Try Pianote FREE for 30-Days: www.pianote.com/affiliate/davidbennett 🎹 and consider subscribing to their RUclips channel: ruclips.net/user/PianoteOfficial 🎼
There’s also an advantage when using conductors. Its significantly easier to do a slow cut time feel rather than fast 4/4. It’s also clearer to the ensemble
In my strings class in 7th grade we played “Drunken Sailor” in 2/2 at 104 half notes per minute, and at the end it slowed down to half the tempo, conducted in good old 4/4 at 104 quarter notes per minute.
Something that even a lot of Brazilian musicians seem to get wrong is that most Samba is actually also in 2/2, with the second beat being emphasized. Interesting to learn how country can be kind of similar to samba in this way!
Yes, a lot of Bossa Nova tunes are notated wrongly in 4/4. The more I get into the genre, the more I despise the tyranny of 4/4. And iReal Pro puts most tracks into 4/4, my looper defaults to 4/4 and my DAW loves 4/4 above all. 😖
@@Rodrigoooous well, to be honest, I don't really know the actual difference between 2/2 and 2/4. What I know is that Samba is counted in groups of two.
@@vitormelomedeiros fellow br here, I had the same doubt over here. but the explanation of using larger value notes was a bit satisfying for that question, although David didn't adressed it
I got into your channel recently and right now I'm binge watching the time sig videos, it's kind of hilarious to be getting more and more complex, all the way up to 19, and then falling back down to 2/2.
Very fast pieces are sometimes counted "one in a bar". I have heard conductors say this before starting a piece to indicate how they will be conducting it.
@@chrisisbell3080 Occasionally fast pieces are even counted one beat for every TWO bars, believe it or not. Beethoven Harp Quartet third movement middle (C major) section, for example. One recording I checked goes about 184 bars per minute so it's more convenient to beat every 2 bars (92 per minute). It's in 3/4 so that's about 552 quarter notes per minute, the fastest I've seen.
I always interpreted Maxwell's Silver Hammer and Jolene as a half time 4/4 and Country Roads as double time so learning they’re actually 2/2 is cool to know. Always enjoy these kinds of videos for that reason, you always learn a lot more than you already do
@@zzzaphod8507and good chance no one making real musical decisions on the original compositions even wrote down a time signature (maybe someone writing auxiliary parts for the studio but good chance Dolly or her main rhythm players would have done it all by ear).
@@stephenbeck7222 Agree. In pop/rock/country etc. the people involved with writing the songs don't generally bother notating sheet music, and I take less stock in decisions made later on by a transcriber or arranger, in terms of which time signature to choose.
Glad you went over this topic. Would appreciate a follow-up video where you address notating the same piece in 2/4 (where note values would be halved) vs 2/2. I know some of the differences in choosing the time signature likely come from style and convention, so it would be good to hear about that as well. Thanks!
That was an awesome and eyes opening episode, especially that comparison of that great song by John Denver in 2/2 time signature vs. that of 4/4, Many Thanks😊😊😊
That's really down to the backing that is more driving in the 4/4 version than its 2/2 counterpart. The phrasing and articulation of the vocal line is still very much the same in both renditions.
I might notate Country Roads in 4/4 time, with the bars twice as long (e.g., the first full bar of the excerpt starting on "roads" and the second one starting on "home"), so "roads" would be a dotted quarter instead of a whole note tied to a half note. Not sure if that has been considered. Notating it in 2/2 misses that some "downbeats" are stronger than others (the beginning of "roads" is stronger than the third beat of "roads"). Same with Folsom Prison Blues: "hear", "the", "train" etc. can all be eighth notes and that excerpt can be 3 bars of 4/4 instead of 6 of 2/2.
Very clearly explained . 2 2 is perhaps the time signature that corresponds most closely to the rhythmn of walking which might be one of the roots of rhythmn
I'm quite surprised that you didn't mention any marches, specifically the ones by John Phillip Sousa, those are always in cut time and are a perfect example of cut time vs 4/4
I was thinking of this as well! Some marches use a triplet feel notated in 6/8, but duple time marches use cut time so often that I've even heard it called "march time" before. As for Sousa, I'm indifferent on the "circusy" sound, my beef with him is that I'm a horn player, and thus am contractually bound to be annoyed at the thought of him.
@@MyRackley well maybe I'm a bit biased because of Monty Python but if you compare how his marches sounds compared to German, Russian, Finnish and Swedish marches, which I think sound more grander and noble, Sousa kinda falls a bit flat imo. With that being said though I still think marches such as the liberty bell and stars and stripes forever are fun to play
Great video. When translating it to 4/4 at the beginning you doubled the tempo, but i was feeling it more like couting the first two 2/2 bars as one 4/4 bar, and doing so i wouldnt be doubling the tempo but simply couting in a 4 way instead of 2. It also helps with the strong beat situation once it is not uncommon to accentuate the 1 and 3. At least it sounds comfortable for me. I would definitely write it in 4/4 if i was given the task
Edit: I made an error in misinterpreting 2/2 as 2/4, so the below message is valid for a different argument and not this video. Been a long week, I need a drink lol: Jolene doesn't feel like 2/4 (different than 2/2), I hear it as fast 4/4 because of the way the phrases sound. The opening acoustic fingerpicking riff especially happens over 2 bars of 4/4, setting the feel of that throughout. Not to mention the phrases in the verse and chorus are 8 bars long (repeated, making the structure of 16 bars, etc). The overwhelming majority of musicians I know hear it in 4/4, and most likely average listener. Trust your ears, don't always trust the trabscriptions on the internet, haha.
