1:44 It's hilarious (not in a bad way) to watch someone serve so wide. He's definitely got an entertaining game. For some reason reminds me a lot of Karatsev.
c'est l'angle qui donne cette impression. C'est souvent exceptionnel, et quand tu sais que les deux prendraient double bulle face à un top mondial tu comprends le niveau incroyable des meilleurs
Ce qu'il faut bien comprendre, c'est que le moindre "clampin" classé négatif est un dieu vivant du tennis pour le commun des mortels. Et la télé écrase énormément la vitesse réelle de la balle.
You haven't heard of him because there are levels to this game. He looks like a world beater in this video but put him against a top 10 in the world player and he would look ordinary.
@@POK2008 Not even top 10. He played Laaksonen later in this tournament (that video is on this channel) and got annihilated. Totally outclassed and Laaksonen was no. 97 in the world at the time. The difference between a futures player and a fringe ATP tour level player is massive, let alone a top 10 player.
Wonderful to watch a single hander backhand its so much better for the body, natural and so easy on the eye. Love the indoor courts, wish we had indoor courts in Australia
Some amazing shots but don't forget these are just the highlights. It this was a compilation of his unforced errors you'd have a much different opinion.
highlights reel. Looking at the actual score, you'll notice he won the first in a tiebreak and the super tie 10-8, probably didn't break his opponent once. The name of the game if you want to climb up the ATP ladder is consistency. If you want a look as to how competitive the French circuit is, I recommend Jules Marie's channel (he is currently #38 in France, and used to be #228 on the ATP, beating 3 top 100 players incl Benoit Paire): ruclips.net/user/JulesMarieTheCourt
Le règlement interclubs a-t-il changé ? Le capitaine ou capitaine adjoint sur le court a maintenant le droit d'applaudir, le se lever pour encourager de vive voix ?! C'est le même règlement que la coupe Davis maintenant ? Je ne suis peut-être plus à jour... J'ai pourtant eu mon diplôme de juge arbitre régional il n'y a pas si longtemps..
Of course he can't. Top players move better, can read his game, have consistently longer and more precise shots. He would still have some great winners though and in highlights one would ask himself why he lost...
@@alessandroardu1059 I graphed the path of the ball as a line in a 3d space. The start of the line was when the racket made contact with the ball, and the end of the line was when the ball first touched the ground. From that I calculated the length of the path, which was 59.8 feet. I then counted how many frames it took for the ball to travel this distance, which was 22 frames. 22 frames is equal to 367 milliseconds. From that I was able to calculate the speed of the ball in feet per second which was then converted to km/h.
Wow, Arthur Reymond is going to be something special! He has a great attacking game and spectacular volleys/net game
1:44 It's hilarious (not in a bad way) to watch someone serve so wide. He's definitely got an entertaining game. For some reason reminds me a lot of Karatsev.
more like Shapo
Très beau jeu d’attaquant
Monstre! en espérant le voir perfer sur des challengers bientôt!
Bordel c'est l'angle de la caméra ou le niveau est juste exceptionnel? 😱
Les deux 😅
Les 2 ! Le physique et la vitesse du gaucher me laisse rêveur !
c'est l'angle qui donne cette impression. C'est souvent exceptionnel, et quand tu sais que les deux prendraient double bulle face à un top mondial tu comprends le niveau incroyable des meilleurs
ruclips.net/video/KDNgsV7EAl0/видео.html
Ce qu'il faut bien comprendre, c'est que le moindre "clampin" classé négatif est un dieu vivant du tennis pour le commun des mortels.
Et la télé écrase énormément la vitesse réelle de la balle.
Magnifique
Great player, nice to watch
Why have I never heard of him? This guy is absolute dynamite!
You haven't heard of him because there are levels to this game. He looks like a world beater in this video but put him against a top 10 in the world player and he would look ordinary.
