George Adamski UFO film, Maryland, February 1965
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 июн 2015
- An 8mm film taken by George Adamski in the presence of several witnesses, at Silver Spring, Maryland, in February 1965. The craft was estimated by an optical physicist to be 27 feet in diameter.
Note the apparent distortion in the frames, causing the craft to change shape. This is believed to be caused by a gravity field associated with the propulsion of the craft. 
Наука
![Megan Thee Stallion - BOA [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TKQY2ZlIEjY/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm reading one of his books. I then saw this video. At that moment, I realized I fuk'd up.
they travel billons of miles and unable to fly steady..
You expect things of them based on a fallacy
It's a toy on a string in front of a tree but close to the eye lens to make it appear larger than what it actually is. Anyone who can spot a con would know instantly that this is totally bogus. I mean, you can literally fucking see the string on top of the toy model.
What string? If it is a model held up my nylon fishing line, it is well balanced and weighted because there is not a hint of wobble.
It may be a cross-section model - a 3D silhouette - but I can't figure out why or how it appears square on the right sise but rounded on the left side.
How is the orb on the right side moving? Is it an effect of perspective?
The way the object moves is bizarre, but that is not evidence against it. We are used to seeing aircraft that are affected by gravity and wind, but an actual craft that is not affected by gravity or wind would move without any kind of resistance.
this is a joke right? ultrafake, its just an object in chiaroscuro near the lens. whoever did this has no credibility
Adamski was a cheater.
Its not a cardboard cutout as the shape changes at the end of video its the model he used for the other photos but it may Aswell be a carboard cutout no detail of the model at all. Filmed on a potato I guess.
Such an obvious, crappy fake.
Hahahahaha!
Greetings (to all Venusians) from Germany!
A small model UFO, being dangled in-front of a backdrop photo with a miniature tree. How anyone could buy this is crazy!
@BiggestFoot I'm so glad you commented
@@theflyingcarshow-allthelat9743 boy, he sure showed me. You're right BiggestFoot, it's clearly a genuine space ship, not a model made by a burger stall owner to cash in on the flying saucer crazy at the time. It's so obvious now
Dan Patten 🤣😂🤣😂. It was actually meant for you, so thanks for pointing that out! ☝️👍🙏👽😉
@@theflyingcarshow-allthelat9743 so do you believe that footage is real too?!
Dan Patten hell no 🤣
You may be interested to know that recent computer enhancement of the photos taken by Adamski at the 1952 encounter with Orthon has revealed the clear image of:
• The large cigar-shaped mothership seen by the group overhead,
• The smaller saucer-shaped craft that descended in full view of the witnesses,
• Orthon himself is clearly visible from the waist up, walking towards Adamski, in one image. His face, hair and clothing are visible.
These historic photos and analysis of them have now been published by two authors:
Michel Zirger, (the French author of the George Hunt Williamson biography) in his “ ‘We Are Here!’- Visitors Without a Passport,” and also in his “Authenticating the George Adamski Case - The Desert Center Investigation,”
and by Rene Erik Olsen, the Danish photographer who did the enhancements of the images (including images from this Silver Spring UFO film) in his “The George Adamski Story - Historical Events of Gigantic Implications.”
Those three books are readily available via Amazon.
Everyone is obviously allowed to believe whatever they like, but do you honestly look at this (or any of Adamski's) photos and see anything but a toy model? I've seen almost all of his 'evidence' over the years, and they clearly show a toy. Perhaps back in the 50's it may have seemed a tiny bit more compelling, but to modern eye it's ridiculous
Lovely Toy😘
Modified lantern lid
SFX by John Dykstra, when he was six years old...
Greetings from Germany!
Give me the Haunebu blueprints. I want to fly away from here.
Couple of things. I noticed the extension and retraction of the bottom right supposed gravity amplifier. That part is interesting. Now for the main question. Has anyone else noticed that this " ship" is identical to what Bob Lazar claimed that he worked on? Could good ol Bob simply have read the books and watched the films to create his story? I know he took a lie detector test but that only tells you what a person believes not the truth or not. Also, people could have beat the machine..it's done all the time. There are ALOT of questions about Adamski and Lazar.
True, Lazar said that's how it worked and lo and behold we're looking at it. I believe Lasar and I have seen a craft like this myself at night where the 3 gravity amps seemed to be bending light emitting a nice orange light. Then two of the lights disappeared which I now learn was the craft going in to a different flight mode again as described by BL. It doesn't mean that this craft was piloted by greys but it does mean there is anti-gravity tech working maybe reverse engineered from lost craft again as Bob was told. Sorry but I believe but maybe because this is I've actually seen although not as close as this.
That was a good spot. Let's see how and why a model could do this back then. The model builder would have made it rigged. On 35 mm film, in front of other people who said it happened. He was poor. Making no money off of this. How could he pay them. He was a strange guy, with lots of mystery surrounding him. I know, I saw a short clip of him and thought, surely not. I don't know, but I'd like to for some reason. Those tic tac things the Pentagon and NAVY say are real film footage just peaked my interest. Friend or enemy, earth bound or, well you know. Just interesting and I'll be the first one running need be .
Lazar's UFO looks more like one of Billy Meier Beamships models tbh.
BiggestFoot
Bob Lazar is a cheater and not even a good one. Nothing of his story (fairy tales) fits. There is no proof at all.
BiggestFoot
;-)
Calm down.
It helps avoid a heart attack.
Lazar is a cheater. And Adamski was a cheater, too.
And, of course, not even a good one...
Looks like a card board cut out....lmao
MAIS 'FAKE' DO QUE ISSO É IMPOSSÍVEL FAZER...
Amazing - it's before the days of CGI so must be real
First Star Wars movie was also made before CGI and its not real.
@@pkmovies92 I don't think you understood the tone of my post.
@@ewaf88 I'm glad you were sarcastic.
@@pkmovies92 Ok sorry I misunderstood your comment. I often wonder how a 50s audience would react if we were able to send the latest Star wars movie back in time. Gasps of astonishment probably.
You all do know there is amazing video from this same guy that does not look fake funny how people like adamski and billy myer have films that look like shit and films that are jaw dropping and critics that only look at one film and assume it’s a hoax
If he ever had real footage then why did he feel the need to produce this nonsense? Use your head for gods sake.
🤣
So crap it's even funny