As long as you mock everyone, it's great. But if you only mock one direction it's just propaganda. We've been calling propaganda satire for a long time.
Oh, you're so right. If you're going to make fun of Hitler, the Nazis, and Stalin, or the KKK, you got to make fun of their opposition too. Because that's fair and balance. If one football team said that they won, the other football team said that they won, don't actually investigate and find out who won, give them both equal time, because that's Fair and balanced. I mean, give equal time to everybody. If you make fun of racist, sexist, homophobic, bigoted billionaires that are oligarchs, you gotta make fun of little people too. The opposition, it's totally fair and balanced in your twisted mind.
@@Derrick-yq8of So you completely misunderstood that comment, and made a nonsensical rant while you were at it. The OP is talking about billionaires from both sides screwing everyone equally. If you only bash Trump, you're only addressing a small part of the problem, while ignoring the rest of the oligarchy. Your rant made no sense: If you're going to bash Hitler, the Nazis, and Stalin, or the KKK, you absolutely do have to bash the opposition. That's absolutely NOT "little people". That would be George Soros, Antifa, Communists, ect. All the people that claim they're for the people, but end up becoming dictators that are just as bad. Either way, we all lose. Your football reference made so sense, so I can't comment. The last part of your rant made a little more sense, but again only covers half the equation. The "little people" are NOT the opposition you're speaking of there. If you're blasting Trump (which is clearly what you were doing even though your reference made absolutely no sense), then you're leaving the rest of the oligarchy unaddressed. There's plenty of other puppet masters pretending to oppose other puppet masters. We need to oppose them all. Are you saying the billionaires that supported and donated to Harris' campaign were the "good guys"? If so you're the one with the twisted mind.
@Derrick-yq8of yeah, I like your strawman. It's got all the smooth brained parts. Guessing its bait, though, because no one is dumb enough to believe anyone actually thinks like your fake hyperbole.
@JanniciTAO It's bait, no one is that stupid. Though I like the "Hitler breathed air and so do you, you're a nazi" part. If they were serious I'd have something else to laugh about for idiots on the interwebs hall of fame.
viewership declines when the source becomes out of touch with the majority of readers. Plenty of news sources to chose now. The audience has become aware of what propaganda is as opposed to news.
Both major political parties rely heavily on wealthy oligarchs to fund the election process. As Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig explains, “Members of Congress and candidates for Congress spend anywhere between 30% and 70% of their time raising money to get themselves elected or their party back in power. But they raise that money not from all of us. Instead, they raise that money from the tiniest fraction of the 1%. Less than 1/20th of 1% of America are the ‘relevant funders’ of congressional campaigns.” This applies equally to presidential campaigns, where the donor class effectively determines the choices available to voters. While this critique comes from a leftist perspective, it could just as easily be expressed from the right. In essence, our elections are dominated by the interests of the wealthy few.
We have memes now, anyone can make one up and post it.....political cartoons in newspapers...that's from a time when there were milkmen, typewriters and rotary phones.
Hey, I resemble that remark! Lol I remember all the above, 1 maybe 2 phones in the house, fixed to the wall, putting out empty bottles for the milkman.
@@mrdinme.4768 That was before my time although I remember rotary phones as a child. There's something to be said for the simplicity of the past. It's too bad people are still prone to do evil no matter what the era.
You misunderstand. She uses cartoons to criticize billionaires. To have a voice. And the freedom to do so. Our voice is the only thing the peasants have. She is furious that they are taking that away from her. Our voices are what allowed us to choose Trump. The media tried very hard to snuff out positive articles about him to sway our votes. This stuff is important. Imagine if the media had full control over ALL information we see and BAN our ability to share our thoughts and opinions on it.
How would that make a cartoon? All politicians receive truckloads of money for their campaigns. This is the first President who enlisted billionaires as advisors… get the punchline now? 😊
I don't read the Wa Post but I'd wager dollars to donuts that this TDS "Journalist/Cartoonist" NEVER made a disparaging or negative cartoon about obama, biden or harris EVER!!
