Ionization Energy - Basic Introduction

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 авг 2024
  • This chemistry video tutorial provides a basic introduction into Ionization Energy. It discusses the periodic trends and exceptions as well as providing plenty of examples and practice problems. The first ionization energy is the energy required to remove an electron from a gaseous atom or ion. The second ionization energy is associated with the removal of the second electron. Ionization energy increases with effective nuclear charge but decreases with distance, shielding and electron repulsions. Paired electrons typically have lower ionization energies that unpaired electrons. This explains how to determine which element and ion has the greater first ionization energy. It covers cations and anions and how to rank elements in order of increasing ionization energy. In addition, it discusses how to identify the element given the ionization energies of that element using valence electrons and core electrons.
    Electron Affinity:
    • Electron Affinity Tren...
    Atomic Radius:
    • Atomic Radius - Basic ...
    Bond Energy & Bond Length:
    • Bond Energy & Bond Len...
    Electronegativity:
    • Electronegativity, Bas...
    Periodic Trends:
    • Ionization Energy Elec...
    __________________________________
    Polar & Nonpolar Covalent Bonding:
    • Polar Covalent Bonds a...
    Bond Polarity & Dipole Moment:
    • Bond Polarity, Electro...
    Ionic Radius:
    • Ionic Radius Trends, B...
    Lattice Energy:
    • Lattice Energy of Ioni...
    Born Haber Cycle:
    • Born Haber Cycle, Basi...
    Bond Energy Calculations:
    • Bond Energy Calculatio...
    ___________________________________
    Lewis Structures - Mega Review:
    • Lewis Structures, Intr...
    Final Exams and Video Playlists:
    www.video-tuto...
    Full-Length Videos and Worksheets:
    / collections

Комментарии • 212

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  7 месяцев назад +7

    Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/

  • @monkeytrollhunter
    @monkeytrollhunter 3 года назад +790

    I absolutely love it when we're asked how to do stuff that were never taught in lecture

    • @ethangjervik4526
      @ethangjervik4526 2 года назад +24

      every single time

    • @NoName-yf3fb
      @NoName-yf3fb 2 года назад +12

      Every damn lesson

    • @okthen9145
      @okthen9145 2 года назад

      Yep. Those teachers have absolutely no business collecting their paychecks. It makes me so mad they get paid to s**t all over science.

    • @en7070
      @en7070 2 года назад +3

      Mhmm!

    • @nightteen5230
      @nightteen5230 Год назад

      U devil😂 same as me too😈

  • @hornelladiaquiese8008
    @hornelladiaquiese8008 4 года назад +172

    I wrote a Chemistry test about a month ago, based on ionization energy and I watched only this video before taking the test and believe it or not, I got an A+ (100%) for that test... I am so happy and grateful to you for making chemistry less complicated than everyone, including lecturer, makes it seem. Thank you so much! God Bless.

  • @georgesadler7830
    @georgesadler7830 Месяц назад +5

    Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for a Basic Introduction/Explanation into Ionization Energy in AP/General Chemistry. Once again, the practice problems/problem selections are off the learning charts from start to finish. This is an error free video/lecture on RUclips TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.

  • @dilanidassanayake8884
    @dilanidassanayake8884 5 лет назад +396

    Sir your explanations are more than perfect you make chemistry so interesting. Thank you very much sir for working hard to produce these videos .May GOD bless you, I am forever grateful to you.

    • @user-pd6lb7pw9g
      @user-pd6lb7pw9g 3 года назад +4

      I agree with you

    • @1nesh956
      @1nesh956 3 года назад +14

      how you act one day before Chem Finals and see this vid

    • @user-pd6lb7pw9g
      @user-pd6lb7pw9g 3 года назад +2

      hahahaha How do you know my Chemistry final is coming

    • @dilanidassanayake8884
      @dilanidassanayake8884 3 года назад +2

      @@idkwhttosay912 lol

    • @Jimmy-rg1vd
      @Jimmy-rg1vd 2 года назад +1

      Not only in chemistry but also perfect in mathematics and physics

  • @anthonyrojas9989
    @anthonyrojas9989 3 года назад +104

    These lectures get through to my soul man, I'm serious. I cannot keep up with my professor's pace, but your videos clarify everything.

