I love spending time from my Hawaii vacation watching Wolfpack's videos on the smart TV's that are provided at our staying locations and showing them to the rest of my family.
I don't know who "Everyone" is, but the vast majority of NATO tankers know that the T-80 has a turbine engine. They also know that, just like the T-72, the T-80 is an "easy opening" tank once the armor package is penetrated.
AWESOME VIDEO!!!!!!!! Of course, I watch all of your videos you post. Your videos, are like reading a book, but seeing it in real time. (Really Enjoy watching all of them). It amazes me, how well rounded you are, regarding your tactics. Whether it is Naval warfare, Submarine Warfare, Air Warfare, or my personal favorite, Ground, and Armored Warfare. I hope you will do a lot more of, GHPC videos. Again, Congratulations, on your continued success with your channel!!!!!!! Keep up the great job!!!!
nice work and gameplay you handled this mission quite well not going to will fast and getting surprised by the m60s but not to slow to where you loses all of your BMPs. 1:43 the FCS is what makes the T-80B special compared to the T-72 or T-64A the 1G42 itself is not super diffrent compared to other soviet gun sights and the gun sight is more like the M1A2 being duel-axis stabilized rather then the M1A1 wacth is single axis-stabilized like the M1 and M1IP i hope you have a good day
What are you talking about? He literally did lose all of the BMPs (although I don't think he could have done much about it, probably just AI being dumb).
@@samargrewal929 fair, but your first comment states he was not too fast, but was fast enough that he didn't lose all the BMPs, yet he did lose all of them
I can’t remember if he is, but if he added infantry and trenches it would make this game a lot more realistic and enjoyable. It would feel like a war front and either funnel you through choke points or you’d have to face close combat with them. Could be cool
I don't know if I'm the only one, but I kind of want them to add the M551 Sheridan. I say this as someone who isn't even really a big fan of the Sheridan, I just think it looks kind of neat, and would also be neat to see in GHPC.
@@harveyknguyen while you are probably correct, the Sheridan was still being used into the early 90's. Also they had just added the gun launched ATGM capability to the Soviet MBTs. As well as being just overall pretty cool to have.
@@malekiththewitchking2799 the only reason i say that is because only vehicles that were in Fulda in 1985 or can reasonably assumed to be in reserve are being added to the game ik the 11th ACR fielded them, but by '85 they may have switched over to the Bradley as their light armor if it doesn't get added, it'll be for the same reason the Challenger 1, T-72B, and T-80BV aren't being added: they weren't in the Fulda Gap in 1985
I gotta wonder what made those m60s so inaccurate. They had plenty of time to line up and score hits but they just sprayed like they were holding a pistol sideways for some reason.
Even in that state the devs get complaints about "ai aimbot" pretty often. It would be cool to see a difficulty where the ai can fire with better accuracy like an experienced player.
Is there any way to direct other units or assets via the map interface? This is a capability that was in M1 Tank Platoon II that is sorely missed in GHPC. You can’t really employ tactics effectively without a map-and-orders interface.
Check steel beasts: You can easily control batallion size units down to single stations in individual vehicles, with all combined arms simulated. Price tag is hefty, but this is what out army use for low cost training
Then you're not following Soviet doctrine and will you achieve Is losing all of you equipment for nothing Clearly you're only knowledge of Soviet doctrine comes from enemy at the gates I.G nothing You can't expect to take no losses but you want to mitigate them
@@RT-dr7us not the doctrines falt if you can't do properly to save your life and you're army is a shall of want came before it Also a LOT of Ukrainians where the Soviet military so where's that Bring up Ukraine in a convention about a what if conflict in the fulda gap in 1985 changes nothing it's the equivalent of bringing up the gulf war when you're talking about Vietnam
When I saw your comment I came to try again and it's normal now. I refreshed it yesterday couple of times but nope. Sometimes this happens, don't know why. Thanks on reply.
