There's a 3rd level to it : Managers /Management, which would include operations, strategy etc. This group of people are mostly viewed as villains who are only trying to make money, but these people are also responsible for making a idea, a product available to the mass. public. Brilliant scientific discoveries, brilliant engineering products need also need brilliant executives and managers to make those products actually become practically available. Why did Google Glasses didn't work in 2013 but we have the metaverse now? Why did companies like Blackberry, Nokia went down? Because of bad management decisions?
Engineers seldomly acknowledge this. They want to be the ones who apply it AND invent it, but historically that’s not been true. I just think that career engineers (not research engineers) live in their own little bubble, unaware of the science and theoretical work in the background that gives them the tools that are required for them to innovate. Like he said, physicists and engineers depend on each other. Without one, there couldn’t be the other.
Fewer of the brightest people are becoming engineers (excepting software engineers) because it appears there are many options for a lucrative career with less hardwork, responsibility and other headaches. I fear that our standard of living will reflect that as our infrastructure crumbles.
@@Brassard1985 Engineers are real pretentious. But the engineers I met were professionals and didnt have that pretentiousness. This pretentiousness only comes from undergrads, internet warriors and engineers on the left side of the dunning kruger effect. For me, the engineers that I have met were humble, they didn't talk alot, but encouraged me when I told them that I wanted to take Biology in college. Unlike the online engineers whod say some bullshit like "ThAts AlL JuST MemORiSinG. OuR MaJOr Is sO mUCh HaRDeR".
Tesla is more of a cult figure now than anything else than a real scientist. Feynman over Tesla any-day, interms of quality of work. Tesla's work is comprehensible by a sophomore physics student. Feynman's work on the other hand, don't even talk about it. Tesla's physics was stuck in the 19th and early 20th century works of Faraday and Maxwell, basically classical mechanics, he had the delusion of grandeur and futurism. Not to say he was absolutely cock-ignorant about both relativity and quantum physics, the 2 pillars of modern physics. To top it off Tesla didn't even believe at one point in time that electrons even existed.
Yup The question is ridiculous Feynman was very very very very very great. Tesla....... He was just a random boi showing off absolutely nothing for the sake of attention. Ridiculous question
@Siddhartha Choudhury are you fcking kidding me? Do you know about alternate current? Hydro power plants? Wifi? Remote control? Wireless communication? Do you know it's significance? Fcking idiots bastards just boasting about nothing. Don't be biased first learn who tesla was then come back... Idiot fckers just caring about the nobel Prize... Do see how much tesla changes the world...
@@maxwellsequation4887 what are you? How much do you know? What is your qualification? Just boasting some biased opinions. Feynman was a legend but do you even consider how much impact tesla had on the world? Yadav don't defame india... You may be a physics student, I am too. Don't compare two legends.. That's what I meant.. I didn't compare thier work... Study and become something better
I completely agree with Michio about how High school crushes kids. We get fed all this information but are never told exactly what it should be used for or what it could do, so we get extremely bored (like all children). It was only after I became an adult and got interested in engineering/physics that I realized how beautiful it all is.
I am a high school physics teacher. Before starting any concept, I go a long way in talking about why should they learn it. Giving examples of situations of present day and a million years in future. Funny speculations etc to bind them to the topic. Of course everyone has a unique style.
Thanks to Kaku, finally someone who doesn't pick a side, simply stating the clear data, science and engineering have to come hand in hand, without one, the other one falters! #STEMlover ahahaha
Physics has no dependence on engineering, humans have dependence. Physicists are not normal humans. Secondly, engineering is not science. Science is exploring the beauty of NATURE. Engineering is more of a business, a human activity. Nobody cares.
@@maxwellsequation4887 wtf is the point of physics if engineering doesn’t exist. There would be no point to discovering anything other than for just knowing it
@@kingassasin6031 physicists are the philosophers of understanding nature through this wonderful thing called mathematics. They're capable of seeing the beauty in the KNOWLEDGE of nature and ways of existence. Knowledge in itself is beautiful; he who has the capacity to admire the beauty in knowledge of any kind is a philosopher in that field. And people with such minds are really lucky. There's happiness in just the act of thinking - there's no need for the knowledge to be put into any usage.
