Lol @ people criticizing Slot Massacre for saying to hold the kicker. Andrew has forgotten more about Video Poker than most people commenting here know. Hes absolutely right. On a 9 6 machine on triple double the expected return on aces with a held kicker is 19.42 vs 15.66 when the kicker isnt held. Its not even close. On 2's with a held kicker is 10.91 vs 9.0. Those advising to not hold the kicker simply dont understand EV (Expected value) and how it relates to a period of time, not just the immediate. If you arent holding the kicker, you shouldn't be playing triple double :)
You need ONE specific card for 4 of a kind before the kicker is of any value. 2 chances is always better than one. No matter what period of time one is referring to. It was proven toward the middle of the video. Plenty of other kickers but you still need the 4th card first. Its not a kicker UNTIL you get 4 of a kind.
@@Billycash528 Correct. People talking about payouts even before hitting the 4th card. By holding the kicker, you only get 1 chance per hand to hit the 4 aces vs 2 chances when you don't hold the kicker.
Looks like there is an option to change the dream card when it shows up if you don't like the one you are dealt. Is that something you have tried to do?
3 aces dealt to you, DO NOT HOLD KICKER! catch the 4th aces and hope for kicker, don't eliminate opportunity to catch the ace!! Also, gut shot straights! Lol.. 1 win out of 13 attempts.. numbers guy, simple!!!
Thing is.... If you have 4 to the royal, you will go for it every time, if you have 3 with a kicker, it seems you should also go for it, just like the royal. Only one card away from the better hand either way. You must keep the kicker.
It's not the same. With 4 to the Royal, you don't have a winning hand yet. With 3 Aces, you have a winning hand with either one or 2 cards to draw for an even better hand. You MUST have the 4 of a kind first before a kicker is of any value. 2 chances is better than 1.
Who is telling you to hold the kicker? It isn't a kicker UNTIL you get 4 of a kind. 2 chances at the 4th A is better than 1. NEVER hold the kicker...it's a sucker's play. Another kicker is out there....take the 2 cards....need the A before the kicker. Hahaaaaaa toward the middle of the vid you proved me right! Awesome!
If the difference between quads w kicker and quads w/o kicker was greater then it would be more obvious why you should hold the kicker. Imagine quads w/o kicker pays 800 credits but w kicker pays 999,999,999,999 credits. You would gladly get a few less quads overall in order to get even one more quads w a kicker. This extreme example shows there is a point where holding the kicker makes sense.
Lol @ people criticizing Slot Massacre for saying to hold the kicker. Andrew has forgotten more about Video Poker than most people commenting here know. Hes absolutely right. On a 9 6 machine on triple double the expected return on aces with a held kicker is 19.42 vs 15.66 when the kicker isnt held. Its not even close. On 2's with a held kicker is 10.91 vs 9.0. Those advising to not hold the kicker simply dont understand EV (Expected value) and how it relates to a period of time, not just the immediate. If you arent holding the kicker, you shouldn't be playing triple double :)
X2
Good call
Casinos count on most people not knowing how to play video poker correctly and there right.yes on triple I hold the kicker.
You need ONE specific card for 4 of a kind before the kicker is of any value. 2 chances is always better than one. No matter what period of time one is referring to. It was proven toward the middle of the video. Plenty of other kickers but you still need the 4th card first. Its not a kicker UNTIL you get 4 of a kind.
@@Billycash528 Correct. People talking about payouts even before hitting the 4th card. By holding the kicker, you only get 1 chance per hand to hit the 4 aces vs 2 chances when you don't hold the kicker.
Go to work my friend! Hi Ma!
WoW 😮 😎💙💙💙💙💙Thx BigKats for the Action!
DUDE THE FAST TALKIN IS F'N GREAT ...LMAO TWEEN TWEEN TWENTY LMFAO
BigKats nice to see The Band is Back Together 😘😘 Great Video, Thsnks for the VP Action Chris and Rick From Chicago ❤️
Loved watching as usual! ♥️😘
Looks like there is an option to change the dream card when it shows up if you don't like the one you are dealt. Is that something you have tried to do?
Yes you can.
Let’s go!deal it out one time!
I got dealt royal on dream card. 3 big ole royals!!
Fun video!
I’m coming in this weekend, how long will you guys be playing there?
27/28th
Awesome - will try to stop and say hello to all !
💜💜💜💜💜💜
Lets go !!
3 aces dealt to you, DO NOT HOLD KICKER! catch the 4th aces and hope for kicker, don't eliminate opportunity to catch the ace!!
Also, gut shot straights! Lol.. 1 win out of 13 attempts.. numbers guy, simple!!!
Correct.
Nice hit Jeremy !!!
Say it ain’t so… get those 🐷🐷🐽🐽
At 1:05 you don’t hold the kicker in Triple Double you already know what a BONEHEAD move that is..
Thing is....
If you have 4 to the royal, you will go for it every time,
if you have 3 with a kicker, it seems you should also go for it, just like the royal.
Only one card away from the better hand either way.
You must keep the kicker.
Good call.
It's not the same. With 4 to the Royal, you don't have a winning hand yet. With 3 Aces, you have a winning hand with either one or 2 cards to draw for an even better hand. You MUST have the 4 of a kind first before a kicker is of any value. 2 chances is better than 1.
Who is telling you to hold the kicker? It isn't a kicker UNTIL you get 4 of a kind. 2 chances at the 4th A is better than 1. NEVER hold the kicker...it's a sucker's play. Another kicker is out there....take the 2 cards....need the A before the kicker. Hahaaaaaa toward the middle of the vid you proved me right! Awesome!
I totally agree. Holding the "kicker" is for suckered, and you ain't one. But I still love you.
I never hold a kicker. I agree.
Casinos love you morons who don’t hold the 3 of a kind with kickers playing Triple Double.
Bigkats has said many times...to each their own, especially on triple double.
If the difference between quads w kicker and quads w/o kicker was greater then it would be more obvious why you should hold the kicker. Imagine quads w/o kicker pays 800 credits but w kicker pays 999,999,999,999 credits. You would gladly get a few less quads overall in order to get even one more quads w a kicker. This extreme example shows there is a point where holding the kicker makes sense.