Our Malaysia Diplomat visited Xinjang in last year 2023 together with bunches of diplomats from other Muslim countries including Indonesia found no such things in Xinjiang. Most Muslim countries in the world have no issues with it, only the West keep expressing their concern on Xinjiang while they remain total silence to what happened in gaza right now!
@@BrunoDias1234 In fact, minorities in China are better treated than the Han Chinese, with many privileges in their favor! Ask any Muslim in China and they will tell you they live along side others for thousands of years without problem!
Normaly no one pro-war. ut that will come to bite them later on because like in the Asia, There are lot of silent conflict and dispute. We just not dumb as Russia to go to full war
Our Malaysia Diplomat visited Xinjang in last year 2023 together with bunches of diplomats from other Muslim countries including Indonesia found no such things in Xinjiang. Most Muslim countries in the world have no issues with it, only the West keep expressing their concern on Xinjiang while they remain total silence to what happened in gaza right now!
India has blocked China’s investment and made it more difficult for Chinese companies working in India. But India is not in US block. During COVID India and South Africa went to US block and asked for temporary moratorium on Covid vaccine intellectual property payment to protect world poor, Germany vetoed the proposal. Covid caused havoc, few moths later Europeans came asking India mentioning it is a democracy all the while decrying it , give us support against Russia. It kind of looked very selfish
India is not a new neutral. It has always been non aligned. Though the U.S. support for Pakistan had occasionally pushed it slightly towards USSR in the past.
Nice scam you got there. India joins Quad, a military alliance, and you are saying that they are non aligned? Remember when war first started in the middle east between Israel and the other? India first move is to voice their support for Israel? Non aligned Indeed. How about some honesty?
India now is more pro US than it's ever been in the past. It's upto the west now to finally win India over to their side. For that r\they will have to make India as the REPLACEMENT for China. That means whatever investment is leaving China, west should make sure it goes to INDIA, so that people recognise the West's gesture, and India will become pro west. However what they have been doing currently: hoarding Separatist- terrorists, Diverting their Chinese divestments to Vietnam, Phillipines, Mexico and the US itself. So they should not be expecting India to be pro west either...
Our Malaysia Diplomat visited Xinjang in last year 2023 together with bunches of diplomats from other Muslim countries including Indonesia found no such things in Xinjiang. Most Muslim countries in the world have no issues with it, only the West keep expressing their concern on Xinjiang while they remain total silence to what happened in gaza right now!
I am from India These Westerners think that their problem is the world's problem but not vice versa... Also these Western Countries will push you to join their alliance when in the past they had worked with the countries who are your enemies...
@@Couchpotato-s2h thats because India is a great military power. So however India backup will probably end winning. Brazil on the other hand have no reason to become military dominant as India.
Read your history to see what happened during WWII. The excuses were the same, "this is not our war". The check wasn't big enough until it was, and Brazil joined the war.
@@marcialabrahantes3369my country india lost more men fighting ww2 both on the battlegrounds as well starving back home when the monster named Churchill diverted food. We have had it fighting other people's wars.
Sadly it's become evident that Bloomberg, Reuters, and the AP are propaganda outlets. They were just better at hiding it in the past. Now people have more sources of information (with receipts). .and we're seeing just how twisted these outlets really are.
Most of the so-called "new neutrals" were never aligned with a foreign power, to begin with. They always had an independent stance. India, Brazil, and co. are just too big and complex to have their interests guaranteed by any superpower
@@NikitOS-vv4ks when you have an entire alliance which considers you their adversary and a threat, you have no choice but to take a defensive stance. also there's specific. To Ru, "them" are those in alliance AGAISNT Ru, while US definition of "them" are the one who does not agree with US actions/policies.
Switzerland has never been neutral, it has always been Pro-West & Pro-US, just that packaging was done nicely for, Switzerland, so as to present them as neutral.