@@pimpilikaa There's happiness in the act of thinking, yes, but only for some, while for the masses there's no material benefit when the knowledge of Physics isn't put into usage, making scientific discovery pretty useless - a waste of time and money if it doesn't amount to anything. In fact, without its usage (engineering), you wouldn't be able to spout this bs over a mobile phone, personal computer, or even the internet for that matter.
yes but it will be useless the guy who found out how to strt a fire didn't know that o2 + heat + fuel = fire but he still made a fire and it was one of the greatest achievements of human kind but the physicist who theorised thermo dynamics and the above fire triangle can't for his life convert the formula to actual fire . no one cares if there is a black hole in the center of milky way but people care if their disabled relative can actually walk again using a bunch of metals and code and wires engineering still exists without physics the lever still tilts where we push we just won't know it is because of gravity , but who cares ? the machine still works and we got a door to protect ourselves edit: i know this is long but I love physics too ,just stop being stupid
@@chessknowledge5150 so u r saying that it's ok to not know the fundamentals wow, and about the guy who found fire do u think that humans will develop things without having the fundamental knowledge of how stuff works 😑. Lemme guess u are from India and Preparing for jee. All u people need is use and use, everything has a use, u r just a fool if you are not able to find any. And you were talking about black holes , do u know how usefull they are if we find their working, you all engineers rant the same thing about theoretical, if humans would have followed your perspective we would been in stone age now.
Not quite. It was in the interview. Physicists make the breakthrough, engineers then take over and make things commercially available and viable. Just thinking of an idea is cheap and useless. You have to get it to the point where it's clear how it can be applied, for the idea to start having any value.
Fusion reactors and carbon nanotubes for example are engineering problems that have already been discovered. Finding a planet and its properties vs getting to a planet.
@@absolutezero6190 If nobody had any ideas, we wouldn't have anything. But there are many more ideas floating around than actual implementations of ideas. You can't sell an idea, you can sell a startup - an enterprise that has already proven the idea works and can be put in practice, even if it doesn't do so profitably. You can't get venture capitalists to invest in an idea. You can get them to invest if you show a working prototype, or at least a partially working prototype. The idea per se has no monetary value. A practical implementation of it has.
As if there were a clear distinction between the professions! The best I can suggest is this: A physicist is a mathematician who knows how to approximate. An engineer is a physicist who knows when to approximate.
@@mohammedaslam1520 but he always praises physics that it helps him to solve lot of problems see the world around it will be too hard without physicists newton einstein etc due to them we understand the universe so well today. The goal of science is not to make only use of the things its goal is to understand universe deeply and Fundamentally thats what physicists do
Science is the Latin word for knowledge. Science creates knowledge that is used by multiple other professionals, engineers, dentists, doctors, politicians ect....
I actually almost teared up at this point: 5:09 Being humiliated by allowing his daughter to become so unhappy with science preparing for that exam. I have never got to that point where I would wonder why anyone would like science, but I am still finding it very hard to be motivated to learn science while essentially pretending to study in sixth form (18 year old level in the UK) There are some big problems with the education system today. I used to be really passionate about science and to some extent I still am but he is describing my life here. My curiosity and will to do science is somewhat (but gladly not completely) crushed, particularly in high school
What is your point? Scientists discover and push new technology, and engineers apply known knowledge to invent or solve problems. They both need each other period.
One has a job and the other needs a PhD to hopefully have a job. *Edit: I take back what I said above from last year.* I just got a job as a physicist with just a bachelor's and the job is freaking amazing. It took a year of job searching though admittedly.
@@theoreticalphysics3644 what exactly do you do? I was thinking about getting into science more. But I wanted to learn about things and how to build them also. Like if I had an idea and I can also create it and make it works!
@@LeoBlight I work in superconductivity and quantum computing r&d. I wear many hats and have a lot of freedom. I'm a physicist (and even a bit of a computer scientist) reading papers/textbooks and constantly engaging in conversations and colloquiums. I'm a software engineer and data scientist working on test and simulation code. I'm a sort of mechanical and electrical engineer in the lab and get to work with dilution fridges operating at some of the coldest temperatures in the universe. I cannot go into specific detail on what I do beyond this, but if you are interested in physics, my area of r&d is growing as corporate and international competition is picking up. Tl;Dr being a physicist in industry from my experience so far is the ultimate intellectual jack of all trades job. The whole bit about a PhD? I see absolutely no reason for it now when I can just get paid to do a master's and not have to worry about surviving on breadcrumbs and being stuck in the toxic academic system. I'm already doin the research I've dreamed of doing and I'm doing it on a much larger scale than I could have done in academia.
@@theoreticalphysics3644 that sounds awesome! I’m glad you get to do what you enjoy. I have always been into science but more like Biology/History/Paleontology. And to be honest I’m getting tired of that and and want to learn something different. I like the idea of building things or understanding how humans give move throughout space from one planet to another. Im also find energy interesting like the fusion etc. I’m just trying to figure out what to learn. Im doing this for fun and for knowledge sake not to get a degree etc! Any advice? I appreciate you answering back!
