Who the hell could place a “Dislike” on this perfectly produced, lecture.? was it the jelous Kaplan or Barbri or Pieper??? How could you dislike such a great video, what r u afraid of competitor? this man is doing a great job, Haters please skip this video.
The answer, as Cole .Beene has shown is that the lecture was disliked by persons who were looking for something else. it is quite an amazingly well done lecture. I suppose if I am looking for a cat, I might tell a dog salesman that his dog is lousy.
Michael, you are the most brilliant Legal scholar I've ever encountered. Thank you for breaking Property into a manageable format. It now appears manageable.
You are the best explainer ever! As a foreign-trained llm I had only 6 weeks of real property in law school. No wonder I had no idea how to put all these pieces together. Thank you so much for uploading this video! At least now I get the analysis and just have to practice and to memorize. All your videos are extremely helpful and I love that you explain so energetically, sometimes almost scream at the camera. Your videos are a 100% better than some other bar preps professors’ boring explanations. God bless you for your effort in making and uploading all these videos!
I just dont understand how you can break something down in 5 minutes that confused me for 4 months my first year. You need to be the dean or curriculum specialist for every non t-14 school out here. seriously. Fangirling over here
Literally I have spent years trying to get this straight, this video clip is pure gold as well as the rest of the channel's content, thank you so much for your work to help us to improve our studying!
Michael, your presentations are absolutely the best I’ve ever heard. I graduated a few years back and came across Studicata; just like discovering a treasure. Wish Id had this in law school.
Totally agree. Took 4 months of property, listened to four different profs teach this, never understood this. You have a gift. Seriously. God bless you.
I watched your videos on Civil Procedure and just had my final for it today. Thank you for always being so clear! I'm definitely going to watch all your Property videos for that course next semester. I heard it's killer.
Great work! Love the content and the teacher does a great job, but their app and website seem to always malfunction. I’m currently a paying customer..but here I am on the free videos.
I salute you, Michael for creating this phenomenal style class. This is a full loaded video with explosive knowledge that researchers seekers cannot miss out… This is an excellent and comprehensive information to enlighten us to take and pass real estate exam...
This is the part that I always get stuck on. Lol, for some reason, I just can’t REMEMBER this. Omg! Playback speed of 0.5x really helps me to understand this.
After satisfying remainder… When uncertainty of person or uncertainty of whether condition happening (meaning conditions exists that must be satisfied to get conveyance BEFORE the natural termination of prior estate) -> Contingent remainder If no uncertainty exists who or when the conveyance is happening and its conveyance depends on condition (AFTER receiving conveyance) -> vested remainder subject to divestment If no uncertainty exists who or when the conveyance is happening & if at the time of conveyance, the percentage of receiving estate is subject to change -> vested remainder subject to open
This is AMAZING!! Thank you so much for posting this! I have struggled with understanding these concepts for months and you were able to explain everything in one hour!! This flow chart is incredible for visual learners like me.
First and foremost just want to say you're the man. Big fan, love your videos. With that being said, is there anyway you could make a video about strategy for the "PT" portion of the bar exam? This would be very helpful. Thanks.
Sure! If you enroll in our Free Bar Review program (www.studicata.com/bar-review-pricing), there's a 53-minute video in Orientation titled: "How to Prepare for the MPT" - you might find this module helpful. 👍
If you head over to studicata.com/leap and scroll down to the "What's Included" section, you can see a detailed breakdown of every module currently available in each subject of our LEAP membership platform.
According to common law if I hold the *deed* of a property for which I have paid in full yet still paying taxes on, I am only a renter. Unless I hold lodial title of it I am a renter.
Yo Mike I have themis - I’m sitting in FL, I did well in my property courses but for some reason now - the material isn’t sticking and so I came to this video and thank u bc I felt I finally learned something. Maybe I need to learn basic property law before worrying about “oh this is the FL distinction or the FL rule. Can I hire you to tutor me because I’m freaking out with no time and 500 subjects to learn with little organizational skills - like outlining or knowing how to structure the day. I just follow what the themis schedule said but I clearly need to talk this out and so are you tutoring new students for July or am I too late? I even wrote out the chart - TWICE but I’m scared bc we’re moving subject to subject and I’m falling behind
I’m lost in “the right of entry” from 28:00-32:00. The transferor has the right of entry even though it’s fee simple subject to condition!? How is that?
