I used to work as a videoreporter for many years. For this job a camcorder is still the best option. It gives you many opportunities while filming. You can react very fast to new and permanently changing situations. DSLR cameras might deliver a better quality whe you can plan and repeat several times every single shot.
Thanks for the comment! I agree both have their strengths and weaknesses. Mirrorless cameras can give a blurry background and better low light performance in a small body, which camcorders cant. But mirrorless cameras (depends on the model of course) don't have features like built in ND filters, large zoom, different battery sizes.
Camcorders for weddings 100%! After using a DSLR for ~10 years, camcorders are a breath of fresh air. I can focus on capturing what's going on around me rather than missing the shot because I was fiddling with a setting. Very low light can sometimes be their downfall but that's the only occasion I'll break out the DSLR.
@@wcsdiariesergonomics, quick zoom with better AF and bigger range, and easier access to all the controls. You have to rig up a DSLR or digital cine camera. They’re better for separate planned shots.
The 'no distractions' thing is also why I keep a separate camera as well as having a smartphone. On a videoing trip I may be using my phone for looking at a map, etc. I currently use a compact camera for filming, but having used my Dad's old tape-based camcorder in the 2000s, I'm now drawn to getting a camcorder.
I've been using camcorders for almost 20 years and have built two popular RUclips channels using them. For a long time I used a Sony 4K camcorder but they don't offer 50/60FPS so I switched to the Panasonic HC-X1500 which is brilliant -- although not without flaws.
Nice! thanks for the comment. I also find it disappointing that the sony ones don't offer 4k at 60fps. (except their mirrorless style bodies or more expensive cameras like FX30, FX6 or Z190) And a perfect camera doesn't exist of course.
I still use Panasonics hc x920's. I have three... the best budget 1080p camera I've ever had. They are like work horses... turn them on and leave them for hours to do their job.
I highly agree. I found an old camcorder from over 10 years ago, and I've been having fun with it. 75x optical zoom, touch screen, great stabilization and 1080p. The image quality isn't the best anymore these days, but it's not really an issue. As much as I love my A6400, video recording is not as fun on the go as with a camcorder.
Best camera is the one you have with you. I carry an Apple iPhone 13 Pro in my pocket. For planned shoots I use a Sony ZV E10, Sony AX43A and a Sony RXO ii.
I've used sony ax700 for a period of time, 1 inch cmos with sharp video quality and pro recording settings. It works good but except its stabilization ability, so I have to use it with tripod almost all the time
I've just bought an Osmo Pocket 3 with wireless mic. For low light it smashes what any of my consumer or professional camcorders can do. Its gimbal and ultra wide angle lens is a deal breaker too.
Thanks for the comment and sorry for the confusion, I meant Action Camera. It is a Sony HDR-AS50, but other Sony models also work with multi camera control (it has to be a sony action cam with wifi support i think). It has a fixed focus wide angle lens so it isn't really great for b-roll. I mostly use it as a compact vlogging camera when going on a vacation. But if I use it with the AX53 I use it right next to it, so I can have multiple perspectives. (wide angle with the action cam and medium / close up with the AX53). Later in post I can switch between them to see which fits the best. Keep in mind that Sony stopped making Action cams. So now you can probably only find them on the used market.
Hola. Sabes cuando saldrán nuevos modelos de videocámaras Sony que sean capaz de grabar a 4K 60 FPS o 4K 120 FPS ? . Los modelos que hay actualmente no permiten grabar en esas resoluciones sino solo a 25 FPS EN 4K. Gracias.
I use a camcorder (AX53) because it doesn't have the crazy 30 minute limit. You made great points, but what are the benefits of that second attached camera?
Thanks for the comment! For me it's nice to have a second angle to choose from because it's wider. You can switch between a wide angle and close up after recording which gives you more flexibility. And because of that it's easier to hide jump cuts because then you can just switch to the different camera instead of seeing an ugly jump cut. Also you don't need to use the camera in the same position. So you can put it further away for example, but still see the preview of both cameras on 1 single camera. So great for multicam shoots in my opinion.
@@ImportantTech What is it called so I can read all about it? Can you have the HDMI out display both cameras in two halves by any chance? Is the second camera 4K? I am looking to get a 4K TV soon, so haven't been enjoying the 4K feature. It was a bumpy experience learning that I will be able to output 4K at 50hz/fps to my TV and record in 1080p. There's a little confusion on the internet about that, but it means with a capture card we can indeed record 4K at 50-60fps, just not on the camera.
@@DaveThompsonfairlife4all sadly it won't show the other camera through HDMI because the other camera is with wifi wirelessly connected. Mine is called HDR-AS50 and it can shoot only in 1080 but there's also FDR X3000 which shoots 4k. But they discontinued it. Also the X3000 is still holding its value and isn't worth the price they ask for on the used market.
@@ImportantTech Thanks for that info. Funny that we crave 4K when 1080 is still very good! I still enjoy my 1080p TV, but then I've never really experienced true 4K, unless you include cropping 1080p out of 4K footage. I wish the terminology had remained more consistent: We didn't started labelling our screens in "K" until 2160p came along. Shall I start calling 1080p 2K? Hmmm
@@DaveThompsonfairlife4all companies try to make people excited by introducing new resolutions, megapixels and frame rates. But in reality what matters the most (in my opinion) is the sensor and the glass you put in front of it. Older high end expensive cinema cameras, (for example an older arri Alexa or Sony F3) don't always shoot in 4k, but have a much more beautiful image compared to 8K smartphone video. That's because of the lenses but also sensor size. And for example Arri is really good with their color science and dynamic range in their sensors. But of course those cameras are much more expensive. But all I am trying to say here is: using resolution is just another way for companies trying to sell their products.