Qhere it concerns about the education i agree with his arguments, here in america the education is meant for memorization, but that's wrong, you dont have to memorize, you have to reach your own curiosity and seach about all the doubts and questions that u have, the real education should focus over the discovering and debating the history and other thing from the common life
Just picked to study physics but now I thinking about engineering because that would actually let me apply my knowledge to work at the most innovative companies and maybe make my own product and brand. Although I think I enjoy physics more.
You need the scientist to discover the new laws and loopholes in the universe. You need the engineer to exploit those laws and loopholes. You need both to push the bounds of what humanity can do.
Obviously physicist. Physical invention itself is a part of experimental physics. Engineers commercialize the already predicted and created models, thereafter titivate them. Physicists are real scientists who provide breakthroughs. Engineers are more like mechanics who understand the concepts and then develop the procreations.
Mri wasnt invented by physicists. The phenomenon is what is discovered, but engineers made the imaging and interpretation of the imaging out of the discovered phenomenon. Without the applied mathematics of engineers to reconstruct scans into 3d cross sections and 3d reconstruction you wouldnt have an MRI
Well x-rays and radio waves exist naturally so he didn't exactly invent those things....but...he did invent the idea that a information could be sent in a carrier of different frequencies and that a receiver could be used to interpret that information. Also Tesla wasn't born in America.
Robots when see the humiliating insult in future, it will be the reason they imprison whole of humanity. The words “Mentally challenged Cockroach“ will be end of all.
@@CamRebires man! I am talking about those who want to understand nature, *their career is to understand nature*. It's not about just studying physics, High schoolers study physics.
Why supposedly smart people want to compare these fields? It like saying whos more important between goal keeper and a forward player in football. Phycologists are laughing at us seriously. We dnt have a clue about system behaviour 😢
@The BlackMace That's if they are actually working as physicists and not engineers or software developers lol. Because what most of them do is play around with string theory all day or bash particles together. There are a lot of people running down dead ends.
@Sunday Sinkers And I didn't say they work on abstract mathematical problems. I'm talking about theoretical physicists and experimental physicst. Most physics graduates and up doing software development of some type of engineering. Which is the point I am making.
this guy is lost, engineering only became a discipline in the 19th century, physicists only job should be to invent stuff woth new physics, its not something to write home about. there have been more inventions by engineers than physicists…
YES!!!!! developing software has nothing to do with science, but the world of programming and software is in essence its own universe and sandbox that is much greater than the real universe. brilliant.
Nothing is created by itself, God the creator of all existence, created all these for a purpose, Allah (God) says in the Glorious Quran, وَمَا خَلَقْتُ ٱلْجِنَّ وَٱلْإِنسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ I Allah (God) did not create jinn and humans except to worship Me. ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلْمَوْتَ وَٱلْحَيَوٰةَ لِيَبْلُوَكُمْ أَيُّكُمْ أَحْسَنُ عَمَلًۭا ۚ وَهُوَ ٱلْعَزِيزُ ٱلْغَفُورُ I Allah (God) the one and only who created death and life in order to test which of you is best in deeds, and He is the Almighty. All-Forgiving. Triumphant are those who turn to their Lord in repentance before their casket closed.
Indeed, but science, mathematics, and engineering are all about our innate desire to reach up and touch the face of God. What is a man, if not a being in search of *meaning* ?
Gran Torino If you don’t read the Quran and understanding linguistically, you’ll never know about the Almighty God, read the Quran then you’ll know the definition of Almighty God, even if you’re the most knowledgeable person in human history, if you don’t read the Quran you’ll never know about Almighty God, neither know about His existence,
That talk is absolutely foolish. See if you want to choose a favorite thing you will take the one you like so it doesn't matter that other doesn't like so same is with every passion see engeeners are doing there job and physicists are doing there. See if you are going to do anything, notice get up in the morning you brush your teeth think where that brush come from and thing who made it and what if who ever made it never made it, then after that eating breakfast fast think the bread you eat where that came from, then you tie your shoes from which brand they are from and think if a person who has made that shoes was a physicist so you never have shoes to wear on, same with your clothes and every daily need. So the point is that you are just a part of daily world no one has more superiority over other. See if thats the case then artists are more creative than scientists 'cause they can show there creativity on a peice of paper with different bursts and strokes of colors so remember "if one person is missing then one profession is missing then you are missing and you can't live without that" 😊
By the end of the century? No, completely wrong. Around 2040 a desktop computer will have the computing power of the human brain. Microsoft's Cortana is considered to have about an IQ of 40. That is doubling ever two to three years as algorithms and hardware improves. We are going to ignore AIs for a couple of years and then look up to see that AIs are smarter than we are.
Brian Ramsey You have been living under a rock. Firstly, computers are efficient not smart (that's why they can answer equations fast but can't have conversations), secondly, transistors are getting so small they almost cannot advance anymore and thirdly, they are not doubling anymore (because of the last point, progress is slowing down).
