8.2 Building Model To Estimate Effect Size in R

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
  • This video goes through the exercise of fitting a model to estimate the effect of smoking on the odds of low birth weight. It pulls together the ideas presented over the previous 3 weeks of the course.
    These videos support a course I teach at The University of British Columbia (SPPH 500), which covers the use of regression models in Health Research. These videos were put together to use for remote teaching in response to COVID.
    ►► Watch More:
    ► Statistics Course for Data Science bit.ly/2SQOxDH
    ►R Course for Beginners: bit.ly/1A1Pixc
    ►Getting Started with R using R Studio (Series 1): bit.ly/2PkTneg
    ►Graphs and Descriptive Statistics in R using R Studio (Series 2): bit.ly/2PkTneg
    ►Probability distributions in R using R Studio (Series 3): bit.ly/2AT3wpI
    ►Bivariate analysis in R using R Studio (Series 4): bit.ly/2SXvcRi
    ►Linear Regression in R using R Studio (Series 5): bit.ly/1iytAtm
    ►ANOVA Statistics and ANOVA with R using R Studio : bit.ly/2zBwjgL
    ►Hypothesis Testing Videos: bit.ly/2Ff3J9e
    ►Linear Regression Statistics and Linear Regression with R : bit.ly/2z8fXg1
    Follow MarinStatsLectures
    Subscribe: goo.gl/4vDQzT
    website: statslectures.com
    Facebook: goo.gl/qYQavS
    Twitter: goo.gl/393AQG
    Instagram: goo.gl/fdPiDn
    Our Team:
    Content Creator: Mike Marin (B.Sc., MSc.) Senior Instructor at UBC.
    Producer and Creative Manager: Ladan Hamadani (B.Sc., BA., MPH)
    These videos are created by #marinstatslectures to support some statistics courses at the University of British Columbia (UBC) (#IntroductoryStatistics and #RVideoTutorials ), although we make all videos available to the everyone everywhere for free.
    Thanks for watching! Have fun and remember that statistics is almost as beautiful as a unicorn!
    #statistics #rprogramming

Комментарии • 7

  • @prabpharm07
    @prabpharm07 3 года назад +1

    Thank you for sharing knowledge. This is exactly a learner needs when fitting a model for the first time.

  • @CipherKilledit
    @CipherKilledit 3 года назад

    Tight! Keep them coming!

  • @averagejoel4830
    @averagejoel4830 2 года назад

    awesome video and explanation! Got my sub !

  • @ghaiszriki7912
    @ghaiszriki7912 3 года назад

    I would to thank you very much for all what you do, it is really a very high-quality teaching matter.
    I have a small question, but I’m not really sure about its pertinence in this case. As we performed several statistic tests on the same dataset, don’t we need to consider the effect of the multiplicity of tests on the “P values” in some way.

  • @prabinshrestha7358
    @prabinshrestha7358 3 года назад

    I have been following your videos for quite a time now, I like them and appreciate your work. For this one though: are we not supposed to check for the effect modification (interaction) first then in its absence check for confounding? if effect modification is present, then checking for confounding would not be necessary right?

  • @lyusvirazi6006
    @lyusvirazi6006 3 года назад

    why not using backward or forward selection? and see the AIC/BIC?

    • @marinstatlectures
      @marinstatlectures  3 года назад +6

      Because here we are trying to estimate the effect of one variable (smoke) on the outcome (lie birth weight), and so we want to identify and remove any confounded, etc. automated selection procedures like forward/backward selection are intended for building predictive models, but would end up with a lot of bias in the estimated effect of smoking on low BW.
      I’ll also add that even for predictive models, I’m not a big fan of automated selection procedures, unless there is a very large number of potential predictor, in which case automation may be necessary. I feel that they rely too much on an algorithm to select variables, without user input/knowledge