Length is 1D, units are meters Area is 2D, units are meters^2 Volume is 3D, units are meters^3 going from 1D to 3D is effectively going up 3 orders of magnitude in size. Dimensionality does depend on size. If you projected a see-through 3D cube on a piece of paper you would get a 2D image that covers less space, and thus is a smaller size, than the original 3D cube.
Chase Beasley I was wondering the same myself, especially now that the LHC has been operational for 2 years and has verified the existence of the Higgs Boson.
lisa randell on her book warped passage page 12 said that she believes in extra dimension because she stops supporting red sox and supporting yonkees and this nade her belief in extra dimension. This is amazing for a person who says that is a physist as a reason to belief in extra dimension. It is amazing time we are living now.
"Size" here is a relative term of course. Something may look like its covering a small size in terms of its dimensionality due to the frame of reference; such as the constellations in the sky making it appear like the least distance between the stars is actually less than it really is. In relativity of course there is no standard reference frame so a size-shift if you like is always to do with a different energy scale being probed that breaks some least action symmetry.
First lecture I have seen on what the LHC is looking for next. And its the first I have seen where experimental and theoretical consequences of extra dimensions are discussed. So very interesting, thanks for sharing, this is exciting stuff. Must go and find out what a brane is - curled up small dimensions I get, but I don't get brane at all
Excellent. Hopefully when they spin up the LHC to these higher energies over the next few years we'll see this. Randall could well be a nobel recipient along with several others. Here is the case for larger and even more powerful accelerators.
there are other dimensions and they are visable also seem to have intelligence of there own that interacts with the person whom enters its realms , the intelligence I speak of is one that interacts with physical self , movements from your arms and hands , also is able to communicate silently with you by moveing with your thought requests , also can pre,empt your interaction . so this realm space I speak of resembles streams of static like rivers that flow also interact
Good teacher, filled in detail sequence, something I always have trouble with because I agree with the Black Hole idea of information projection, time perceived now means everything happens at once , so I can see from this talk why the research is done this way.
If the dimensions (of space etc) are due to the substantive measurement of superimposed infinite time duration/modulation connected as the real image of the universe, then the existence of the dimensional centre of mass is both focused on a location now and distributed in hireachic dimensions to infinity according to the density/intensity of frequencies of occurrence. The semantic description, the nomenclature in congruence, of the implied spacetime connection point that is turned around on itself by every possible combination of relative timing, (for example, as in the field lines made visible around charged objects and magnets), ..has been scrambled inadvertently(?) by branching specialties and methodologies.
Do neutrinos work nonadimensionaly or octadimensionaly? Do they have anything to do with the quantum foam as they seem to be so random (at constantly practically light speed) in large numbers everywhere?
what about this Ion Murgu Condition of Uniform Travel, him speak about a Space Time contraction into layers? About any Ion Murgu Rreal Magic angles what can to appears around maybe deformed of interactions?
We need to start looking at the 3 dimensions of "space" as just the one dimension, or at best two, seeing as in the supra-cosmological sense our universe is a sheet like membrane.
I’m just wondering if you can help me understand, If a particle light is the fastest thing in the universe, what happens to the protons/neurons that exceed the front of that light particle?… Do they stop and just go along with the ride or are they still acting like Atoms that we know in this universe to move around each other? just curious
Joe Lunchbucket, who flunked out of high school, can study the 4th dimension by simply stepping out into the woods at night, out behind his single wide manufactured home, and rap a couple of drum sticks together. Then all he needs to do is listen. But he can talk as well, and see if he can get the 4th dimensional people that Lisa Randall cannot admit that exist, to perform some sort of stunt like stomping their feet a specific number of times, breaking a branch, or rapping some rocks together. No $trillion dollar super collider nor triple Phd required. The 4th dimension that these woods people live in, is at least as large as man's 3 dimensions. True, string theory is the basis for the 4th dimension, so you can toss out TIME and the tessuract that you have stuffed into your memory someplace. Gravity has a lesser affect on 4th dimensional people because they spend much of their time just floating around up into the tree branches. A certain type of free quanta loops are what helps define the properties of 4th dimensional quanta strings that comprise the body of the 4th dimensional people. You can read all about the physics by buying the book X3 by Adrian Dvir, who was handed the physics by 4th dimensional people from another solar system. And you can also find out about the secrets of several other mysteries in the same book. Lisa does not appear to have read the book, needless to say.