I don't know. Are people usually allowed to publicly ridicule their boss...at work? To me, she should've taken it in stride as a given in this life. A bit touchy, I'd say.
People object to this like this hasn't been happening since before Christ. Rich people have always paid off the politicians, and people who criticize them always get fired. Yet nowadays we clutch our pearls over it. (I'm not criticizing the artist. I'm criticizing all the people who will be outraged by this story. :-)
Wow. That's real " cutting edge " stuff. Who could have imagined that tech giants would try to curry favor with D.C. power brokers? It's not as though it's happened before...
Agreed. There there aren't many smart or well thought out ones anymore. I see memes that are smarter and more thought provoking than some of these legacy media political pundit cartoonists. For years now it's just been circle jerking "orange man bad, my tribe good" and it's honestly boring now because it's just so lain the same ways himself. There's just too much hyperbole from both sides, really. I'm kind of sick of the exaggeration and disingenuousness/straw men I see all the damn time now. Crap like that is why I'll prob always be an Independent voter and stay registered as such. I have been since I became an American at 19(From Norway)in 2003. Though i do more lean right than left here both right and left kind of suck and are weaklings when it comes down to it. Have a great 2025.
@@ssuwandi3240 Remember when Steve Dahl tried to cancel disco music in 1979, by publicly smashing disco records.. I do. It was the typical reaction tantrum conservatives pretend they never do. Ie. cancel culture.
Personally I saw nothing wrong with the cartoon. IMHO newspaper cartoonists/ political cartoonists are the same as the Opinion sections of Newspapers, they don't have to be unbiased as they are opinions. And I don't buy the newspaper's story that they didn't want to run that one because they have ran articles already. I think it was more to do with not wanting to tick off the check writer ultimately.
Do you really think 'your' press was Free Press, Ann? ( ...her cartoons frequently satirized Trump, his administration, and his policies, which are hallmarks of right-wing politics in the U.S. context...) and now with shift like this your surprised??!??
Why did Trump brag about being besties with Epstein? Do you actually think you will get a free press with someone like that? Or do you live in a bubble?
@@valevisa8429 Where did you get that from? I am simply offering a suggestion as to an alternative comedic opportunity considering her editor has said that the 'Billionaire" topic was overcooked. I make no comment whatsoever on censorship... in fact it is quite the opposite considering the editor told her that this topic is very well covered - but is Biden's dementia and the cover-up associated with it "over covered" - or is that the censorship you refer to and/or is it self-censorship?
Well, to be honest it's not very funny, it's just a whiney comment image that appeals to very few people. She thought she was funny. She wasn't. Now She's unemployed. Comedy comes in 3's 😂
"I hold people accountable...as a cartoonist." Ok lady. Political cartoonists are supposed to make observations that are interesting, not commonplace. Noticing that people donate money to politicians is not a poignant observation. These cartoons should also be humorous, but she admitted that making us laugh was not her goal, rather, it was to "hold powerful people accountable (with a drawing)".
From a billionaire who appears to have really thin skin while owning a newspaper that proclaims to embrace independent unbiased journalism (includes cartoonists)? Score one for the ultra powerful. Finally, they “win” one. Hooray.
Good for the editor. I think if the content is over saturated then save it for a week, it’s too funny to waste or let it get nullified by content repetition. That said, those other articles better be pretty good to crowd out that.. I support Trump, but just because her comedy uses him as a partial butt of the joke does mean it isn’t a great comic.
They probably knew she would quit and wanted her out so they wouldn’t have to lay a layer off like they’re doing all their other employees. Don’t have to pay unemployment if they quit.
Threats to a free press come from outside the press, not inside. She would be justified if the cartoon was cancelled due to outside influences or orders. What she found was that you cannot mock your company owner on the company bulletin board or product (the newspaper).
When people don't respect your work, you leave that job. Pure and simple. Better to be unemployed and rich from self gained worth than beg for scraps from a workplace that actively leeches money from you.