![Kodak Black - Versatile 4 [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VcP_1Ua__vY/mqdefault.jpg)
I missed the after action hit-review :(
Yea, i really wanted to know where that ricochet ended up at xD
This right here
It would be cool if you did a duel campaign Cold Waters/Gunner, HEAT, PC! Get both land and sea aspects of the war...
that would be pretty cool
Or triple aspect with DCS World
Can't wait to see you try part 2, massive ballache that one with the M901s
T-80 has great reverse speed? Then you'll like T-72 even more! 😅
Can it match an Italian design?
You should see how fast it can go vertically.
I hope they make this game multiplayer someday. Like co op missions or custom games. Stuff like that
Checkout their roadmap. It's planned, but at the end.
Love to see some GHPC content!
I love spending time from my Hawaii vacation watching Wolfpack's videos on the smart TV's that are provided at our staying locations and showing them to the rest of my family.
Everyone thinks the Abrams is the only tank that uses a turbine engine. WRONG. :)
Dude, let the Murikas dream in peace, don´t bully them.
I think the Swedes were actually the first to put a turbine engine in a tank, the Strv 103.
I don't know who "Everyone" is, but the vast majority of NATO tankers know that the T-80 has a turbine engine. They also know that, just like the T-72, the T-80 is an "easy opening" tank once the armor package is penetrated.
@@danielmiller2076 like the Abram's they explode so fast.
@@soviet9922 so did i with your mom yesterday bud
i hope Wolfpack had a good birthday!
awesome video, @3:35 it look like that round got deflected then flew off in the distance, so cool.
That can happen, but the tank also caught on fire so it probably went through and out the back.
3:53 Wolfpack: I want smoke!
Me:🤔.........Oh thaaaat smoke! Silly me!
Man, this game looks like its gotten much better since i last played it. Makes me want to jump back in
Imagine when its actually finished.
AWESOME VIDEO!!!!!!!!
Of course, I watch all of your videos you post. Your videos, are like reading a book, but seeing it in real time. (Really Enjoy watching all of them).
It amazes me, how well rounded you are, regarding your tactics. Whether it is Naval warfare, Submarine Warfare, Air Warfare, or my personal favorite, Ground, and Armored Warfare.
I hope you will do a lot more of, GHPC videos.
Again, Congratulations, on your continued success with your channel!!!!!!!
Keep up the great job!!!!
nice work and gameplay you handled this mission quite well not going to will fast and getting surprised by the m60s but not to slow to where you loses all of your BMPs.
1:43 the FCS is what makes the T-80B special compared to the T-72 or T-64A the 1G42 itself is not super diffrent compared to other soviet gun sights
and the gun sight is more like the M1A2 being duel-axis stabilized rather then the M1A1 wacth is single axis-stabilized like the M1 and M1IP
i hope you have a good day
What are you talking about? He literally did lose all of the BMPs (although I don't think he could have done much about it, probably just AI being dumb).
@@MaxCroat kinda impossible to beat this without losing some or all of the bmps
still he handle better then most people have seem
@@samargrewal929 fair, but your first comment states he was not too fast, but was fast enough that he didn't lose all the BMPs, yet he did lose all of them
@@MaxCroat fair point
Reminds me of a game I was obsessed with on the PlayStation one. Can’t remember its name but it was this game. But 20 years ago 😂
happy birthday to peoples who is born on 28th may....
i know its wolfpacks birthday on the 28th may i saw it in a vid once back in a silent hunter III vid
I can’t remember if he is, but if he added infantry and trenches it would make this game a lot more realistic and enjoyable. It would feel like a war front and either funnel you through choke points or you’d have to face close combat with them. Could be cool
Guess what's being teased by the Devs of the game.
Causing an enemy armoured vehicle to explode is always worthy of a passing grade. - (paraphrasing of LTC Nicholas Moran, USANG)
RED ARMY ROLLING IN
10:50 Your apology about there being no battle report made me laugh really hard for some reason, so no worries about that.
Eyyyy more GHPC! Nice :)
Good thing those Bradleys decided not to use their BGM-71s...
I don't know if I'm the only one, but I kind of want them to add the M551 Sheridan. I say this as someone who isn't even really a big fan of the Sheridan, I just think it looks kind of neat, and would also be neat to see in GHPC.
it may be an out of theater vehicle, as far as I can tell it was replaced by the Bradley by 1985 but it could be a reserve tank
@@harveyknguyen while you are probably correct, the Sheridan was still being used into the early 90's. Also they had just added the gun launched ATGM capability to the Soviet MBTs. As well as being just overall pretty cool to have.