@johnmc3862 edit: see edit in previous message: 2/4 has accent/down-beat only on beat one, whereas 4/4 has the biggest downbeat on beat one, with a medium accent on beat three. It gives the default feel of common time, whereas 2/4 feels more like a march rhythm due to the uniform nature of the pulses. There is only one pulse in 2/2 which sounds as "STRONG weak STRONG weak" whereas 4/4 has two pulses (aka duple pulse) and sounds like "STRONG weak MEDIUM weak". Listen to where the accents occur in the lyrics of Jolene and how the phrases are sung, it's definitely in 4/4 based on my description of why 2/2 and 4/4 are different
@user-qu5fp6or1z oh yes you are correct and I made an error, I should have specified 2/4 when I made the "march" analogy. Which 2/4 and 4/4 both have different feels than 2/2, my mistake
I really enjoyed this video, David! I was hoping you would do a video on 2/2 time and was very excited to see this. I remember right before the pandemic hit, I was gonna be in the pit band for a production of School of Rock the musical that my music school was doing, and one of the songs, “Where Did The Rock Go?” was notated in 2/2 time
Excellent job Dave !!!👍 I’ve always been a stickler about these matters, but many are desensitized to it. Kudos and keep up the great work in music education! 👨🏻
Hi David Bennett Piano, I have struggled for years to understand how and why and when to use 2/2 notation versus 4/4 notation. Thank you for this explanation, but it hasn't really done it for me. For example, in your longest and most detailed example, Country Roads, you give audio examples of it in 2/2 time, but you've changed the way it sounds for your example (you've removed the percussive hits that happen on both "and" counts). And then when you give the audio demonstration in 4/4 time, you've added equal emphasis chord and percussive hits on every quarter note, which is something that is rarely done in any kind of music. What the song actually does on the original popular recording is give base notes on the 1 and the 2 counts, but give various percussive hits on all four quarter notes "1" "and" "2" "and". These percussive hits emphasize "1" the most with the lower pitches, also strongly emphasizing "2" with lower pitches, but emphasize both "and" counts about equally with higher pitched percussion including finger snaps. This pattern is also very common in pop 4/4 time. I suspect that the written time signatures 2/2 versus 4/4 have a greater effect in the performers mind and thinking while playing than they do on the actual sound of the music, so when people that are very musically literate like yourself hear music that is in 2/2 time versus 4/4, if you are able to tell whether it's 2/2 or 4/4 then the same kind of mentality happens in your mind when you listen. As you listen "in" 2/2 or "in" 4/4, your mind greatly exaggerates the distinctiveness of the 2/2 versus 4/4 sound and feel, where as to a musically dyslexic person like myself, most of the time music sounds very similar or identical between 2/2 and 4/4. For me, as a result when I try to play music in 2/2 or 4/4, I struggle to know how to play them differently. For example, here is what Country Roads actually sounds like, and you and your viewers will note that it sounds almost exactly halfway between your two 2/2 and 4/4 examples: ruclips.net/video/1vrEljMfXYo/видео.html
Maggie's Farm is interesting in that it's solely the bass guitar that gives it that 2/2 quality. The drummer is doing a standard 4/4 pattern. Which goes to show how important instrumentation is.
Africa by Toto uses 2/2. It is able to have odd numbers of bars without it sounding weird. If it was in 4/4, it wouldn't add up and sound like something's missing.
You don't answer the question I was scratching my head about : why 2/2 and not 2/4 considering it's always quite uptempo and that the half-note (or minim) is quite a long note. If you play a very fast country song, why not even 2/8.... Please answer ;)
2/2 because of the emphasis of the 1st and 3 rd beats... 2/4 would be the same as 4/4 with twice as many bars/measures and 2/8 the BPM/tempo would be cut in half to get the same results as 2/4 or 4/4. (pertaining to the songs mentioned in the video).
A fun example of a metal band using 2/2 is Sabaton, whose songs often have a march-like tempo to go with their lyrical themes of military history - 'Carolus Rex' and 'The Last Stand' being two such examples :)
I was always told this was called 'Marching Time' and of course a lot of big band songs from the WW2 years etc. yield to that. :) Another great video, thanks!
In a way, 2/2 is closer to 2/4, with each note value doubled. Both count in 2 beats per measure. 4/4 counts in 4. Rach III in 2/4 would then sound the same (adjusted for note length and tempo), whereas 4/4 does not.
El 2/2 tiene mucho sentido y -por tanto- y utilización en la música académica, pero en la música popular no tanto, la mayoría de las canciones (incluídas las de los ejemplos) se pueden escribir en 2/4 sin problema.
Don't know how much this counts, but reading Breve to me (breh-veh) reads as "half" purely since I'm a barista at my day job, and a latte breve is a latte made with steamed cream (half-and-half in NA) -- I don't speak Italian myself, but there's a correlation there
What would really help me as a complete beginner in music is to have a metronome click on the beats. I've watched (and enjoyed!) a number of your time signature vids and I always wish you'd played a version with clicks to follow, as well as a non clicked version :-)
Some sea chanties are also in 2/2, for example “Drunken Sailor” (at least how I learned it in 7th grade strings class, which was my first introduction to 2/2 written as such, rather than a C with a line through it) and “The Wellerman”.