Oh boooooo... poor little cartoonist isn't being allowed to continue trashing Trump as she has been for years... my heart aches for this horribly oppressed bastion of truth and honesty. She should move to Great Britain, or somewhere in the EU, where they have greater liberties.
@@stevezilla68 is sarcasm that hard to identify or comprehend? Does it really matter why it was rejected? An egotistical cartoonist threw a tantrum because she didn't get her way. I don't feel the slightest bit sorry for her.
@@scott9872 yes, it matters. Great Britain has more liberties? Really? That will be news to them. Did ya know they throw people in jail for mean comments on social media, smooth-brain? Did you know that, or is this another attempt at sarcasm?
@ seriously? You replied for a hyphen? A hyphen that would have been there if these button ifons had been larger and my thumbs smaller? If i had been less ham-handed in my texting?
Way to quit with a bang rather then laid off with a whimper. Guessing she has a book deal for her political cartoons over the years.Or already has one published. So some cheap advertising for her.
Maybe foreign leaders dropping 10% for the "big" guy would be more appropriate?
He has to get back in office.
@@silencemeviolateme6076 allegedly he’s still in office. Allegedly…
Washington Post will never report on the big guy scandal
@@marcK599. And ''Democrats'' too!
Egypt and Saudi Arabia have already Bought him.
Now that the tables are reversed, suddenly it’s unfair
Yep the MSM and the woke mob are at 11.
calling Post writers “high profile” suggests that the Post has a large readership. that’s a joke, right?
Free press. That’s funny.
WaPo used to be the best source in the country for political news. They chose to go the direction of cable news, and are reaping what they sowed.
Cartoonist with tds will sorely be missed.
*sowed
@@TheSouthIsHot de nada
@@SK-gc7xv 👍🏼
@@timb7775 She ran home crying to her mommy.
That's simply wrong, the claim that censorship is new and hasn't been common over the last ten years. Censorship has been normalized.
But but its always been in their favor, suddenly its a problem?
@@mrdinme.4768 They are going to hate equality.
You ''Democrats'' have normalizing censorship for years you're just angry because you just lost your monopoly on it.
Truth has been denormalized!
I wonder if she wrote or drew anything about the Hunter Biden laptop? 🤔
I d like to call this drawing, "The trash taking itself out" lol
As long as you mock everyone, it's great. But if you only mock one direction it's just propaganda. We've been calling propaganda satire for a long time.
Oh, you're so right. If you're going to make fun of Hitler, the Nazis, and Stalin, or the KKK, you got to make fun of their opposition too. Because that's fair and balance. If one football team said that they won, the other football team said that they won, don't actually investigate and find out who won, give them both equal time, because that's Fair and balanced. I mean, give equal time to everybody. If you make fun of racist, sexist, homophobic, bigoted billionaires that are oligarchs, you gotta make fun of little people too. The opposition, it's totally fair and balanced in your twisted mind.
@@Derrick-yq8of So you completely misunderstood that comment, and made a nonsensical rant while you were at it. The OP is talking about billionaires from both sides screwing everyone equally. If you only bash Trump, you're only addressing a small part of the problem, while ignoring the rest of the oligarchy.
Your rant made no sense: If you're going to bash Hitler, the Nazis, and Stalin, or the KKK, you absolutely do have to bash the opposition. That's absolutely NOT "little people". That would be George Soros, Antifa, Communists, ect. All the people that claim they're for the people, but end up becoming dictators that are just as bad. Either way, we all lose. Your football reference made so sense, so I can't comment. The last part of your rant made a little more sense, but again only covers half the equation. The "little people" are NOT the opposition you're speaking of there. If you're blasting Trump (which is clearly what you were doing even though your reference made absolutely no sense), then you're leaving the rest of the oligarchy unaddressed. There's plenty of other puppet masters pretending to oppose other puppet masters. We need to oppose them all. Are you saying the billionaires that supported and donated to Harris' campaign were the "good guys"? If so you're the one with the twisted mind.