    • @trikebeatstrexnodiff
      @trikebeatstrexnodiff 3 года назад +4

      Exactly! I dont understand anything what my teachers "teach" but thanks to this man and his language, it helps me learn what I am not very able to learn in my native language and that's wonderful but also terrifying cos I just figured out that I dont understand a subject in my native language but understand in english :(

  • @merkive
    @merkive 4 года назад +32

    my lecturer is a doctor, you and her have the same tone to your voice, constant. But the thing is I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE TEACHING thank god

  • @irlbrisa7775
    @irlbrisa7775 5 лет назад +372

    2x speed for finals

  • @eri4232
    @eri4232 5 лет назад +59

    I cant thank you enough, I had no hope for my chemistry As Level but thanks to you i can finally understand what my school failed to do, I hope eveything amazing comes your way.

    • @chrissysher0680
      @chrissysher0680 3 года назад +2

      dude im studying for my As level rn as well..... well 2 years later than u

    • @scarlett6541
      @scarlett6541 3 года назад +2

      @@chrissysher0680 me too! i just started my AS levels a few months ago

    • @sophiaouchari2785
      @sophiaouchari2785 3 года назад +2

      @@scarlett6541 keep us updated lolol

    • @nick2aim431
      @nick2aim431 2 года назад

      @@chrissysher0680 how was it bro

    • @hasoonnine
      @hasoonnine 9 месяцев назад

      @@nick2aim431probably not good since they never replied

  • @friday8091
    @friday8091 3 года назад +14

    I love your teaching. I really appreciate it. You are gifted and also have perfect voice- warm, clear, right speed, clear explanation.

  • @NaomiKatuta-kp1wj
    @NaomiKatuta-kp1wj 2 месяца назад +2

    Ohh my God,am ready for my exam now.May God richly bless you

  • @jaipalsingh3712
    @jaipalsingh3712 5 лет назад +16

    The last example u gave ... Was the most difficult for me to identify untill I watched your video... Thanks for such a good explanation

  • @meadowfraser1033
    @meadowfraser1033 4 года назад +138

    where are you getting these values my guy

  • @Free.palestine8
    @Free.palestine8 8 месяцев назад +3

    I understood your lessons more than my professor even I'm not good at English
    Because of the difference in language. Good efforts ☺️🌸

  • @natburns1300
    @natburns1300 2 года назад +8

    This man is single-handedly saving my grades in Chem

  • @torb69
    @torb69 5 лет назад +39

    i hope there will be more people like you in the future

  • @Shimry
    @Shimry 2 года назад +12

    Your explanations are so crystal clear and iam so grateful for your teaching. Thank You so much Sir! for this and for making it free for us to learn. Means a lot!

  • @melissajade7717
    @melissajade7717 2 года назад +12

    Thank you for making this so easy to understand!!! I'm honestly blown away at how easy it was for me to catch onto this. I went here to understand why ionization isn't used more as a clean propulsion method. Now I truly see why it's such a task. But I won't stop. Those noisy propellers will be a thing of the past! I'm going to build a prototype ion propulsion system for future AVs. Thanks for your time, and explanation. I'll subscribe to the rest of your lessons.

  • @eikigbecharles4877
    @eikigbecharles4877 3 года назад +4

    Once In a life time polymath, and best teacher ever

  • @Sammi-nm8bg
    @Sammi-nm8bg 5 лет назад +8

    I luv u mr. organic chemistry tutor theres no words as to how much i appreciate u

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад +8

    This is such an amazing channel and series of videos. More people need to have their ion you 😎

  • @gladysnnabugo
    @gladysnnabugo Год назад +3

    Thanks for your videos you make chemistry less complicated for me I really appreciate your hard work

  • @aphilemdluli
    @aphilemdluli Год назад +2

    Thank you very much, sir. You explain so perfectly. I am very grateful for the time you take to make these videos.

