Great video, I like this exercise a lot! One comment, the additional Datum Axis was not used in this example, but I agree, if it were used, it does aid in simpler selection for downstream changes, i.e. being used for an explicit Horizontal References, etc., and one that can be moved independently from the Absolute Datum CSYS. Very cool!
Really amazing tutorial and for your information warnings can be cleared by right clicking on the top of the Part Navigator(Clear Warning Alerts). Thank you
That's a one of smartest way I've seen to combine the extensive feature list NX is proposing. ACE ! I have a question regarding the feature group. I don't see any feature number on them, are they "non timestamped groups" ? Why this type ? Thank you.
Hi Stephane, sorry for late response - the timestamp of the feature groups can be displayed via the timestamp column. The group always has a higher timestamp, that its members. So, it is not a parent of its content. Kind regards, Simon
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training Hum, not sure is you understood my question. In NX customer default, you can choose which kind of feature group you prefer (Timestamped Only / Floating/ Both). Why in your case did you choose floating group (maybe I'm wrong but as there is no (xx) feature number, I assume they are floating groups then)? To me, flaoting ones are confusing as they can group "non following" features. Thank you
I really liked this video and it was definitely demonstrative of the value of the selection filters, in a way I hadn't seen before. I've been reading a little more about RMS and other modelling methods. You called this "horizontal" design in your video, just thought I'd give you a heads up that it looks like that sort of method exists and is patented by Delphi, but I think their definition is different from yours. Do you know about that at all, am I mistaken in that they are different? Algorithmic/horizontal modelling, as you defined it, seems very powerful and more so than the Delphi version. Also, have you been able to replicate this behavior in other softwares effectively?
Thanks. Its hard for me right now to find time for reading the study. But I will for sure remember at some time. I have recognized the horizontal modeling method at some companies using e.g. Catia
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training Have you got a short tutorial on implementing horizontal modelling in terms of multi-part assemblies? I'm trying to see if there is some novel method I'm missing that is more efficient than what most of us are typically doing.
Nice tutorial. One suggestion I might make, and hopefully comes across constructively. Skip explaining all the alternate ways to get where you're going. One thing about NX.. there are lots of ways to do any type of thing. I like the explanation of "why" you picked a particular workflow, but going back and forth on alternates kinda muddies up the instruction. Overall, very nicely done and again, thank you.
Hey man, I appreciate comments like these. I don't have the video content in mind exactly, but I think I know what you mean. I needed to pause for a few months but further videos are going to be shorter. I wasn't quite sure about the viewers knowledge when I have startet this chanel. Some of them are still beginners and expecting a deep explanation. But the focus will be more Pro-wise. See you soon, Simon
Hi Simon, dankeschön/thanks allot for your work. At Min 07:57 you've defined the Extrude (8) as Child of the Composite Curve (3), it makes sense and I understand also why. Perfect! Wunderbar! Later on, by Min 12:42, in order to create the Boss Feature groupe, you've copied the entire content of the Frame Feature groupe and the Sketch_000, (why?), Mother of Composite Curve (3), without copying it, ( the composite.curve, again why? ) Althrough copyed without it's corect reference, but the wrong one, NX didn't gave no information or warning, how come? After pasting, you've obtained among the others, the Extrude (13), Child of Sketch_000, HÄÄ?? Now I don't follow anymore.. Questions: 1- Why didn't the Extrude (13), screamed for it's righteous Mother, the Composite Curve (3)? Why NX allowed, through Copy/Paste operation, to "change" in the the pasted Extrude 13 to have another Mother, like it's GrandMother, I.e. the Sketch_000, how come? If this Behavior is standard by NX, than how can I trust it to copy/paste identically? It's not the first time when NX, replaces by it's own will references, as it pleases. Can you please explain, how is this even possible? Besten Gruß,
Hi Alex, is it a business usecase or private? I would recommend you to join NX groups on facebook, if it is private. Depending on the problem, the response time might be faster, than writing emails. But anyway: info@bizlearn.de
Hello Sir; I want to sketch a polygon and control its side number by expressions. So by changing for example from 4 to 5 and get 5 side polygon. I have tried to use expression but I couldn^t add expression. Is there any solution to this problem ?
Hi, depends on the NX version - but you can right click any dimension in the sketch and use the "add expression" option. In later releases, it is possible to enter the expression directly! I hope this helps :-)
Hi. I am trying to learn NX and find your videos very constructive and helpful. My program does not look like yours. For example, tools are not as easily visible, but they are always there if I search for them. Could this be because I'm using the siemens student version? Understandable if there are light versions, but less understandable why there would be a full version where features are just harder to find.
I am using the default advanced Siemens roles for my videos... It is possible that your commands are minimized. There should be a symbol right at the bottom of each feature dialog, which allows you to maximize the commands. The student version has no restrictions btw.
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training I loved it. I wish you’d do autodesk inventor tutorials like this. 10 years I have been using it and I still learn something new every day. And now these videos I can try to apply as much as possible.
