Murad says that when you add words into the Qur'an, it's surprisingly SINFUL! (#05)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- To obtain Saint Murad's FREE Quran translation sample, click here: buymeacoffee.c...
Murad now moves on to examples in the English Qur'an where the translators from the Arabic imposed words and phrases which they found in the Standard Islamic Narrative (S.I.N.), which are the much later Islamic Traditions.
It was obvious in almost every case that the translators needed these words or phrases in the text to give authority to what has been written in the SIN.
Here are two examples, numbers 9 and 10, of the 40 which Murad is introducing in this series:
9) Surah 3:123 - The word "Badr" means in Arabic a time of year, usually when the moon is at its fullest, so the 'Full Moon'.
In this verse, however, the Muslim English translators have changed it to say "the battle of Badr", which was the first battle which Muhammad was involved in, during the year 624, according to the SIN.
In order to have this battle referred to in the Qur'an, to give it more authority, the translators imposed it into the text, when it clearly is not there in the Arabic.
Surah 8:41 - Here the words in Arabic should be simply "the day the two armies met", but in the translations they have added the words "at Badr", yet it clearly is not in the Arabic. In the context, the verse is about the time when Moses was separating the sea. But the translators needed this story of Badr in the Qur'an, so they just imposed it "willy-nilly".
Surah 3:165 - Here is another example of a battle, but no reference is in the Arabic to say which battle it is, yet, the translators have added two SIN battles, that of Badr and Uhud, though these names are not there in the Arabic at all.
10) Surah 8:1 - the word "Anfail" which means in Arabic "additional" has been translated "spoils of war" by the English translators. That is clearly not the meaning at all. But the translators need this added idea to support what happened at the battles which Muhammad took part in.
In two other verses, Surah 17:79 and Surah 21:72 we find the same words, yet in both of those instances the translators translated the word correctly, saying "additional".
These are all examples of "Asbab al-Nuzul" which, according to Wikipedia means Occasions or circumstances of revelation (asbāb al-nuzūl, أسباب النزول), or referencing the historical context in which Qur'ran verses were revealed from the perspective of the S.I.N. (i.e. traditionalist theology of Islam).
Though it has some use in reconstructing the Qur'an's historicity, asbāb is by nature an exegesis rather than a historiography genre, and as such usually associates the verses it explains with
general situations rather than specific events.
In order for Muslims to find credence for the events in the Standard Narrative, they look at occasions in the Qur'an where they can add those instances, or in these two examples, the names and ideas, so that greater authority is given to these events in their traditions.
This, however, goes against every rule in translation, so that instead of properly exegeting the Arabic text, the translators have eisegeted it (imposed their own meanings) which suggests not only a bias, but an agenda.
© Pfander Centre for Apologetics & Polemics - US, August 1, 2018
(108,740) Music: 'Joy at Word' by Musicifiles, from filmmusic-io
![MHMD [13] Do John of Damascus & the Chinese know more about the MHMDs?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/h6f_yRUL13M/mqdefault.jpg)
Finally, we have proof of what we already guessed.
This is great. Now we can show the Muslims their religion is false without insulting them
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "show me one muslim scholar who says there is more than one quran"
muslim scholar hythem sidky: "saying there is only 1 quran falls under the umbrella of lying to children"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "show me 2 muslim scholars who say there is more than one quran"
🤣🤣🤣
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "Daniel Haqiqatjou won. He beat everyone in the debate"
Daniel haqiqatjou: "Women should be beaten beat beat beat beaten"
🤣🤣🤣
worldwide acceptance arabic qurans
1. Hafs - 92% acceptance
2. Warsh - 4% acceptance
3. Ad Dury (alkisa'i) - 2% acceptance
4. Qalun - 1% acceptance
5. Hisham - 1% acceptance
6, Hafs Ad- Dury (Abu - Amro alBasri)
7. Al Laith
8. Al Bazzi
9. Al Azraq
10. As Susi (Abu Amro alBasri)
11. Idrees
12. Ibn shanboodh
13. Al Asbahaani
14. Khaled
15. Ibn Dhakwan
16. Isa BinWardan
17. Sulayman
18. Ibn Jammaz
19. Ahmad bin Farah
20. Qunbul
21. Showba
22. Ruwais
23. Shujaa' bin Abi Nasr Al- Balakhi
24. Abu Amro Al - Ala
25. As Susi (ibn-katheer)
26. Ruh
27. Al Dury (Al Hasan AlBasri)
28. Hafs Al - Dury (ibn kathir)
29. Khalf
30. Ishaq
31. Al Hasan bin Said Al- Matuu'l
32. Abu - Farah Al Shan - budhi
33. Ibn Masud QUR'AN
34. Ubai kab QUR'AN
35. Ruh QUR'AN
36. Abu Musa QUR'AN
37. Hafs QUR'AN 1982 edition
38. Ibn Abbas QUR'AN
39. Topkapi Qur'an
40. Samarkand Kufic Qur'an
40 differ Arabic Queerans?