I like to think Waylon Jennings did this a lot with his songs. As a drummer I always called it the “Waylon Beat”. I can think of so many of his songs that have that 2/2 feel or “cut time.”
I just realized a lot of modern dubstep is in 2/2 due to the kick and snare usually hitting on beat 1 and 3, as well as people headbanging at raves moving on beat 1 and 3 as well. Of course some will still be in 4/4 though due to other percussion or basses having a 4/4 feel. Some pretty good examples are versa - the pit, samplifire & evilnoiz - helheim, papa khan - rain, and akeos - soul material
Your videos are amazing. I've been watching and taking notes on all your videos about chord progressions to break me out of a songwriter's block. You're always looking for ideas: I noticed that in many of the examples here, the music is notated less "accurately" than the actual song, intentionally of course. Why does sheet music write music without the swing and specificity of the actual music? For instance, in Country Roads, the notes that are actually sung are not precisely notated where the singer sings them but actually in a more "robotic" and mechanical way that would sound strange if the singer actually sang them that way. Maybe you could do a video on this? Thank you!
In a lot of music of the classical and romantic periods (c. 1750-1910), there is a very big difference between the performance of common and ‘alla breve’ time.
good video, I recommend that you analyze the music of the band the Wise Tone because it uses time changes as in the theme Waste of time 5/4 to 4/4... They also make time changes as in the How Long theme from 100bpm to 75bpm etc. They apply many harmonizations with interesting style and similar to The Beatles, you could start listening to it and see how it is
I'm Italian, the correct pronunciation of "Alla breve" is "Alla brɛvɛ" (like bed is bɛd). By the way "breve" means short referred to a time duration: "a very short song" is "una canzone molto breve"
I thought exactly the same thing - and yet (in the UK) we pronounce "semibreve" to rhyme with "leave". But I would always pronounce "breve" like "Rev". He also said "tempos" where I would say "tempi".
Embarrassing confession I guess, but I was in school band/other performing groups from ages 10 to 22 and have engaged with music as an occasional hobby since then and 2/2 was never really explained well to me and remained the one basic music theory thing that I've never been able to explain. So this FINALLY made it made sense. Earlier today I was driving and was listening to my Liked Songs playlist on Spotify and had two 2/2 songs appear back-to-back (Mucho Mungo/Mt Elga by Harry Nilsson, which actually switches between 4/4 and 2/2, and On the Bound by Fiona Apple) and I was like ohhhhhhhhh I get it now
Total music agnostic here. I find you videos very informative. I'd be interested to know if you have done a video about the various symbols used on sheet music and what they mean.
Even as (choral) singer it took a _long_ time to get it. It doesn't make any difference how we sing, it's just what the instrumentalists are doing with the rhythm.
Another gem! Here’s my question- i always learned the 2/2 or cut time signature was just a way to write music in the more readable form than 4/4- Would you do the great example of how it’s more than that. I find myself counting 2/2 time as 1+2+3+4+ across two measures…because that tends to lineup with the two in the four on the drum beat. But when you played the 4 beats as would normally be played on country road I was like that’s just awful! Lol. Nice work again
Also, before recorded music, musical notation wasn't the only way of recording how the composer intended to be played as human memory also provided an account for those who heard it under the baton of the composer.
By this definition of 2 2, though, with a strong and weak beat, the drum part of most songs in 4 4 would be in 2 2. Like Billie Jean, for example, the emphasis is on those two beats, so it's pretty much played in 2 2, but notated in 4 4 eother way. Which goes to show that a time signature, lile chords or modes, is something you play and not sonething that's intrinsic to the music.
You know your whole life is a lie when you've been counting most popular tracks as 4/4 and learning years later from David that these time signatures can exist outside classical music
Also all of the Latin American music can preferably be written in 2/2 since the feel of the music is really two and f.i. in Cuban music the clave can be turned around by just adding or leaving a bar instead of having to change the time signature...
Great video! But the thing is you never mentioned 2/4 or even 2/8 time. Most of the songs you showed were not of slow tempo and I would say I felt a lot of them as more of a 2/4 personally.
hello david. could you make a video on how to figure out which chord extension to use. there are so many that sound amazing but I have no idea which ones to use for my chord progressions
As someone who plays by "ear", this is something I wish I would have studied harder as a youth in band class, instead of just memorizing the feel and sound of the song. Time signatures always seemed like rubbish to me but the reality is is that it helps to understand how the music really flows.
This video made me realise that Danny Elfman's "This is Halloween" (for The Nightmare Before Christmas) is probably in 2/2 time (or at least can be transcribed to 2/2 rather easily?) Time signatures are going to be the death of me tbh
It's so weird, because generally, being a math GOD, 2/2 and 4/4 are the exact same, 1. So is 3/4 and 6/8. I think the difference is that one is more swing, and the other is more upbeat and straight
the counting is different. in 4/4 you count 4 notes and in 2/2 you count 2 beats. and with 3/4 you have 3 groups of 2 notes, so 3 beats and in 6/8 you have 2 groups of 3, so 2 beats in a bar but they still take the same amount of time, the feel is just different.