@Derrick-yq8of yeah, I like your strawman. It's got all the smooth brained parts.
Guessing its bait, though, because no one is dumb enough to believe anyone actually thinks like your fake hyperbole.
@JanniciTAO It's bait, no one is that stupid. Though I like the "Hitler breathed air and so do you, you're a nazi" part. If they were serious I'd have something else to laugh about for idiots on the interwebs hall of fame.
@@Derrick-yq8of Do you know the difference between libel and slander? You probably should if you are going to go around making comments like that.
I wonder if the cartoonist did a cartoon when corporations donated millions to Biden’s inauguration?
Guess what? Biden isn’t a traitor and convicted criminal. Can you see the difference?
Too funny! 🤣🤣
What about the 10 million Trump got from the Egyptian Security Service or the 150 million his daughter and son in law got from.Saudi Arabia?
viewership declines when the source becomes out of touch with the majority of readers. Plenty of news sources to chose now. The audience has become aware of what propaganda is as opposed to news.
How is it free press if i she shows just one side of political spectrum
You just show Germany's and japans crimes during ww2 not your own 🤷♂️
Both major political parties rely heavily on wealthy oligarchs to fund the election process. As Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig explains, “Members of Congress and candidates for Congress spend anywhere between 30% and 70% of their time raising money to get themselves elected or their party back in power. But they raise that money not from all of us. Instead, they raise that money from the tiniest fraction of the 1%. Less than 1/20th of 1% of America are the ‘relevant funders’ of congressional campaigns.” This applies equally to presidential campaigns, where the donor class effectively determines the choices available to voters. While this critique comes from a leftist perspective, it could just as easily be expressed from the right. In essence, our elections are dominated by the interests of the wealthy few.
I think Bezos didn't like the way he is portrayed as a cartoon.
We have memes now, anyone can make one up and post it.....political cartoons in newspapers...that's from a time when there were milkmen, typewriters and rotary phones.
Hey, I resemble that remark! Lol I remember all the above, 1 maybe 2 phones in the house, fixed to the wall, putting out empty bottles for the milkman.
@mrdinme.4768 These were normal days. Now AI will be telling you what to do. The left wing AI.
@@mrdinme.4768 That was before my time although I remember rotary phones as a child. There's something to be said for the simplicity of the past. It's too bad people are still prone to do evil no matter what the era.
Also, she’s clearly not a good artist. I didn’t recognize the people she’s supposed to be making fun of
Where’s the cartoon showing harris getting millions
Did she make any cartoons of the massive donors to the Kamala kampaign? My guess is no …
Of course not. Her cartoons have all been pro-left, anti-capitalist and anti conservative.
Over $1B poured into Kamala's campaign, and that pile of cash definitely wasn't from the poor!
*Liberal's Moto:* _Rules for thee but not for me._
Considering the DNC had donations over 1 billion! Trump didn’t have that much!
Exactly.
Kamala Harris isn’t the president elect……
Fired because she was out of touch with reality. An Olympic break dancer.
She resigned. Not fired.
@@FrisbieinsteinThey resigned her.
Never a good idea to mock your boss..
She has always been a bigot behind a cartoon.
She actually thinks there is a free press? Poor baby is out of touch.
🤖 Activist cartoonist with TDS obviously. 🤡
Captain Gulf of America you mean?
With a commie/socialist mindset as well.
@@michaelquinones-lx6ks Ah diddums did he hurt your feelings? But remind me who's Putin's puppet?
@@michaelquinones-lx6ks Ah diddums did he hurt your fascist feelings?
She thinks her mission on planet earth is to keep Billionaires accountable? By drawing...CARTOONS. BAAAHAHAHAHAHAA 🤣 🤣 🤣
You misunderstand. She uses cartoons to criticize billionaires. To have a voice. And the freedom to do so. Our voice is the only thing the peasants have. She is furious that they are taking that away from her. Our voices are what allowed us to choose Trump. The media tried very hard to snuff out positive articles about him to sway our votes. This stuff is important. Imagine if the media had full control over ALL information we see and BAN our ability to share our thoughts and opinions on it.