I thought 37 which Hatun collected hard copies!!!
Allah's preservation of all these queerans is a miracle in itself
THIS IS HUGE 😮✨️
Thank you!
The Quran reminds me of Dave in 2001 odysee saying when looking into the oblisk saying; my God it's full of lies.
thing is full of added words
Innovation starting with Muhammad or some alleged prophet whose work was added onto later.
@@chrisazure1624 what innovation was a direct result of Islam? name some
@tommyrotton9468 Algebra. The inheritance distribution was so compkex they needed a way to calculate it.
But that was not the innovation i was referring to. I was referring to the innovation of religious practices.
@@chrisazure1624 and what part of the Quran did algebra feature in? Not the prophets take on inheritance mathematics ??
What religious practice is in the Quran not already a part of other religions?
Historically Algebra was already a part of mankind's history long before Isam was dreamed up. The real reason Caliphs invested so much patronage into mathematics started in the Abbasid Empire as being Persians they wanted more accurate horoscopes.
Religious practices, not a single practice cannot be found elsewhere, but Islam does practice some more vigorously, forced occupation, booty stealing and submission of the indigenous, it's called the little Jihad.
@@tommyrotton9468You seem to be misunderstanding my intent. The innovation is the Quran and the new religion of Iztlam. It is all fabricated by someone who may or may not have been Muhammad and then amended later.
The Quran does borrow from other religions, but it combines them in its own way. Jinn, Angels, Jesus virgin birth, etc., but then denies Jesus deity. They borrowed from Zoroastrianism the circumambulation then made it around a cube in the desert.
I am only telling you what I heard about al gebra, an arabic term. It was necessary for calculating the inheritance divisions. Certainly aspects of mathmatics pre-date Itzlam, but the name is arabic. Make of that what you wish.
To add a third battle that never existed, the battle of the trench is an obvious rip off of the battle of Dara between the Persians and Byzantines that occured in the early 6th century. 😁😂👍
Romans, please. The famous general Belisarius came up with the idea to dig trenches.
@@SEnricoPIndiogine The nomenclature doesn't have to be from the time to know who we are talking about.
What is your qualification in history? Is it the work of competing missionaries to decide each other's historicity? It is a work of neutral academia, not biased low-level missionaries.
I wonder why Allah was not perfectly clear from the very start, why do we need so many explanations, interpretations, tafsir, hadiths, sira etc. to understand the meaning of His words ?
Because Allah was always in the pocket of muhamad
The Battle of Badr might be the Idles of March in Julius Caesar and later would says that it was'nt a Date but a place near Rome.
My own translation may be read on my blog, the link to which may be found on my channel.
May be Ali Baba might know what is Badar? He won the Battle there!
May be (🧕Ali Baba) might know what is Badar? He won the Battle there! 🕳️🙊🙈🙉🌙🌜🌑
You know Revelation talks of the man of sin. Could God be playing on words, and it's 'The Man of Sin [Standard Islamic Narrative]'????
I am not an Arab but I am doing not just the translation but also the interpretation of the Quran ss taught by the Greatest Teacher of all (Verse 96:5). I have been on it longer than you did but nowhere near finishing. You have done good work but, unfortunately, because you have renounced Allah's religion of Islam, not the Sunni kind, you also miss a lot because Allah says He has placed a veil over the hearts of people like you.