Well, to be honest. I have a very unique and personal career background, which I wouldn't recommend to follow. I have never studied officially, was just focussing on doing what ever plaesed me 😄I am involved in engineering and designing process', but anyway didn't go the usual way. But I think going for studiyng mechanical engineering isn't the worst choice^^
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training Nowadays I work with CREO and I tried to reproduce it in CREO and there is no rules available for it now. I set the challenge to my support.
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training sir i work on nx for designing plastic mould. I am a fresher in this trade . finding it difficult to align data and work on it .it will be really helpful if you will put some light on it . Thankyou
Table of Content:
0:00 Introduction
1:56 Start of design process
2:33 Composite Curves
3:32 Point Set
4:51 Point
5:26 General Feature Pattern
6:25 Horizontal Modeling
7:35 Feature Group
7:46 Extrude
8:23 Draft
10:35 Edge Blend
12:26 Copy&Paste
13:50 Reference Feature Pattern
15:07 Delete Body
15:35 Boolean Operation
16:22 Edge Blend through Feature Intersection Edges
17:21 Advanced Copy&Paste
19:02 Trouble Shooting
19:34 Testing
so crazy modeling, the definition of parametric modeling
Absolutely perfect tutorial, I've learned so many things in this one single video!
It's interesting, you explain the something's useful, not many people aware, very appreciate you!
This is really amazing.
Perfect Tutorial👍🏻 I've worked quite a lot with NX by now, but you really pushed my understanding on how to create stable parts
Crazy good! This is probably first great tutorial on NX I have found on RUclips. Keep up the good work :)
Excellent explanation. Keep up the good work. I started loving NX, big fan.
I learned so many things. Great job sir.
dude that was masterful, thank you
Very informative
Excellent tutorial! Please keep up your great videos!!
Thank you Peter (-:
Phenomenal! Thanks you.
Thank you for the support
super helpful. thanks!
Awesome job ;-)👌😉👍
Great video, I like this exercise a lot! One comment, the additional Datum Axis was not used in this example, but I agree, if it were used, it does aid in simpler selection for downstream changes, i.e. being used for an explicit Horizontal References, etc., and one that can be moved independently from the Absolute Datum CSYS. Very cool!
Восторг! It's amazing!
You are amazing ... Thanking you for this video it's really magic.... U r a magician ...thanks a lot for making us also magicians ♥️💟
Thanks for the comment mate. I appreciate that. Bless you, Simon
Really amazing tutorial and for your information warnings can be cleared by right clicking on the top of the Part Navigator(Clear Warning Alerts).
Thank you
Oh thank you. I didn't know that 🤔😂😁
Thank you!
thank you!
very cool video. thank you very much!
😁 Gerne... Da gibt's noch mehr Videos, welche ähnlich cool sind. Und wir bieten auch ein Training dazu an, falls Interesse besteht.
Viele Grüße,
Simon
Amazing
Perfect video
Thanks (:
This is kind of modeling that I love!
Can I work with you? I have 20 years of NX experience.
good job
Super video bro
Thank you :)
Awesome. Could you show us some example mixing reuse library? It will set up this modeling way to another level for sure!
Thank you, if I have an issue about the lib, I'm gonna provide a video.
That's a one of smartest way I've seen to combine the extensive feature list NX is proposing. ACE !
I have a question regarding the feature group. I don't see any feature number on them, are they "non timestamped groups" ? Why this type ?
Thank you.
Hi Stephane,
sorry for late response - the timestamp of the feature groups can be displayed via the timestamp column. The group always has a higher timestamp, that its members. So, it is not a parent of its content. Kind regards,
Simon
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training Hum, not sure is you understood my question. In NX customer default, you can choose which kind of feature group you prefer (Timestamped Only / Floating/ Both).
Why in your case did you choose floating group (maybe I'm wrong but as there is no (xx) feature number, I assume they are floating groups then)?
To me, flaoting ones are confusing as they can group "non following" features.
Thank you
Please... Please creat a video about how draw a cyclodial disk with equation curve... A 2d disk cyclodial
everything worked well what you have showed in the video, but if I modify and give it little bit hard shapes or more edges it does not work properly
Oh I mean if I used spline it did not work, but if I used lines it works just fine. thank you for sharing all this crazy stuff.
I really liked this video and it was definitely demonstrative of the value of the selection filters, in a way I hadn't seen before. I've been reading a little more about RMS and other modelling methods. You called this "horizontal" design in your video, just thought I'd give you a heads up that it looks like that sort of method exists and is patented by Delphi, but I think their definition is different from yours. Do you know about that at all, am I mistaken in that they are different? Algorithmic/horizontal modelling, as you defined it, seems very powerful and more so than the Delphi version. Also, have you been able to replicate this behavior in other softwares effectively?
core.ac.uk/download/pdf/61471988.pdf thats the study I found that references the "horizontal" method
Thanks. Its hard for me right now to find time for reading the study. But I will for sure remember at some time. I have recognized the horizontal modeling method at some companies using e.g. Catia
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training Have you got a short tutorial on implementing horizontal modelling in terms of multi-part assemblies? I'm trying to see if there is some novel method I'm missing that is more efficient than what most of us are typically doing.