I love that people on these RUclips comments think they can call bullsh*t on one of the most often sighted physicist of all time (Lisa Randall). Not saying all of her theories will end up being confirmed in nature but I do know that NONE of your theories will be. Just sit back, shut up and learn try to something from this lecture.
Higher dimensions are visible only with higher energy than light. Photons are the lowest in line. The higher level are ev increased and boson is one such. There may be many others like that but not known. Each particle is an extra dimension. Proton is in a higher dimension than electron.
you know Phi is containing the radial infinite go Ion Mugu Condition of Uniform Travel and Phytagorean Triples Sorry for a little bit asymmetry there but how can infinity to have symmetry?
in her theory, so to say? she knows what she is speaking about! do you think the dates 04, 05, 07, 09 and the max in 2012, as related to dimensional warp? anyone know this girl? ask her, give me feedback if you do. joanne hewett? maybe?
At 25:16 she picks up a laser pointer that I can only guess is over sized because of the natural tendency of speakers to put their own laser pointer back in their pocket and walk out. Now if they walk out with this one they deserve all ridicule from their peers. Solves the problem by giving up a bit of space to save bits of time.
Think of the classical example of a sphere (3 Dimensions), with the size of basket ball, that you see from a distance of 1 km. Can you resolve it? What is the best you can see? A DOT! Therefore, 3 dimensions are somehow 'curled up in one. This is not crap my friend, it is science. We shouldn't characterise what we don't understand!:)
My 'One-moment Universe' hypothesis: An electron is actually a moment in time at one of its ultimate level. All the moments are actually one moment forever traveling backwards and forwards in time. Because, they are all the same "moment"! The idea that there is just the one, single moment going forwards and backwards in time is possible. There is a single moment field in time, not a single moment. The field is going forward in time, sometimes the field is going backward in time (and sometimes forward, and sometimes backward, in the x,y,z directions...). Each moment is a ripple in this field like every other moment in time. So in a sense, there really is just one moment in time that shows up in many places. Khalid Masood
I wrote my honours thesis on the first of these papers, which I hear in this talk has been cited over 3000 times now! Her work is quite incredible and beautiful. This is pure beauty and joy to me :) arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9905221
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .
Article THEORIES OF THE BRANE on edge dot org helps. It happens to have been written by Lisa in 2003. (Google THEORIES OF THE BRANE and its about the fourth item after the truly awful Wikipedia links)
Michael Bauers i think string theory is the same thing as m-theory, basically. m-theory contains all the 5 consistent string theories; it's all strings and membranes and stuff.
It makes me sad that I do not understand a word of what she is saying. It's just way above my knowledge I have about space. Ans I'm passionate about the universe. I'm in awe when I see the size of the universe. I've devoured all of Tyson Degrasse and Krauss speeches and videos but I'm not able to go any further.
ChrischrosBelgium i like Susskind's lectures best probably, for giving real physics but explaining enough that i get some idea of what it all means. love randall too, but this lecture is pretty high level
N Marbletoe I'm going to check Susskind out!! Thanks. If I get a nobel price in physics one day, I'll mention you in my speech. PS:I'll probably win it for unifying Einsteins theory with quantum theory. :)
@12.17 she is lecturing that because a water drop is stuck in 2 dimenstion in 3 dimenstional world we have to belief in extra dimension? that is so funny.
Oh my god! she told the audience: "if you have any question please feel free to interrupt, because the lecture will build on itself, and if you get lost early on you're not gonna be able to follow, so feel free to interrupt i don't mind" just reminds me of a son of a bitch who is totally the opposite, he used to tell us "whoever dare to interrupt me at any moment before i finish my lecture i will kick him out the class & i will end the lesson for good" those moments when you wish you had a gun.
This goes with my photonic soul theory. It has been stated by me that the soul id one or more photons trapped and or held by the biological body. It has been further stated by me as well that our thoughts exist in the 4th dimension while seeing into the third. Most specifically to make this a viable claim I think it would have the be assumed that the captured photon(s) must be slowed down by this process.
Length, width and height are but dimensions of time. All Extra Dimensions are but Dimensions of Time. There are Infinitely Extra Dimensions of Time. There are Infinitely Many Dimensions of Time. There are an Infinite Number of Dimensions of Time. Khalid Masood
Science will have a continue evolution into subatomic, we must to tray to stay away for fixing or blocking this evolution, then yet we must use the word a possibility to be soo there
? Dimensions too small to see because they are 'curled up'?? since when did a dimension of any type have a dependance on size??? That's a load of crap !