If I understand your question correctly, I think the answer is that the transferor's right of entry cannot vest until the condition subsequent fails. In present estates and future interests, "right of entry" is a legal term of art-it does not literally mean that the transferor has the right to enter the land whenever he pleases (for his nonpossessory future interest to become possessory, he needs the condition subsequent to fail).
Why is it contingent to Bobby to turn 25 year old so if Bobby is living ascertainable person shdnt it be vested conditions subsequent?? At 56;55 min example can some one explain?! Is it because he needs to be 25 Thts why?? I am a bit confused
Yep! they dont get shit because there is no future interest conveyed by the FSA.. A has the option to convey the prop to his/her heirs bc A has FSA, but in that hypo the heirs dont have anything.
I think the lecturer misstated the difference between fee simple on condition subsequent and fee simple determinable. Although my knowledge is limited, I’ve never seen anyone make the distinction based on condition and duration. My professor and most commercial study aids state the 2 interests are very similar, other than the way the present interest terminates. With few simple determinables, the termination is automatic. Whereas with condition subséquents the grantor must actually make a claim for re-entry. Probably worth checking with your professors to see if they recognize this lecturer’s distinction
Michael is right here. Also know that modernly, courts frown on possibility of reverts, b/c it' so draconian. In fact, in California it's illegal; and a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent MUST have that language in the contract so purchasers are aware. Otherwise, it will not operate.
Hello Michael You are the best. I have memorized all of the subjects of law through your videos and I would like to apply for and take the bar exam. However, I don't know how to go about it. Is there a way that I could get some consultation from you? Please advise Jim Kabir
What if amy dies and bobby is her only survivor, but she froze her eggs with some stipulated set of requirements which would initiate their fertilization at an indefinite date?
Awesome... absolutely Awesome. Would you be open to talking with me concerning vesting my interest, pertaining to the warranties established in the mandatory Act titled Settled Land Act 1925... whereby I am scheduling a chamber's hearing to have my legal right established, to a residue estate held in trust via reversion, subject to the strict land settlement by means of initially removing all rights duties and powers, real, personal & mixed to the status of tenant for life.
![Destructibility of Contingent Remainders, Rule in Shelley's Case, & Doctrine of Worthier Title [2/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/V6elJq8NcG0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Destructibility of Contingent Remainders, Rule in Shelley's Case, & Doctrine of Worthier Title [2/3]](/img/tr.png)
![How to Analyze the Rule Against Perpetuities on Real Property Questions [PART 3/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2XdmY_3QAe4/mqdefault.jpg)
Who the hell could place a “Dislike” on this perfectly produced, lecture.? was it the jelous Kaplan or Barbri or Pieper??? How could you dislike such a great video, what r u afraid of competitor? this man is doing a great job, Haters please skip this video.
This was so confusing ? And didn’t help with the practice essays but had about interests . Calm yourself. I mean Themis wasn’t anymore helpful
@@munchface94 I'm going to be uncalm with Tyron. Looks like you're in the minority of one thus far. Thank you, Michael!
People probably see a whiteboard and get bored, somehow expecting legal education to be exciting.
He's a gifted teacher. Period!
The answer, as Cole .Beene has shown is that the lecture was disliked by persons who were looking for something else. it is quite an amazingly well done lecture. I suppose if I am looking for a cat, I might tell a dog salesman that his dog is lousy.
This video is INCREDIBLE! This has never once made sense to me. Never met anyone who could explain this so clearly- the color code is a game changer!
Awesome-glad it was helpful for you!
Michael, you are the most brilliant Legal scholar I've ever encountered. Thank you for breaking Property into a manageable format. It now appears manageable.
Thank you so much!