On the front of the v800 you can see it says 62mm. So you can use 62mm filters on the camera. But this depends on the model. Some allow for it, some don't
I never did understand y the hell camcorder went out in the first place. I don't like the way the new stuff if going. It's al about making money. Just like RUclips. Ppl always ask me y tf I use a mp3 when playing music I say it's free & no Comercials
I'm still using my small camcorder 📹. It's easy to use, I can record anything so fast, great zoom and audio, also I can record for hours with one battery charge. The main downside for me is the image stabilization. Thanks for the video.
In these aspects I like to compare myself to what the professionals use: in this case that would mean filmmakers, the ones that make actual movies and documentaries. Those cameras have no stabilisation, no AF, and often, no zoom. And when they do have stabilisation, they're usually huge rigs that you have to support yourself. So you can learn to keep still while holding a camera, at least until you can afford a new one with IS 😁 and when you do, you'll have combined stabilisation from what you learned with the old camera, and the technology from the new camera :)
Have an older 1080p camcorder in the closet that I took out recently having not used it in a while. So much easier, intuitive, and ergonomic than a phone or mirrorless camera setup. Will look into a modern 4k camcorder.
One thing you forget to mention is Sony 4k can record Surround Sound. I was blown away when I played back my 4k footage on my Surround Sound system. I could hear every detail behind me and people talking in the distance. BIG PLUS for having a SONY Camcorder.
THIS video makes so much sense to me, and you provide lots of relevant thoughts and input. Well done man. I currently use a Canon EOS M50, but I'm considering a Sony FDR AX43. I'm sure I'll be happy with it :) Thanks for a great video!
I remember doing some video projects work whilst serving in the army (conscripted) circa 2004, and using a mini-DV camcorder. Being able to use Firewire to capture both live views and recording transfers from the camera in Premiere was great too. This was probably the best thing at the time because they handed me 30+ VHS tapes, VCDs, and DVDs that I needed to digitize and unify the formats for editing. The VHS tapes were a pain since I only had a RealMagic capture card at home so tapes had to be digitized in real-time. The flip (up)side is that I got to stay home and not have to report in to camp during that period. I wonder if the current generation of camcorders can actually do this (albeit with USB probably).
@@VinnytotheK I mentioned that it had to be digitalized in real-time with the realmagic since it's purely an analog capture card compared to the other mediums (VCD/ DVD) which could be ripped much faster. The annoying part for VHS is that you need to be awake to monitor and hit record/ stop manually unlike DV cam firewire transfers which would be handled automatically. OTOH, I got to effectively stay home for 3 months and got awarded off time for another month's worth once the project completed so there's that.
They’re still needed depending on what type of work you’re doing. Like for sports. If you’re recording an entire game start to finish you won’t one long take zooming in for close ups and zooming out…Which would be hard to do with a Mirrorless, you have to twist the lens in and out most lens don’t have power zoom, plus with the smaller sensor the focus distance isn’t massive. You can zoom out for a wide shot, then zoom in for a close up with out loosing focus. Even Sony with its amazing autofocus still will have to catch up, and when you’re filming live that’s important. Also all mirrorless cameras even the ones that have no record limits still break the clips up into 30 min clips and that’s not always practical
I use the Sony Ax33 and its got fantastic video quality its better than my Sony Xperia 5 iii but the phone is still very good. When i go out i use my Handycam for video and my phone for photos sometimes i use my phone for video.
Even though I like camcorders, I highly doub it. The reason is, people like things that are easy to use/handle the 90s early 2000 people practical way of seeing things is not the same as for this and they camcocerder current functionality doesnt outweight the one of any of the little cam that are on the market. Stabilization is just not worth it on camcorder pre-production and once you have to take this post-prod it is no longer for the regular people usage as it was in the 90s. in a market where you have really small cameras like DJI Pocket 3, goPro 12, zve-1 people going for this makes it harder. Pro would always complain about and say things like: "I want great quality and equpiment" yet they will pull their iphone to record something on the moment or just choose the higest quality gear when have something planned and a camcorder ain't it.
just found yesterday one of 6.1p, 108 HD --and it looks really fantastic. I do fully agree, that Handycam -is really handy and better than any other device. you really enjoying from the process - its amazing . I am going to test the one i found at home 1080 HD and if its not sharp enough, i am thinking to buy one ( latest model) --looking now at the price--800 euros ( a bit expensive) -will see. SONY handycams =are the piece of art for sure !!!!