+Vault Von Well, consciousness is nothing more than an illusion produced by a highly capable network of neurons that analyses, records and reacts to stimulations around us multiple times at a second. I would say that our brains are just highly advanced computers.
Completely wrong lol shut up, you don't even know what you are talking about. What is your background? Cortana is one example of very few, and it's just A.I. Not a robot. Dr. Kaku specified both. He clearly stated the day when robots could possibly take over is long in to the future. This clearly implies an intelligent machine with a body having the biomechanics of a human. Of course Microsoft will have one of the most advanced A.Is, because they are a mega company. They have the resources to research and develop.
![ROSÉ(로제) - APT. (Band VER.) (With. 이영지) [더 시즌즈-이영지의 레인보우] | KBS 241129 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IW8qaemx74g/mqdefault.jpg)
I've always known this: scientists discover how nature is, engineers use this to develop society.
Nope, you miss the point
There's a 3rd level to it : Managers /Management, which would include operations, strategy etc. This group of people are mostly viewed as villains who are only trying to make money, but these people are also responsible for making a idea, a product available to the mass. public. Brilliant scientific discoveries, brilliant engineering products need also need brilliant executives and managers to make those products actually become practically available. Why did Google Glasses didn't work in 2013 but we have the metaverse now? Why did companies like Blackberry, Nokia went down? Because of bad management decisions?
Engineers are Applied Physics people. Some are pretty good at it and some are just "copy the previous calcs" sorts.
Ok Einstein
This is the truth
Engineers seldomly acknowledge this. They want to be the ones who apply it AND invent it, but historically that’s not been true. I just think that career engineers (not research engineers) live in their own little bubble, unaware of the science and theoretical work in the background that gives them the tools that are required for them to innovate. Like he said, physicists and engineers depend on each other. Without one, there couldn’t be the other.
How many engineers do you know btw?
@@SuhaibZafar A lot.
Fewer of the brightest people are becoming engineers (excepting software engineers) because it appears there are many options for a lucrative career with less hardwork, responsibility and other headaches. I fear that our standard of living will reflect that as our infrastructure crumbles.
@@Brassard1985 Engineers are real pretentious. But the engineers I met were professionals and didnt have that pretentiousness. This pretentiousness only comes from undergrads, internet warriors and engineers on the left side of the dunning kruger effect. For me, the engineers that I have met were humble, they didn't talk alot, but encouraged me when I told them that I wanted to take Biology in college. Unlike the online engineers whod say some bullshit like "ThAts AlL JuST MemORiSinG. OuR MaJOr Is sO mUCh HaRDeR".
This is same as comparing nikola tesla and richard feymann
Tesla is more of a cult figure now than anything else than a real scientist. Feynman over Tesla any-day, interms of quality of work. Tesla's work is comprehensible by a sophomore physics student. Feynman's work on the other hand, don't even talk about it. Tesla's physics was stuck in the 19th and early 20th century works of Faraday and Maxwell, basically classical mechanics, he had the delusion of grandeur and futurism. Not to say he was absolutely cock-ignorant about both relativity and quantum physics, the 2 pillars of modern physics.
To top it off Tesla didn't even believe at one point in time that electrons even existed.
@Siddhartha Choudhury yeah way way way better teacher
Yup
The question is ridiculous
Feynman was very very very very very great.
Tesla....... He was just a random boi showing off absolutely nothing for the sake of attention.
Ridiculous question
@Siddhartha Choudhury are you fcking kidding me? Do you know about alternate current? Hydro power plants? Wifi? Remote control? Wireless communication? Do you know it's significance? Fcking idiots bastards just boasting about nothing. Don't be biased first learn who tesla was then come back... Idiot fckers just caring about the nobel Prize... Do see how much tesla changes the world...
@@maxwellsequation4887 what are you? How much do you know? What is your qualification? Just boasting some biased opinions. Feynman was a legend but do you even consider how much impact tesla had on the world? Yadav don't defame india... You may be a physics student, I am too. Don't compare two legends.. That's what I meant.. I didn't compare thier work... Study and become something better
I completely agree with Michio about how High school crushes kids. We get fed all this information but are never told exactly what it should be used for or what it could do, so we get extremely bored (like all children). It was only after I became an adult and got interested in engineering/physics that I realized how beautiful it all is.
I am a high school physics teacher. Before starting any concept, I go a long way in talking about why should they learn it. Giving examples of situations of present day and a million years in future. Funny speculations etc to bind them to the topic. Of course everyone has a unique style.
Thanks to Kaku, finally someone who doesn't pick a side, simply stating the clear data, science and engineering have to come hand in hand, without one, the other one falters!
#STEMlover ahahaha
Physics has no dependence on engineering, humans have dependence. Physicists are not normal humans.