Proverb 28:9. Who break the law of the Father or Allah King of Righteousness or God?!. Leviticus 5:17. Psalms 44:21 I
Allah is NOT mentioned in the Bible.
Murad is attacking the bible.
You can do exactly the same with biblical translations.
If we apply his rules. We can do that to any translation of any book or text.🥴🤣
Murad is a stand up comedian. He invents ‘linguistic’ rules that don’t exist. His whole terrible video and ‘translation’ is based on his own made up rules.
Does he provide scholarly source for his own made up rules?
The answer is no.
That’s why they have to appear on fully controlled channels with yes men. These men don’t want to be challenged in real settings. They will run away.
Yawn! Here we go again ... The Bible does not make the same claims for itself .. It talks about their deity using the words of men and women. Whereas the Qwahrarrrn states it the actual word of a deity unaltered and unalterable... yet here we see evidence of innovation.
Pathetic deflection once again.
They wallowed in innovation.That is why they had to create an institution to prevent innovation when matters threatened to go beyond their control.@@martinjackman2943
NO, you CANNOT. Bible translators are HONEST. They work in GROUPS to keep each other diligent. They engage in constant research of ancient texts to make their translations as accurate as possible. Reporting you for lying.
@@martinjackman2943
Your argument is weak.
You don’t even understand my argument.
How do you know what the bible says?🥴🤣
How do you know how to translate the bible?
We should use the ‘methodology’ of Murad.
We can throw away all your biblical translations based on his own made up rules.
He insists that the same word always has the same meaning. I don’t know where he got this made up rule from.🥴🤣
You can’t refute my argument. We are talking about linguistics. The argument is about linguistics.
At least you admit that your bible has many changes and corruption.
It’s not the word of god.
You can’t trace these words back to god.
Stop claiming the bible as the word of god.
@martinjackman2943
what do you expect from an abdul who believes a footnote is a hadith?
This is brilliant as it shows that the copious amounts the SIN has written about the battle of Badr is just hot air. 😁👍
This was totally new to me. And new to most of us, I would think.
When talking to an abdul:
Q. How many qurans?
A. One quran
Q. Is hafs quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. Is warsh quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. Is doori quran a quran?
A. Yes
Q. How many qurans?
A. One quran
Q. Are all qurans around the world same?
A. Yes
Q. Do the Sana manuscript and Birmingham manuscript have variants?
A. Yes
Q. Are qurans preserved word for word, letter for letter?
A. Yes
Q. In sura 37.12, one quran says "you", another "I"?
A. They are different accents
Q. How many ahrufs did muhamad recite?
A. 7
Q. How many ahrufs did uthman destroy?
A. 6
Q. How many ahrufs today?
A. 7
Q. How many qiraats did muhamad recite?
A. None
Q. How many qiraats today?
A. 10, 15, 20, 50
Q. Is Bible preserved?
A. No
Q. Is muhamad prophesied in the Bible?
A. Yes
Q. Did muhamad marry a child?
A. No
Q. How old was aisha?
A. 6
Oh man you are killing it!! These Abdul’s are in for some fun!!
this is brutal, death by a thousand correct answers
brother murad is my favourite 😍
How is this not bigger news
Suppression by a cult
Bad news travels slowly.
Because Islam is a weapon of destruction and the destruction is not yet complete.
It will be one day
THE BIBLE: The Bible was originally written in three different languages (Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic), on three different continents (Europe, Asia, and Africa), in a time-spend of over 1500 years, by over forty different authors among whom were kings, peasants, philosophers, fishermen, poets, statesmen, scholars, a herdsman, a general, a cupbearer, a doctor, a tax collector, and a rabbi. Without contradicting one another, each author wrote on the common theme of God’s enduring love for mankind, and God’s redeeming plan of salvation through His Son - Jesus Christ.