I have been using Sony Camcorders for over 16 years - HDR-HC7 MiniDV (until I drowned it), HDR-CX550 (Great stabilisation), and HDR-AX100 (not good stabilisation). I believe the size of the sensor has something to do with this. I do travel videos for You Tube. The CX550 is mounted in the windscreen these days and the AX100 sits on the seat beside me for handheld driveby shots. The still camera in the AX100 I find more than adequate, and I only shoot in 1080p. I would like to upgrade the CX550, but find that I can get around it's inadequacies in Da Vinci Resolve. All in one shooting is the key for me. Being in Australia, we shoot at 25fps, whereas phones are all 30fps, which creates another problem in combining frame rates in post. The work around is that you might have an hour at 25fps and 10 minutes at 30fps, and you need to edit the whole lot at 30fps to get a smooth(ish) result. Overall, less gear, less hassle, quicker & smoother shooting.
I use it because I'm an old geezer and don't know how to use a computer. I'm old school and use a/v cable to transfer my video to dvds on a DVR. I just have to have that has those cables with it
A couple of other things I like about my AX53: The lens is supported on a stabilisation rig built right in, so that makes it easier to get smoother shots. Also, I often prefer to use the eyepiece viewfinder, especially for picking out subjects at long distances. These are still great camcorders.
Camcorders are my favorite of the three. I have used all three types of cameras. As you mentioned they all have their pros and cons, but my number 1 choice is camcorders. I find them to be highly underrated. Having been in film school I find many people liked to bandwagon on getting DSLR or mirrorless cameras. While those cameras could be good I found the camcorders having more flexibility including with that zoom feature you're talking about. I've had chances to look at some video shot on 4K camcorders and I'm surprised at just how good it can look especially with the zoom feature. I rented out a Canon 400XF Camcorder for the Chicago Marathon and the LCD screen didn't do It justice. It wasn't until I watched the footage again on a larger Apple computer screen that I saw how good it can look. My latest video upload on this channel is from a Chicago Air & Water show video. That was shot with a Sony PXW-X70 HD camera. That was also a freelance gig and that was a great camera for that freelance project. Being on a rocky boat and trying to capture planes flying fast. The zoom feature really helped there. You can watch the video and see for yourself what I mean. It turned out great. The 4K version of that camcorder could make the planes look even better I bet.
I use all of them. I bought a Canon camcorder about 6 years ago and I really don't regret it. When I'm not in the mood to mess with any of the other cameras including the DSLR for the phone and fiddle with them I just pulled the camcorder out flip the screen out and around and start recording. The longest time I might spend setting up is mounting it onto a tripod which takes only a moment. For content creation is just the best and you can also include footage from any of the other devices in the final video.
I have a Sony AX33, my only complaints are the viewfinder is small and hard to view quickly. And the Zoom doesn't zoom enough. I was using a JVC Everio for the longest time that was decent and had an excellent zoom.
It is possible to put a wide angle lens on there because there is a 55mm front filter thread. So if you find a wide angle lens with a 55mm diameter screw on filter it should work. Keep in mind that most of the wide angle adapters are of low quality so don't expect the best images when using a wide angle adapter
All the things you said, and another thing about my S23 phone is that it has AI software running that interrupts my camera for stupid things. Frustrating. I like my Sony CX405 much better. I miss half the shots I want with my phone. Wonky.
@@ImportantTechthe only problem I see is the quality of audio. Built in microphone captures the noise of the work of the camcorder. I use rode external mic
I just bought a new Panasonic 4K VX980 (2016) ; it's reliable and has the best stabilization, IMHO. It's not overly big and much better to use; I hate vertical smartphone videos; negative ! I still have my smartphone. I also have a real small HC-V380 (Full HD)with x50 optical zoom and a Panasonic HC-X1500.
Added a 👍. I've been use the AX-33 since 2015 and it's still going strong. I would have bought the AX-53 except it came out only a year later than the AX-33. The AX-700 is no longer made and it seems that Sony is focusing on cameras like the A-6700 and I don't want a lot of lenses. Plus the PZ lenses are super expensive.
I hardly ever zoom while filming, was considered amateurish in my younger day. Yes, camcorders are easier to handle. But when you use it, everybody sees a filming cameraman. While using a mobile, they just see another guy.
Thank you for the informative video! I was curious at about 3:30 you have on screen a lens hood with an a light attached to it??? where would I be able to grab one of those? Also, would that fit on the AX53???
Thanks for the comment! Sadly the lens hood doesnt work on the AX53. I think it isn't sold seperately and it comes included with the HDR-PJ650. Also, the camera itself has the light. And there is a small hole in the lens hood so that the light can shine through.
The AX53 has balanced optical steadyshot which is a bit different compared to IBIS (in body stabilisation). With balanced optical steadyshot the lens and sensor are mounted in a floating stabilizer. In my opinion it's about the same if not better stabilization than IBIS, but it's not as good as a gimbal or the newer GoPro stabilization.
I watched a couple of videos and i-phone had better stabilization than these camcorders. Aren't they supposed to have better stabilization than just a phone? Also gopro has better stabilization than both phone and camcorder. So what is the point of using camcorder then ? If i m gonna use just statically ? Mirrorless cameras have better quality for that purpose already.
It depends on which model you use. But the stabilisation of camcorders is most of the time not always better than phones. But the point of a camcorder is the large amount of zoom, smooth zoom, options for external mics and headphones for listening live to the audio, close focussing distance, flip screen. But of course not everyone needs this depending on the shooting situation. Like I said in the video: camcorders aren't perfect and meant for everyone. Phones are also good these days. But I still prefer to use a camcorder
I have used some of the best camera phones but have now just gone back to a camcorder - Sony AX100 - which allows me to shoot aircraft in the sky where a cameraphone screen is really impossible to see when on a bright day... The Sony AX100 looks like a very straightforward interface which is a relief! My previous camcorder, a Sony DCR TRV950 miniDV camcorder was very complicated...
