Yes. The loop started in late 2003 or 2004. We averted a nuclear exchange and the universe is trying to self correct, it has to radiate out through virtual particles until it stabilizes.
Good to hear about reality with regard to the LHC for a change, rather than boosterism by theoretical physicists whose predictions of what would be found in the earlier runs, other than the Higgs, turned out to be entirely wrong. For anyone who's interested, Sabine Hossenfelder has a lot to say on that. Also, why doesn't this podcast have more views and comments? It seems click-bait "science", like the nonsense that comes out of Avi Loeb and his ilk, gobbles up all the attention.
Yes. The loop started in late 2003 or 2004.
We averted a nuclear exchange and the universe is trying to self correct, it has to radiate out through virtual particles until it stabilizes.
And do you happen to know when it ends?
@@LucaDetomasi 2027, right before the recorrected bounce back, then nuclear war
@@hobocorner8397 thanks
@@LucaDetomasi may be sooner, but time is funny it is dependent on probability.
So choice always changes outcomes, unless there isn't any
Because I’ve too many deja-vecu, how can I view my future before?
Good to hear about reality with regard to the LHC for a change, rather than boosterism by theoretical physicists whose predictions of what would be found in the earlier runs, other than the Higgs, turned out to be entirely wrong. For anyone who's interested, Sabine Hossenfelder has a lot to say on that. Also, why doesn't this podcast have more views and comments? It seems click-bait "science", like the nonsense that comes out of Avi Loeb and his ilk, gobbles up all the attention.
I sincerely hope not. Would hate to have to date my ex again :-/
From a universal standpoint.
👍