We got bigger problems in our own countries than other people’s wars. Our people need jobs and basic services. Best believe our priority will be our own people
I think they're calling the group the new neutrals, not that each country in it is newly neutral. Some of them are, so the group gets a name to differentiate from 10 years ago
More people are dying in Palestine every bloody day, and yet, the chief example is the war in Ukraine. This is why you get neutral countries. Love from a neutral country.
You mean: "Has taken Putin his money, and therefore sullied its own reputation for the foreseeable future". If India does not act against what Russia is doing in Ukraine then Pakistan may as well take Kashmir. It would be fair game after all, as India has signaled with this.
Yes, and India has with that raised its shoulders to what Russia is doing in Ukraine. Ironically, it signaled that Pakistan for example could annex Kashmir, that is how dangerous to the regional and world order its position is.
Then how is India not neutral?? India never condemned Russia but it also said Russia directly to stop war, during direct meetings. Moreover unlike Iran or North Korea, India has never send weapons or military to Russia and same in Ukraine, India has even send humanitarian assistance in Ukraine, despite it's relationship with Russia. I don't know, what neutrality is, if not that.
Dear Bloomberg or whoever the editors of this video, when you talk and show India why you always show the most crowded place Delhi or the slums of Dharavi, India is literally much more than that. We are the 5th Largest and fastest economy in the world. India is the only country that eradicated extreme poverty in 2023 as per IMF, yet you guys always present us as the poor. Yes, India still has a long way to go but we are not less than any country. We have several amazing infrastructures, buildings... Every Major companies CEO's are Indians from Google to World Bank and from You tube to Only fans. Please stop showing only the worst part of India in every other video.
Dictatorship lol.. You need to educate yourself. India is the largest democratic country in the world. We ain't china, pakistan or Iran. Read news and reports from IMF.. Don't just google..
picking sides is what will cause world war iii. world war i and ii were actually european wars, but since europe had colonized the whole world, everyone became involved. the world split in two because europe was split in two. but it is not necessary for that to happen again. if countries follow their own interests, largely then we can end the wars of this century with mostly regional wars (russia/ukraine and israel/gaza) and skirmishes (india/china). but if the us forces everyone into two sides we may just get world war iii
If two groups are fighting and you have nothing to do with any of the group, then what side do you choose? The answer is a simple neither. Bloomberg is making it more complicated than what it is.
Geo-politics is often a losing proposition. The US lost trillions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Still, the US is continuing its decades-long misadventure in the Middle East with regards to Israel, etc.
The US didn't lose trillions. 8 trillion public dollars became private dollars, trickle-down economics continued to not happen, profit and lobbying ensured the system remains successful. Eisenhower warned Americans of this on 1961.
As Indian foreign policy minister said Europe needs to stop acting like the rest of the world's problems aren't theirs and its problems are the world's problems
@@SajtosNokedliIAM S Jaishankar is a seasoned diplomat and has been ambassador to several countries during his tenure and saying he doesn't know European problems is childish.
India has always been non-aligned and was never and still todays, not part of any alliance. During cold wars in the past and and ongoing wars, India faced immense pressure from different countries to pick the side, but India did not buckle and played important role in preventing the world economy going into the recession which could have impacted lot of small and medium countries whose economies were already struggling. India never waged any war on other countries. Companies can invest looking at the historical record.
Can someone please tell me why, as an american its getting very disgusting, why we dont spend all our money on our healthcare, infrastructure, and let other counties who want war swim or sink, this spending is killing us
Because the last times we tried to demobilize, we got dragged into WW1, WW2, and 9/11. Disengagement just means more space for adversaries to carry out operations against us.
Why should countries unnecessarily pick a side and avoid/hate other countries? Countries must always cooperate with each other and not keeping hating each other. Unite and not divide, that should be the motto for the world.😀😃😎
the difficulty in being non aligned or not choosing sides, is when they are sanctioned by bigger countries for dealing with certain parties deemed unfriendly to the bigger countries... thats when maidans, regime change, flower/colour revolutions happen...
That's right, states should be for their own first and foremost since there's no greater cause. Make friends with as many countries as possible, not allies. Live and let live.
Because there's only one annoying bully forcing others to pick side. Not happening on the other side. Well, we can tell who is panicking and who is losing.