Secondly, engineering is not science. Science is exploring the beauty of NATURE. Engineering is more of a business, a human activity. Nobody cares.
@@maxwellsequation4887 wtf is the point of physics if engineering doesn’t exist. There would be no point to discovering anything other than for just knowing it
@@kingassasin6031 physicists are the philosophers of understanding nature through this wonderful thing called mathematics. They're capable of seeing the beauty in the KNOWLEDGE of nature and ways of existence. Knowledge in itself is beautiful; he who has the capacity to admire the beauty in knowledge of any kind is a philosopher in that field. And people with such minds are really lucky. There's happiness in just the act of thinking - there's no need for the knowledge to be put into any usage.
@@pimpilikaa fair point 👍
@@pimpilikaa There's happiness in the act of thinking, yes, but only for some, while for the masses there's no material benefit when the knowledge of Physics isn't put into usage, making scientific discovery pretty useless - a waste of time and money if it doesn't amount to anything. In fact, without its usage (engineering), you wouldn't be able to spout this bs over a mobile phone, personal computer, or even the internet for that matter.
"Engineering without physics is nothing but physics without engineering is physics"
Physics without Maths is Nothing too
@@shiv9582 true. Physicists are egomaniacs.
@@shiv9582 mathematics is the backbone of science
yes but it will be useless the guy who found out how to strt a fire didn't know that o2 + heat + fuel = fire
but he still made a fire and it was one of the greatest achievements of human kind
but the physicist who theorised thermo dynamics and the above fire triangle can't for his life convert the formula to actual fire .
no one cares if there is a black hole in the center of milky way
but people care if their disabled relative can actually walk again using a bunch of metals and code and wires
engineering still exists without physics the lever still tilts where we push we just won't know it is because of gravity , but who cares ? the machine still works and we got a door to protect ourselves
edit: i know this is long but I love physics too ,just stop being stupid
@@chessknowledge5150 so u r saying that it's ok to not know the fundamentals wow, and about the guy who found fire do u think that humans will develop things without having the fundamental knowledge of how stuff works 😑. Lemme guess u are from India and Preparing for jee. All u people need is use and use, everything has a use, u r just a fool if you are not able to find any. And you were talking about black holes , do u know how usefull they are if we find their working, you all engineers rant the same thing about theoretical, if humans would have followed your perspective we would been in stone age now.
So scientists think of an idea and engineers execute
No, scientist make the lego chips and engineer use them to make stuff.
Not quite. It was in the interview. Physicists make the breakthrough, engineers then take over and make things commercially available and viable. Just thinking of an idea is cheap and useless. You have to get it to the point where it's clear how it can be applied, for the idea to start having any value.
Fusion reactors and carbon nanotubes for example are engineering problems that have already been discovered. Finding a planet and its properties vs getting to a planet.
@@a0flj0 it’s not cheap and useless lol. If nobody thought of any ideas, we wouldn’t have anything!
@@absolutezero6190 If nobody had any ideas, we wouldn't have anything. But there are many more ideas floating around than actual implementations of ideas. You can't sell an idea, you can sell a startup - an enterprise that has already proven the idea works and can be put in practice, even if it doesn't do so profitably. You can't get venture capitalists to invest in an idea. You can get them to invest if you show a working prototype, or at least a partially working prototype. The idea per se has no monetary value. A practical implementation of it has.
They’re both equally useful, if one was better than the other and more complete, then there would be no need for the other to exist.
I love the fact how confident and clear Michio Kaku is. He is a Genius and Genius posses intuition to make predictions
Michigan: "Why do u have to memorize stuff for science"
Indian education system: hold my beer
That's sad :'(
@@ChronicleBlaster ikr
Physicists discover, engineers invent
!!!!!!INVENTOR WINS!!!!!!
@@centralprocessingunit2564 both of them "wins"
@@Salmanul_ inventor wins
@@centralprocessingunit2564with a physicists we wouldn’t know why were how gravity works and without that we couldn’t have engineers
Expiremental physicist also invent
First question and answer was the best part of the video.
As if there were a clear distinction between the professions! The best I can suggest is this:
A physicist is a mathematician who knows how to approximate.
An engineer is a physicist who knows when to approximate.
Physicists if they want they can be great engineers like elon musk but i think it will be too hard to reverse it as engineering becoming a physicist.
I don't think it's a good example.What I mean is Elon is a great entrepreneur but not a physicist.(Not sure about his engineering skills).
@@mohammedaslam1520 but he always praises physics that it helps him to solve lot of problems see the world around it will be too hard without physicists newton einstein etc due to them we understand the universe so well today. The goal of science is not to make only use of the things its goal is to understand universe deeply and Fundamentally thats what physicists do
Science is the Latin word for knowledge.
