This is literally a textbook example of gamblers not understanding the concept of independent events. While it is far less likely to get 10 in a row than 7 in a row, when you see three in a row and start you have the exact same statistical chance of hitting 7 bad draws in a row that you would have if you started not knowing anything about the previous 3.
You literally just used the gambler´s fallacy and made a strategy out of it. It doesn´t make the slightest difference if you enter a table just whenever you feel like it or if you wait for one single chance to hit 3 times before you enter. One in 127 runs will lose. The result of prior spins has no impact on the result of the next spin. As you win 126x your basic bet in the runs that win, while losing 127 basic bets when you lose, you simply can´t win. You can even enter a table after 6 red numbers in a row and bet on red and it won´t change the outcome.
However over the long run all probability ends up evening out. So the myth of the gamblers fallacy doesn’t apply in the long term. So even if the previous spins don’t dictate the next result, probability says it will eventually.
@@universalnetwork264 It almost never does in reality, Only in statistics. Just visit the homepage of any European casino, they offer you so-called "Permanences", which is the historic data of all their roulette tables, sometimes back for 30 years and more. You can check this real world data and just for fun, find out on how many single days you would have won by betting that the probablities will even out. You are right, it will eventually, but nowhere does it state that it will on a single day or within the time when you still have money. The gamblers fallacy is no myth, it´s the reason for a lot of lost fortunes.
I wait for a pattern of 6. Units are 100. Stop loss is at 1500. I only do 1 win per session. (Casino is 5 minutes away from me). Once I get one win, I leave. I go daily to the casino, sometimes twice a day earning me anywhere from 3,500 to 4,500 a month. I put aside a Bankroll and pocket the rest. Also, i get tons of free play because of the amount of action i lay down. I have days where i hit my 100 quota with the free play. Do i wipe out? Yes. It happens. But it's worked out to where I've made up a bankroll and then some before wiping out. For those who want to try this, start with 75, 5 units. Play for 5 wins. Per session. Stick to the rule of 6 patterns. When you get to 150, unit becomes 10. 225, unit=15, 300, unit=20, 375, unit=25 and continue the trend. Once you're at 25 unit, the one win per session rule kicks in. Gamble responsibly.
may i ask if their is realy a difference instead of playing once a day to 2 times a day? since yo only win for 100 per day. does that mean, youll have the second bankroll at day 15?.😅
I’ve lost all of my money doing this. Black hit 14 times in a row. It is a good system, but do not fool yourself into thinking that you will always win. The more patient you are tho, the better. Maybe wait until there is a pattern of seven or eight before playing.
Me too. I started with 2 units on 1-18 low numbers with 5 high numbers In a row, my bankroll got wiped out because the high numbers came out 12 additional times for a total of 17 high numbers in a row😢
outside bet, not limited to red and black. try even odd. this is more random than red black I think. or maybe 1-18 and 19-36. but this one sometimes hit a streak of 1 dozen so based on my experience I bet on even and odd. sometimes alternative. most profitable system for me is One up double down column. bet on 2nd or 3rd column. don't bet 1-3 dozen.
I play Martingale Red Black Red... Statistically,it shouldn't matter what method you use on outside bets but it seems to work in avoiding long same colour streaks.
I've hit a run of 9 even 10 straight, more than a few times which has sent me in fury about the house. And what makes it even worse is that the Table limit is $100 max bet, which makes it so much harder. It means you have to start at $1 and/or 50c and you'll lose a big chunk of money trying to save 50c/$1. Crooked the house is. If they want your money.... they'll grab it when they want. The Martingale strategy is the most common and used system.... I don't use it anymore. I ignore straight colour runs now, they're just a trick!
Oh man, with such a low max bet it's going to be really difficult to play the martingale system effectively. What casino do you play at? I've found some roulette tables with $1 minimum and $1,000 max.
Actually, its not a 50/50 chance when you have a zero or double zero. Also, you gotta be aware of chops in color (red, black, red, black, or vice versa). I have witnessed 20 blacks in a row.