@@zarzee8925 depends. 6/8 has a swing feel but the notes themself are not necessarily swung. dividing a beat into 3 feels like a waltz or swing but the notes can still be played straight, the distance between them can still stay the same.
It’s also common to find polka music in cut time. One example is Schultz’s Polka by Western Senators. That’s the most obvious example. But a more subtle one, now that I’m looking is Rosamunde Polka by Oktoberfest Party. I originally thought it was in 8/8 time. But now that I know what 2/2 time is, I know that just about every polka I’ve heard is in cut time.
I'm so glad you did one of these without a Radiohead songs; usually you spend a minute explaining the theory and showing in abstract form then just when I think I understand you cut to some wailing noise and random notes and claim 'You can hear X in this song by Radiohead' and all I can hear is someone undergoing dental treatment using household appliances.
Yay and nay. From my personal practical standpoint, especially last weekend when I encountered this problem. 😉 In a 4/4 I would expect to hear bassdrum on beat 1 and 3 and snare on 2 and 4. In 2/2 bass drum would be on beat 1 and snare on beat 2. The same effect would be half time in the 4/4 you showed on screen. But to accommodate for the 4/4 notation I would use eight notes as shortest notes in the score so that BD and SN would hit at the same phrases when notated in 2/2. And in the examples of Johnny Cash Bob Dylon you can hear the SN hit 2 and 4. So imho it‘s the bass with the change from root to fifth that brings in the 2/2 feeling. So for me, hearing a 4/4 beat in a 2/2 notation would confuse me more than I‘m willing to confess. 🙂
You're mainly referencing rock music conventions here. Brazilian music, e.g. Samba and Bossa Nova, has a lighter 2/2 feel, and drumkits are different from those used in rock, to express this. Have a listen to Rafael Barata - there are a few videos of him on RUclips.
@@MyRackley I had the problem, that the medley went from 4/4 over 6/8 to 2/2. So everytime the tempo was adjusted to adapt to the beat. That way the overall feel stayed almost the same, but in the 2/2 section a half note had the same length as a fourth note in the 4/4 section. Little confused I was. To me that didn‘t make the score more readable, just measures shorter.
Try Pianote FREE for 30-Days: www.pianote.com/affiliate/davidbennett 🎹 and consider subscribing to their RUclips channel: ruclips.net/user/PianoteOfficial 🎼
There’s also an advantage when using conductors. Its significantly easier to do a slow cut time feel rather than fast 4/4. It’s also clearer to the ensemble
In my strings class in 7th grade we played “Drunken Sailor” in 2/2 at 104 half notes per minute, and at the end it slowed down to half the tempo, conducted in good old 4/4 at 104 quarter notes per minute.
Something that even a lot of Brazilian musicians seem to get wrong is that most Samba is actually also in 2/2, with the second beat being emphasized. Interesting to learn how country can be kind of similar to samba in this way!
Yes, a lot of Bossa Nova tunes are notated wrongly in 4/4. The more I get into the genre, the more I despise the tyranny of 4/4. And iReal Pro puts most tracks into 4/4, my looper defaults to 4/4 and my DAW loves 4/4 above all. 😖
I was taught that samba is in 2/4
You're a great teacher, knowing to answer the ultimate Why?
@@Rodrigoooous well, to be honest, I don't really know the actual difference between 2/2 and 2/4. What I know is that Samba is counted in groups of two.
@@vitormelomedeiros fellow br here, I had the same doubt over here. but the explanation of using larger value notes was a bit satisfying for that question, although David didn't adressed it
Like other comments, would appreciate a video on the difference between 2/2 and 2/4. Not so much the theory, but the feel and articulation.
I got into your channel recently and right now I'm binge watching the time sig videos, it's kind of hilarious to be getting more and more complex, all the way up to 19, and then falling back down to 2/2.
I love how Country Roads instantly becomes rock with 4/4 time xD
Rocky Roads
I'm waiting for the 1/1 time signature video
john cages 4'33" is on 0/1 time
Borodin's 2nd Symphony 2nd movement is in 1/1. About 108 bpm, so 432 quarter notes per minute.
I once conducted a piece that had many different time signatures including one bar of 1/4. Fun!
Very fast pieces are sometimes counted "one in a bar". I have heard conductors say this before starting a piece to indicate how they will be conducting it.
@@chrisisbell3080 Occasionally fast pieces are even counted one beat for every TWO bars, believe it or not. Beethoven Harp Quartet third movement middle (C major) section, for example. One recording I checked goes about 184 bars per minute so it's more convenient to beat every 2 bars (92 per minute). It's in 3/4 so that's about 552 quarter notes per minute, the fastest I've seen.
Could you do a video on waltzes?
The best part for him is that John Lennon loved waltzes.
3/4
Good idea 😊
@@DavidBennettPiano Eliott Smith neeeds to be there!
@@DenKulesteSomFinstotally, he did write so many songs in 3/4
ok ive always wondered what that "dup dup" sound was, now I know its 2/2 time.