How did I end up here from aTerrance McKenna video. I was happy listening to his journeys to the lands of the elves and fairys--. and what the hell is she babbling about brains and mass scales of planks and roots to tv brainsand who the hell is higgs phermeion h square - b square. I guess i am on the weak tv brain
omfg you would think this pretentious title would assure your eardrums not be busted by a preposterous fumbling crackling explosion ..straight up starting.....w aa ste of time..warning
Length is 1D, units are meters
Area is 2D, units are meters^2
Volume is 3D, units are meters^3
going from 1D to 3D is effectively going up 3 orders of magnitude in size. Dimensionality does depend on size. If you projected a see-through 3D cube on a piece of paper you would get a 2D image that covers less space, and thus is a smaller size, than the original 3D cube.
I loved her book, Warped Passages, and have read it twice and will read it still again in the future. She is so brilliant =)
Cool
I think I will give it a go!
Are these ideas still relevant/valid? Thanks!
Chase Beasley I was wondering the same myself, especially now that the LHC has been operational for 2 years and has verified the existence of the Higgs Boson.
Could sit listening to her lectures all day.
Dang, Dr. Randall is the real deal, and It's nice to see the mathematical formalism.
lisa randell on her book warped passage page 12 said that she believes in extra dimension because she stops supporting red sox and supporting yonkees and this nade her belief in extra dimension. This is amazing for a person who says that is a physist as a reason to belief in extra dimension. It is amazing time we are living now.
"Size" here is a relative term of course. Something may look like its covering a small size in terms of its dimensionality due to the frame of reference; such as the constellations in the sky making it appear like the least distance between the stars is actually less than it really is. In relativity of course there is no standard reference frame so a size-shift if you like is always to do with a different energy scale being probed that breaks some least action symmetry.
First lecture I have seen on what the LHC is looking for next. And its the first I have seen where experimental and theoretical consequences of extra dimensions are discussed. So very interesting, thanks for sharing, this is exciting stuff. Must go and find out what a brane is - curled up small dimensions I get, but I don't get brane at all
will you upload the other two lectures?
The sound is a little odd in the video. :L
I'll get them up as soon as possible.
Excellent. Hopefully when they spin up the LHC to these higher energies over the next few years we'll see this. Randall could well be a nobel recipient along with several others.
Here is the case for larger and even more powerful accelerators.
there are other dimensions and they are visable also seem to have intelligence of there own that interacts with the person whom enters its realms , the intelligence I speak of is one that interacts with physical self , movements from your arms and hands , also is able to communicate silently with you by moveing with your thought requests , also can pre,empt your interaction . so this realm space I speak of resembles streams of static like rivers that flow also interact
Good teacher, filled in detail sequence, something I always have trouble with because I agree with the Black Hole idea of information projection, time perceived now means everything happens at once , so I can see from this talk why the research is done this way.
If the dimensions (of space etc) are due to the substantive measurement of superimposed infinite time duration/modulation connected as the real image of the universe, then the existence of the dimensional centre of mass is both focused on a location now and distributed in hireachic dimensions to infinity according to the density/intensity of frequencies of occurrence. The semantic description, the nomenclature in congruence, of the implied spacetime connection point that is turned around on itself by every possible combination of relative timing, (for example, as in the field lines made visible around charged objects and magnets), ..has been scrambled inadvertently(?) by branching specialties and methodologies.
Do neutrinos work nonadimensionaly or octadimensionaly? Do they have anything to do with the quantum foam as they seem to be so random (at constantly practically light speed) in large numbers everywhere?
what about this Ion Murgu Condition of Uniform Travel, him speak about a Space Time contraction into layers?
About any Ion Murgu Rreal Magic angles what can to appears around maybe deformed of interactions?
!
It is quite annoying to have an add pop up that has nothing to do with the video, I want to watch the vid not deal with pop ups
great lecture
We need to start looking at the 3 dimensions of "space" as just the one dimension, or at best two, seeing as in the supra-cosmological sense our universe is a sheet like membrane.