Yes you are right, it's not completely 50/50 but it's pretty close. I don't doubt that you have seen 20 black numbers in a row. It's very rare, but it does happen.
In roulette, with each spin start, the odds of falling into a box are always 1/37 (with a table with a zero), simply because when starting a new betting round, there is still only 1 marble and 37 cells, this will not change when starting with a new spin. Thus, the player is always at a disadvantage... Don't look for a strategy, it simply never exists. You have to believe it...
Theres only a couple ways to consistently come out ahead in Roulette. 1) "Reverse" Martingale System. 2) Clocking Spins, which can takes years to become constantly accurate. 3) Find a "biased" tabe & only place bets on the top 5 or 6 #'s
I always wait for 5 in a row before I start the martingale. Made a lot of money doing that BUT it has hit 12 in a row more than once so always hit and run
If you have the patience to wait for 5 in a row then yes your strategy is better. You need to see multiple tables otherwise you could be waiting all day before placing a bet
I do it 1st 12 and wait 8 spins without it landing on 1st 12 to play you make so much more money . For a bit more risk , i make 200 quid in about 20 minutes and stop
I sort of do this with Bitcoin futures trading. I always bet 1% of my trading account and take at 2% profit, but for every 1% BTC drop in value - I place an additional trade of 0.5% of my trading account starting at each 1% drop. When it does go back up then I get all those 0.5% trades plus the original and make quite a bit. Sometimes I can be waiting weeks though before I make anything, but as my trades are so low - I have not lost yet.
I double my losses and segregate the wins. So every time I get back to even if I win the next bet I segregate that win to the side. It’s a bit more of a grind.
But this strategy is pretty decent. Think about it, if we are playing heads or tails, and i use this strategy. Im basically saying all i need to do is win 1 out of 7 , so you pick tails and i pick heads. You have to get tails 7 times in a row to beat me , while i just need to win once outta 7 times to be profit. What side would you rather be on ?
I calculated i included the chance of getting a 0 witch he did not in 10 tries you stil have 5.9 % of loss, if we go to 15 tries however that goes al the way down to 0.42% witch in my opinion is acceptable i also recomend not onlydoubleing the investion but tripling it every time so you can actualy profit lets say you stareed with 5 dolars u waited for 3 straight in a row black then you went in up to the 12th and last try you woul have invested 885 tousant dollars and all together to that point 1.330 milion dollars however if you win on the 15th you wil gain aproximetley 440 thousant dollars Withc is quite good in my opinion. Aslo please rather wait for 5 to hit in a row much safer option :)
What matters is that after 7 lost even bets of any kind, you hit the table limit. Skipping a roll doesn't do anything to the next rolls. And looking at the roulette wheel, it's clear that red and black are the most random bets ever, even with biased dealers. Therefore, betting on 10 consecutive rolls to not be all of the same color is meaningless. In order to find a winning strategy, you should focus mainly on how much to bet, not on what. D'alembert is the best example of that.
This is trippy cause i found out this strategy after playing online casino where i can see 15+ tables at once and i wait until i see 5-7 red or 5-7 black and bet on the opposite. I don't play roulette much but this strategy has got me lots of profit. I made profit for 3 weekends straight, i thought i found a money printer but it is true. Eventually i seen 11 straight red plus 0 and another 8 red . I took a huge hit here and been scared to go back since lol many games i seen over 12+ red or black so it does happen
You are absolutely right it can happen but that's extremely unlucky. What Casino do you play at where you can see 15+ tables? Is that in a live casino or online?
The best casino to do this strat is 888 casino. I play from canada. 888 casino shows the outcome of all tables without actually joining the table, and they have the most selection of roulette tables compared to others. Good Luck@@CasinoMatchmaker
I just counted they have over 50+ roulette tables, most of switch our Live. I stay away from american roulette and any PC roulette tables. Real Dealers Only @@CasinoMatchmaker
Exactly what I was doing. However it works till it does not. Long streaks can and do happen. Its like hunting for those long steaks and you will see them more often by watching 20 tables.
