Debridement doesn’t necessarily need be precise. All that needs to happen is that the necrotic tissue is removed. Healthy tissue is resilient enough that the scraping sufficiently cleans the wound while leaving living tissue mostly intact.
This surgeon used the same curette as he moved from wound to wound. S/He cultured and took biopsy tissue from each wound--using the same curette. Seriously? So let's infect all wounds using the same instrument. S/He even "cleaned" it off as he moved from the first wound to the second--so s/he knew he was doing it. No wonder hospital-acquired infections are rampant. Shame on you.
Dropping in here late to say that this doctor is male and speaks perfect English without the slightest accent-not that it should matter. Watch any video in which he speaks. He also edits out some of the logistics of changing gloves, etc., but will often mention that he has. He is very careful about contamination and clearly knows what he’s doing. As far as “milking the insurance system” is concerned, do you imagine surgeons operate in their own world with no oversight? Even if he wanted to do something to keep a patient sick, it would take a large number of people to be in on it, including the ER nurses, radiologists and radiology technicians, post-op staff, the medical review committee and numerous people in the finance department. Moreover, insurance companies (I work for one) have substantial fraud departments to review anything suspicious-especially with Medicare/caid patients as the federal government requires. My company also employs nearly 300 doctors and nurses to review anything that might be questionable pre-and post-op. You might think we do this to keep from paying claims, but any legitimate insurer knows the welfare of our customers is our bread and butter. Even if we were all a huge pack of rabid misanthropes who lived to hurt people and rip them off, we wouldn’t last in business-we would be sued to bankruptcy by every patient, hospital and government agency. *I* know we care about our customers, whether or not you believe it. I also know that doing things right and helping doctors take good care of their patients is good business.
Have you posted videos of further procedures??
How scared it is
How would that happens?
The surgeon said it was due to a deficiency and an autoimmune disorder. I had this done after an infected c-section.
Venous insufficiency
I’m surprised that with ulcers that large on both lower extremities, that the patient still has both lower extremity and that they haven’t amputated
Man that was gnarly. Is it me or did the work seem Sloppy?
Debridement doesn’t necessarily need be precise. All that needs to happen is that the necrotic tissue is removed. Healthy tissue is resilient enough that the scraping sufficiently cleans the wound while leaving living tissue mostly intact.
This surgeon used the same curette as he moved from wound to wound. S/He cultured and took biopsy tissue from each wound--using the same curette. Seriously? So let's infect all wounds using the same instrument. S/He even "cleaned" it off as he moved from the first wound to the second--so s/he knew he was doing it. No wonder hospital-acquired infections are rampant. Shame on you.
I'm curious if you're judging this based on some intuition or prior clinical knowledge of how infections of wounds actually work.
Milk the insurance let’s get paid health care system is kinda sad 😢
@@OCPodiatry I'm guessing that English is not your first language huge language barrier here
Dropping in here late to say that this doctor is male and speaks perfect English without the slightest accent-not that it should matter. Watch any video in which he speaks. He also edits out some of the logistics of changing gloves, etc., but will often mention that he has. He is very careful about contamination and clearly knows what he’s doing.
As far as “milking the insurance system” is concerned, do you imagine surgeons operate in their own world with no oversight? Even if he wanted to do something to keep a patient sick, it would take a large number of people to be in on it, including the ER nurses, radiologists and radiology technicians, post-op staff, the medical review committee and numerous people in the finance department.
Moreover, insurance companies (I work for one) have substantial fraud departments to review anything suspicious-especially with Medicare/caid patients as the federal government requires. My company also employs nearly 300 doctors and nurses to review anything that might be questionable pre-and post-op.
You might think we do this to keep from paying claims, but any legitimate insurer knows the welfare of our customers is our bread and butter. Even if we were all a huge pack of rabid misanthropes who lived to hurt people and rip them off, we wouldn’t last in business-we would be sued to bankruptcy by every patient, hospital and government agency.
*I* know we care about our customers, whether or not you believe it. I also know that doing things right and helping doctors take good care of their patients is good business.