@jais8370 wo to islami tareeka hai. Muhammad bhi apna dost Abu Bakr ki 6 saal ki beti se shadi kiya tha
Nice podcast ❤
Please note that the GDP of Maharaja Ranjit Singh's rule was more than 25% of world's GDP.
❤❤❤
بہت عمدہ ذیشان صاحب!
No all wrong, fake narrative. False equivalence. Jinnah was a dirt bag. India is a secular nation. India mein 1000s muslim ladkiyon ka forcible conversion nahin hota. Do not compare India with a disease called Pakistan.
Jinnah offered a blank cheque to Master Tara Singh.
Well, let us look at Ahmadias.
Pakistan resolution was drafted by an Ahmadia.
Creation of Pakistan was supported by Ahmadias.
And we know where Ahmadias stand today.
Sikhs escaped this fate.
Great leader m a Jinnah
True, the pork eater and wine drinker,
he is what he is and he was not hiding his lifestyle, it was for all to see.
Jinnah was a Brahmin his grand father converted to Muslim
Bhai isko history ka H bhi nahin aata.... Aadhi baaten jhooth bol raha..... aadhi hypothetical. Sirf jiinna ko justify kar raha.....
I slute you sir and your knowledge
😯😯😯...
🤔🤔🤔...
😢😢😢...
🌹🌹🌹...
Very sad very goood and very informative GUPPP SHUPPP...
Lekin
aik baaat aaap bataaana bhoool gaye k baqol Jinaaah Saaab Pakistaaan mainay aor meray Type writer na banaaaya hay aor may Moslim aksariat par Hindostaaan k mosalmanooon ko qurbaaan kar rahaaa hooon ???
A kaaash aisaaa na hotaaa ???
zabardast
Ab content creators sy loog history sunain gy wah
The British left because the USA had pressured them. And there was mutiny of the navy and Air force.
Jishan bhai Mount betten ki death 1979 me London ke samandar me ek boat me bethe ki kisi ne goli markar kar di thi os time me 10 th me padhta tha.
Fantastic.channel.but.full.of.reallity
Capture at midnight
I love 💕 sweetheart my Leader Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah
❤
Mahatma Gandhi jise koi nhi 😢❤
Jinmah tho reason hai aaj ki Pakistan 🇵🇰 ki halat k liye.
We are happy wo humare desk se nikal gayen.
Simply put ,divide and rule by British
Muslim league did mistake during British era by recognising Jinnah as leader of Indan Muslim. As consequenc millions of Muslim during 1947 migration.
How many Hindus died under i&/@mic rule ?
Sar aap lagta hai aapane cabinet mission ke bare mein Puri jankari nahin liye. Teen tarah ke state banae gaye the unmen se 10 varsh pakshat alag hone ka Adhikar Diya gaya tha jiski vajah se Muslim bahul ilake Pakistan ki taraf ho sakte the yah Jawaharlal Nehru ko aashram ka thi
akaalee mishan yojana mein bhaarat ko teen samudaayon mein vibhaajit karane kee baat thee:
grup e (hindoo bahul kshetr)
grup bee (muslim bahul pashchimee kshetr)
grup see (muslim bahul poorvee kshetr)
neharoo ko yah dar tha ki is desh kee ekata aur akhandata mein khatara paida ho sakata hai, kyonki muslim leeg kee is yojana ka upayog karake deshon ko vibhaajit kiya ja sakata hai.