*
Unlike the Quran written in a period of about 23 years in Mohammed’s native tongue (the Quraishi tribal dialect and then translated into the Arabic language), the forty plus different authors of the Bible were moved by the Spirit of God to write down truths about God in their own ways of thinking, in their own ways of understanding, and in their own ways of reasoning in that which is truth. Each author also wrote down the truths of God in his own style of compositions - be it essay, music, or poetry.
*
Critics of the Bible claimed the Bible contains contradictions. How? - Because two different authors living hundreds and hundreds of years apart on two different continents, and whose writing styles (essay, music, or poetry) in two different languages did not use the same word or phrase to describe the same event. How ridiculous the claim!
*
We must also consider the Bible was not originally written on computer software (Microsoft Disk, iPad, or CD Rom), but rather the Bible was written on papyrus - a wet land plant-based substance (or materials) that would rot and decay; thus, making the transcribers (copyists, clerks) to primitively re-write the Bible by hands unto new papyrus decades, after decades, after decades for centuries, after centuries, after centuries… What a monumental feat in all human existence - What an enormous human ingenuity of preservation!
Christianity does not rely on the existence of God ,as it's based on the words of Christ .However without a God Islam is irrelevant ,as it came from a messenger of God who may or not exist .
Without LIES, Islam DIES.
The word نافلة (nafilatan) is very interesting.
There are to roots to consider here: n-p-l and p-l-ʾ.
n-p-l is attested across Semitic languages meaning 'to fall', also see Akkadian, Ugaritic, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Sabaic.
The second one p-l-ʾ in Hebrew פלא (pele) meaning 'wonder'. נפלא (nip̄lā) means 'wonderful', 'marvelous'.
In Ancient North Arabian I could only find n-f-l attested as a name, so the root is likely p-l-ʾ meaning gift or wonderful.
In Arabic the noun نفل (nafal) means 'gift'.
Isaac and Jacob in Q21:72 are a gift which plays into Q21:73 zakah - giving alms i.e. gifts.
The Quran was being added to and revised, continually until 1924. Then Egypt selected the final version and dumped all the others into the Nile.
Mic dropped so hard that there was an earthquake from it!
Very interesting.
he (the abdool alonzo) said in boast, "I have made it to the virgos in paradiso", But virgos they were not, nor were they unopened, but so it was made to appear to him
olla creates the dolls and opens them himself!!!! before handing over to momineen and making it appear them that they are unopend
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "The Bible is not true and the qurans are true because the qurans correct the Bible"
Christians: "but the qurans say Mary is the sister of Aaron"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "The hadiths explain that Mary is not the sister of Aaron but she was only called so"
Christians: "So the hadiths correct the qurans confirming that the Bible is true"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: 😭
My question for friends on here...
Why the Koran?
Or rather...why did the rulers of the Arab empire in the late 7th century have to use such a fragmented and disorganized dossier of Apocrypha and polemics as the foundation of their social engineering?
I mean, they could have edited the bible, re-organised the cannon, found one of a hundred other religious books and treatises, or not used a scripture at all.
Why was the proto-Koran so important?
read who were the saracenes
LLoyd De Jongh is a fantastic channel, thanks for giving him a shout out Murad
Sin sin sin . Pagan Islam
islam, oeuvre du Menteur !
In Murad's translation, does he highlight the differences?
[16]For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son(Jesus), so that, So called Loving jesus Can Teach the World How to Beat the Slaves and attitude towards Slaves...
Luke 12:47-48
[47]And that servant who knew his master’s will, and did not prepare himself or do according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.
[48]But he who did not know, yet committed things deserving of stripes, shall be beaten with few.
I want to ask Murad about Mansa Musa's pilgrimage to Mecca around 1325. A journey that lasted for 2 years with over 60,000 men, 12,000 slaves, camels and other resources according to sources. It is stated that the story was from an Arab historian from Damascus (Al-Umari), who was also a student of Ibn Taymiyya (Hanbali school) who had close ties with the Mamluks in Egypt.
Dear Dr Smith, please share your thoughts about the Israel and Hamas Palestinians conflicts
We from the world are worries so much if the escalation would be higher and can cause a world war
And how we as a citizen of the world must take precautions?