Science creates knowledge that is used by multiple other professionals, engineers, dentists, doctors, politicians ect....
Furthermore, I think Engineering in Latin means ingenium. Which means cleverness.
I actually almost teared up at this point: 5:09 Being humiliated by allowing his daughter to become so unhappy with science preparing for that exam. I have never got to that point where I would wonder why anyone would like science, but I am still finding it very hard to be motivated to learn science while essentially pretending to study in sixth form (18 year old level in the UK) There are some big problems with the education system today. I used to be really passionate about science and to some extent I still am but he is describing my life here. My curiosity and will to do science is somewhat (but gladly not completely) crushed, particularly in high school
Physics is the originator of theories/concepts while Engineering creates/applies theoretical ideas and concepts of physics.
We have applied physicists
@@ritaboateng8729 They are clearly engineers
Far into the future = 100 years. Me flipping my shit.
Wilhelm Rontgen and Nikola Tesla both had degrees in engineering and both invented the X-ray and radio respectively
What is your point? Scientists discover and push new technology, and engineers apply known knowledge to invent or solve problems. They both need each other period.
His point is that if you have both hands, it’ll make your work all the more credible and original.
Tesla is both a physicist and an engineer
@@A--lex No he was an engineer.
@@ameyanadkarni7270 He was a physicist too dude.
Nowadays there's no clear line between research Engineers and scientists
A physics major senses an Engineer ,cummon I agree that Engineers are better than Chemists
Engineers are stupid
@@ifrazali3052 yeah sure 👍
You are commenting it using what Engineers designed...
That's true.
Brilliant answers!!
Physics is Pure.. Engineering is Applied
Indirectly, he has made physicist look genius. 🤓
"Faaaaaarrrr into the future like a 100 years..." WTF??? That's not that far!
It's enough to make u a hostory
It is, given the enormous technological developments, it is tooooo far
@@samsidvars It's not that far, it's like 1-2 generations of people
Father of Thermodynamics was an French Mechanical Engineer ... ( Nicolas Sardi Carnot).... There are plenty more examples existing.
He was also a physicist
He was a also a physicst
One has a job and the other needs a PhD to hopefully have a job.
*Edit: I take back what I said above from last year.* I just got a job as a physicist with just a bachelor's and the job is freaking amazing. It took a year of job searching though admittedly.
Which one ?
@@LeoBlight physicist. I take this comment back, I got a job as a physicist with just a bachelor's and it kicks ass.
@@theoreticalphysics3644 what exactly do you do? I was thinking about getting into science more. But I wanted to learn about things and how to build them also. Like if I had an idea and I can also create it and make it works!
@@LeoBlight I work in superconductivity and quantum computing r&d. I wear many hats and have a lot of freedom. I'm a physicist (and even a bit of a computer scientist) reading papers/textbooks and constantly engaging in conversations and colloquiums. I'm a software engineer and data scientist working on test and simulation code. I'm a sort of mechanical and electrical engineer in the lab and get to work with dilution fridges operating at some of the coldest temperatures in the universe. I cannot go into specific detail on what I do beyond this, but if you are interested in physics, my area of r&d is growing as corporate and international competition is picking up.
Tl;Dr being a physicist in industry from my experience so far is the ultimate intellectual jack of all trades job.
The whole bit about a PhD? I see absolutely no reason for it now when I can just get paid to do a master's and not have to worry about surviving on breadcrumbs and being stuck in the toxic academic system. I'm already doin the research I've dreamed of doing and I'm doing it on a much larger scale than I could have done in academia.
@@theoreticalphysics3644 that sounds awesome! I’m glad you get to do what you enjoy. I have always been into science but more like Biology/History/Paleontology. And to be honest I’m getting tired of that and and want to learn something different. I like the idea of building things or understanding how humans give move throughout space from one planet to another. Im also find energy interesting like the fusion etc. I’m just trying to figure out what to learn. Im doing this for fun and for knowledge sake not to get a degree etc! Any advice? I appreciate you answering back!
Science comes first then engineering.
Because you use one science to make different equipment and technology for different conditions
Different life.
After his first few words.
This guy is literally a genius 🧐🤯
Wish they put this guy on TBBT
They have
@@yograjbir9993
WAIT WHAT??
ARE YOU SURE?
WHAT SEASON?
WHAT EPISODE?
“Engineering is the Oompa Loompa of physics.” Dr. Sheldon Cooper
As smart as a cat
Then we will have exceeded human level intelligence.
Physics!!!
I was waiting for you... 😂
We go on to the next frontier
Kaku pls do physics vs maths
Nano technology too invented by a physicist.
Physics is truth, engineering is commercialization. BIG BIG DIFFERENCE.
If this is only from 3 years ago , then AI has definitely grown exponentially...