  • @BigcatTVGaming
    @BigcatTVGaming 4 года назад +10

    I wish I could like this more than once. So helpful

  • @marin4767
    @marin4767 5 лет назад +39

    where are you getting those values?

    • @evanhughes6952
      @evanhughes6952 4 года назад +17

      If you’re taking a course, your teacher will likely have provided you with a chart. If not, you can look one up. It’s all based on experimental evidence.

  • @anonymoussender3298
    @anonymoussender3298 2 года назад +5

    I don't understand a single thing, like how tf did u get those numbers🧐

  • @skykrasher4475
    @skykrasher4475 3 года назад +4

    I have a Chem test tomorrow and I was legit about to have a panic attack because I could not figure this out. Thanks for helping me!

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад

      How did it go?

    • @skykrasher4475
      @skykrasher4475 2 года назад +1

      @@PunmasterSTP well I passed out in the middle of studying from stress but I got an A so it was fucking worth it

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад

      @@skykrasher4475 I’m sorry you passed out, but I’m glad you got an A!

  • @shreyasimaiti1654
    @shreyasimaiti1654 6 лет назад +13

    Great explaination.... I love it now it is very clear this can only possible because of so many examples

  • @rocroc
    @rocroc Год назад +2

    Ionization energy - is a measure of the capability of an element to enter into chemical reactions requiring ion formation or donation of electrons. It is also generally related to the nature of the chemical bonding in the compounds formed by the elements.

  • @marisasanders6756
    @marisasanders6756 4 года назад +7

    On a test when we are not given a periodic table with the ionization energies on them, how would I be able to know different exceptions to the rule?

  • @vishtoxic5928
    @vishtoxic5928 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much, words cant describe how grateful I am to you.

  • @richardc8189
    @richardc8189 6 лет назад +88

    watch at 1.25x speed

    • @karinarinarina
      @karinarinarina 5 лет назад +2

      1.5 w/ the captions on does enough lol

    • @fota5406
      @fota5406 4 года назад +2

      1.75 is working just fine for me, if I use 2.0 then I'll need captions on for sure.

    • @evanhughes6952
      @evanhughes6952 4 года назад +4

      I love that he talks so slowly and clearly when I’m doing my first round on a tricky topic, but I love that I can speed him up, too. I didn’t know I could do this. Thanks for the heads up.

    • @fkncompton7124
      @fkncompton7124 4 года назад +1

      2.0x is usually fine for review but I think he talks faster than others so I have to hit rewind sometimes

    • @ev6564
      @ev6564 3 года назад +1

      I watch at 1.5x, especially for the videos closer to an hour long.

  • @cashuur10
    @cashuur10 2 года назад +1

    Teacher thanks
    I'm from Somalia 🇸🇴 when watching this lesson very very I understood this lesson thanks much
    Than I gave you subscrip and like

  • @luyolocollen405
    @luyolocollen405 3 года назад +2

    sir thanks you explain everything well.

  • @a.b.williams4888
    @a.b.williams4888 Год назад +2

    Where do you get the ionization energy numbers in kj/mol that’s the part I’m confused about

  • @akoterryeyong8259
    @akoterryeyong8259 Год назад

    Thanks so much sir 🙏✌️✨ Since I entered form one I have been using your lessons and explations to write my exams. Thanks so much sir❤

  • @regnas7868
    @regnas7868 6 лет назад +5

    Amazing. Well explained. Thank you.

  • @charlesoluwajoba7838
    @charlesoluwajoba7838 3 года назад +1

    Your voice makes the video good!!😁

  • @christopheromoya535
    @christopheromoya535 Год назад +1

    You laid a very strong foundation on IE in me......

  • @AbishAlisher
    @AbishAlisher 3 года назад +5

    i think there is contradiction. 19:00 the more the electron is stable, the more ionization energy it requires to remove it. im judjing by your drawings and explanations.

    • @fl6rence
      @fl6rence 3 года назад +2

      I realized that as well thanks for pointing it out

    • @ev6564
      @ev6564 3 года назад +1

      Thanks for pointing that out! Since distance from nucleus and energy needed to remove an electron are directly proportional, I guess it would be instability/repelling of the electrons ↑ ionization energy ↓ distance from nucleus ↓. I'll correct that in my notes.