I’m just wondering if you can help me understand, If a particle light is the fastest thing in the universe, what happens to the protons/neurons that exceed the front of that light particle?… Do they stop and just go along with the ride or are they still acting like Atoms that we know in this universe to move around each other? just curious
Joe Lunchbucket, who flunked out of high school, can study the 4th dimension by simply stepping out into the woods at night, out behind his single wide manufactured home, and rap a couple of drum sticks together. Then all he needs to do is listen. But he can talk as well, and see if he can get the 4th dimensional people that Lisa Randall cannot admit that exist, to perform some sort of stunt like stomping their feet a specific number of times, breaking a branch, or rapping some rocks together. No $trillion dollar super collider nor triple Phd required. The 4th dimension that these woods people live in, is at least as large as man's 3 dimensions. True, string theory is the basis for the 4th dimension, so you can toss out TIME and the tessuract that you have stuffed into your memory someplace. Gravity has a lesser affect on 4th dimensional people because they spend much of their time just floating around up into the tree branches. A certain type of free quanta loops are what helps define the properties of 4th dimensional quanta strings that comprise the body of the 4th dimensional people. You can read all about the physics by buying the book X3 by Adrian Dvir, who was handed the physics by 4th dimensional people from another solar system. And you can also find out about the secrets of several other mysteries in the same book. Lisa does not appear to have read the book, needless to say.
I have travelled the next dimension, and I can't wait for science to catch up!
Neat Star Trek T Shirt @ 34 minutes. Where can I order one of those?
"Any further questions?"😂😂😂😂😂😂 yes ma'am😂😂 about a bajillion 😜 THAT WAS AWESOME
Shame on you people who are saying such disrespecful things!
I love that people on these RUclips comments think they can call bullsh*t on one of the most often sighted physicist of all time (Lisa Randall). Not saying all of her theories will end up being confirmed in nature but I do know that NONE of your theories will be. Just sit back, shut up and learn try to something from this lecture.
Higher dimensions are visible only with higher energy than light. Photons are the lowest in line. The higher level are ev increased and boson is one such. There may be many others like that but not known. Each particle is an extra dimension. Proton is in a higher dimension than electron.
Thank you. Raphael Santore
The 14 dislikes are from the people who have it all figured out
you know Phi is containing the radial infinite go
Ion Mugu Condition of Uniform Travel and Phytagorean Triples
Sorry for a little bit asymmetry there but how can infinity to have symmetry?
!
in her theory, so to say? she knows what she is speaking about! do you think the dates 04, 05, 07, 09 and the max in 2012, as related to dimensional warp? anyone know this girl? ask her, give me feedback if you do. joanne hewett? maybe?
Lisa's intelligence makes her even more beautiful
No soundcheck....
Well... it might explain where McKenna's 'worlds' actually reside. :-)
Beautiful human female with a beautiful human brain. Lisa Randall, I genuinely admire you :)
Pff what are ya 5 year old ? Did you like your own comment too ? you poor little man
I like how she keeps asking, "Okay?" as if I was going to be able to argue with what she said.--Also dig that Light Saber Laser Pointer.
I think it's more of a "you with me?" thingy. :-)
So far as physics is concerned, all spatial dimensions and extra dimensions are the dimensions of time.
Khalid Masood
At 25:16 she picks up a laser pointer that I can only guess is over sized because of the natural tendency of speakers to put their own laser pointer back in their pocket and walk out. Now if they walk out with this one they deserve all ridicule from their peers. Solves the problem by giving up a bit of space to save bits of time.
BAI Dunno, maybe she likes holding big fat rods.
Think of the classical example of a sphere (3 Dimensions), with the size of basket ball, that you see from a distance of 1 km. Can you resolve it?
What is the best you can see? A DOT!
Therefore, 3 dimensions are somehow 'curled up in one.
This is not crap my friend, it is science.
We shouldn't characterise what we don't understand!:)
My 'One-moment Universe' hypothesis:
An electron is actually a moment in time at one of its ultimate level.
All the moments are actually one moment forever traveling backwards and forwards in time. Because, they are all the same "moment"! The idea that there is just the one, single moment going forwards and backwards in time is possible. There is a single moment field in time, not a single moment. The field is going forward in time, sometimes the field is going backward in time (and sometimes forward, and sometimes backward, in the x,y,z directions...). Each moment is a ripple in this field like every other moment in time. So in a sense, there really is just one moment in time that shows up in many places.
Khalid Masood
All spatial dimensions and extra dimensions are the dimensions of time.
Khalid Masood
I would like time to move in quadrature in the dimension orthogonal to the dimension we feel like we experience.