And how much was she overpaid by doodling while poopooing capitalism.
Where in the real world can you criticise your employer and get away with it. She's the real joke
hypocrite of the highest order
BEZOS OWNES THE PAPER!
NOW she's worried about censorship?
Talk about overestimating your own importance... We're talking about a CARTOONIST here. So ridiculous!
Just like Scott Adams, right?
@@Jamesaepp I had to look up the name to even know who that is, so yes - just like Scott Adams.
@@Mechulus Just ensuring you're consistent :)
I quit my job too when they would not let me do what I wanted. 😂 yeah right
No Unemployment for her.
But when they give 1B to Kamala it's fine 😂
How would that make a cartoon? All politicians receive truckloads of money for their campaigns. This is the first President who enlisted billionaires as advisors… get the punchline now? 😊
@@gwarlow So true.
I wanna see her Kamala cartoons if she ever made one
This is Citizen Kane playing out in real life. Some just never learn.
@@heinedenmark not at all
@@o9brian It really is.
Goid, she can move to Canadia while she's at it.
So she bashes her boss and is surprised he didn’t like it? What a baby.
This is why it’s impossible to criticize the rich. They own everything.
People gotta learn to give the boss what he wants. Then there won't be no problems.
Most of the rich are babies. They never hear no, so they never grow up.
@CharlesCurran-m9p And throwing a temper tantrum like a spoiled little child!
@@captainlockes2344 Rich ''Democrats'' that own the so called Main Stream Media if that's what you mean.
I don't read the Wa Post but I'd wager dollars to donuts that this TDS "Journalist/Cartoonist" NEVER made a disparaging or negative cartoon about obama, biden or harris EVER!!
And how DOES it feel when your voice is silenced and your speech censored?
It doesn't feel good!
Does it?
I don't know. Are people usually allowed to publicly ridicule their boss...at work?
To me, she should've taken it in stride as a given in this life. A bit touchy, I'd say.
Oh no. Did she just experience being cancelled? How in heaven could this happen in 2025?
I'm glad their cancel culture is backfiring on the woke mob!
*I like Jeff Bezos, but this is just wrong. He shouldn't block a cartoonist's work being for critical of him.*
People object to this like this hasn't been happening since before Christ. Rich people have always paid off the politicians, and people who criticize them always get fired. Yet nowadays we clutch our pearls over it.
(I'm not criticizing the artist. I'm criticizing all the people who will be outraged by this story. :-)
@@mustbetrue1602 I mean, that's what it's for. Like I saw someone complain "Why do the powerful people get to tell us what to do?" Heh.
Humanity claims it's sophisticated but then claim primitive behavior as it's excuse. lol
And the world hears what one idiot has to say
Another severance pay avoided…and she is unlikely to be missed
No unemployment benefits wasted either!
She has extreme TDS.
So, we are not allowed to use Trump in any cartoon? Is that rule included in the MAGA doctrine? 😊
@@gwarlow Sounds like you have extreme TDS too.
I've quit loads of jobs, but it never gets reported in the global media.
Maybe you didn’t doodle for a living.
Free speech doesn’t mean others are required to echo you, or give you a soapbox.
Wow. That's real " cutting edge " stuff. Who could have imagined that tech giants would try to curry favor with D.C. power brokers? It's not as though it's happened before...
Freedom of the press has always meant freedom of the owner of the press.
Political cartoons used to be clever and boundary-pushing. Now its just intellectually lazy and grandiose.
Agreed. There there aren't many smart or well thought out ones anymore. I see memes that are smarter and more thought provoking than some of these legacy media political pundit cartoonists. For years now it's just been circle jerking "orange man bad, my tribe good" and it's honestly boring now because it's just so lain the same ways himself. There's just too much hyperbole from both sides, really. I'm kind of sick of the exaggeration and disingenuousness/straw men I see all the damn time now. Crap like that is why I'll prob always be an Independent voter and stay registered as such. I have been since I became an American at 19(From Norway)in 2003. Though i do more lean right than left here both right and left kind of suck and are weaklings when it comes down to it.
