2 Peter is a forgery?! - Examinatorics

This is in response to ‪@BloggingTheology‬
If I have any weird pauses while speaking, I had a headache that day so I was powering through haha.
Resources I used:
Note: it was MICHAEL Kruger, not Peter Kruger. Lol.
Dr. Michael J. Kruger is the President and Samuel C. Patterson Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at the Charlotte campus of Reformed Theological Seminary.
www.biblicalst...
Michael S. Heiser (1963-2023) was a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania (M.A., Ancient History) and the University of Wisconsin- Madison (M.A., Ph.D., Hebrew Bible and Semitic Studies). He had a dozen years of classroom teaching experience on the college level and another ten in distance education. He was a former scholar-in-residence at Logos Bible Software.
drmsh.com/TheN...
Daniel B Wallace is an American professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary. He is also the founder and executive director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, the purpose of which is digitizing all known Greek manuscripts of the New Testament via digital photographs.
With reference to Jude: bible.org/seri...

[@fireandworms]

Yeah the "style is different" argument is so silly, unless you don't believe Peter used scribes. In which case you're contradicting Ehrman, who loves to call the disciples illiterate.
I'd say that Origen quoting 2 Peter isn't really a good argument, Origen wasn't very discriminating. Other Fathers might be a better argument.

[@examinatorics]

Hmm, that's interesting on Origen. The issue there I suppose is that it's hard to believe that, even if Origen was not particularly discriminating, that he would value a work that had only appeared in recent memory to him, and that if it was forged in the second century, he would have certainly known so.
One must presume either that Origen was aware of it's very recent construction, and decided to power on through with full knowledge that it was a non-Petrine forgery, or that he was in accordance with a wider view of its authenticity.