@@ImportantTech Yes indeed, the ND filters are a nice professional asset to the ax100. I even had a Panasonic DMC CM1 which had the same software and lens as a simple automatic camera, also a 1" sensor! It was described as "a camera with a phone attached"! Took lovely pictures, but the video suffered from the slightly jerky zoom control that you described and then with no viewfinder it was really hard to use it in strong sunlight or against the sky for aircraft. I stayed with it for years for the photo quality but the ultimate downfall was that Panasonic stopped the possibility to update the OS. I started to loose basic compatibility with it as far as the smart phone side was concerned. I still have it in a drawer...If I could update the OS I would go back to it, for the sake of having a good stills camera always in my pocket...To replace it I have a Motorola G8...medium quality stills but modern smart phone ability came as a revelation!
sorry to say, but the gopro is still the best! Turn off noise reduction in GoproLabs firmware, shoot in 5.3k with the volta battery grip attached and turn on Flat mode with WIDE=1 (wider color range) in gopro labs
@@sidstevens9035 you can use fisheye correction both in camera and in post. The issue with gopros is that while they are very versatile in terms of environments they can be used in, they are almost unusable for lowlight and don't have any optical zoom, auto or manual focus, or depth of field. I have a GoPro and I like it a lot but it's definitely a b-cam for me.
![[Limbus Company - Teaser] Season5 - Oblivion](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8anKuEeZLeI/mqdefault.jpg)
Also check out my new video I made about camcorders: ruclips.net/video/9K4BxdYGzbY/видео.html
I used to work as a videoreporter for many years. For this job a camcorder is still the best option. It gives you many opportunities while filming. You can react very fast to new and permanently changing situations. DSLR cameras might deliver a better quality whe you can plan and repeat several times every single shot.
Thanks for the comment! I agree both have their strengths and weaknesses. Mirrorless cameras can give a blurry background and better low light performance in a small body, which camcorders cant. But mirrorless cameras (depends on the model of course) don't have features like built in ND filters, large zoom, different battery sizes.
How are they better for news?
Camcorders for weddings 100%! After using a DSLR for ~10 years, camcorders are a breath of fresh air. I can focus on capturing what's going on around me rather than missing the shot because I was fiddling with a setting. Very low light can sometimes be their downfall but that's the only occasion I'll break out the DSLR.
@@JR0298 what do you mean you dont need to adjust the settings for camcorders? Are they all auto?
@@wcsdiariesergonomics, quick zoom with better AF and bigger range, and easier access to all the controls. You have to rig up a DSLR or digital cine camera. They’re better for separate planned shots.
The 'no distractions' thing is also why I keep a separate camera as well as having a smartphone. On a videoing trip I may be using my phone for looking at a map, etc. I currently use a compact camera for filming, but having used my Dad's old tape-based camcorder in the 2000s, I'm now drawn to getting a camcorder.
As a handycam dcr-sr47 user who is planning on upgrading to the hdr-sr11, I agree with all these points
I've been using camcorders for almost 20 years and have built two popular RUclips channels using them. For a long time I used a Sony 4K camcorder but they don't offer 50/60FPS so I switched to the Panasonic HC-X1500 which is brilliant -- although not without flaws.
Nice! thanks for the comment. I also find it disappointing that the sony ones don't offer 4k at 60fps. (except their mirrorless style bodies or more expensive cameras like FX30, FX6 or Z190) And a perfect camera doesn't exist of course.
Does that one have IR for night recording?
I still use Panasonics hc x920's. I have three... the best budget 1080p camera I've ever had. They are like work horses... turn them on and leave them for hours to do their job.
@@FightCollective does it have night vision mode?
@@wcsdiaries No the panasonics HC X 920 doesn't have night vision. The panasonic hc-vx870 does though... you can check it out on youtube
I highly agree. I found an old camcorder from over 10 years ago, and I've been having fun with it. 75x optical zoom, touch screen, great stabilization and 1080p. The image quality isn't the best anymore these days, but it's not really an issue. As much as I love my A6400, video recording is not as fun on the go as with a camcorder.
What’s the camcorder you’re using that has 75X optical zoom?
@@petzlju Was way off, it's only 50x with 'intelligent zoom' beginning at 40x. It's the HC-V500M Panasonic. No clue where I got 75x from.
Thanks for this I’ve just resurrected my CX 240e and ditching using my iPhone 13 mini 😊for filming my layout
Noiice is it the blue one or black?
I use an iPhone 11 Pro - for stills and videos. It is always in my pocket. Like & Hi from Michigan 🚂
Nice. Thanks for the comment!
Best camera is the one you have with you. I carry an Apple iPhone 13 Pro in my pocket. For planned shoots I use a Sony ZV E10, Sony AX43A and a Sony RXO ii.
I've used sony ax700 for a period of time, 1 inch cmos with sharp video quality and pro recording settings. It works good but except its stabilization ability, so I have to use it with tripod almost all the time
Thanks for sharing
I've just bought an Osmo Pocket 3 with wireless mic. For low light it smashes what any of my consumer or professional camcorders can do. Its gimbal and ultra wide angle lens is a deal breaker too.