The west "... has to grow out of the mindset that its problems are the world's problem, but the world's problems are not its problems", to quote my beloved country's beloved EAM Dr. S Jaishankar
Take India for example. There is simply no reason why India shud pick a side. Multi allignment has payed them amazing dividends. Its becoming the Switzerland of Asia ( much bigger, much powerful).
For longest time modernization meant westernization till Global South countries got United and said enough is enough. Global South will now define what it means to be Global by setting its own standard and index.
Being an economist and not explaining the audience why correlation and causation are not at all the same thing at 4:05 just goes to show how much BS y'all are trying to push
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Watch more of our News Spotlight documentaries: ruclips.net/p/PLqq4LnWs3olXOhUOv4O6r-9OdWTQN83se
US is an evil empire trying to demonize China which wants a peaceful world for trade and business!!!
Our Malaysia Diplomat visited Xinjang in last year 2023 together with bunches of diplomats from other Muslim countries including Indonesia found no such things in Xinjiang. Most Muslim countries in the world have no issues with it, only the West keep expressing their concern on Xinjiang while they remain total silence to what happened in gaza right now!
@@BrunoDias1234 In fact, minorities in China are better treated than the Han Chinese, with many privileges in their favor! Ask any Muslim in China and they will tell you they live along side others for thousands of years without problem!
Everyone just read the comments guys! 😂
What they are wondering is why more Nations aren't pro-war.
Normaly no one pro-war. ut that will come to bite them later on because like in the Asia, There are lot of silent conflict and dispute. We just not dumb as Russia to go to full war
And unlike the Great Powers, they also have more to lose as well.
Aren't they lovers of Freedom and Democracy?
When both sides wanted war. We chose peace. The world doesn't realise how important this stand is.
This video desperately screams “save the economy” to me
Your enemy doesn't have to be my enemy.
thank you! pretty much like any other person with some common sense would think....but aparantly common sense is hard to find these days.
@@kaiserxblueit's not so common
Our Malaysia Diplomat visited Xinjang in last year 2023 together with bunches of diplomats from other Muslim countries including Indonesia found no such things in Xinjiang. Most Muslim countries in the world have no issues with it, only the West keep expressing their concern on Xinjiang while they remain total silence to what happened in gaza right now!
@@BrunoDias1234 you wont see bcz the Chinese wont let your diplomats see it.
India has blocked China’s investment and made it more difficult for Chinese companies working in India. But India is not in US block. During COVID India and South Africa went to US block and asked for temporary moratorium on Covid vaccine intellectual property payment to protect world poor, Germany vetoed the proposal. Covid caused havoc, few moths later Europeans came asking India mentioning it is a democracy all the while decrying it , give us support against Russia. It kind of looked very selfish
Germany veto ?
tank u sir
India is not a new neutral. It has always been non aligned. Though the U.S. support for Pakistan had occasionally pushed it slightly towards USSR in the past.
Pakistan is a well known vassal state.
Their army ‘owns’ Pakistan.
Nice scam you got there. India joins Quad, a military alliance, and you are saying that they are non aligned? Remember when war first started in the middle east between Israel and the other? India first move is to voice their support for Israel? Non aligned Indeed. How about some honesty?
India now is more pro US than it's ever been in the past. It's upto the west now to finally win India over to their side. For that r\they will have to make India as the REPLACEMENT for China. That means whatever investment is leaving China, west should make sure it goes to INDIA, so that people recognise the West's gesture, and India will become pro west.
However what they have been doing currently: hoarding Separatist- terrorists, Diverting their Chinese divestments to Vietnam, Phillipines, Mexico and the US itself. So they should not be expecting India to be pro west either...
Multi alignment and non alignment are different
Our Malaysia Diplomat visited Xinjang in last year 2023 together with bunches of diplomats from other Muslim countries including Indonesia found no such things in Xinjiang. Most Muslim countries in the world have no issues with it, only the West keep expressing their concern on Xinjiang while they remain total silence to what happened in gaza right now!