@@POK2008 Not even top 10. He played Laaksonen later in this tournament (that video is on this channel) and got annihilated. Totally outclassed and Laaksonen was no. 97 in the world at the time. The difference between a futures player and a fringe ATP tour level player is massive, let alone a top 10 player.
@@bobanmihajlov338 I agree with you 100%. People who casually watch tennis don’t understand this.
Wonderful to watch a single hander backhand its so much better for the body, natural and so easy on the eye.
Love the indoor courts, wish we had indoor courts in Australia
Молодцы, пацаны. Агрессивно и остро.
Beautiful technic. Looking forward to seeing more fron Reymond.
Some amazing shots but don't forget these are just the highlights. It this was a compilation of his unforced errors you'd have a much different opinion.
Super fast serve
Can't wait for this guy to hit the ATP
it's still amateur, it takes time to be pro !!!
@@JimClay.. hes in the atp...i believe he is around 60p
The title sum it up quite well.
Single backhand player is very cool !!!
From some of this one would think he won in straights. Tough player. I can't even recognize this as tennis compared to what I "play."
His game is spectacular, yet dude's not in ATP top 400 at age 22. Weird.
highlights reel.
Looking at the actual score, you'll notice he won the first in a tiebreak and the super tie 10-8, probably didn't break his opponent once. The name of the game if you want to climb up the ATP ladder is consistency. If you want a look as to how competitive the French circuit is, I recommend Jules Marie's channel (he is currently #38 in France, and used to be #228 on the ATP, beating 3 top 100 players incl Benoit Paire): ruclips.net/user/JulesMarieTheCourt
Consistency is difficult
Tells you just how good all the other ATP players really are.
Anybody can look spectacular when you only post their highlights. Watch how easily Laaksonen (97 in the world) handled him a couple days later.
future top 40 at least
Man, Reymond is only 426 in the world??? His level is much higher than that
But is his level like that every point 💁🏽♂️
@@nascentnaga You have a point, but he did beat Lamasine and he is 276 in the world
These are some of the most amazing shots I've seen. How is this guy only 600 in the world?
that's what court level view does for you, if only all the pro tournaments are streamed in court level
he's probably 600 because of the points that aren't featured in this highlight video
I was thinking the opposite actually. I'm not ranked, but these guys are not far off my level of play. They are good but not that good.
@@Vishypoo yeah right mate..
@@Vishypoo I 100% believe that your close to this level without being ranked.
I wonder how they would play with the old faster balls and courts..
Le règlement interclubs a-t-il changé ? Le capitaine ou capitaine adjoint sur le court a maintenant le droit d'applaudir, le se lever pour encourager de vive voix ?! C'est le même règlement que la coupe Davis maintenant ? Je ne suis peut-être plus à jour... J'ai pourtant eu mon diplôme de juge arbitre régional il n'y a pas si longtemps..
cant believe reymond cant crack 200...rune is top 10
il a de la foudre dans son bras gauche lui
Well that was a display lol
he smashes every fucking forehand but the crowd doesnt say a word but when he frames a backhand winner they say hura?!
Yep, pretty much destroyed him.
Great player.
Not enouf power in the service keep grinding get that serve better
존나게 잘하네
This guy is not in top 500 so something is not right he can’t play like that against world class atp players
Of course he can't. Top players move better, can read his game, have consistently longer and more precise shots. He would still have some great winners though and in highlights one would ask himself why he lost...
The serve at 1:41🤨
Of what speed can we talk about? 210 km/h maybe?
That serve was 179 km/h
@@temporality_ how do You know it?
@@alessandroardu1059 I graphed the path of the ball as a line in a 3d space.
The start of the line was when the racket made contact with the ball, and the end of the line was when the ball first touched the ground. From that I calculated the length of the path, which was 59.8 feet.
I then counted how many frames it took for the ball to travel this distance, which was 22 frames. 22 frames is equal to 367 milliseconds.
From that I was able to calculate the speed of the ball in feet per second which was then converted to km/h.