The AX53 also has night vision, which is not something phones have.
I forgot about that one
Great video.
WHat is that small 'etching' camera'. And where do I get one. And what do you use it for. Looks so nice. Maybe for B roll?
Thanks for the comment and sorry for the confusion, I meant Action Camera. It is a Sony HDR-AS50, but other Sony models also work with multi camera control (it has to be a sony action cam with wifi support i think).
It has a fixed focus wide angle lens so it isn't really great for b-roll. I mostly use it as a compact vlogging camera when going on a vacation. But if I use it with the AX53 I use it right next to it, so I can have multiple perspectives. (wide angle with the action cam and medium / close up with the AX53). Later in post I can switch between them to see which fits the best.
Keep in mind that Sony stopped making Action cams. So now you can probably only find them on the used market.
Very informative video. The dual camera setup was interesting, and I assume via bluetooth.
Glad it was helpful! Bluetooth isn't strong enough to deliver real time video so it's through the wifi feature
Which model is this?
In the video I was using the Sony HDR PJ650 and FDR AX53
thanks!
@@ImportantTech
Hola. Sabes cuando saldrán nuevos modelos de videocámaras Sony que sean capaz de grabar a 4K 60 FPS o 4K 120 FPS ? . Los modelos que hay actualmente no permiten grabar en esas resoluciones sino solo a 25 FPS EN 4K. Gracias.
Sadly I have no idea. I think they will stop making camcorders in the future because these models are already getting old.
What you think about the Panasonic HC-VX981 vs This one? And do you think this camecorder better then the DJI pocket 3? Thanks😊
Also the video stabilization it's better on camcorders
In my opinion most newer phones have smoother image stabilisation, but it depends on the model of course
For the best stabilization, GoPro -style action cameras set the standard. But they work best only for wide angle shooting, of course.
An excellent case for the defence!
I use both camera recorder and phone
I agree. But I use all of them depending on the situation.
Nice! Of course it's not like camcorders are perfect for everything. Different cameras work great in different situations
@@ImportantTech If this camera could film in 4K 60P I would buy one.
Cool !!
Thank you!
You omitted the camcorder's advantage in monitoring and managing dynamic audio.
Gosh I wish Sony made a new version of the VG30. A APSC camcorder with e-mount.
would be great if they made that!
I use a camcorder (AX53) because it doesn't have the crazy 30 minute limit. You made great points, but what are the benefits of that second attached camera?
Thanks for the comment!
For me it's nice to have a second angle to choose from because it's wider. You can switch between a wide angle and close up after recording which gives you more flexibility.
And because of that it's easier to hide jump cuts because then you can just switch to the different camera instead of seeing an ugly jump cut.
Also you don't need to use the camera in the same position. So you can put it further away for example, but still see the preview of both cameras on 1 single camera. So great for multicam shoots in my opinion.
@@ImportantTech What is it called so I can read all about it? Can you have the HDMI out display both cameras in two halves by any chance? Is the second camera 4K?
I am looking to get a 4K TV soon, so haven't been enjoying the 4K feature. It was a bumpy experience learning that I will be able to output 4K at 50hz/fps to my TV and record in 1080p. There's a little confusion on the internet about that, but it means with a capture card we can indeed record 4K at 50-60fps, just not on the camera.
@@DaveThompsonfairlife4all sadly it won't show the other camera through HDMI because the other camera is with wifi wirelessly connected. Mine is called HDR-AS50 and it can shoot only in 1080 but there's also FDR X3000 which shoots 4k. But they discontinued it. Also the X3000 is still holding its value and isn't worth the price they ask for on the used market.
@@ImportantTech Thanks for that info. Funny that we crave 4K when 1080 is still very good! I still enjoy my 1080p TV, but then I've never really experienced true 4K, unless you include cropping 1080p out of 4K footage.
I wish the terminology had remained more consistent: We didn't started labelling our screens in "K" until 2160p came along. Shall I start calling 1080p 2K? Hmmm
@@DaveThompsonfairlife4all companies try to make people excited by introducing new resolutions, megapixels and frame rates.
But in reality what matters the most (in my opinion) is the sensor and the glass you put in front of it. Older high end expensive cinema cameras, (for example an older arri Alexa or Sony F3) don't always shoot in 4k, but have a much more beautiful image compared to 8K smartphone video. That's because of the lenses but also sensor size. And for example Arri is really good with their color science and dynamic range in their sensors.
But of course those cameras are much more expensive. But all I am trying to say here is: using resolution is just another way for companies trying to sell their products.
Can i use nd or cpl filter on budget camcorder like Panasonic V800
On the front of the v800 you can see it says 62mm. So you can use 62mm filters on the camera. But this depends on the model. Some allow for it, some don't
Which camcorder have built image stabilization? Do iPhone have this feature?
It feel strange that phones has better image stabilization then camcoders
I'm waiting for 200 MP fold 6
I never did understand y the hell camcorder went out in the first place. I don't like the way the new stuff if going. It's al about making money. Just like RUclips. Ppl always ask me y tf I use a mp3 when playing music I say it's free & no Comercials
Sony AX53 is fantastic but long overdue for an update. I wish Sony would put the A7Siii sensor in a camcorder body. That would be a buy for me.