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад

      I definitely think this was confusing. If I understand correctly, he was referring to the intrinsic energy of the electron and *not* the ionization energy. If an electron is in a more stable (and lower energy) state, then it would take *more* energy to ionize it (rip it away from the atom).

  • @osmondlin6242
    @osmondlin6242 6 месяцев назад

    note that +2 will be oxidation state, so it should 2+ as a charge when you write it on the upper right

  • @okthen9145
    @okthen9145 2 года назад

    Yea my teacher couldn't be bothered to explain the simplicity of the discontinuity. He acts like this level chemistry is advanced hyper rocket science and us lowlifes don't technically deserve to be in his presence. SMC chemistry is taught by old gatekeeping boomers who ruin the sciences. Thank you for actually treating us students with some decorum and respect.

  • @saptahadilesmana6719
    @saptahadilesmana6719 3 года назад +2

    Why ionization energy measured in gases phase ?

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад

      I might be mistaken, but I think it’s easier to measure the ionization of gases. Also, if you’re putting in enough energy to rip electrons off of atoms, I imagine that things might melt and boil anyway…

  • @nithik._.senpai2257
    @nithik._.senpai2257 4 года назад +4

    simply amazing!

  • @yq9091
    @yq9091 5 лет назад +2

    thx a lot . ur explanation is so accurate to the point. really hleps alot 😄

  • @binichi_
    @binichi_ 3 года назад

    you actually said all the questions i had to ask

  • @randomb2367
    @randomb2367 11 месяцев назад

    these are the best study videos

  • @ayadilova
    @ayadilova 4 года назад +1

    Thx very much, this video is much more understandable!!

  • @sbusisoquintin8004
    @sbusisoquintin8004 4 года назад +2

    This man who's talking in this video looks like nothing he doesn't know sometimes...😊😊😊 That includes mathematics, technology even science

  • @kmccorristonrocks
    @kmccorristonrocks 5 лет назад +5

    thank you so much for this!!

  • @ethangreenberg2107
    @ethangreenberg2107 5 лет назад +6

    I'm in 6th grade and working on 8th this really helped

    • @qusayjamous3431
      @qusayjamous3431 3 года назад +2

      good on you

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад +1

      That’s awesome! I hope your studies are going well.

  • @dagmwitmelkamu9470
    @dagmwitmelkamu9470 3 года назад +1

    what is that mean pair and unpaired electron you got make everything crystal clear

  • @unknown-st8vq
    @unknown-st8vq 12 часов назад

    Thank you so much sir

  • @fernandocruz9882
    @fernandocruz9882 5 лет назад +3

    this was a great explanation

  • @joupoes6092
    @joupoes6092 3 года назад +2

    Hi, to cationise a ion (P -3) won’t it require more energy coz it’s already stable?

  • @davidkeyes1205
    @davidkeyes1205 3 года назад +1

    Quick question: Is it incorrect to say that there is more shielding with Na than Li because the effective nuclear charge is the same? If so, then that would mean the only reason why Li has greater ionization energy is that it has less distance from the nucleus. Thanks!

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад

      I think you’re right. Usually when I’ve heard about shielding, it’s in the context of moving across a row of the periodic table. Doing that, the shielding from the inner electrons stays constant but the nuclear charge increases, so the atom size generally decreases and the ionization energy generally increases.

  • @shaikhmarianazim1374
    @shaikhmarianazim1374 3 года назад +1

    How can distance decrease if energy has decreased???

  • @nityaverma17
    @nityaverma17 4 года назад +2

    What books do you use? Can you please tell I need recomendations for studying purposes

  • @WhereWhatWhenWhy
    @WhereWhatWhenWhy 2 месяца назад

    My problem is how did you find the values of the ionization energy? Where are the numbers being made from?