#Neurolink
#teslaFsd ;)
Very clear explanation, why star trek is better than star wars.. I love it
Hopefully there is going to be a day were there are flying fridges.
Kreslím novú verziu auta kde kolesá sami doplnia energiu
Qhere it concerns about the education i agree with his arguments, here in america the education is meant for memorization, but that's wrong, you dont have to memorize, you have to reach your own curiosity and seach about all the doubts and questions that u have, the real education should focus over the discovering and debating the history and other thing from the common life
4:36 I have been interested in electrical engineering since age six.
Beautiful 👏🏾
In regards to robots taking over the world, why is a physicist answering an engineering question?
lmao here in 2022, when we are debating if googles lamda is sentient, I think its coming sooner than 100 years, I'm a physics major btw.
Very wise.
I love me some Michio 🥰❤🥰❤
Physics > Engineering. Always.
Kakooo should visit kashmir because physics dances here
yeah....nuclear physics lol! 😂😂
Who came here after Elon Musk's physics vs engineers video?
Just picked to study physics but now I thinking about engineering because that would actually let me apply my knowledge to work at the most innovative companies and maybe make my own product and brand. Although I think I enjoy physics more.
@@NormanWasHere452 if you like engineering then you should try it
Thank for this comment Imma watch that video
This video showed up in the recommended just after I watched that video holy shit!
I’m going to have to marry a physicist or a engineer because I’m completely obsessed with both.
Please.
Still the biggest debate is messi vs ronaldo.
Mine is messi who do you support?
Chiellini
Everyone is limited to their own cage..... .........which they themself made....... Peace....
You need the scientist to discover the new laws and loopholes in the universe. You need the engineer to exploit those laws and loopholes. You need both to push the bounds of what humanity can do.
Obviously physicist. Physical invention itself is a part of experimental physics. Engineers commercialize the already predicted and created models, thereafter titivate them.
Physicists are real scientists who provide breakthroughs. Engineers are more like mechanics who understand the concepts and then develop the procreations.
How about Phy vs math
if physics dies engineering dies, if engineering dies physics wouldn't know ..
Mri wasnt invented by physicists. The phenomenon is what is discovered, but engineers made the imaging and interpretation of the imaging out of the discovered phenomenon. Without the applied mathematics of engineers to reconstruct scans into 3d cross sections and 3d reconstruction you wouldnt have an MRI
Wow
Mr Kaku is cool
Love you all god bless
Great 🙂🙏
Both are interrelated
Why is he trying to make things hostile for ? Keep it completely harmonious and engaging not testing and daring. I hate interviews like this.
You still suppressing my comments? or is it cool for me to comment too? I see just as long as it follows what you want me to think then I can comment.
Engineering physicists for the win
We now (2021) have the neuromorphic computer; it can mimic the intelligence of a small rodent. Things are moving a little faster then you thought.
Wasnt the x ray and radio created by the serbian american inventor Nikola Tesla?
Well x-rays and radio waves exist naturally so he didn't exactly invent those things....but...he did invent the idea that a information could be sent in a carrier of different frequencies and that a receiver could be used to interpret that information. Also Tesla wasn't born in America.
No the waves exist naturally.
😑
Radio waves discovered by hertz
Robots when see the humiliating insult in future, it will be the reason they imprison whole of humanity. The words “Mentally challenged Cockroach“ will be end of all.
Physics deal with how nature work but engineering deals in invention
It not "Oompa Loompas of Science"
Does it really matter, just give me more money!
scientists > engineers
Physicists do not care about the application,
We enjoy the abstraction of ideas in our mind and so do mathematicians
Which is something none of the AI can do ....
Yeah, like Elon
@@CamRebires Elon Reeve Musk FRS is an entrepreneur and business magnate. He is the founder, CEO, and Chief Engineer at SpaceX
@@amrmuhammad7527 Elon is all that (+Tesla) despite having studied physics, which contradicts your first comment
@@CamRebires man!
I am talking about those who want to understand nature, *their career is to understand nature*.
It's not about just studying physics, High schoolers study physics.
physicist is the owner and engineers are the mangers of his companies 😂😂😂😂
Math, Physics, others. That’s how God ranks sciences. ;)
Indians laugh at Physicists as michio said they both depend on each other.😅🤔
Watching this in the era of coronavirus, I couldn't help but cringe at the end when they shook hands with each other.
Man I really didn't enjoy this guy's questions... Thanks god Michio is a social genius amongst his other remarkable skills
Why supposedly smart people want to compare these fields? It like saying whos more important between goal keeper and a forward player in football.
Phycologists are laughing at us seriously. We dnt have a clue about system behaviour 😢
This video didn't age well 😅
How so?