Dont get it. I need a VERY patient teacher in front of me-a piano and about 3 hours
I always interpreted Maxwell's Silver Hammer and Jolene as a half time 4/4 and Country Roads as double time so learning they’re actually 2/2 is cool to know. Always enjoy these kinds of videos for that reason, you always learn a lot more than you already do
Unless the songwriter labeled it as 2/2, not sure I would say they are "actually 2/2". There's often more than one reasonable way of notating it.
@@zzzaphod8507and good chance no one making real musical decisions on the original compositions even wrote down a time signature (maybe someone writing auxiliary parts for the studio but good chance Dolly or her main rhythm players would have done it all by ear).
@@stephenbeck7222 Agree. In pop/rock/country etc. the people involved with writing the songs don't generally bother notating sheet music, and I take less stock in decisions made later on by a transcriber or arranger, in terms of which time signature to choose.
The official story I heard was "...Dixie, double 4 time"
@@GizzyDillespee I approve of that reference, great song
Glad you went over this topic. Would appreciate a follow-up video where you address notating the same piece in 2/4 (where note values would be halved) vs 2/2. I know some of the differences in choosing the time signature likely come from style and convention, so it would be good to hear about that as well. Thanks!
Note value isn't halved in 2/4. The bar/measure length is halved...
We use to call this a polka beat(oompha oompha)
Japanese girl with blue hair holding a vegetable in her hand and singing in a high pitch (ACTIVATED) 🎶 Levan Polkka… 🎵
That was an awesome and eyes opening episode, especially that comparison of that great song by John Denver in 2/2 time signature vs. that of 4/4, Many Thanks😊😊😊
That's really down to the backing that is more driving in the 4/4 version than its 2/2 counterpart. The phrasing and articulation of the vocal line is still very much the same in both renditions.
In 4/4 it sounded like Hawkwind😊
I might notate Country Roads in 4/4 time, with the bars twice as long (e.g., the first full bar of the excerpt starting on "roads" and the second one starting on "home"), so "roads" would be a dotted quarter instead of a whole note tied to a half note. Not sure if that has been considered. Notating it in 2/2 misses that some "downbeats" are stronger than others (the beginning of "roads" is stronger than the third beat of "roads"). Same with Folsom Prison Blues: "hear", "the", "train" etc. can all be eighth notes and that excerpt can be 3 bars of 4/4 instead of 6 of 2/2.
Very clearly explained . 2 2 is perhaps the time signature that corresponds most closely to the rhythmn of walking which might be one of the roots of rhythmn
0:37 beatles example
I'm quite surprised that you didn't mention any marches, specifically the ones by John Phillip Sousa, those are always in cut time and are a perfect example of cut time vs 4/4
I was thinking that too except for the Sousa part, his marches sound too circusy
@@torstenlandsson9757 I don't like them either lol, I just think they were important to be mentioned
@@torstenlandsson9757 As in Monty Python?
I was thinking of this as well! Some marches use a triplet feel notated in 6/8, but duple time marches use cut time so often that I've even heard it called "march time" before.
As for Sousa, I'm indifferent on the "circusy" sound, my beef with him is that I'm a horn player, and thus am contractually bound to be annoyed at the thought of him.
@@MyRackley well maybe I'm a bit biased because of Monty Python but if you compare how his marches sounds compared to German, Russian, Finnish and Swedish marches, which I think sound more grander and noble, Sousa kinda falls a bit flat imo. With that being said though I still think marches such as the liberty bell and stars and stripes forever are fun to play
Great video. When translating it to 4/4 at the beginning you doubled the tempo, but i was feeling it more like couting the first two 2/2 bars as one 4/4 bar, and doing so i wouldnt be doubling the tempo but simply couting in a 4 way instead of 2. It also helps with the strong beat situation once it is not uncommon to accentuate the 1 and 3. At least it sounds comfortable for me. I would definitely write it in 4/4 if i was given the task
Jack Bruce's "As You Said" has one bar of 1/8 in it. It is used perfectly and cannot be omitted in any way.
the point is not comparing 2/2 with 4/4, but 2/2 with 4/2. That's where the difference is very obscure or non existent
Edit: I made an error in misinterpreting 2/2 as 2/4, so the below message is valid for a different argument and not this video. Been a long week, I need a drink lol:
Jolene doesn't feel like 2/4 (different than 2/2), I hear it as fast 4/4 because of the way the phrases sound. The opening acoustic fingerpicking riff especially happens over 2 bars of 4/4, setting the feel of that throughout. Not to mention the phrases in the verse and chorus are 8 bars long (repeated, making the structure of 16 bars, etc). The overwhelming majority of musicians I know hear it in 4/4, and most likely average listener. Trust your ears, don't always trust the trabscriptions on the internet, haha.
2/2 and 4/4 are the same, it just depends how you write the music.
@johnmc3862 edit: see edit in previous message:
2/4 has accent/down-beat only on beat one, whereas 4/4 has the biggest downbeat on beat one, with a medium accent on beat three. It gives the default feel of common time, whereas 2/4 feels more like a march rhythm due to the uniform nature of the pulses. There is only one pulse in 2/2 which sounds as "STRONG weak STRONG weak" whereas 4/4 has two pulses (aka duple pulse) and sounds like "STRONG weak MEDIUM weak". Listen to where the accents occur in the lyrics of Jolene and how the phrases are sung, it's definitely in 4/4 based on my description of why 2/2 and 4/4 are different
@@OurgasmComrade If you want the same emphasis on 1 and 3 maybe it should just be written as 2/4 instead. Jolene definitely sounds like 4/4 to me.