  • @jumanaal-baalawi4929
    @jumanaal-baalawi4929 3 года назад

    You are so much better than my teacher

  • @shaikrafiq9498
    @shaikrafiq9498 4 года назад +1

    Sir I have a doubt .. the ba is more electronegative than fe because the d orbitals in ba provide poor shielding effect...........🙏🙏🙏 please help me

  • @deru8430
    @deru8430 2 месяца назад

    I've been confused by this quetion the quetion was
    The first ionization energy of aluminium is slightly less than that of magnesium, why?

  • @millerlynb.catakaw4648
    @millerlynb.catakaw4648 4 года назад +4

    How did you get the values of Ionization energy? I am kinda confuse here.

    • @rwayle
      @rwayle 4 года назад +3

      He looked them up. They have to be determined experimentally.

  • @cbbbe
    @cbbbe 5 месяцев назад

    But how do you even get the first ionization of 780 kj/mol?? everyone seems to skip that part and show no equation.

  • @9myst1c21
    @9myst1c21 3 года назад

    where do you get these values or whatever it is?????????

  • @vivianjoseph814
    @vivianjoseph814 10 месяцев назад

    Great video, but could you pls explain why Al+3 has more IE than Al+2 even though it is jumping from p to s sublevel for Al+2?

  • @cheaire
    @cheaire 8 месяцев назад

    i think u made a mistake at 18:30 (?) isnt the more stable an orbit, the greater its IE? you said P with 1060 has less energy than S with 1005

  • @user-cn2xt2nj9i
    @user-cn2xt2nj9i 2 месяца назад

    Sir! Please can you please explain why some elements show variable valencies 🙏

  • @nurfatihahzakaria328
    @nurfatihahzakaria328 6 лет назад +2

    what apps did you use to make this video?

  • @vedarovski4110
    @vedarovski4110 5 лет назад +2

    I dont get the P-2 and P-3 example. Ionization Energy of P-3 looks more to me because it is 18 electrons.

    • @zlidyh5
      @zlidyh5 5 лет назад +1

      The amount of ionization energy needed to remove an electron increases as you remove more electrons. P-2 has 2 extra electrons while P-3 has 3 extra electrons, so in a way P-2 has "removed" one more electron than P-3.

    • @mht4908
      @mht4908 4 года назад +1

      @@zlidyh5 but doesn't p3- have a noble gas configuration (Ar) and p2- has the configuration of Cl? Typically noble gas configurations require the highest ionization energy, and looking at 15:31 the ionization energy for Cl is lower than Ar, so shouldn't p3- have the higher IE?

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад

      @@mht4908 I think things can be confusing because usually only the *first* ionization energies are talked about. While it’s true that ripping one electron off of an electrically neutral argon atom would require more energy than ripping one electron off a neutral chlorine atom, ripping the *second* electron off of a (now positive) argon atom would require even more energy. You can take a look at the different ionization energies here ( en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molar_ionization_energies_of_the_elements ).
      And also, by removing electrons from a negative ion (anion), you’d be reducing the electrostatic repulsion and making things more stable, which would help to decrease the ionization energies.

  • @Wkashif1111
    @Wkashif1111 10 месяцев назад

    Do we need to memorize the energies and the exceptions in the periods??

  • @bharatlalratre
    @bharatlalratre Год назад

    Thanks sir for making it clear

  • @user-sl7sx6ec4v
    @user-sl7sx6ec4v Год назад

    There is something I don't understand from your explanation in I. E (this particular video). Here, you said the reason why the first ionisation energy of Mg2+ is bigger than the ionisation energy of Al3+ is because there is a decrease inionisation energy whenever there is a move from the S-block to the P-block , but why didn't this works for Be (beryllium) and fluorine, where Be with electronic configuration ending with 2S² (S-Block), while the fluorine ending with 2p5 (P-block)

  • @oparathelma4062
    @oparathelma4062 6 месяцев назад

    Does e- mean ionisation energy like a constant?

  • @brahamirayhane5860
    @brahamirayhane5860 5 месяцев назад

    How can I calculate the ionization energy?

  • @juniordachaser7177
    @juniordachaser7177 5 лет назад +1

    Quality videos you can trust.