As a brazillian the only thing I can say is: this sh** is not our problem.
I am from India
These Westerners think that their problem is the world's problem but not vice versa...
Also these Western Countries will push you to join their alliance when in the past they had worked with the countries who are your enemies...
I am from India and Idk how y'all do it. We are getting hate left and right for being neutral. smh
@@Couchpotato-s2h thats because India is a great military power. So however India backup will probably end winning. Brazil on the other hand have no reason to become military dominant as India.
Read your history to see what happened during WWII. The excuses were the same, "this is not our war". The check wasn't big enough until it was, and Brazil joined the war.
Almost all Latin American countries have that thought, why do we get involved in other people's problems when we have to solve our own?
Americans when they realise not every country act like there european vassals
their*
but yes everyone says yes to $$ until it affects them
usually cuz they didn't get hammered in ww1 or ww2
@@crusader3108Give two example 😅
@@marcialabrahantes3369my country india lost more men fighting ww2 both on the battlegrounds as well starving back home when the monster named Churchill diverted food. We have had it fighting other people's wars.
@@crusader3108 lol tony blair
@@crusader3108Afghanistan !! Ukraine ?.
They want peace, they are not warmongers backed by corporates...
US neocons' modus operandi is to create fear, conflicts in order to shift $$ to the US MIC and other associates 🤪🤪
This was more propaganda than news.
Sadly it's become evident that Bloomberg, Reuters, and the AP are propaganda outlets. They were just better at hiding it in the past. Now people have more sources of information (with receipts). .and we're seeing just how twisted these outlets really are.
yes bro its western propoganda
Yes
@@A-Wesker-5 he is biased mf 😂
@A-Wesker-5 "The New Neutrals"? India is non alligned since it's independence. It lead the non aligned movemnet.
Most of the so-called "new neutrals" were never aligned with a foreign power, to begin with. They always had an independent stance. India, Brazil, and co. are just too big and complex to have their interests guaranteed by any superpower
Well said. Its noe south korea or taiwan. To big.
Poland neutral? What a load of bs in this video.
Lol😂 Poland openly say it want to destroy Russia
They mean Poland is not willing to be a hardcore anti-china😂
as far as I know, of all the countries, Poland hates Russia the most (not counting Ukraine)
Have these morons heard Sikorski? Poland is more pro-US than the US itself.
They said, poland is a place where investments happen, not that it's nautral
America: Why don’t you choose side? (False)
America: Why don’t you choose to die for me? (Real)
That’s so true😂
India is sovereign country
When talk about india always show clips from old delhi😂😂😂
Old Delhi and dharavi 😂😂 they want built an image by this about India
I honestly don't even know if these are from the latest clip. I remember seeing old money before demonetization.
Because that is 90% india. I am also indian, but how it help us to have inflated ego showing 10% affluence while rest 90% bring us shame?
@@abcxyz-ss6uy how old Delhi is 90percent india?
And sometimes Chandpole Bazar from Jaipur where all the rickshaws have been replaced by electric ones but they'll still use the old footage.
It should be "why some nations picking sides".
West: We vs them
Global south: We and them.
Russia is West, truly.
@@NikitOS-vv4ksRussia wanted to be west but they are east
@@jerrellholder8382 Russia has "we vs them" mentality, so that's why I said Russia is West.
@@jerrellholder8382 No. Russia wanted to be West, but the West doesnt want Russia. Only option left is Global South.
@@NikitOS-vv4ks when you have an entire alliance which considers you their adversary and a threat, you have no choice but to take a defensive stance.
also there's specific. To Ru, "them" are those in alliance AGAISNT Ru, while US definition of "them" are the one who does not agree with US actions/policies.
Not picking sides has served Switzerland well
Shame they gave that up. Again due to NATO pressure and non stop propaganda.
Having everyone around them permanently defanged by the Americans and British helps a lot.
but but how can you compare european neutrality to developing coutries neutrality
Sadly, the days of Swiss neutrality is long gone.
Switzerland has never been neutral, it has always been Pro-West & Pro-US, just that packaging was done nicely for, Switzerland, so as to present them as neutral.