Have a great 2025.
In other words you want to dictate speech based on your emotions.
I wish woke got a sprinkle of intelligence
@@ssuwandi3240 "woke" like how Republicans cancelled the Dixie Chicks in the early 2000's for pointing out the truth?
@@ssuwandi3240 Remember when Steve Dahl tried to cancel disco music in 1979, by publicly smashing disco records.. I do.
It was the typical reaction tantrum conservatives pretend they never do. Ie. cancel culture.
Glad she quit. Should have been fired.
Personally I saw nothing wrong with the cartoon. IMHO newspaper cartoonists/ political cartoonists are the same as the Opinion sections of Newspapers, they don't have to be unbiased as they are opinions. And I don't buy the newspaper's story that they didn't want to run that one because they have ran articles already. I think it was more to do with not wanting to tick off the check writer ultimately.
Do you really think 'your' press was Free Press, Ann? ( ...her cartoons frequently satirized Trump, his administration, and his policies, which are hallmarks of right-wing politics in the U.S. context...)
and now with shift like this your surprised??!??
Your right, cancel culture was alive and well when the Dixie Chicks rightfully called out the Republican lead 20 yr war...........
Why did Trump brag about being besties with Epstein?
Do you actually think you will get a free press with someone like that?
Or do you live in a bubble?
How about she does a cartoon on Biden's dementia? No. I thought not.
So you are OK with political censorship ?
There you go😅
@@valevisa8429 under what evidence but silly WOKE mockery
@@valevisa8429 Where did you get that from? I am simply offering a suggestion as to an alternative comedic opportunity considering her editor has said that the 'Billionaire" topic was overcooked. I make no comment whatsoever on censorship... in fact it is quite the opposite considering the editor told her that this topic is very well covered - but is Biden's dementia and the cover-up associated with it "over covered" - or is that the censorship you refer to and/or is it self-censorship?
In other words you are exactly what you screamed at others for.
She sure has a high opinion of her value in this world
Glad it's GONE
Humiliating the owner of your company has little to do with politics, more like carreer suicide, or a complete lack of common sense.
Well, to be honest it's not very funny, it's just a whiney comment image that appeals to very few people.
She thought she was funny.
She wasn't.
Now She's unemployed.
Comedy comes in 3's 😂
She has the right to publish it along with starting her own media outlet where what she says goes....Nobody is stopping her.
Her new job title: Unemployed Cartoonist
It was a one time deal. She should wait until it happens more than once before whining.
The Oligarchy takes no criticism, I'm done with the post.
Gee, it's almost as if you work for the paper and not the other way around...
"I hold people accountable...as a cartoonist." Ok lady.
Political cartoonists are supposed to make observations that are interesting, not commonplace. Noticing that people donate money to politicians is not a poignant observation. These cartoons should also be humorous, but she admitted that making us laugh was not her goal, rather, it was to "hold powerful people accountable (with a drawing)".
On no.........anyways is there any real news ?
Free speech is not a newspaper, free speech is your mouth. The guy who owns the newspaper, not the employees, gets to speak.
Thanks
I'm gonna take a stab and say it's because she put the owner in the cartoon.
Our very own Citizen Kane, with weak continence.
That never happens with a billionaire. lol
@@JEdwarrdnothing even close to Citizen Kane
@@o9brian Mr. Hearst & Mr. Murdoch would protest too... my point still stands.
She sounds like a crybaby that tells lies.
Payback.
From a billionaire who appears to have really thin skin while owning a newspaper that proclaims to embrace independent unbiased journalism (includes cartoonists)? Score one for the ultra powerful. Finally, they “win” one. Hooray.
She didn’t want to kiss the Bezos ring any longer 😂😂😂
Over 1 billion to the hyena, no big deal.
A few million to orange man, sound the alarm
😂 oh how the sweet pendulum swings. Bye bye
Does she know she can post her cartoon anywhere? She should have a conversation with Scott Adams.