You are the best explainer ever! As a foreign-trained llm I had only 6 weeks of real property in law school. No wonder I had no idea how to put all these pieces together. Thank you so much for uploading this video! At least now I get the analysis and just have to practice and to memorize. All your videos are extremely helpful and I love that you explain so energetically, sometimes almost scream at the camera. Your videos are a 100% better than some other bar preps professors’ boring explanations. God bless you for your effort in making and uploading all these videos!
I did LLM and now preparing for Bar, he is an exceptional teacher.
Thank you so much! I'm glad the videos have been helpful in your bar exam preparation.
Very dense I was watching the video and taking notes...took me more than 5 hours to get through first 40 minutes. Great video really appreciate it
I just dont understand how you can break something down in 5 minutes that confused me for 4 months my first year. You need to be the dean or curriculum specialist for every non t-14 school out here. seriously. Fangirling over here
Dean?!? ROFLMAO!! Dean's don't teach. They don't do anything but punish and collect a check paid by tuition dollars!
@@JackH007 hehe but you got the idea what shes trying to say.
Thank you-I'm glad this was helpful for you!
Literally I have spent years trying to get this straight, this video clip is pure gold as well as the rest of the channel's content, thank you so much for your work to help us to improve our studying!
Sure-happy to help!
I struggled with this during school and through barbri, and Adaptibar. Neither courses did a good job on the subject. Used this and it is 100% better.
Awesome, glad this was helpful for you!
This video opened a whole new world of understanding this really annoying subject, thank you SO MUCH!!
Absolutely, present estates and future interests is not fun for most students. Glad this video made it more bearable for you!
Thanks Michael. Your lecture clarified everything that the other commercial Bar Prep lecture could not to me, personally.
Sure-happy to help!
I AM SO GLAD I FOUND THIS! This is in plain English and so easy to follow. You should write a book on this. Thank GOD for you!
Glad it was helpful!
Wish I would’ve discovered this video months ago, not the morning of my exam haha. Good work!
Thank you!
I wish I would've used these videos in property class! Thank you so much Michael
Of course, I'm happy to help! I saw some law professors are now including a link to this video in their course materials-pretty cool. 😎
Michael, your presentations are absolutely the best I’ve ever heard. I graduated a few years back and came across Studicata; just like discovering a treasure. Wish Id had this in law school.
The best explanation and visual graphic of this topic EVER!!
Totally agree. Took 4 months of property, listened to four different profs teach this, never understood this.
You have a gift. Seriously. God bless you.
(bookmarks for self)
8:14 present estates
I watched your videos on Civil Procedure and just had my final for it today. Thank you for always being so clear! I'm definitely going to watch all your Property videos for that course next semester. I heard it's killer.
Sure, happy to help! Sounds like a good plan to me. 👍
Did you pass?
I finally got a handle on this! Thank you so much, extremely helpful. Broken down approach that is easy to follow.
Awesome, I'm glad it clicked for you!
Michael has a gift.
Great work! Love the content and the teacher does a great job, but their app and website seem to always malfunction. I’m currently a paying customer..but here I am on the free videos.
Studicata should have videos for each year, we could subscribe. As it is, I can get 1L and part of 2L only.
Thank you so much for this video! I have been struggling with these concepts and now they finally make sense!!
Excellent video and diagram. Straightforward explanation. TY
Awesome, thank you!
most helpful video I have ever seen thank you!! you saved my law school grades!
Awesome, I'm glad it was helpful for you!
Thank you for such a wonderful video. It was so helpful!
Sure-happy to help!
I salute you, Michael for creating this phenomenal style class. This is a full loaded video with explosive knowledge that researchers seekers cannot miss out…
This is an excellent and comprehensive information to enlighten us to take and pass real estate exam...
Awesome, glad it was helpful for you!
You are amazing! I have been trying to understand this for a long time, you explained it in simple way! Thank you
Sure, happy to help!
May God bless you and keep you safe!!
This is pure fun and knowledgeable
Awesome, glad you enjoyed it!
This is the part that I always get stuck on. Lol, for some reason, I just can’t REMEMBER this. Omg! Playback speed of 0.5x really helps me to understand this.
Awesome, glad it's helpful!
My Property professor should watch this video before she teaches property again.