Chat section seems more reliable than this video😂
Picking side means picking war, be detached, play fair
And why should they ?
Because of morals. Do you really want your country to do business with war-raging countries?
@@tamikovacs3887 where were the morals when they nuked Japan, Vietnam war, middle east war,
SOUNDS LIKE WORLD SHOULDN'T DO ANY BUSINESS WITH UNITED STATES @@tamikovacs3887
@@shashwataggarwal1 exactly , where were their morals then? and why ask now?
@@tamikovacs3887 lol governments have morals? cmon.
I suggest you change the title to Why Some Nations Are Picking Sides
touché
true
We got bigger problems in our own countries than other people’s wars. Our people need jobs and basic services. Best believe our priority will be our own people
India is not a new neutral. It has always been non-aligned, being at the forefront of Non aligned movement
I think they're calling the group the new neutrals, not that each country in it is newly neutral. Some of them are, so the group gets a name to differentiate from 10 years ago
More people are dying in Palestine every bloody day, and yet, the chief example is the war in Ukraine. This is why you get neutral countries. Love from a neutral country.
Because they are smart.
India has taken a neutral stance which is right
Nobody cares.
You mean: "Has taken Putin his money, and therefore sullied its own reputation for the foreseeable future". If India does not act against what Russia is doing in Ukraine then Pakistan may as well take Kashmir. It would be fair game after all, as India has signaled with this.
@@bababamamama9303 you cared enough to reply.
Yes, and India has with that raised its shoulders to what Russia is doing in Ukraine. Ironically, it signaled that Pakistan for example could annex Kashmir, that is how dangerous to the regional and world order its position is.
Xinjiang2.0 done what?🤡
India is a "new neutral"? Are you completely uneducated? Literally turning Wikipedia articles into videos using AI would be less inaccurate.
not uneducated...agendaed
How is that wrong?
Elaborate? Your generic comment looks like it was written by AI.
@@prashantsingh9426 india is not new to neutrality - asli singh hai ya cheeni shepherd hai tu dost?
Then how is India not neutral?? India never condemned Russia but it also said Russia directly to stop war, during direct meetings. Moreover unlike Iran or North Korea, India has never send weapons or military to Russia and same in Ukraine, India has even send humanitarian assistance in Ukraine, despite it's relationship with Russia.
I don't know, what neutrality is, if not that.
Sounds like propaganda. You'll get better analysis from twitter than bloomberg nowdays
I see brics start to annoy them, sanction more then. Sounds like solution.
It will not work now
Dear Bloomberg or whoever the editors of this video, when you talk and show India why you always show the most crowded place Delhi or the slums of Dharavi, India is literally much more than that. We are the 5th Largest and fastest economy in the world. India is the only country that eradicated extreme poverty in 2023 as per IMF, yet you guys always present us as the poor. Yes, India still has a long way to go but we are not less than any country. We have several amazing infrastructures, buildings... Every Major companies CEO's are Indians from Google to World Bank and from You tube to Only fans. Please stop showing only the worst part of India in every other video.
1 Billion Indians are currently living in poverty under modi's dictatorship. 800 million people are on govt food assistance programs.
@@anuragchakraborty8766 1 billion mana bujhis?
Porasuna kora ai..
IMF ar reports dakh..
@@joydebroy9339 Boka soda khangeer chele tui 800 million mane bujhis? Eta govt er nijer report ...
Dictatorship lol.. You need to educate yourself. India is the largest democratic country in the world. We ain't china, pakistan or Iran. Read news and reports from IMF.. Don't just google..
@@anuragchakraborty8766from where you are getting this data... Dhruv rathee videos??😂
picking sides is what will cause world war iii. world war i and ii were actually european wars, but since europe had colonized the whole world, everyone became involved. the world split in two because europe was split in two.
but it is not necessary for that to happen again. if countries follow their own interests, largely then we can end the wars of this century with mostly regional wars (russia/ukraine and israel/gaza) and skirmishes (india/china).
but if the us forces everyone into two sides we may just get world war iii
Western-Eastern Front war most devastating war compared to WW1 and 2
I invite the USA to pick our side 😂
What's that
@@laloitalia russian
😂
4:33 just western media things. They always show bad side of India. 😂
If two groups are fighting and you have nothing to do with any of the group, then what side do you choose? The answer is a simple neither. Bloomberg is making it more complicated than what it is.
