Being all critical of the poster's work in several videos and advertising your own work in someone else's praise comment for the poster (that isn't even as long and complex as the poster had been creating and developing since then) - I think you're a narcissist wanting to receive attention from others in unorthodox ways. That is not how a critic works, if that's what you're aiming for. You have a right to be critical and have opinions, but being narcissistic doesn't grant you any favors.
@@kbear1234 About the complexity of my work..., opposing myself from the dominant movement, I don't praise complexity but rather meaning, consistence and pleasant. For this reason, I choose not to do neojazz or neoconcrete and try to stick with simple and function ideas. However, there is, indeed, a good level of complexity in case you would like to see. There is a very function counterpoint in "Le Tourbillion..." at 0:40 and the harmony, structure, germ ideas and four part writing of "will to power" is very distinguish. I have hundreds of music's and videos that sounds like the music's of others amateur composers who I critique, but I don't publish it because, in my opinion, it is bad. You may not have sympathy for me due to my opinion be different then your. Of course, if I thought the same as you your reaction would be to agree with me and, therefore, support. However, because I oppose myself relative to you, a friction is created and that helps to develop this view of me as an "evil" person, even though I praise a lot of composers, but you may not see those praises because you don't follow them. But I am just a honest critique who have different opinions from you and who, sometimes, try to get critiques to my music so I can improve myself. I am not your enemy or a narcissist, just someone you don't like so deaw with it.
@@kbear1234 1. I am an honest critique who praises good composers and critique bad pieces or parts of pieces. If you only saw me pointing mistakes, then you only saw the pieces that I found bad. 2. From time to time I directly and honestly communicate that I want someone to see my music and that's my right and the person choice to see it or not. There is nothing wrong in it. Specially because if I didn't do it directly, I would have to do it indirectly through manipulation and I find that wrong, so my choice is to do it directly when I do it. 3. I am not your enemy or a narcissist. I am just someone who have different opinions, who you disagree with and, therefore, don't have sympathy. Deaw with different opinions and stop seeing me as an enemy. 4. About the complexity of my works..., complexity means less to me then meaning and consistence. So I don't stick to complexity in my work even though there is some, for example, in "Le tourbillion..." At 0:40 there is an emotional and effective counterpoint; another example is the four to five part writing in "Will to Power" that also have some good germ ideas, structure and harmony.
1. I am an honest critique who praises good composers and critique bad pieces or parts of pieces. If you only saw me pointing mistakes, then you only saw the pieces that I found bad. 2. From time to time I directly and honestly communicate that I want someone to see my music and that's my right and the person choice to see it or not. There is nothing wrong in it. Specially because if I didn't do it directly, I would have to do it indirectly through manipulation and I find that wrong, so my choice is to do it directly when I do it. 3. I am not your enemy or a narcissist. I am just someone who have different opinions, who you disagree with and, therefore, don't have sympathy. Deaw with different opinions and stop seeing me as an enemy. 4. About the complexity of my works..., complexity means less to me then meaning and consistence. So I don't stick to complexity in my work even though there is some, for example, in "Le tourbillion..." At 0:40 there is an emotional and effective counterpoint; another example is the four to five part writing in "Will to Power" that also have some good germ ideas, structure and harmony.
It would be a better music if the initial counterpoint were separated into another mjsic of its own. Sometimes it is too repetitive. But overall it is good 👍
Dang this is insane. can't believe I saw your video 2 minutes ago.
if only i had 4 hands
It really is one of the best transcriptions
See mine also! My latest one!
Being all critical of the poster's work in several videos and advertising your own work in someone else's praise comment for the poster (that isn't even as long and complex as the poster had been creating and developing since then) - I think you're a narcissist wanting to receive attention from others in unorthodox ways. That is not how a critic works, if that's what you're aiming for.
You have a right to be critical and have opinions, but being narcissistic doesn't grant you any favors.
@@kbear1234
About the complexity of my work..., opposing myself from the dominant movement, I don't praise complexity but rather meaning, consistence and pleasant. For this reason, I choose not to do neojazz or neoconcrete and try to stick with simple and function ideas. However, there is, indeed, a good level of complexity in case you would like to see. There is a very function counterpoint in "Le Tourbillion..." at 0:40 and the harmony, structure, germ ideas and four part writing of "will to power" is very distinguish. I have hundreds of music's and videos that sounds like the music's of others amateur composers who I critique, but I don't publish it because, in my opinion, it is bad.
You may not have sympathy for me due to my opinion be different then your. Of course, if I thought the same as you your reaction would be to agree with me and, therefore, support. However, because I oppose myself relative to you, a friction is created and that helps to develop this view of me as an "evil" person, even though I praise a lot of composers, but you may not see those praises because you don't follow them.
But I am just a honest critique who have different opinions from you and who, sometimes, try to get critiques to my music so I can improve myself. I am not your enemy or a narcissist, just someone you don't like so deaw with it.
@@kbear1234
1. I am an honest critique who praises good composers and critique bad pieces or parts of pieces. If you only saw me pointing mistakes, then you only saw the pieces that I found bad.
2. From time to time I directly and honestly communicate that I want someone to see my music and that's my right and the person choice to see it or not. There is nothing wrong in it. Specially because if I didn't do it directly, I would have to do it indirectly through manipulation and I find that wrong, so my choice is to do it directly when I do it.
3. I am not your enemy or a narcissist. I am just someone who have different opinions, who you disagree with and, therefore, don't have sympathy. Deaw with different opinions and stop seeing me as an enemy.
4. About the complexity of my works..., complexity means less to me then meaning and consistence. So I don't stick to complexity in my work even though there is some, for example, in "Le tourbillion..." At 0:40 there is an emotional and effective counterpoint; another example is the four to five part writing in "Will to Power" that also have some good germ ideas, structure and harmony.
1. I am an honest critique who praises good composers and critique bad pieces or parts of pieces. If you only saw me pointing mistakes, then you only saw the pieces that I found bad.
2. From time to time I directly and honestly communicate that I want someone to see my music and that's my right and the person choice to see it or not. There is nothing wrong in it. Specially because if I didn't do it directly, I would have to do it indirectly through manipulation and I find that wrong, so my choice is to do it directly when I do it.
3. I am not your enemy or a narcissist. I am just someone who have different opinions, who you disagree with and, therefore, don't have sympathy. Deaw with different opinions and stop seeing me as an enemy.
4. About the complexity of my works..., complexity means less to me then meaning and consistence. So I don't stick to complexity in my work even though there is some, for example, in "Le tourbillion..." At 0:40 there is an emotional and effective counterpoint; another example is the four to five part writing in "Will to Power" that also have some good germ ideas, structure and harmony.
This is amazing, please never stop creating a masterpiece like this.
Wow! This is great I’m sad I haven’t seen this earlier!
@@-strawberry-milk- you're not late, I'm actually glad you came listening to this transcription :)
Awesome
Nice
Wow
Check mine!
Noice
It would be a better music if the initial counterpoint were separated into another mjsic of its own.
Sometimes it is too repetitive.
But overall it is good 👍