Holy cow this is a great teacher. Thank you
After satisfying remainder…
When uncertainty of person or uncertainty of whether condition happening (meaning conditions exists that must be satisfied to get conveyance BEFORE the natural termination of prior estate) -> Contingent remainder
If no uncertainty exists who or when the conveyance is happening and its conveyance depends on condition (AFTER receiving conveyance) -> vested remainder subject to divestment
If no uncertainty exists who or when the conveyance is happening & if at the time of conveyance, the percentage of receiving estate is subject to change -> vested remainder subject to open
So much better than Barbri! Amazing
Thanks!
You are a phenomenal teacher. Thank you so much for all of your help! Greatly appreciate it.
I second that
Sure-happy to help!
This is AMAZING!! Thank you so much for posting this! I have struggled with understanding these concepts for months and you were able to explain everything in one hour!! This flow chart is incredible for visual learners like me.
Awesome, it took several attempts to get the flow chart spaced and sized correctly on the whiteboard-glad it was helpful for you!
Thank you explaining such a complex concept with clarity
Sure-happy to help!
Thanks a lot for your effort.
You're genius
Thank you so much!
god this is so helpful. best of luck everyone!!!
Thank you-best of luck to you, too!
First and foremost just want to say you're the man. Big fan, love your videos. With that being said, is there anyway you could make a video about strategy for the "PT" portion of the bar exam? This would be very helpful. Thanks.
Sure! If you enroll in our Free Bar Review program (www.studicata.com/bar-review-pricing), there's a 53-minute video in Orientation titled: "How to Prepare for the MPT" - you might find this module helpful. 👍
You sir, are my hero- thank you very much. I had a really hard time with this topic in my law school class and this was super helpful.
Thank you-happy to help!
This video is just awesome!
Thank you!
This has really helped me!
You are an amazing teacher!!! Thank you for your videos!
Thank you for your support!
You are the best!
Thank you!
THANK YOU! You make this so much more clear.
You're welcome-happy to help!
PLEASE, PLEASE do the video on the Limitaitions on nterests held by a transferee you talk about BEFORE JULY 31 !!!!!!!!!!
LOL. No.
Both videos are up!
Please keep making these videos
🙌🏻🙌🏻 Awesome. I never understood these relationships. Now I do.
Glad the video was helpful for you!
This is great! Thanks much.
Sure-happy to help!
Thank youuuu!
You're welcome!
can u do a disabilities post? and one for the statute of limitations?
Yes! Finally!!! And it's nice and thorough!! Thank you!
Sure-happy to help!
WOW just fully understood property for the first time ever.
Awesome, glad I could be of assistance!
Why aren't you a law professor then? Or do you own this LEAP company? You should do one or both.
@@studicata gosh i suck at replying
Super helpful. Thank you.
Sure-happy to help!
great video, thanks
Sure-happy to help!
This is outstanding
Thank you!
Thank you so much! this was amazingly helpful
Sure-happy to help!
I love you guys! Saving me for the 2020 bar
Awesome, hope it went well!
do you have 1L property vids in the membership? Bailments, Adverse Possession etc?
If you head over to studicata.com/leap and scroll down to the "What's Included" section, you can see a detailed breakdown of every module currently available in each subject of our LEAP membership platform.
Excellent.
is there anyone with a pdf of this chart? it's soo helpful, thank you for the lesson!
Draw it, and keep it with you. Have a friend quiz you on it.
If anyone is trying to get a screenshot go to 6:48
THANK YOU!!!!!
great lecture
Thanks!
This is amazing! Thanks so much
No problem, happy to help! 👍
Hello Michael! My daughter is preparing to take the LSAT to get into LAW school. Do you have a course(s) that would help her prepare? Thanks!
Great structure for memorizing! Thx!
Sure-happy to help!
Wow, thanks this helped a lot
According to common law if I hold the *deed* of a property for which I have paid in full yet still paying taxes on, I am only a renter. Unless I hold lodial title of it I am a renter.
THANK U
My king. Thank you.
You're welcome!