10 in row or more can happen, but it's more rare than 5 in a row happening, and even more than 3 in a row. I get that the chances are still there and there is no memory to the ball and it can land on black 100 times or green a hundred times, but will it? If it happens every now and then, that means you're screwed? I've done this strategy for years, I have a stop/restart limit, so when it rarely happens, my bank roll doesn't get eaten up. I recoup my losses on that, and carry the strategy forward. I made a lot of money with ties on Baccarat doing this. 10 cent minimum wait for 15 loses and then start the betting progression. I have 15 tries before I count my losses on it. I generally hit the tie between the 20th and 30th hands. 40 in a row with no tie is rare, but it happens. 50 is extremely rare and I just saw it the other day, but on average it looks like a tie happens within the first 15 from the last and no more than 30. That's what I play into, and it works reguardless of what the skeptics say. I know it does because I do it all the time.
Nice channel! I beg to differ about the improvement you suggest on the Martingale system, though. The odds of having 7 reds in a row is 128 to one (let's ignore the 0 for the sake of simplicity) and of having 10 reds in a row is 1024. However there is what we call conditioned probability: the odds of having 10 reds in a row given that 3 have already happened are the same of having 7 reds in a row from the beginning, assuming that reds and blacks are equally likely.
correct, but you will bet less times, hence lowering the risk. You will bet less times, instead than playing every single round, you will only play an average of 1 rounds every 8 rounds (2 power of 3, waiting for a series of 3 favorable results) so it works out but you will play less and so win less, but for sure also lose less
You are right! But that can take a long time before we see such a pattern. There will be a lot of waiting around. I use a pattern of 3 before I jump in but if you don't mind waiting and want to play it safe, you can wait for 3 or 4
I don’t trust online roulette. The other day I was playing roulette and noticed that odd numbers hadn’t come up for ten in a row (the sequence included two zeros). Suddenly they closed down the table with a message that it was temporarily closing. Was that because someone was using this method? Even though it was a well known site, the table was provided by a third party.
it is correct, doing so u will bet less times, instead than playing every single round, you will only play an average of 1 rounds every 8 (2 power of 3, waiting for a straight of 3 favorable results) so it works out but you will play less and so win less, but for sure also lose less
The biggest problem with this is: you can never have a winstreak right? Since after you win, you have to w8 again for 3 blacks in a row So with 5 euro it can take very long, and the longer you play, the more time for the dealer to win
if black came 3 times in a row and you want to bet that that it won't come 10 times in a row even if you are correct you can still lose your whole stake. 6 blacks and one zero will wipe you out. that's why those zeroes are there - so you can't win in the long run.
Good strategy. An add on to this is hvar a targer profit and a stop loss. My stop loss would be 20% of my banktoll which also determines my unut bet. Would play 5 sessions targeing 0.5 to 1% of my bankroll. Do this everyday dor 30 days you will see results. Also this needs discipline Nd patience. Never chase lossws
I would agree with you, but if your first lot of bets are losses.... you'd be chasing on the get go. You shouldn't give up. Sometimes the challenge will clear and you must focus... you will be proud that you didn't give in. Often, my friends and I have sweated it out to the extreme to save our dollars.
Dude talks about 10 in a row not being common, but I see it almost every time that I go to the casino. Or a dozen hit 12 times in a row. Or a column miss 22 times in a row. I don't play Martingale until at least 5-7 occurrences in a row. And I've still lost every once in awhile.....
@@CasinoMatchmaker I'll use another strategy while I wait for a particular one to signal a go. That way I'm maximizing my time. Or if I'm on an ETG, I'll just wait a coupla spins, they go so fast.....
