Thanks so much for doing this video. Since I'm no longer a paid member of the OPS class, I didn’t realize that D&S had changed it from responsibility to generalize. Anyway, I'm glad they made the name change.
I find it potentially hard to embrace a specific type, when the numbering implies social value. While talking to Kendrick, Uzair had a good rant recently about how you'd not wanna embrace being, for example, a #4. I think, it could be easier to do so, if the four social needs were only called Ego, Friends, Specialize and Generalize, without the hierarchy.
I agree that the numbers suggest a problematic interpretation, just as the name “Responsibility” did. Personally, I don’t think that having a certain social types implies inherent social value. Awful #1s and super successful #4s show that. As you said, I think it’s about having a certain social needs stack and the numbers are merely a shortcut for the different stacks. This probably needs to be communicated more clearly and more often. In case of having Flex last, I hope our video expressed clearly that we think the need of Flex should not be disregarded which is along the lines of Uzair’s rant if I remember correctly.
Thanks so much for doing this video. Since I'm no longer a paid member of the OPS class, I didn’t realize that D&S had changed it from responsibility to generalize.
Anyway, I'm glad they made the name change.
So are we 😊
I find it potentially hard to embrace a specific type, when the numbering implies social value. While talking to Kendrick, Uzair had a good rant recently about how you'd not wanna embrace being, for example, a #4. I think, it could be easier to do so, if the four social needs were only called Ego, Friends, Specialize and Generalize, without the hierarchy.
I agree that the numbers suggest a problematic interpretation, just as the name “Responsibility” did.
Personally, I don’t think that having a certain social types implies inherent social value. Awful #1s and super successful #4s show that.
As you said, I think it’s about having a certain social needs stack and the numbers are merely a shortcut for the different stacks. This probably needs to be communicated more clearly and more often.
In case of having Flex last, I hope our video expressed clearly that we think the need of Flex should not be disregarded which is along the lines of Uzair’s rant if I remember correctly.
could you please link me to that?
I feel like you both were the ones to single handedly get the words changed for generalize v specialize. Maybe I am crazy 🤷♂️😂
Let’s just assume we did 😆
Great breakdown of generalize and specialize and how the two can overlap
Yeah, both sides might actually do the same but they might frame their approach very differently.
Plz make a video about the friends and flex coins :3
Yes, we should really do that 🙂
Felix' DiOe 2 and Holly's DeOe 3 seem very congruent as a couple though, as far as introversion/extroversion levels.
We could definitely need some more blast for our endeavor but the #2 and #3 Responsibilities do balance each other out nicely ☺️
i did not understand the new coin whatsoever before this video
I’m glad we could help out. 😊
I assume that understanding the new social types is pretty much impossible if you’re not subscribed to their class.