Thank you very much. I was studying policy and impact evaluation in Switzerland, and it was hard to understand this Law. now, with your explanation it's clear. I hope it helps me for the exam :D
At around 2:48 you say that taking an expectation of an expectation is essentially summing over all the values which the variable sex can take on. Is it really though? Isn't it more accurate to say that it's summing over all the values which E[IQ | Sex] can take on (by the definition of expectation). It appears you are missing a crucial step and I don't want to immediately accept that that it is just the same as summing over all the values for which sex can take on.
I don't understand the very last bit, aren't you supposed to take a second expectation of both male and female populations after summing their expectations together?
Pray the lord ! After crying on Wooldridge and Cameron, I saw the light in just 4:25 min !
Thanks a lot for your work !!!!!
good old fashion "read the Wooldridge and Cameron"
6 yrs later and I'm just starting on Wooldridge, FML
Thanks for all of these very helpful videos. Calm and clear explanation! The internet needs more great people like you.
Thank you very much. I was studying policy and impact evaluation in Switzerland, and it was hard to understand this Law.
now, with your explanation it's clear.
I hope it helps me for the exam :D
Thank you. Makes perfect sense now.
Hi, glad to hear it helped! Best, Ben
So easy to understand when you explain it. Thanks man!
Nice explanation! Better than my college lecturer!🎉😂
Finally get the intuition behind it, thank you so much
So just a weighted average of sub-populations, said in a fancy way!? That's how I got it. Thanks for explaining it in simple terms!
This is pretty clean and clear.
Awesome work, Ben. We appreciate you.
thank you so much, now the concept is much clearer
Brillian work, Ben. We appreciate you!
Amazing explanation.
This just confirms everything.
You are the genius, thank you so muccch
Thanks for your video, clear explanation.
Great explanation! Thank you very much!
At around 2:48 you say that taking an expectation of an expectation is essentially summing over all the values which the variable sex can take on. Is it really though? Isn't it more accurate to say that it's summing over all the values which E[IQ | Sex] can take on (by the definition of expectation). It appears you are missing a crucial step and I don't want to immediately accept that that it is just the same as summing over all the values for which sex can take on.
That is a beautiful explanation. But I did not understand why E(E(X/Y)) has to be the sum of Y's.
I don't understand the very last bit, aren't you supposed to take a second expectation of both male and female populations after summing their expectations together?
Thank you so much !!!
This is a nobel price explanation
That was an absolutely beautiful explanation. Thank you!
Great stuff!
Thank you so much for this video!
that was really helpful!
Very helpful thank you!
thanks sir!!
thank u so much
I hate that I didn't find this sooner!
It's a good thing
Thanks for helping!
Had to log in to hit a like!
tehe
he said sex
all kidding aside thanks for this video it saved my butt
감사합니다~
you're a beast