  • @nila6100
    @nila6100 3 года назад +1

    Thank you sir

  • @lpcoral2000
    @lpcoral2000 3 года назад +1

    Explicas buenardo pero muy relax tu voz carnal

  • @dagmwitmelkamu9470
    @dagmwitmelkamu9470 3 года назад

    and how does nuclear charge if directly proportion to ionization energy how ?

  • @PurityMutinta-zd4re
    @PurityMutinta-zd4re Год назад

    We really appreciate you 😊

  • @violet3541
    @violet3541 5 месяцев назад

    I don't get it how'd u get the numbers

  • @Hect-se9ht
    @Hect-se9ht 4 года назад

    so am i right when i say this. I am answering a question, the question is why the jump from the second to the third ionization energy higher than the third and fourth ionization energy?
    It is easier to remove a 3p electron than a 3s electron because the 3p electron is the furthest from the nucleus so it decreases and also the shielding decreases which makes it easier for the valence electron to get attracted to the nucleus because there are less electrons now that will repel the valence electron

    • @annh316
      @annh316 3 года назад

      What do thé 3p and 2s mean I’m so confused

  • @yulizarchandra252
    @yulizarchandra252 2 года назад +1

    If an unpaired electron is more stable, why does Mg has bigger ionization energy than Na?

    • @Pinkshark27
      @Pinkshark27 9 месяцев назад

      im really confused on this

  • @jagadeeshjaggu9294
    @jagadeeshjaggu9294 6 месяцев назад

    Bro how you calucate ionization value

  • @bestrong6517
    @bestrong6517 7 лет назад +2

    I'm looking for a analytical chemistry books!! Do you have any recommendations?? Please 🙏🏻

  • @xuanyidu3259
    @xuanyidu3259 4 года назад +1

    studying this at midnight

  • @ShakeelAhmad-mb3hv
    @ShakeelAhmad-mb3hv 4 года назад

    Why valency is more in between 3_4 than 1_2?

  • @daliasaker7067
    @daliasaker7067 4 года назад +1

    Is the nuclear charge means the positive protons or the negative electrons

    • @supernova1288
      @supernova1288 4 года назад +1

      nuclear charge is the total positive charge in the nucleus of an atom

    • @daliasaker7067
      @daliasaker7067 4 года назад

      Thank you 💝

  • @vuyoboniswa297
    @vuyoboniswa297 Год назад

    guys were can i get magnitudes of first and second ionization energy

  • @lalaineevangelista6178
    @lalaineevangelista6178 3 года назад +1

    How do you calculate the KJ/Mol?

    • @grim7.62
      @grim7.62 3 года назад

      Futang ina modules fak yo

    • @grim7.62
      @grim7.62 3 года назад

      HAHAHAHA

  • @shihabalislam841
    @shihabalislam841 4 года назад

    From where we can find the kj/mol?? Help me pls

  • @kansthighs8280
    @kansthighs8280 2 года назад +1

    how do you even get I2, I3, I4, I5

    • @romansubira156
      @romansubira156 Год назад

      It's the atomic number I think you're talking about, it shows you in the periodic table

  • @leahm3842
    @leahm3842 3 года назад +3

    I genuinely owe you my degree

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 года назад

      I’m just curious; what degree are you getting/did you get?

  • @surendersingal2192
    @surendersingal2192 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you sir
    It appears to me periodic table is always expanding as more compounded rocks are found in nature around globe. Jussojuan

  • @A45A45
    @A45A45 2 года назад

    When he said remove a valence electro on the silicon example, why dis he put + e- when he removed it?

  • @Madu4ify
    @Madu4ify 2 года назад

    U are the best love you !!!!!

  • @reecechetty3085
    @reecechetty3085 3 года назад

    Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank youuuuuuuuu

  • @nouranmoustafa9036
    @nouranmoustafa9036 4 года назад +2

    You are blessing from god

  • @irenesanil308
    @irenesanil308 11 месяцев назад

    U r a real saver❤😂

  • @nikopivac8642
    @nikopivac8642 2 года назад

    Thank you.