Transient Conduction, Spatial Effects

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • heat transfer, spatial effects T(x,t) in slab or T(r,t) cylinder and sphere

Комментарии • 14

  • @krazycrarie
    @krazycrarie 7 лет назад +12

    I spend so much money every term on this god forsaken institution where teaching is the side-hobby. I wish more professors were like you Dr. Randall! Thank you!

  • @kartiksunil2721
    @kartiksunil2721 5 лет назад +1

    nice video bro, see you soon. you keep it real mate

  • @hamzahmousa9277
    @hamzahmousa9277 8 лет назад +1

    thank you very much Dr Randall , I would travel all the way from Jordan to take just one of your lectures !

  • @brandonbell5456
    @brandonbell5456 8 лет назад +3

    Dr. Randall: True?
    Yes, Dr. Randall. True.

  • @sunalgautam6255
    @sunalgautam6255 7 лет назад

    Thanks a lot, professor, Hat's off to you!!

  • @ruancabralexatas6370
    @ruancabralexatas6370 7 лет назад

    Thank you professor

  • @hkkhgffh3613
    @hkkhgffh3613 2 года назад

    Is there a Manteufel number?

  • @yosiefamanios6843
    @yosiefamanios6843 6 лет назад

    8:12
    Which has the greatest fourier number question.
    Lets consider thermal diffusivity, which is a function of K in its numerator. So the higher k value will result in higher thermal diffusivity value, which then results in higher fouriers number value. From this we can conclude the bigger our K value, the bigger our fourier number will be. Very big K equals to very little heat resistance in an object. Case A shows very little resistance to heat transfer because the surface temperature is very similar to the mid plane temperature. So then I have determined case A has the greatest fourier number.
    Please let me know if my thought process is off.

    • @randallmanteufel6411
      @randallmanteufel6411  6 лет назад

      Yosief Amanios your ideas are good. I think it is same slab, so k not changed. What changes is time, and Fourier number proportional to time.

  • @TwoTenEats
    @TwoTenEats 8 лет назад +2

    "HUUUUGE!!! difference"

  • @mariopersaud6703
    @mariopersaud6703 6 лет назад

    For the Bi number in terms of Ro isn't it in meters ?

    • @randallmanteufel6411
      @randallmanteufel6411  6 лет назад

      I don't understand your question. Starting around 18:40 the length scale used in Bi number is explained. It is a little confusing, since it uses Ro/2 to check if lumped capacitance is valid, yet is Ro when looking up zeta1 and C1 in Table 5.1. Biot number is always dimensionless.

    • @mariopersaud6703
      @mariopersaud6703 6 лет назад

      I meant at 28:25 when we found the Bi number we used Lc. Since the diameter is 3 cm (0.3m) shouldnt we use the Ro to be 0.015 to get 0.08036 than 0.15 to get 0.8036

    • @thermalengineeringmanojshe1302
      @thermalengineeringmanojshe1302 4 года назад

      Unitless