@user-qu5fp6or1z oh yes you are correct and I made an error, I should have specified 2/4 when I made the "march" analogy. Which 2/4 and 4/4 both have different feels than 2/2, my mistake
Great comparison of 2/2 and 4/4 time. I have always struggled with that. Thank you for making it much clearer for me 👍
I really enjoyed this video, David! I was hoping you would do a video on 2/2 time and was very excited to see this.
I remember right before the pandemic hit, I was gonna be in the pit band for a production of School of Rock the musical that my music school was doing, and one of the songs, “Where Did The Rock Go?” was notated in 2/2 time
Excellent job Dave !!!👍 I’ve always been a stickler about these matters, but many are desensitized to it. Kudos and keep up the great work in music education! 👨🏻
Mirror in the Bathroom by the English Beat is a great example of 2/2 time.
Hi David Bennett Piano, I have struggled for years to understand how and why and when to use 2/2 notation versus 4/4 notation. Thank you for this explanation, but it hasn't really done it for me. For example, in your longest and most detailed example, Country Roads, you give audio examples of it in 2/2 time, but you've changed the way it sounds for your example (you've removed the percussive hits that happen on both "and" counts). And then when you give the audio demonstration in 4/4 time, you've added equal emphasis chord and percussive hits on every quarter note, which is something that is rarely done in any kind of music. What the song actually does on the original popular recording is give base notes on the 1 and the 2 counts, but give various percussive hits on all four quarter notes "1" "and" "2" "and". These percussive hits emphasize "1" the most with the lower pitches, also strongly emphasizing "2" with lower pitches, but emphasize both "and" counts about equally with higher pitched percussion including finger snaps. This pattern is also very common in pop 4/4 time. I suspect that the written time signatures 2/2 versus 4/4 have a greater effect in the performers mind and thinking while playing than they do on the actual sound of the music, so when people that are very musically literate like yourself hear music that is in 2/2 time versus 4/4, if you are able to tell whether it's 2/2 or 4/4 then the same kind of mentality happens in your mind when you listen. As you listen "in" 2/2 or "in" 4/4, your mind greatly exaggerates the distinctiveness of the 2/2 versus 4/4 sound and feel, where as to a musically dyslexic person like myself, most of the time music sounds very similar or identical between 2/2 and 4/4. For me, as a result when I try to play music in 2/2 or 4/4, I struggle to know how to play them differently. For example, here is what Country Roads actually sounds like, and you and your viewers will note that it sounds almost exactly halfway between your two 2/2 and 4/4 examples: ruclips.net/video/1vrEljMfXYo/видео.html
Maggie's Farm is interesting in that it's solely the bass guitar that gives it that 2/2 quality. The drummer is doing a standard 4/4 pattern. Which goes to show how important instrumentation is.
Africa by Toto uses 2/2. It is able to have odd numbers of bars without it sounding weird. If it was in 4/4, it wouldn't add up and sound like something's missing.
You don't answer the question I was scratching my head about : why 2/2 and not 2/4 considering it's always quite uptempo and that the half-note (or minim) is quite a long note.
If you play a very fast country song, why not even 2/8....
Please answer ;)
2/2 because of the emphasis of the 1st and 3 rd beats... 2/4 would be the same as 4/4 with twice as many bars/measures and 2/8 the BPM/tempo would be cut in half to get the same results as 2/4 or 4/4. (pertaining to the songs mentioned in the video).
A fun example of a metal band using 2/2 is Sabaton, whose songs often have a march-like tempo to go with their lyrical themes of military history - 'Carolus Rex' and 'The Last Stand' being two such examples :)
I'm so inept that I have to learn the rhythm first, and then worry about "emphasis" afterwards...can't do it any other way...
Can't wait for the video about songs is 1/1 time!
I was always told this was called 'Marching Time' and of course a lot of big band songs from the WW2 years etc. yield to that. :) Another great video, thanks!
I understood march (and polka) time to be 2/4, admittedly an even subtler difference.
supergrass sometimes i make you sad is a good 2/2 example
fuck it, let's just call everything 1/1 and go for drinks
Very interesting! Never heard of this concept before
In a way, 2/2 is closer to 2/4, with each note value doubled. Both count in 2 beats per measure. 4/4 counts in 4. Rach III in 2/4 would then sound the same (adjusted for note length and tempo), whereas 4/4 does not.
this. 2/2 is just 2/4 with doubled note values. It has very little to do with 4/4.
El 2/2 tiene mucho sentido y -por tanto- y utilización en la música académica, pero en la música popular no tanto, la mayoría de las canciones (incluídas las de los ejemplos) se pueden escribir en 2/4 sin problema.
Hello!
Don't know how much this counts, but reading Breve to me (breh-veh) reads as "half" purely since I'm a barista at my day job, and a latte breve is a latte made with steamed cream (half-and-half in NA) -- I don't speak Italian myself, but there's a correlation there
Just a heads up, "alla breve" is pronounced "alla brae-vae"
What would really help me as a complete beginner in music is to have a metronome click on the beats. I've watched (and enjoyed!) a number of your time signature vids and I always wish you'd played a version with clicks to follow, as well as a non clicked version :-)
Some sea chanties are also in 2/2, for example “Drunken Sailor” (at least how I learned it in 7th grade strings class, which was my first introduction to 2/2 written as such, rather than a C with a line through it) and “The Wellerman”.