Geo-politics is often a losing proposition. The US lost trillions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Still, the US is continuing its decades-long misadventure in the Middle East with regards to Israel, etc.
Correction: US taxpayer lost money in Afghanistan, US arms and ammunition companies didn't. The deep state earned lot of money.
nah, they are just fine, since they can just print another couple of trillions dollars without much of inflation.
The US didn't lose trillions. 8 trillion public dollars became private dollars, trickle-down economics continued to not happen, profit and lobbying ensured the system remains successful. Eisenhower warned Americans of this on 1961.
why does Great 🇺🇸 always force ppl to pick side?
It's a bully
Better planning, less surprises
@@s-qc9nsyeah, but why bully about picking sides
Oh, also building military bases. The more on our side the more our influence and threat grows
They want another World War
Only weaponry corporations want you to pick sides. Economics used to be about: openness, globalization, competition, diversification, and so on.
Lol that's what they told you anyway. Russia saw the writing on the wall and backed out of the Bretten Woods Conference in ww2
Country chose side in cold war 1.0 . Now one world is poor one is rich. Nobody is doing same mistake again.
That's interesting assertion. Nice observation 👍🏻👍🏻
@@SPmis global south (poor/developing/underdeveloped) vs global north (rich/developed/middle income countries) specifically...
" INDIA IS ON PEACE AND HUMANITY'S SIDE "
Really😂
@@AhmedElmohamadi-i5tyes, not a warmonger. We support peace.
As new generation IIT engineer from INDIA. We were the reason for your growth stories, not anymore 🇮🇳
Why most nations aren't picking side?
fixed the tittle for you.
As Indian foreign policy minister said
Europe needs to stop acting like the rest of the world's problems aren't theirs and its problems are the world's problems
Indian foreign policy minister might not know too much about European politics then
@@SajtosNokedliIAM S Jaishankar is a seasoned diplomat and has been ambassador to several countries during his tenure and saying he doesn't know European problems is childish.
India was always neutral. Since the end of WW2 and its independence.
India has always been non-aligned and was never and still todays, not part of any alliance. During cold wars in the past and and ongoing wars, India faced immense pressure from different countries to pick the side, but India did not buckle and played important role in preventing the world economy going into the recession which could have impacted lot of small and medium countries whose economies were already struggling. India never waged any war on other countries. Companies can invest looking at the historical record.
Are you considering Israel genocidal war on Palestine? Who are those enabling and backing it.
Can someone please tell me why, as an american its getting very disgusting, why we dont spend all our money on our healthcare, infrastructure, and let other counties who want war swim or sink, this spending is killing us
Because the last times we tried to demobilize, we got dragged into WW1, WW2, and 9/11. Disengagement just means more space for adversaries to carry out operations against us.
@@doujinflip doesn't mean US will always have to in a perpetual war mode or continue spending for wars
“New neutrals”? I think you mean non-aligned movement? It’s exactly why they formed the bloc. This isn’t new. In fact, it’s almost 100 years old
Why would they ever pick sides in a war they aren't involved in?
Countries that didn't vote or abstain fell into Russia block.... Speaks volumes about U.S... "you're with us or against us" mentality
USA's: "If you are not with us then you are against us"
Russia: " If you aren't against us, then you are with us"
One of the mistakes that some political analysts make is to think that their enemies should also be our enemies. Nelson Mandela
Wow, it's almost like they don't want unnecessary human conflicts, like war for example
Why should countries unnecessarily pick a side and avoid/hate other countries? Countries must always cooperate with each other and not keeping hating each other. Unite and not divide, that should be the motto for the world.😀😃😎
It’s necessary to settle on a common set of rules. Differences in what these arrangements ought to be sets the stage for conflict.