All this comments sure love political censorship!! Keep this energy up when a conservative is censored too!
WHEN conservatives get censored? That has been the status quo since 2016.
LOL 😆😆 You're about 4 years late!🤦
There had been 3 articles about the Very Same subject...that's why it wasn't used. The info was at the end of the report. Maybe you missed it.
Censorship is in the eye of the beholder.
Good for the editor. I think if the content is over saturated then save it for a week, it’s too funny to waste or let it get nullified by content repetition. That said, those other articles better be pretty good to crowd out that..
I support Trump, but just because her comedy uses him as a partial butt of the joke does mean it isn’t a great comic.
They probably knew she would quit and wanted her out so they wouldn’t have to lay a layer off like they’re doing all their other employees. Don’t have to pay unemployment if they quit.
Threats to a free press come from outside the press, not inside. She would be justified if the cartoon was cancelled due to outside influences or orders. What she found was that you cannot mock your company owner on the company bulletin board or product (the newspaper).
Too bad Ann Telnaes wasn't around during the Obama years when it was forbidden to criticize "The One".
way 2 go , good work
Yeah arrest everyone who's anti trump. He's going to be elected in 2028 and 2032!
Can we see her cartoon of Biden pardoning Hunter?
Her bravery is propped up with the fact that she’ll earn more collecting social security.
Now Titled A Lonely Cartoonist
Na-na-na-na, na-na-na-na
Hey hey hey, goodbye
@nobodyspecial9262 And GOOD RIDDANCE!
Yep, the 1st Amendment is in danger due to censoring her cartoon. I wonder, did she defend Scott Adams?
WaPo is such a biased news outlet, I'm surprised she quit. Maybe the HuffPo would be a good fit for her.
replace with AI
So she stomped her feet like a toddler when she didn't get her way.
Heartbreaking news, I shall miss her the most 👋🏼
When people don't respect your work, you leave that job. Pure and simple. Better to be unemployed and rich from self gained worth than beg for scraps from a workplace that actively leeches money from you.
So, her propaganda was rejected. Too bad...
Oh boooooo... poor little cartoonist isn't being allowed to continue trashing Trump as she has been for years... my heart aches for this horribly oppressed bastion of truth and honesty. She should move to Great Britain, or somewhere in the EU, where they have greater liberties.
I don't think her cartoon was rejected because of what it said about Trump, but rather what it says about Bezos. Ya know; her boss.
@@stevezilla68 is sarcasm that hard to identify or comprehend? Does it really matter why it was rejected? An egotistical cartoonist threw a tantrum because she didn't get her way. I don't feel the slightest bit sorry for her.
@@scott9872 yes, it matters. Great Britain has more liberties? Really? That will be news to them. Did ya know they throw people in jail for mean comments on social media, smooth-brain? Did you know that, or is this another attempt at sarcasm?
@@stevezilla68 my god, you really are dense... I stated directly that is is sarcasm.
Oy vey, what will they do with outcha??
As a cartoonist it’s her job to hold powerful people and institutions accountable? Really? I think she may have misunderstood her position.
Frankly her cartoon is not very witty. It’s rather ordinary and Han handed.
*ham-handed*
@ seriously? You replied for a hyphen? A hyphen that would have been there if these button ifons had been larger and my thumbs smaller? If i had been less ham-handed in my texting?
A load of bollocks from the editor.
Way to quit with a bang rather then laid off with a whimper. Guessing she has a book deal for her political cartoons over the years.Or already has one published. So some cheap advertising for her.
Perhaps it was because you portrayed the owner of your magazine on there???
So now she is crying because she want free speech?
The most accurate cartoon l have seen in a while
lmao 😂
Release everything you have
So she criticizes her boss and does not like the reaction and has a tantrum.
Goodbye
Learn to give the boss what he wants. Then there won't be no problems.
imagine thinking the Post doesn’t censor conservatives.
putting her boss in it .. what you think is going to happen.