You didn't even mention marches, the old 2/2 staple. Very good! I'm tired of that chestnut!
Very interesting... thanks so much
I like to think Waylon Jennings did this a lot with his songs. As a drummer I always called it the “Waylon Beat”. I can think of so many of his songs that have that 2/2 feel or “cut time.”
“As you can hear, country roads in 4/4 absolutely slaaaaaps.”
This blew my mind!! I had never heard of it!
I'm used to this being referred to as 2/4, not 2/2.
I just realized a lot of modern dubstep is in 2/2 due to the kick and snare usually hitting on beat 1 and 3, as well as people headbanging at raves moving on beat 1 and 3 as well. Of course some will still be in 4/4 though due to other percussion or basses having a 4/4 feel. Some pretty good examples are versa - the pit, samplifire & evilnoiz - helheim, papa khan - rain, and akeos - soul material
They call it half time and i wonder what is the difference between cut time and half time
@@ilyaprofit most likely because the drum beat is usually a 4 on the floor style beat (commonly used in techno or house) at half speed, or half time
funnily enough i just played at a concert (orchestra) where basically every piece was in 2/2
Your videos are amazing. I've been watching and taking notes on all your videos about chord progressions to break me out of a songwriter's block. You're always looking for ideas: I noticed that in many of the examples here, the music is notated less "accurately" than the actual song, intentionally of course. Why does sheet music write music without the swing and specificity of the actual music? For instance, in Country Roads, the notes that are actually sung are not precisely notated where the singer sings them but actually in a more "robotic" and mechanical way that would sound strange if the singer actually sang them that way. Maybe you could do a video on this? Thank you!
great stuff!
Thanks!
In a lot of music of the classical and romantic periods (c. 1750-1910), there is a very big difference between the performance of common and ‘alla breve’ time.
Worth noting that a large portion of American military marches are/were written in 2/2.
Country Roads in 4/4 sounds like indie rock
Wow, I had no idea Jolene is 2/2 ~ a great lesson today David, thanks!
This never made sense to me before. Thank you.
What’s the difference between 2/2 and 2/4? Is there any reason to choose one over the other?
... I always thought that most ballet music is in 2/2 or tutu time signature! 😂. Good vid! Thx
🩰
Can confirm country roads are in West Virginia as someone newly living here.
good video, I recommend that you analyze the music of the band the Wise Tone because it uses time changes as in the theme Waste of time 5/4 to 4/4... They also make time changes as in the How Long theme from 100bpm to 75bpm etc. They apply many harmonizations with interesting style and similar to The Beatles, you could start listening to it and see how it is
I was looking forwards to a composition in cut time
I'm Italian, the correct pronunciation of "Alla breve" is "Alla brɛvɛ" (like bed is bɛd).
By the way "breve" means short referred to a time duration: "a very short song" is "una canzone molto breve"
I thought exactly the same thing - and yet (in the UK) we pronounce "semibreve" to rhyme with "leave". But I would always pronounce "breve" like "Rev". He also said "tempos" where I would say "tempi".
@@MyRackley This is because Italian and English are different languages. Different languages pronounce words differently.
Thank you so much
Embarrassing confession I guess, but I was in school band/other performing groups from ages 10 to 22 and have engaged with music as an occasional hobby since then and 2/2 was never really explained well to me and remained the one basic music theory thing that I've never been able to explain. So this FINALLY made it made sense. Earlier today I was driving and was listening to my Liked Songs playlist on Spotify and had two 2/2 songs appear back-to-back (Mucho Mungo/Mt Elga by Harry Nilsson, which actually switches between 4/4 and 2/2, and On the Bound by Fiona Apple) and I was like ohhhhhhhhh I get it now
Fascinating.
Merci beaucoup. C'est une révélation !
That was excellent.
Total music agnostic here. I find you videos very informative. I'd be interested to know if you have done a video about the various symbols used on sheet music and what they mean.
Look for his tier list (?)
What comes to mind anyway.
I watched the whole video and I still don't understand how 2/2 is any different than 4/4 😂 I suppose that's why I'm not a musician
Even as (choral) singer it took a _long_ time to get it.
It doesn't make any difference how we sing, it's just what the instrumentalists are doing with the rhythm.
Thank you so much for the video. And what is 2/4 in all of that ?
Another gem! Here’s my question- i always learned the 2/2 or cut time signature was just a way to write music in the more readable form than 4/4- Would you do the great example of how it’s more than that. I find myself counting 2/2 time as 1+2+3+4+ across two measures…because that tends to lineup with the two in the four on the drum beat. But when you played the 4 beats as would normally be played on country road I was like that’s just awful! Lol. Nice work again
Also, before recorded music, musical notation wasn't the only way of recording how the composer intended to be played as human memory also provided an account for those who heard it under the baton of the composer.
is there a 2/4? if so, what would that sound like?
Just start to learning Chopin prelude 28 op 4, which is alla breve too.
