The Supreme Court & Social Media Censorship Part 1

The Supreme Court is currently deciding if government officials coercing social media platforms into censoring protected speech violates the First Amendment.
FIRE thinks it does-and has asked SCOTUS to stop this censorship by proxy.
Former ACLU President and FIRE Senior Fellow Nadine Strossen explains.
The Supreme Court is currently deciding the Murthy v. Missouri, NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, and Moody v. NetChoice cases.
#freespeech #scotus #lawsuit #socialmedia

[@NRALifer1]

The Dem's & Rino's Swamp in action!

[@michaeloppenheimer2582]

All speech is constitutionally protected.

[@DeanaWhite-kp5qy]

Will they ever have to be held accountable? They should but I'm losing hope that any of them will be held accountable. It goes so deep. We will find out the truth. Facts! All of the truth. 👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️

[@dawlben2247]

Government asking someone else to do something is the government doing it.

[@andydarbyshire4933]

Prosecution s please

[@dr.jonesusa7122]

Let's start closing agencies and evaluate the impact to the country.

[@michaeloppenheimer2582]

A person,the individual, Is the one who is responsible for doing?The research to determine weather a video or news reports or other information is accurate and truthful, This is the individuals Is responsibility. It is not the government's responsibility to determinate.What is accurate and what is inaccurate information or to use that to violate freedom of speech.

[@reidrodgers3870]

So, what are we going to do about it? Anybody going to jail? Hahahaha.

[@FatherNovelty]

What's the best overview of this topic?

[@markstrickland8736]

"The government." She means Democrats.

[@GarryBurgess]

Lies kill people FFS.

[@Rebecca-nx5ec]

Land of the free, the whole world is laughing at America