Thank you man, I was down today and walked out to my car for some air, saw this video and went back in with $75 and a clear plan. After a few wins on $2.5 and 5$ I could see this play out across 2 roulette screens and also sicbo!! I was on fire there for a good half hour and made my money back. Learning everyday I love it
Glad to hear this helped you get your money back Reece. It's a good system but be careful not to overplay it. Multitable is a really good idea because it will stop you from getting bored and placing your bets before you need to. Let me know if there's any other topics/systems you want me to cover and I'll be happy to investigate for you
This may seem like you are increasing your chances but in reality you are not there are literally no differences between hitting 7 blacks in a row and 3 blacks and 4 reds mathematically. Both of their chances are 1/128
This is nonsense - every spin is a unique random event, the fact that you jump in after three black numbers in a row does in no way change the odds of the next seven numbers being black, they literally call this the gambler's fallacy
You are absolutely right that every event is a unique event. But if you decide to stick with the martingale system you are betting that the next 7 in a row won't be black. The same way if you were to place a bet your going to flip 7 heads in a row... the probability would be 0.78% (It would happen less than 1 in 100 attempts)
Its not, when you in a plane the day after a plane crashed, and the day before that too, You think yours will crash? Ofc the chanches are the same, but the odds are near impossible
Nope …here is better way to play… win two 5$ bets martingale on red …then use the winner casino cash on dozens .. 5$first dozen 5$second dozen and you will go from 50% probability on red or black to 4:6 probability …if lose dozens go back to martingale red black until you recover your 5$ and 5$ again … when you double or triple get out of the casino
Of course you're going to lose. The odds of winning is not 50/50. Each spin you have a 47.5% chance to win, or a 52.5% chance to lose. This is true regarless if you wait for 3 blacks in a row, or 10 blacks in a row. There is no system that will change the casino's edge.
Here's the problem with your embracing of Gamblers Fallacy. If you truly believe your odds are improved then simply take a look at an extreme case. If you wait on 20 Red hits before placing a single bet on Black do you really think your odds have dramatically increased?
I saw 14 times to 20 times in a row black or white and you lose your money martingale strategy or not better is to wait 10 times in a row and split your bankroll in 5 than you are 100 percent secure
Its definitely safer. However waiting for 10 even chance bets in a row could take a long time. You will spend the majority of your time sat on the sidelines waiting to place a bet
This is mathematically incorrect, in my opinion. This strategy has exactly the same odds as the regular martingale strategy. Waiting for 3 blacks in a row has no effect and does not improve your chances.
@@CasinoMatchmaker - Yes, but you're waiting until 3 blacks have ALREADY happened. Therefore, moving forward, only 7 consecutive blacks need to be achieved, not 10. Therefore, the odds are the same. 7 equals 7. 7 does NOT equal 10.
The problem with a system like this is the fallacious logic. Each spin is its own event. Let's say I am flipping a coin. I flip 10 heads in a row. What are the odds that my next flip is heads? Well, it's still a 50/50 chance that I flip heads again. If you walk up to a roulette table and see 5 black numbers in a row, or 10 black numbers in a row, what are the odds that the next number will be black? The odds are still 50/50 (excluding 0 and 00 of course). It is a different scenario if you are betting on what the outcome of the next 10 spins will be. If there was a bet for "will the next 10 spins be red/black" the odds will obviously shift dramatically. But the bets are being made one at a time, for each individual event. The outcome of the next spin has no correlation with any previous spin. You would get similar results if you alternated your increasing bets between red and black, or went from odd to black to even to red.
So you are absolutely right. The ball has no memory, and it doesn't matter what the previous spin was.... However you mentioned in your last paragraph it's different if we are betting on the next 10 in a row. And that's what the martingale system is. It's making the bet that the next 7 bets will not be the same colour.