By this definition of 2 2, though, with a strong and weak beat, the drum part of most songs in 4 4 would be in 2 2. Like Billie Jean, for example, the emphasis is on those two beats, so it's pretty much played in 2 2, but notated in 4 4 eother way. Which goes to show that a time signature, lile chords or modes, is something you play and not sonething that's intrinsic to the music.
youve changed my life... good job
The first thing that came to my mind when I saw two two was rach 3. I love the concerto
You know your whole life is a lie when you've been counting most popular tracks as 4/4 and learning years later from David that these time signatures can exist outside classical music
You should also point out that 2/2 vs. 4/4 also matters as to how it is conducted (in addition to how it is read or felt).
Thank you
Also all of the Latin American music can preferably be written in 2/2 since the feel of the music is really two and f.i. in Cuban music the clave can be turned around by just adding or leaving a bar instead of having to change the time signature...
Great video! But the thing is you never mentioned 2/4 or even 2/8 time. Most of the songs you showed were not of slow tempo and I would say I felt a lot of them as more of a 2/4 personally.
The John Denver song is in 2/4, not 2/2.
Absolutely. But I didn’t go to college.. just piano lessons
can you do a video on songs that are in a weird tempo for the genre they are in?
It's also the definitive meter of polka and oompah music
I was so hoping you'd bring Rach 3 to the table when I read the title. Lets say I wasn't disappointed :D
The 3rd movement of Holst's 1st suite is in 2/2
Bro, I thought you died in like 1793
@@KurtCobain-vh2sd I thought you died in 1994!
@@DrLC. Bro, i'm his reincarnation
Thank you for a Awsome site !!!!!!°😊
hello david. could you make a video on how to figure out which chord extension to use. there are so many that sound amazing but I have no idea which ones to use for my chord progressions
Nice idea. I’ll keep it in mind!
As someone who plays by "ear", this is something I wish I would have studied harder as a youth in band class, instead of just memorizing the feel and sound of the song. Time signatures always seemed like rubbish to me but the reality is is that it helps to understand how the music really flows.
This video made me realise that Danny Elfman's "This is Halloween" (for The Nightmare Before Christmas) is probably in 2/2 time (or at least can be transcribed to 2/2 rather easily?)
Time signatures are going to be the death of me tbh
Could you make a video about inverse/reverse picardy third? Like a major song ending on a minor chord
Take Me Home, Country Roads in 4/4 is kind of awesome, though.
Yeah totally unexpected how good that sounded
🤣
It's so weird, because generally, being a math GOD, 2/2 and 4/4 are the exact same, 1. So is 3/4 and 6/8. I think the difference is that one is more swing, and the other is more upbeat and straight
the counting is different. in 4/4 you count 4 notes and in 2/2 you count 2 beats. and with 3/4 you have 3 groups of 2 notes, so 3 beats and in 6/8 you have 2 groups of 3, so 2 beats in a bar but they still take the same amount of time, the feel is just different.
I think having a swinging beat is independent of the time signature
@@zarzee8925 depends. 6/8 has a swing feel but the notes themself are not necessarily swung. dividing a beat into 3 feels like a waltz or swing but the notes can still be played straight, the distance between them can still stay the same.
3/4 and 6/8 are very different, the accents are on different notes
Very interesting and informative video as always David. Are we getting another orchestral video soon? maybe brass
Thank you! And yeah the brass video is coming out soon! 😊
@@DavidBennettPiano Looking forward to it.
It’s also common to find polka music in cut time. One example is Schultz’s Polka by Western Senators. That’s the most obvious example. But a more subtle one, now that I’m looking is Rosamunde Polka by Oktoberfest Party. I originally thought it was in 8/8 time. But now that I know what 2/2 time is, I know that just about every polka I’ve heard is in cut time.
I believe polkas (and marches) are 2/4.
I'm so glad you did one of these without a Radiohead songs; usually you spend a minute explaining the theory and showing in abstract form then just when I think I understand you cut to some wailing noise and random notes and claim 'You can hear X in this song by Radiohead' and all I can hear is someone undergoing dental treatment using household appliances.
Yay and nay. From my personal practical standpoint, especially last weekend when I encountered this problem. 😉 In a 4/4 I would expect to hear bassdrum on beat 1 and 3 and snare on 2 and 4. In 2/2 bass drum would be on beat 1 and snare on beat 2. The same effect would be half time in the 4/4 you showed on screen. But to accommodate for the 4/4 notation I would use eight notes as shortest notes in the score so that BD and SN would hit at the same phrases when notated in 2/2. And in the examples of Johnny Cash Bob Dylon you can hear the SN hit 2 and 4. So imho it‘s the bass with the change from root to fifth that brings in the 2/2 feeling. So for me, hearing a 4/4 beat in a 2/2 notation would confuse me more than I‘m willing to confess. 🙂
You're mainly referencing rock music conventions here. Brazilian music, e.g. Samba and Bossa Nova, has a lighter 2/2 feel, and drumkits are different from those used in rock, to express this. Have a listen to Rafael Barata - there are a few videos of him on RUclips.
@@MyRackley I had the problem, that the medley went from 4/4 over 6/8 to 2/2. So everytime the tempo was adjusted to adapt to the beat. That way the overall feel stayed almost the same, but in the 2/2 section a half note had the same length as a fourth note in the 4/4 section. Little confused I was. To me that didn‘t make the score more readable, just measures shorter.