Nice tutorial. One suggestion I might make, and hopefully comes across constructively.
Skip explaining all the alternate ways to get where you're going. One thing about NX.. there are lots of ways to do any type of thing. I like the explanation of "why" you picked a particular workflow, but going back and forth on alternates kinda muddies up the instruction.
Overall, very nicely done and again, thank you.
Hey man, I appreciate comments like these. I don't have the video content in mind exactly, but I think I know what you mean. I needed to pause for a few months but further videos are going to be shorter. I wasn't quite sure about the viewers knowledge when I have startet this chanel. Some of them are still beginners and expecting a deep explanation. But the focus will be more Pro-wise. See you soon, Simon
Hi Simon, dankeschön/thanks allot for your work. At Min 07:57 you've defined the Extrude (8) as Child of the Composite Curve (3), it makes sense and I understand also why. Perfect! Wunderbar!
Later on, by Min 12:42, in order to create the Boss Feature groupe, you've copied the entire content of the Frame Feature groupe and the Sketch_000, (why?), Mother of Composite Curve (3), without copying it, ( the composite.curve, again why? ) Althrough copyed without it's corect reference, but the wrong one, NX didn't gave no information or warning, how come? After pasting, you've obtained among the others, the Extrude (13), Child of Sketch_000, HÄÄ?? Now I don't follow anymore.. Questions:
1- Why didn't the Extrude (13), screamed for it's righteous Mother, the Composite Curve (3)? Why NX allowed, through Copy/Paste operation, to "change" in the the pasted Extrude 13 to have another Mother, like it's GrandMother, I.e. the Sketch_000, how come?
If this Behavior is standard by NX, than how can I trust it to copy/paste identically?
It's not the first time when NX, replaces by it's own will references, as it pleases.
Can you please explain, how is this even possible?
Besten Gruß,
Thanks for this amazing tutorial!
May I e-mail you asking some help about a modeling issue that I had?
Hi Alex, is it a business usecase or private? I would recommend you to join NX groups on facebook, if it is private. Depending on the problem, the response time might be faster, than writing emails. But anyway: info@bizlearn.de
Hello Sir;
I want to sketch a polygon and control its side number by expressions. So by changing for example from 4 to 5 and get 5 side polygon. I have tried to use expression but I couldn^t add expression. Is there any solution to this problem ?
Hi, depends on the NX version - but you can right click any dimension in the sketch and use the "add expression" option. In later releases, it is possible to enter the expression directly! I hope this helps :-)
Hi. I am trying to learn NX and find your videos very constructive and helpful.
My program does not look like yours. For example, tools are not as easily visible, but they are always there if I search for them. Could this be because I'm using the siemens student version? Understandable if there are light versions, but less understandable why there would be a full version where features are just harder to find.
Like at [8:15]. I don't have an offset option. Is this due to my version?
I am using the default advanced Siemens roles for my videos...
It is possible that your commands are minimized. There should be a symbol right at the bottom of each feature dialog, which allows you to maximize the commands. The student version has no restrictions btw.
No such restrictions, to be clear 😅
Is there any option to check spellings when we create Notes in drafting sheets?
No, maybe there are external plug-ins available. But not by default.
& U'r ''datum axis'' is the selected relation only! right?..
Concerning the draw direction, it is!
nx 12. freeze when i try to use studio material
Maybe the graphics card driver?
🤯
Haha - it feels uncomfortable to become comfortable (-: I hope you enjoyed the content anyway^^ have a nice day
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training I loved it. I wish you’d do autodesk inventor tutorials like this. 10 years I have been using it and I still learn something new every day. And now these videos I can try to apply as much as possible.
I'm fresher. I don't have any industrial experience so guide me.
How to become a design engineer.? (BE mechanical).
From INDIA
Well, to be honest. I have a very unique and personal career background, which I wouldn't recommend to follow. I have never studied officially, was just focussing on doing what ever plaesed me 😄I am involved in engineering and designing process', but anyway didn't go the usual way. But I think going for studiyng mechanical engineering isn't the worst choice^^
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training Nice bro
I am quite sure that CREO cant do it and I doubt that CATIA does. It is what I call parametric.
Catia does, but NX offers more rules as far as I remember
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training Nowadays I work with CREO and I tried to reproduce it in CREO and there is no rules available for it now. I set the challenge to my support.
Put some tutorial on reverse engineering
I have prepared something similar already, which I will upload these days😀 You mean reverse enginering based on facets?
@@Bizlearn_Siemens_NX_Training sir i work on nx for designing plastic mould. I am a fresher in this trade . finding it difficult to align data and work on it .it will be really helpful if you will put some light on it . Thankyou
hi
Hihi