I wrote my honours thesis on the first of these papers, which I hear in this talk has been cited over 3000 times now! Her work is quite incredible and beautiful. This is pure beauty and joy to me :)
arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9905221
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )
The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea.
I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.
Article THEORIES OF THE BRANE on edge dot org helps. It happens to have been written by Lisa in 2003. (Google THEORIES OF THE BRANE and its about the fourth item after the truly awful Wikipedia links)
So many idiotic comments here, really disheartening.
I am surprised she uses the term string theory. I thought m-theory was the more commonly used term now, perhaps I have been misled.
Michael Bauers i think string theory is the same thing as m-theory, basically. m-theory contains all the 5 consistent string theories; it's all strings and membranes and stuff.
All extra dimensions are additional time dimensions.
Khalid Masood
It makes me sad that I do not understand a word of what she is saying. It's just way above my knowledge I have about space. Ans I'm passionate about the universe. I'm in awe when I see the size of the universe. I've devoured all of Tyson Degrasse and Krauss speeches and videos but I'm not able to go any further.
ChrischrosBelgium i like Susskind's lectures best probably, for giving real physics but explaining enough that i get some idea of what it all means. love randall too, but this lecture is pretty high level
N Marbletoe I'm going to check Susskind out!! Thanks. If I get a nobel price in physics one day, I'll mention you in my speech.
PS:I'll probably win it for unifying Einsteins theory with quantum theory. :)
+The Prophet Hahahaha, not really.
which part?? all the speculation?
@12.17 she is lecturing that because a water drop is stuck in 2 dimenstion in 3 dimenstional world we have to belief in extra dimension? that is so funny.
She is so beautiful. I can listen to her all day.
I wish Dyson could comment on this.
Oh my god! she told the audience: "if you have any question please feel free to interrupt, because the lecture will build on itself, and if you get lost early on you're not gonna be able to follow, so feel free to interrupt i don't mind" just reminds me of a son of a bitch who is totally the opposite, he used to tell us "whoever dare to interrupt me at any moment before i finish my lecture i will kick him out the class & i will end the lesson for good" those moments when you wish you had a gun.
This goes with my photonic soul theory. It has been stated by me that the soul id one or more photons trapped and or held by the biological body. It has been further stated by me as well that our thoughts exist in the 4th dimension while seeing into the third. Most specifically to make this a viable claim I think it would have the be assumed that the captured photon(s) must be slowed down by this process.
Another thing is she saying that electromagnetism doesn't exist in other dimensions? Or at least not with as much strength as in this one.
+casinogiant You need to lay off the sauce.
+Scott Slaughter, Hahaha. Your reply gave me a hearty laugh.
Lay off the new age woowoo...
Meta Tron Lol.
Length, width and height are but dimensions of time.
All Extra Dimensions are but Dimensions of Time.
There are Infinitely Extra Dimensions of Time.
There are Infinitely Many Dimensions of Time.
There are an Infinite Number of Dimensions of Time.
Khalid Masood
I wouldn't mind resonating with her, nudge nudge, wink wink, say no more! :*)
So 126 GeV.... maybe 126.4? ;)
There you go Death...
Lisa, bulk?
Science will have a continue evolution into subatomic, we must to tray to stay away for fixing or blocking this evolution, then yet we must use the word a possibility to be soo there
? Dimensions too small to see because they are 'curled up'?? since when did a dimension of any type have a dependance on size??? That's a load of crap !
She really remind me of jodie poster in the movie contact
It it is not a load of crap, but that doesn't even seem to address the question.
God dunnit.
Why the hell is the introduction so long? Did you need to write an entire summary for the whole video? Just write what it's about and get on with it.
black holes portal vi weight holes wat is yours difentes of the tow hole s tillme what the difents are hear from you soon
she is so beautiful :)
☺😊😀😁😂5 Smile's
She is so beautiful
How did I end up here from aTerrance McKenna video. I was happy listening to his journeys to the lands of the elves and fairys--. and what the hell is she babbling about brains and mass scales of planks and roots to tv brainsand who the hell is higgs phermeion h square - b square. I guess i am on the weak tv brain
SCENIC MUSIC VIDEOS TeV brane instead of TV brane.
Oh, if I was thirty years younger and single......
omfg you would think this pretentious title would assure your eardrums not be busted by a preposterous fumbling crackling explosion ..straight up starting.....w aa ste of time..warning
gibberish