I agree! A7siii in a camcorder body already kind of exists with the FX6, but the FX6 is a lot bigger / heavier. Not really easy to carry around
@@ImportantTech An updated version of the old Sony NEXVG900 would be awesome. Camcorder body, interchangeable lens, full frame sensor.
I agree! I wish they made another version of it. But they probably won't
I'm still using my small camcorder 📹. It's easy to use, I can record anything so fast, great zoom and audio, also I can record for hours with one battery charge. The main downside for me is the image stabilization. Thanks for the video.
That's great! Thanks for the comment
In these aspects I like to compare myself to what the professionals use: in this case that would mean filmmakers, the ones that make actual movies and documentaries. Those cameras have no stabilisation, no AF, and often, no zoom. And when they do have stabilisation, they're usually huge rigs that you have to support yourself. So you can learn to keep still while holding a camera, at least until you can afford a new one with IS 😁 and when you do, you'll have combined stabilisation from what you learned with the old camera, and the technology from the new camera :)
Have an older 1080p camcorder in the closet that I took out recently having not used it in a while. So much easier, intuitive, and ergonomic than a phone or mirrorless camera setup. Will look into a modern 4k camcorder.
One thing you forget to mention is Sony 4k can record Surround Sound. I was blown away when I played back my 4k footage on my Surround Sound system. I could hear every detail behind me and people talking in the distance. BIG PLUS for having a SONY Camcorder.
Sadly only when shooting in AVCHD but yes that's also a great feature I forgot to talk about! Thanks for the comment!
I still have and use the Sony ax53 camcorders.. still works great. And people don’t even know..
I didn't know that you can view another cameras screen and use them at the same time! I love camcorders and today I learned something new.
I'm glad you learned something!
THIS video makes so much sense to me, and you provide lots of relevant thoughts and input. Well done man.
I currently use a Canon EOS M50, but I'm considering a Sony FDR AX43. I'm sure I'll be happy with it :)
Thanks for a great video!
Thanks for the comment!
I remember doing some video projects work whilst serving in the army (conscripted) circa 2004, and using a mini-DV camcorder.
Being able to use Firewire to capture both live views and recording transfers from the camera in Premiere was great too.
This was probably the best thing at the time because they handed me 30+ VHS tapes, VCDs, and DVDs that I needed to digitize and unify the formats for editing.
The VHS tapes were a pain since I only had a RealMagic capture card at home so tapes had to be digitized in real-time. The flip (up)side is that I got to stay home and not have to report in to camp during that period.
I wonder if the current generation of camcorders can actually do this (albeit with USB probably).
They wouldn't have had to be digitized in real-time if you had your RealMagic capture card? How is that so?
@@VinnytotheK I mentioned that it had to be digitalized in real-time with the realmagic since it's purely an analog capture card compared to the other mediums (VCD/ DVD) which could be ripped much faster.
The annoying part for VHS is that you need to be awake to monitor and hit record/ stop manually unlike DV cam firewire transfers which would be handled automatically.
OTOH, I got to effectively stay home for 3 months and got awarded off time for another month's worth once the project completed so there's that.
They’re still needed depending on what type of work you’re doing. Like for sports. If you’re recording an entire game start to finish you won’t one long take zooming in for close ups and zooming out…Which would be hard to do with a Mirrorless, you have to twist the lens in and out most lens don’t have power zoom, plus with the smaller sensor the focus distance isn’t massive. You can zoom out for a wide shot, then zoom in for a close up with out loosing focus. Even Sony with its amazing autofocus still will have to catch up, and when you’re filming live that’s important. Also all mirrorless cameras even the ones that have no record limits still break the clips up into 30 min clips and that’s not always practical
I use the Sony Ax33 and its got fantastic video quality its better than my Sony Xperia 5 iii but the phone is still very good. When i go out i use my Handycam for video and my phone for photos sometimes i use my phone for video.
Nice! Thanks for the comment.
TLDR: Zoooom
I use both,sony zv-e10 for my photography and my sony cx-405 for video.I am very happy with both.Cheers.
Thanks for sharing
I think camcorders will have a resurgence especially if Sony and Panasonic update their products.
I would love camcorders to come back.
Even though I like camcorders, I highly doub it. The reason is, people like things that are easy to use/handle the 90s early 2000 people practical way of seeing things is not the same as for this and they camcocerder current functionality doesnt outweight the one of any of the little cam that are on the market. Stabilization is just not worth it on camcorder pre-production and once you have to take this post-prod it is no longer for the regular people usage as it was in the 90s. in a market where you have really small cameras like DJI Pocket 3, goPro 12, zve-1 people going for this makes it harder. Pro would always complain about and say things like: "I want great quality and equpiment" yet they will pull their iphone to record something on the moment or just choose the higest quality gear when have something planned and a camcorder ain't it.
just found yesterday one of 6.1p, 108 HD --and it looks really fantastic. I do fully agree, that Handycam -is really handy and better than any other device. you really enjoying from the process - its amazing . I am going to test the one i found at home 1080 HD and if its not sharp enough, i am thinking to buy one ( latest model) --looking now at the price--800 euros ( a bit expensive) -will see. SONY handycams =are the piece of art for sure !!!!
