Third-Degree Price Discrimination or Segmenting

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 авг 2024
  • This video shows how to solve a basic price discrimination problem when the firm uses segmenting.
    If this video helps, please consider a donation: www.paypal.com...

Комментарии • 50

  • @tayyabaraza264
    @tayyabaraza264 5 лет назад +27

    25 is Q not 80.....when I was solving I recognized this mistake..Tc is 30Q

  • @fifihei
    @fifihei 8 лет назад +4

    Loved this video! I got an exam in 2-3 hours. Hope that it will be save my life! Keep up with the great efforts!

  • @michellemiddleton5173
    @michellemiddleton5173 4 года назад +3

    Thank you for the helpful video - none of my economics material explained it this well!

  • @barovierkevinallybose1040
    @barovierkevinallybose1040 5 лет назад +1

    you mislead me for my exam (but can't say I haven't learnt from you during the semester) but you are suppose to evaluate the appropriate price level before determining what quantity demand function to use. You went directly to just using the aggregate demand function.

  • @damhippos
    @damhippos 7 лет назад +2

    Thank you so much! You are a million times better than my economics teacher. You are a goddamn hero.

  • @de5339
    @de5339 2 года назад

    thank you, for some extra help here :) some professors cant explain the most basic economic equations beacuse they only read results that they took from somewhere else anyway.

  • @nicolasvoisard6139
    @nicolasvoisard6139 2 года назад

    thank you you saved my exams i love u

  • @vuyontshangase8624
    @vuyontshangase8624 2 года назад +1

    You're the best!!!

  • @gunsandroses4
    @gunsandroses4 9 лет назад +19

    4:45 isn't Q = 25 and not 80?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  9 лет назад +8

      Thanks for finding the error. The correction is noted in the video.

    • @Hercules003
      @Hercules003 4 года назад +1

      It was a typo, he still got the right result though of $1250-otherwise it would have been -400!

  • @yowanyowan5168
    @yowanyowan5168 3 года назад +1

    Thanks sir I learnt lot from you 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

  • @henriettaifyede1737
    @henriettaifyede1737 4 месяца назад

    In the example without price discrimination, isn't p = 130- Q and MR = 130-2Q? where Q is 50 and not 25? How did you get p = 130-2Q?

  • @walidmohamed9237
    @walidmohamed9237 8 лет назад +2

    beautiful explanation. keep on the good work!

  • @MediaWorkify
    @MediaWorkify 9 лет назад +1

    This is awesome sir,
    thank you very much for uploading this!!!

  • @teenskeey2157
    @teenskeey2157 3 года назад +1

    Wow man...God bless you

  • @dheliyaisuranga5205
    @dheliyaisuranga5205 4 года назад +2

    Sir,Please can explain me how to get the market supply equation of below question
    There are 100 identical firms in the market.
    P=200-2Q
    TC=32+20q+8q^2
    MC=20+16q

  • @Mohareal
    @Mohareal 7 лет назад +2

    Where did the 2Q come from?

  • @iDokka__BAE
    @iDokka__BAE 6 лет назад

    thanks mate so much appreciated that was rly helpful. keep on going bro.

  • @aminurkhan5376
    @aminurkhan5376 5 лет назад

    Great video sir. Thank you so much

  • @daniellake9955
    @daniellake9955 7 лет назад +1

    Great Video

  • @serinacat4781
    @serinacat4781 6 лет назад

    hope you can post a second price discrimination

  • @RAVIKUMAR-ky2rc
    @RAVIKUMAR-ky2rc 3 года назад

    Super sir👍👌

  • @sophiamalik1729
    @sophiamalik1729 8 лет назад

    You're amazing! Thank you!!!!

  • @liuzeyu1044
    @liuzeyu1044 7 лет назад +2

    Hi, I understand that P=130-2Q but why you can get MR=130-4Q?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  7 лет назад +5

      zeyu liu total revenue = PxQ = (130-Q)Q = 130Q - 2Q^2. After taking the derivative of total revenue, we get MR = 130 - 4Q.

    • @liuzeyu1044
      @liuzeyu1044 7 лет назад +1

      Thank you so much sir

  • @bulkacademy9267
    @bulkacademy9267 7 лет назад

    very helpful thanx

  • @Claudia-pp6on
    @Claudia-pp6on 6 лет назад

    very helpful

  • @aparnaagarwal4364
    @aparnaagarwal4364 5 лет назад

    thank you so so much...

  • @Mandy-sx7li
    @Mandy-sx7li 8 лет назад

    Thank you :)

  • @awsalmanmohamed8428
    @awsalmanmohamed8428 3 года назад

    i think the inverse demand function is p=13-0.2Q.

  • @muhammadalim8038
    @muhammadalim8038 2 года назад

    App NY explain achay tarap Kia hy... Magar Mera samj main nahe a rah hae app assan tareeka main explain krly app ka mehrbhani ho gy

  • @funnyvideobymonster2795
    @funnyvideobymonster2795 6 лет назад

    Is it possible to do the problem without knowing the value of MC or MR?

  • @yutongkang578
    @yutongkang578 8 лет назад

    why MR is double of P?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  8 лет назад

      It's just a fact that MR will have a slope that is twice as steep as its linear demand curve. Here's the proof: p = a - bq. TR = pq = (a - bq)q and simplifying TR= aq - bq^2. To get MR take the derivative of TR or dTR/dq = MR = a - 2bq.

  • @ardasev
    @ardasev 6 лет назад

    this is wrong you cant add up demand curves like that you need to make horizontal sum. if price were to be 10 first customers will buy 20 and second customers would buy 0 not -5 so demand is 20 for 10 . If you plug 10 in summed up equation demand becomes 15 . very wrong.............

  • @abdelrahmankamel8417
    @abdelrahmankamel8417 4 года назад

    incorrect results please revised your numbers

  • @MLSfootballz
    @MLSfootballz 8 лет назад +1

    boss

  • @emerenciananchimbi428
    @emerenciananchimbi428 7 лет назад

    i did,nt get it how 5p=65_q turned into p=130-2q

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  7 лет назад

      Emerenciana Nchimbi There is a decimal point in front of the 5; it should read 0.5p = 65 - q. After dividing both sides by 0.50, you get p = 130 - 2q.

    • @emerenciananchimbi428
      @emerenciananchimbi428 7 лет назад

      +1sportingclays sorry sir.0.5 how😞?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  7 лет назад

      Emerenciana Nchimbi Q1 = 40 - 0.2P1 and Q2 = 25 - 0.3P2. Q1 + Q2 = Q = 65 - 0.5P.

    • @emerenciananchimbi428
      @emerenciananchimbi428 7 лет назад

      +1sportingclays okay.....thank you

    • @ericmokua3311
      @ericmokua3311 5 лет назад

      @@EconomicsinManyLessons clearly it shows that's 5 and not 0.5

  • @MediaWorkify
    @MediaWorkify 9 лет назад

    You made an error. 83.33 - 3.33*8 is 56.69, not 56.67.
    Therefore profit etc is incorrect