Yo Mike I have themis - I’m sitting in FL, I did well in my property courses but for some reason now - the material isn’t sticking and so I came to this video and thank u bc I felt I finally learned something. Maybe I need to learn basic property law before worrying about “oh this is the FL distinction or the FL rule. Can I hire you to tutor me because I’m freaking out with no time and 500 subjects to learn with little organizational skills - like outlining or knowing how to structure the day. I just follow what the themis schedule said but I clearly need to talk this out and so are you tutoring new students for July or am I too late? I even wrote out the chart - TWICE but I’m scared bc we’re moving subject to subject and I’m falling behind
Just watch over and over, then take some essay and MBEs.
I think Michael is a multimillionaire now.
Thorough
Yeeees... finally!
👍
Thanks!
Thank you so much 😁😁😁
Perfect!
Thanks!
so... are heirs ascertainable?
I’m lost in “the right of entry” from 28:00-32:00. The transferor has the right of entry even though it’s fee simple subject to condition!? How is that?
If I understand your question correctly, I think the answer is that the transferor's right of entry cannot vest until the condition subsequent fails. In present estates and future interests, "right of entry" is a legal term of art-it does not literally mean that the transferor has the right to enter the land whenever he pleases (for his nonpossessory future interest to become possessory, he needs the condition subsequent to fail).
@@studicata you are the one!
@@al7areth1 Thank you!
thank you soooo much!
Sure-happy to help!
Why is it contingent to Bobby to turn 25 year old so if Bobby is living ascertainable person shdnt it be vested conditions subsequent?? At 56;55 min example can some one explain?! Is it because he needs to be 25 Thts why?? I am a bit confused
What about the future interest of heirs in the case of a fee simple? "To A and her heirs." What do the heirs have? Nothing?
Yep! they dont get shit because there is no future interest conveyed by the FSA.. A has the option to convey the prop to his/her heirs bc A has FSA, but in that hypo the heirs dont have anything.
Whts a FSA??
@@misscappuccino5920 Fee Simple Absolute
😊
I think the lecturer misstated the difference between fee simple on condition subsequent and fee simple determinable. Although my knowledge is limited, I’ve never seen anyone make the distinction based on condition and duration. My professor and most commercial study aids state the 2 interests are very similar, other than the way the present interest terminates. With few simple determinables, the termination is automatic. Whereas with condition subséquents the grantor must actually make a claim for re-entry. Probably worth checking with your professors to see if they recognize this lecturer’s distinction
Michael is right here. Also know that modernly, courts frown on possibility of reverts, b/c it' so draconian. In fact, in California it's illegal; and a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent MUST have that language in the contract so purchasers are aware. Otherwise, it will not operate.
Hello Michael
You are the best. I have memorized all of the subjects of law through your videos and I would like to apply for and take the bar exam. However, I don't know how to go about it. Is there a way that I could get some consultation from you?
Please advise
Jim Kabir
Check with your state's Bar committee. They have requirements beyond studying.
Thanks brother!
No problem, happy to help! 👍
holy shit thank you
Sure, happy to help!
@@studicata was highest score in my class on future interests exam
@@TMeyer-cc9cw Awesome job! Glad the video was helpful for you.
I think only one state does fee tail.
Probably Louisiana, they have screwy statutes.
What if amy dies and bobby is her only survivor, but she froze her eggs with some stipulated set of requirements which would initiate their fertilization at an indefinite date?
Exactly. RAP is pointless.
BUT, they still test on it, but I think only on the MBEs.
Awesome... absolutely Awesome. Would you be open to talking with me concerning vesting my interest, pertaining to the warranties established in the mandatory Act titled Settled Land Act 1925... whereby I am scheduling a chamber's hearing to have my legal right established, to a residue estate held in trust via reversion, subject to the strict land settlement by means of initially removing all rights duties and powers, real, personal & mixed to the status of tenant for life.
thank you times a gazillion! lol
Sure-happy to help!
Helpful videos. But he definitely reminds me of the ski instructor from South Park. "If you ignore my lessons, you're gonna have a bad time."
Lol, nailed it!
Ecinomiv Dabitage to help Trumph in election but damaginh USA
you should be a professor.
He did teach. But now he's super rich and lives along the French Riviera.
Do you have pdf of flowchart?
Draw it out.
Af