Thanks for sharing! I think it is sad that they still havent made newer models recently
Totally agree with you...I have the new Samsung S24 ultra and I only use my minolta camcorder for video.
Since camcorders use an sd card, you are not restricted to the phone's internal memory when filming with a phone.
I have been using Sony Camcorders for over 16 years - HDR-HC7 MiniDV (until I drowned it), HDR-CX550 (Great stabilisation), and HDR-AX100 (not good stabilisation). I believe the size of the sensor has something to do with this. I do travel videos for You Tube. The CX550 is mounted in the windscreen these days and the AX100 sits on the seat beside me for handheld driveby shots. The still camera in the AX100 I find more than adequate, and I only shoot in 1080p. I would like to upgrade the CX550, but find that I can get around it's inadequacies in Da Vinci Resolve. All in one shooting is the key for me. Being in Australia, we shoot at 25fps, whereas phones are all 30fps, which creates another problem in combining frame rates in post. The work around is that you might have an hour at 25fps and 10 minutes at 30fps, and you need to edit the whole lot at 30fps to get a smooth(ish) result. Overall, less gear, less hassle, quicker & smoother shooting.
"I believe the size of the sensor has something to do with this" that's why phone stabilisation, when at its best, is so incredible!
It's almost impossible to find a new camcorder anymore. I had a Canon Handycam but something went wrong with its charger.
I like that you can use filters and other lens attachments with a camcorder
I use it because I'm an old geezer and don't know how to use a computer. I'm old school and use a/v cable to transfer my video to dvds on a DVR.
I just have to have that has those cables with it
MarkusPix thinks very highly of the Sony CX405 and Panasonic vx981
What modle is this camcorder i love it!
Sony AX53 and PJ650
For what I do, the only real option are camcorders. DSLR`s are just noch up to the task when you have to react quick and are on the move.
Thank you for the comment!
Would have been good to see image comparisons too
Thanks for the tip!
A couple of other things I like about my AX53: The lens is supported on a stabilisation rig built right in, so that makes it easier to get smoother shots.
Also, I often prefer to use the eyepiece viewfinder, especially for picking out subjects at long distances. These are still great camcorders.
for $1000, it better be still great!
The downside you don't mention is camcorder can't get good blurry background. This is you still need mirrorless cam.
Yes! If you want a blurry background, then a camcorder isn't a good option.
Camcorders are my favorite of the three. I have used all three types of cameras. As you mentioned they all have their pros and cons, but my number 1 choice is camcorders. I find them to be highly underrated. Having been in film school I find many people liked to bandwagon on getting DSLR or mirrorless cameras. While those cameras could be good I found the camcorders having more flexibility including with that zoom feature you're talking about.
I've had chances to look at some video shot on 4K camcorders and I'm surprised at just how good it can look especially with the zoom feature. I rented out a Canon 400XF Camcorder for the Chicago Marathon and the LCD screen didn't do It justice. It wasn't until I watched the footage again on a larger Apple computer screen that I saw how good it can look.
My latest video upload on this channel is from a Chicago Air & Water show video. That was shot with a Sony PXW-X70 HD camera. That was also a freelance gig and that was a great camera for that freelance project. Being on a rocky boat and trying to capture planes flying fast. The zoom feature really helped there. You can watch the video and see for yourself what I mean. It turned out great. The 4K version of that camcorder could make the planes look even better I bet.
I use all of them. I bought a Canon camcorder about 6 years ago and I really don't regret it. When I'm not in the mood to mess with any of the other cameras including the DSLR for the phone and fiddle with them I just pulled the camcorder out flip the screen out and around and start recording. The longest time I might spend setting up is mounting it onto a tripod which takes only a moment. For content creation is just the best and you can also include footage from any of the other devices in the final video.
Outlast
hello fellow Sony Handycam user, i still use my CX-330 but on a different channel
Awesome!
I have a Sony AX33, my only complaints are the viewfinder is small and hard to view quickly. And the Zoom doesn't zoom enough. I was using a JVC Everio for the longest time that was decent and had an excellent zoom.
I really want a fish eye lens on my Sony fdr ax43-a do you know if that possible and wich one I need ?
It is possible to put a wide angle lens on there because there is a 55mm front filter thread. So if you find a wide angle lens with a 55mm diameter screw on filter it should work.
Keep in mind that most of the wide angle adapters are of low quality so don't expect the best images when using a wide angle adapter
All the things you said, and another thing about my S23 phone is that it has AI software running that interrupts my camera for stupid things. Frustrating. I like my Sony CX405 much better. I miss half the shots I want with my phone. Wonky.
I use fdr ax53. It is really nice. I enjoy it very much.
Good to hear! Thanks for sharing
@@ImportantTechthe only problem I see is the quality of audio. Built in microphone captures the noise of the work of the camcorder. I use rode external mic
I just bought a new Panasonic 4K VX980 (2016) ; it's reliable and has the best stabilization, IMHO. It's not overly big and much better to use; I hate vertical smartphone videos; negative ! I still have my smartphone. I also have a real small HC-V380 (Full HD)with x50 optical zoom and a Panasonic HC-X1500.
If I'm at a family gathering it's good to let the kids 'have a go' with the (cheaper) HC-V380 and get their perspective while I use the bigger ones.