They got problems only when india goes neutral 😂😂😂😂
Question-Why some nations aren’t picking any side
Answer- why should any nation pick side
the difficulty in being non aligned or not choosing sides, is when they are sanctioned by bigger countries for dealing with certain parties deemed unfriendly to the bigger countries...
thats when maidans, regime change, flower/colour revolutions happen...
Much love to all from Republic of Alaska, Russia.
Some nations are siding with war
Some are siding with development
Not taking sides IS TAKING SIDES. You’re not fooling anyone with this narrative.
That's right, states should be for their own first and foremost since there's no greater cause. Make friends with as many countries as possible, not allies. Live and let live.
I have no enemies. We all have no enemies
@@A-Wesker-5 Muslims
@@ShivaYadav-uu7rl😂😂 Radical muslims will be more correct
say no to Russia and Israel at the same time
they based this whole video around russia and ukrain vote and not even mentioned palstine vote and us vetoing lol. what a load of propoganda
But israel and Iran does@@A-Wesker-5
Western media is not fair👎
🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾🇧🇷
DESDOLARIZACIÓN BRICS + 🇧🇷🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇿🇦
Because there's only one annoying bully forcing others to pick side. Not happening on the other side.
Well, we can tell who is panicking and who is losing.
Who is losing?
India 🇮🇳 Bharat is not country it is subcontinent in world this subcontinent has 600 languages 12000 dialects 🌎 🗺 miniature
Tittle= why nation not going accordingly USA 😂😂😂
India has always been a leader in the non aligned bloc
The west "... has to grow out of the mindset that its problems are the world's problem, but the world's problems are not its problems", to quote my beloved country's beloved EAM Dr. S Jaishankar
The question is why some countries are picking sides. Political favour? Haven't we seen two world wars
Just say, these nations do not want war.
As war funds USA.
cuz these countries are smart and not like a sheep blindly following a hypocritical nation
Because politics isn't anymore about left vs right.
Because we Thai people love to live peacefully❤
Take India for example. There is simply no reason why India shud pick a side. Multi allignment has payed them amazing dividends. Its becoming the Switzerland of Asia ( much bigger, much powerful).
Why any country should be forced to take sides?? Nope.
American hegemony is NOT acceptable.
America when they realise nit every country is united kingdom 😂
Picking sides are for small countries not for big countries like India .
Not now or never , we create our own side.
could have fooled me .... BRICS conference was everyone ..... except the West. Such a BS map .....
At this point, UK is just America's largest aircraft carrier.
For longest time modernization meant westernization till Global South countries got United and said enough is enough. Global South will now define what it means to be Global by setting its own standard and index.
When 2 groups of students in a school clash, which side should the rest choose? Why should the rest choose sides?
Why does this feel like US propaganda?
Being an economist and not explaining the audience why correlation and causation are not at all the same thing at 4:05 just goes to show how much BS y'all are trying to push
US realizing the world exists
Why just say anti globalism rather than blocs
Why should countries picking side if they have one same goal?
Some? It's most of the world
India was the leading founder of non aligned movement after the Second World War and that strategy is still intact.
Because they’re NOT been harassed by some huge country.
gosh, you say that like it rocket science :O)
why take sides, just do what's BEST for your country, and have the best of BOTH sides.
Simple
Because they don't want to engage in trade war
Its comfortable to have many options
Forced unity is so much worse than voluntary life.
Why is Malaysia flag in the middle of the vid thumbnail almost like it’s in the middle of rifle crosshairs?
whats that old saying "Its nothing personal, Just business"
They are doing the right thing. Stay neutral and then try to bargain with both sides. It worked for Switzerland.
Western propoganda at its finest.
Gasoline... 🔥🔥😂😂
Cold War 2.0 wouldn't be complete without a new Non-Aligned Movement.
i pick the side that pays me more
As a Canadian, I would've prefered Canada to just stay neutral. For the interest of our economy.
India is not "Non*Aligned", India is "All-Aligned"