How is that not a double standard?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
- How can Google justify deplatforming a website from its ad platform - not by the content produced by the website itself, but by the websites comment section - while Google insists that the protections it receives under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act are essential to shield it from liability from its own users content? How is that not a double standard?
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Good Job Senator Lee
Ok. You're my hero again. 😊❤ Thank you for doing this.
Thank God for you seneter Lee
Double speak... They are experts aren't they?
Disband 230 protections now!
The US govt is a business partner to every legal business in the USA, IMHO, You can't do legal business in this country without their consent. By means of permits, tax laws, work requirements and safety issues to name only a few. So how is it that a "Pvt company" can prevent free speech, or prevent someone from practicing their occupation to earn legal revenue?
So educated and not a bit of COMMON SENSE....GOD HELP US ALL...❤🇺🇸❤
👍🏻👍🏻
Proud off you. Hit them hard. They deserve it.
What Google doesn’t realize, even though they may control the comment section on RUclips, they are still protected under Section 230 of the CDA. Even if they do nothing with the comment section, they are still protected.
This google guy is totally missing the point regarding What Mike Lee is saying about 230
His not missing the point, he’s avoiding it.
I love you sir! God has brought me here! Stay true! XOXXX
Comments are opinions of people...
1st amendment..
To bad if you don't agree...
Freedom for me, but not off thee!!!
Zero recommendations under this video, I’ve never seen that before, what a shame...also, today it the first day I’ve seen your channel in my feed
Is that a coincidence?
Google: We have a problem on our website with how other people comment on others content, therefore it’s their fault and responsibility to fix it.
I’m pretty sure if I’m renting a space and shit comes out of the plumbing and goes all over the place, it’s the landlord and not the tenet’s responsibility to fix the plumbing and clean up the shit.
You're ignoring section 230, which classifies RUclips as a "platform". They'd be like the land owner that the actual Landlord (The Federalist) is renting from to sublease to the tenants (commenters). You Tube is disingenuous claiming to want to protect their advertisers as they hold the same monopoly on that market as they do on the platform.
Do you have conservative boards at monitor comments? No didn't think so from my understanding it's all liberal biased.
So anyone can go to any website and make comments that will shut down that site?
Sooo when he says news industry... I assume that doesn't include the independent media?
Ecosystem? Need to get some nerds Sen Lee
Arrogant, double-talking, robot who has no clue many of us aren’t fooled by the act.
Google is not obligated to publish peoples garbage.
How tough would it be to modify section 230 to state that anyone receiving section 230 protections will have to have a first amendment standard? It seems that it would be easier and more straight forward than trying to pound these pukes with an anti-trust case.
They never answer the fuckin question
Sen. Lee--- are you being 'shaddow banned'? I am 'subscribed' to your RUclips channel and have requested 'ALL NOTIFICATIONS' yet, I am getting NO NOTIFICATIONS!
These people need to go! Then I wonder if this will ever be read!
Thought police aka Google
What Google doesn’t realize, even though they may control the comment section on RUclips, they are still protected under Section 230 of the CDA. Even if they do nothing with the comment section, they are still protected.
because it makes their panties all bunched up when they can censor people and their views... it is because they were the kids that got beat up in second grade, and were never chosen for the team