Added a 👍. I've been use the AX-33 since 2015 and it's still going strong. I would have bought the AX-53 except it came out only a year later than the AX-33. The AX-700 is no longer made and it seems that Sony is focusing on cameras like the A-6700 and I don't want a lot of lenses. Plus the PZ lenses are super expensive.
Thank you! I agree. A good PZ lens can be as expensive, if not more expensive than a camcorder.
I hardly ever zoom while filming, was considered amateurish in my younger day. Yes, camcorders are easier to handle. But when you use it, everybody sees a filming cameraman. While using a mobile, they just see another guy.
I worked on Sony AX53 for four years, it's a great camera
Very easy and helps a lot during work
Recommend a tripod for RUclips or one that also can shot overhead that won’t damage the bottom of the camcorder?
I use an old Sony CCD, perfect quality lol
Nice
I'm in the camcorder team!
Thank you for the informative video! I was curious at about 3:30 you have on screen a lens hood with an a light attached to it??? where would I be able to grab one of those? Also, would that fit on the AX53???
Thanks for the comment!
Sadly the lens hood doesnt work on the AX53. I think it isn't sold seperately and it comes included with the HDR-PJ650. Also, the camera itself has the light. And there is a small hole in the lens hood so that the light can shine through.
very interesting thanks
Glad you enjoyed it
I love camcorders. I'm onboard and just subscribed!
Looking forward to some camcorder video work on your channel.
Thank you for subscribing!
Thanks for your explanation, I'm just planning to buy an AX53, it solves my wonderings.
Another great, to the point and informative video.
Glad you liked it! Thanks a lot!
Does this camera have in body stabilization?
The AX53 has balanced optical steadyshot which is a bit different compared to IBIS (in body stabilisation). With balanced optical steadyshot the lens and sensor are mounted in a floating stabilizer. In my opinion it's about the same if not better stabilization than IBIS, but it's not as good as a gimbal or the newer GoPro stabilization.
I watched a couple of videos and i-phone had better stabilization than these camcorders. Aren't they supposed to have better stabilization than just a phone? Also gopro has better stabilization than both phone and camcorder. So what is the point of using camcorder then ? If i m gonna use just statically ? Mirrorless cameras have better quality for that purpose already.
It depends on which model you use. But the stabilisation of camcorders is most of the time not always better than phones. But the point of a camcorder is the large amount of zoom, smooth zoom, options for external mics and headphones for listening live to the audio, close focussing distance, flip screen.
But of course not everyone needs this depending on the shooting situation. Like I said in the video: camcorders aren't perfect and meant for everyone. Phones are also good these days. But I still prefer to use a camcorder
nice review . i also have the AX53 i love it and will use it as long as possible. how watching you video I'm just learning about the action camera.
Glad it was helpful!
How well does the night vision work? Could you use it for wildlife at night or can you not see very far with it?
@@wcsdiaries I never use night vision. But you can zoom very far in the day
Which current Sony camcorder has the best sound for recording classical music?
They all sound decent but nothing amazing. You probably want to get one with a microphone port so you can attach an external microphone
How about the bokeh effect of your camcorder 😅…still mirrorsless for me.
True! Some 1 inch camcorders can get a bit of bokeh, but definitely not as much as something like the mirrorless cameras.
I still do not want to get rid of my AX53. A fantastic camera! I love it! It is so hard to beat the value and the zoom is fantastic!
I completely agree and I feel the same way. It's just disappointing that they didn't release a newer model.
@@ImportantTech yes! They certainly could bring camcorders back but the issue there is that they are far less profitable than the DSLR style craze.
I have used some of the best camera phones but have now just gone back to a camcorder - Sony AX100 - which allows me to shoot aircraft in the sky where a cameraphone screen is really impossible to see when on a bright day... The Sony AX100 looks like a very straightforward interface which is a relief! My previous camcorder, a Sony DCR TRV950 miniDV camcorder was very complicated...
Nice! Also the ax100 has nd filters and a larger sensor compared to a smartphone. I hope they make an update of the ax100/700 line soon
@@ImportantTech Yes indeed, the ND filters are a nice professional asset to the ax100. I even had a Panasonic DMC CM1 which had the same software and lens as a simple automatic camera, also a 1" sensor! It was described as "a camera with a phone attached"! Took lovely pictures, but the video suffered from the slightly jerky zoom control that you described and then with no viewfinder it was really hard to use it in strong sunlight or against the sky for aircraft. I stayed with it for years for the photo quality but the ultimate downfall was that Panasonic stopped the possibility to update the OS. I started to loose basic compatibility with it as far as the smart phone side was concerned. I still have it in a drawer...If I could update the OS I would go back to it, for the sake of having a good stills camera always in my pocket...To replace it I have a Motorola G8...medium quality stills but modern smart phone ability came as a revelation!
Very good video!
Thank you so much!
sorry to say, but the gopro is still the best! Turn off noise reduction in GoproLabs firmware, shoot in 5.3k with the volta battery grip attached and turn on Flat mode with WIDE=1 (wider color range) in gopro labs
Except the fish eye lens problem
@@sidstevens9035 you can use fisheye correction both in camera and in post. The issue with gopros is that while they are very versatile in terms of environments they can be used in, they are almost unusable for lowlight and don't have any optical zoom, auto or manual focus, or depth of field. I have a GoPro and I like it a lot but it's definitely a b-cam for me.