@@lukealadeen7836 don't tell me you still haven't heard of ChatGPT
Physicists make a good part of the discoveries, but engineers use the said discoveries to better the lives of the society
Engineers get no respect lol
@The BlackMace That's if they are actually working as physicists and not engineers or software developers lol. Because what most of them do is play around with string theory all day or bash particles together. There are a lot of people running down dead ends.
@@aodoemela Physics is a lot larger than quantum mechanics. You are talking about 1% of physicists there.
@The BlackMace 😂😂😂
@Sunday Sinkers Yeah as you said they get employed doing engineering or applied physics which is essentially engineering.
@Sunday Sinkers And I didn't say they work on abstract mathematical problems. I'm talking about theoretical physicists and experimental physicst. Most physics graduates and up doing software development of some type of engineering. Which is the point I am making.
this guy is lost, engineering only became a discipline in the 19th century, physicists only job should be to invent stuff woth new physics, its not something to write home about. there have been more inventions by engineers than physicists…
Physics set the rules for what engineers can do. Physics is already in place but engineers do the real magic imo
YES!!!!!
developing software has nothing to do with science, but the world of programming and software is in essence its own universe and sandbox that is much greater than the real universe. brilliant.
@@centralprocessingunit2564 No, it's not.
In one shot , Without a physical scientist, engineering will not improve. And if there is physical scientists then there is engineers .
Radio was invented by an engineer named "Nikola Tesla". He is wrong in many examples like this
Nothing is created by itself, God the creator of all existence, created all these for a purpose, Allah (God) says in the Glorious Quran,
وَمَا خَلَقْتُ ٱلْجِنَّ وَٱلْإِنسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ
I Allah (God) did not create jinn and humans except to worship Me.
ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلْمَوْتَ وَٱلْحَيَوٰةَ لِيَبْلُوَكُمْ أَيُّكُمْ أَحْسَنُ عَمَلًۭا ۚ وَهُوَ ٱلْعَزِيزُ ٱلْغَفُورُ
I Allah (God) the one and only who created death and life in order to test which of you is best in deeds, and He is the Almighty. All-Forgiving.
Triumphant are those who turn to their Lord in repentance before their casket closed.
Indeed, but science, mathematics, and engineering are all about our innate desire to reach up and touch the face of God.
What is a man, if not a being in search of *meaning* ?
Gran Torino
If you don’t read the Quran and understanding linguistically, you’ll never know about the Almighty God, read the Quran then you’ll know the definition of Almighty God, even if you’re the most knowledgeable person in human history, if you don’t read the Quran you’ll never know about Almighty God, neither know about His existence,
You are watching the wrong video,,,,,you should not be here,,,,,,this is not any religious content
@@Revert2010 I have Vedas, so no need for other books to understand Him 🕉️
That talk is absolutely foolish. See if you want to choose a favorite thing you will take the one you like so it doesn't matter that other doesn't like so same is with every passion see engeeners are doing there job and physicists are doing there. See if you are going to do anything, notice get up in the morning you brush your teeth think where that brush come from and thing who made it and what if who ever made it never made it, then after that eating breakfast fast think the bread you eat where that came from, then you tie your shoes from which brand they are from and think if a person who has made that shoes was a physicist so you never have shoes to wear on, same with your clothes and every daily need. So the point is that you are just a part of daily world no one has more superiority over other. See if thats the case then artists are more creative than scientists 'cause they can show there creativity on a peice of paper with different bursts and strokes of colors so remember "if one person is missing then one profession is missing then you are missing and you can't live without that" 😊
By the end of the century? No, completely wrong. Around 2040 a desktop computer will have the computing power of the human brain. Microsoft's Cortana is considered to have about an IQ of 40. That is doubling ever two to three years as algorithms and hardware improves. We are going to ignore AIs for a couple of years and then look up to see that AIs are smarter than we are.
Brian Ramsey You have been living under a rock. Firstly, computers are efficient not smart (that's why they can answer equations fast but can't have conversations), secondly, transistors are getting so small they almost cannot advance anymore and thirdly, they are not doubling anymore (because of the last point, progress is slowing down).
Brian Ramsey that is computing power. what michio kaku is talking about is consiousness.
+Vault Von Well, consciousness is nothing more than an illusion produced by a highly capable network of neurons that analyses, records and reacts to stimulations around us multiple times at a second. I would say that our brains are just highly advanced computers.
couldn't agree more
Completely wrong lol shut up, you don't even know what you are talking about. What is your background? Cortana is one example of very few, and it's just A.I. Not a robot. Dr. Kaku specified both. He clearly stated the day when robots could possibly take over is long in to the future. This clearly implies an intelligent machine with a body having the biomechanics of a human. Of course Microsoft will have one of the most advanced A.Is, because they are a mega company. They have the resources to research and develop.
joke interview.