@@malekiththewitchking2799 the only reason i say that is because only vehicles that were in Fulda in 1985 or can reasonably assumed to be in reserve are being added to the game
ik the 11th ACR fielded them, but by '85 they may have switched over to the Bradley as their light armor
if it doesn't get added, it'll be for the same reason the Challenger 1, T-72B, and T-80BV aren't being added: they weren't in the Fulda Gap in 1985
@@harveyknguyen That is fair honestly. As I had stated you are probably correct. I just think it would be kinda neat.
@@malekiththewitchking2799 yeah hopefully there's evidence that the Sheridan was there, it'd be kinda cool to use a western missile that isn't a TOW
This game looks pretty kick ass. I'm going to buy it.
If they added infantry to this game id be so pumped!
they're still in progress
I gotta wonder what made those m60s so inaccurate. They had plenty of time to line up and score hits but they just sprayed like they were holding a pistol sideways for some reason.
Video game reasons. Probably something similar to bioshock where the first ranged attack will always miss?
Even in that state the devs get complaints about "ai aimbot" pretty often. It would be cool to see a difficulty where the ai can fire with better accuracy like an experienced player.
Bloody youtube fail . Subbed & get notified of your video after 2 weeks .
love this game
Very nice
Is there any way to direct other units or assets via the map interface? This is a capability that was in M1 Tank Platoon II that is sorely missed in GHPC. You can’t really employ tactics effectively without a map-and-orders interface.
Check steel beasts: You can easily control batallion size units down to single stations in individual vehicles, with all combined arms simulated. Price tag is hefty, but this is what out army use for low cost training
@@maoh1772Thanks, I’ve had SB Pro PE for many years. I agree it’s awesome.
you need to use soviet tactics: charge full speed ahead, dam the casualties lol
Then you're not following Soviet doctrine and will you achieve Is losing all of you equipment for nothing
Clearly you're only knowledge of Soviet doctrine comes from enemy at the gates I.G nothing
You can't expect to take no losses but you want to mitigate them
@@robingrewal8103 read the news lately? care to rethink your response lol
@@RT-dr7us not the doctrines falt if you can't do properly to save your life and you're army is a shall of want came before it
Also a LOT of Ukrainians where the Soviet military so where's that
Bring up Ukraine in a convention about a what if conflict in the fulda gap in 1985 changes nothing it's the equivalent of bringing up the gulf war when you're talking about Vietnam
@@RT-dr7us also if you're using main steam news sources you argument
That doesn't make me very convinced just saying
How about some T-64B action?
When I saw your comment I came to try again and it's normal now. I refreshed it yesterday couple of times but nope. Sometimes this happens, don't know why. Thanks on reply.
@@fromhelltocell Happy for that because it's was a great offering by our guy WP.
What do you use for gun traverse controls?
When's this set? 1980s? Even so, seems like a significant lack of ATGMs
The 2nd part of this mission has plenty. Takes place in 1985.
McClure Cape
me and a friend are trying to id the helicopter at the beginning of the video can someone help me it looks like its a MIL design but i cant find it
Garrett, That is the MiL Mi -2. Hope this helped.
@@Tamburello_1994 thanks I kinda guessed it was but I couldnt immediately find a pic to place it
@@garrettflaherty5440 Glad you found it helpful.
Ty
If you get the opportunity to run it across 3 monitors as 5760x1080 ... you will not forget it.
سلام دوست عزیز نسخه کامل این بازی رو از کجا دانلود کنم
Nice.
No AAR?! I want my money back! 😂 Seriously though, great video.
Hansen Land
i feel like the Russo-Ukraine war is gonna create some good video games
I'll be the drone operator coz I'm not doing a tank.
Hit like and subscribe to support the Wolfpack
FIRST
There's lazy, then there's making a 10 minute "Part 1." What, too much work to put out a 20 minute Part 1 AND 2?
Worst ai ever.