Thank you Dr Smith
God Bless you and you always be healthy
I’m sorry, but the Koran has absolutely been destroyed! I laugh at their excuses!
The glory of the moon is that it reflects the sun. Similarly, we are to reflect the Son.
Murad, you are so witty (too much sin around here!) and I agree!
Wow God bless you bro's
WITHOUT LIES ISLAM DIES
This is bad[r]!
How can you compare the Quran with the confused bibles
You have it backwards. The Bible is remarkably coherent. it also is compatible with the known facts of history and science. The Qur'an is an incoherent mess, filled with errors, evils, contradictions, absurdities, and plagiarized materials. The Bible is considered a masterpiece of world literature, while the Qur'an is a childish joke.
If two people gave two different accounts of the same thing contradicting each other, then at least one of them is wrong or inaccurate.
1. There are christians who claim Jesus is God.
2. There are christians who claim Jesus is son of God and not God.
3. There are christians who claim Jesus is both God and son of God.
4. There are christians who believe Jesus is a man (not God, not son of God)
Which is accurate?
These are all major contradictions in the religion. Different factions occured since after the time of Jesus.
The Quran is the latest Revelation from God and is the Criterion over the current bible(s).
It consists of message for mankind including to Jews, Christians and polytheists.
Message for mankind include warning mankind of their errors.
OFF TOPIC. Deal with the LIES Muslims use when translating the Qur'an, instead of LYING on some other subject.
Mother Mary is the real messiah. Jesus never existed, just borrowed from ancient Greek so that the early Christians could reject a female messiah.
If you saying Isa never exist, I agree with you 😅
YAWN. Stupid conspiracy theory for which there is not a drop of evidence. Reporting you for lying.
@@Dom66 thank you. mother Mary is the one and only. The word Muhammad in Quran also refers to Mother Mary.
What did Murad do with those weird words that don't make sense that we were thinking were loan words from Syriac or Aramaic?
He leaves them untranslated. Murad is offering his translation for the first two Sura's for free if you go check out his channel, and that includes the introduction where he explains his methodology and why he decided to leave those non-Arabic words untranslated.
@@Satarack
He asks for money?🥴🤣
The anonymous scammer who pretends to be a qualified person without any qualification. He is charging you money for his non academic made up translations.
@@AlonzoHarris235 Ad Hominem and Appeal to authority... Is that all youve got? Prove his translation wrong ... wait...you can't. FAIL
@@martinjackman2943
It’s not an appeal to authority.
It’s an appeal to linguistics.
I have already proven him wrong.
He can’t even prove his made up ‘linguistic’ rules.
He claims that the same word must always mean the exact same thing in one text or one book.
What’s his evidence for that?🥴🤥
He can’t even prove his made up rules.
You are defending an uneducated person. You don’t like it when Christians are getting exposed for the huge lack of knowledge.
You can’t even prove the foundation of your ‘argument’. It’s all based on made up rules without any linguistic source.
What is even "standard islamic narrative" ? What narrative? What is included in that narrative? It really feels like something made up by anti islam people because it sounds cool puns, SIN and sin.
It's a direct quote from Muslim scholar Yasir Qadi...
so no...not a lie.. just a hilarious coincidence!
Try and keep up. the SIN is the pack of FAIRYTALES Islam tells about Muhammad, Mecca, and the rise of Islam. Muhammad NEVER EXISTED. Mecca did not exist in the 7th century AD. No mention of "Muslims" or "Islam" until the END of the 7th century - some 6 DECADES after Muhammad supposedly died. The Qur'an is a cocktail of texts, stolen from dozens of ancient sources and smooshed together into one incoherent whole.
These Christians believe in three gods.
FAIL boy deflects again... Laughable OCD
1924 fake quran ,😂😂😂🐖
These Christians are DESTROYING Islam with FACTS. Cope.
@@martinjackman2943
The trinity is three gods.
@@AlonzoHarris235 We know what your belief is just projecting 1z1amic dogma onto others doesn't make it true.
Why do you always deflect away from the subject?
Because you have NO answers to "The holes in the narrarive"
1z1am is false.