@@CasinoMatchmaker I understand what you are saying, and don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to trash you or anything like that. I guess my main point is that the system does not need to rely on choosing the same color for each bet. Therefore, the part of the system where you wait for 3 of the same spins in a row before you start betting doesn't make statistical sense. If the person betting was alternating their bets between red and black, they would get the same results, statistically speaking. Each spin has a 50/50 chance of winning regardless (again, discarding 0's). It would be just like you flipping a coin, me making bets on the outcome, and making increasing bets trying to win my money back. I don't need to keep choosing heads, I just need to win one of the 50/50's.
What if u insteda of jumping on the 4th u jump on 6 or 7 now it’s pretty much guarantee right? Cus i never seen hitting the same colour 14 times in a row
I created an odd way to reduce variability. I call it the Mayer Progression. Use Red and Even. Or Black and Odd at the same time. Less long streaks because there are only 8 winning numbers and 10 losers(including 0,00). As opposed to betting just red or black and having 18 winning numbers and 20 losing numbers. Reducing variability reduces the length of streaks enabling you to survive the table max. I’m an accomplished inventor and have obsessed over a solution for the game for about 6 years. Give it a try 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
I play this exact system, just one odd thing though. It's actually better to start with 5 dollars rather than 1. You make too little profit with 1 dollar to recoop your money in an eventual loss.
The local tables here have a min. bet of 50c, which gets used, because believe it or not the max bet limit is $100 here (Sydney, Australia)... Absolutely crooked!
@Hedriks the Tables in Las Vegas are too expensive. They however have machines that play roulette with a live ball that sometimes start at 1 dollar and some places start at 5 dollars. I ran this play starting at 1 dollar and got demolished where as 5 dollar I still had money even taking eventual loss. I stop when my bets goes over 150 dollars.
Its really F up casinos expect you to rely on chance luck while their allowed to stack the deck in their favor the government allows American roulette a 00 giving an extra edge why do we put up with this
This makes no sense. Say you saw 5 black in a row and you think there is less chance to get a black again... it's wrong! there is again the same probability to get a black as there is to get red. Looking at probabilities of getting series of whatever you want ia fine as long as the series hasn't started yet. In the case of a series of 5 black which just happened, what is the probability that the first is a black? 100% because it already occured. If you make probabilities, on the roulette odds, about future events, you must only take into consideration the future and not the past.
Not rare at all. I have been doing this strategy by myself and lost all my money. There were 14... I repeat FOURTEEN of the same colour. not once but 3 times in a row. on 3 different tables. It is not about strategy. Online casinos cheat.
It can happen but it shouldn't happen 3 times on 3 different tables that's incredible odds! Where are you playing? I've found 3 casinos that I've audited myself you can check them out on the website casinomatchmaker.com/roulette-casinos/
This is BS strategy!! You just can’t simply beat the casino, I was actually waiting when 10 black or red hit then play. And I had $3000 bank roll, sometimes it goes up to 19-24 times. It’s not possible to beat the casino, nice to watch but it won’t work. You will win 1/2/3 days and you come back to loose it all and more. Good luck
For sure it's not a guaranteed winner everytime, but you have to get very unlucky to walk into 10 in a row. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but it's unlikely. I agree with you, Like I Said in the video don't over use this strategy. Make some quick profit and leave before you run into trouble
@@CasinoMatchmaker if you are playing you are running into trouble. It’s that simple. I’ve seen comes 16 times red I’ve seen it come 24 times black, I’ve seen comes high that much. There is no strategy to beat roulette. If there is a way the casino would ban roulette, also you will only win to give it all back and some more. So In the end of the day you will go home broke whatever happens, not today. Not tomorrow but that day will come soon or later. If you play roulette on regular you know this by now 😉
Any martingale is a loser. You can wait 4 or 5 then play and still hit the table limit. I have personally lost 12 times in a row but thankfully the bets were all $5 bets. So I lost $60 instead of the disastrous martingale of over $5000!
You are right, it's certainly a possibility that you can still hit the table limits. But by being patient and waiting for the pattern of 3, you can reduce this dramatically.
@@CasinoMatchmakerthis is not correct. While I agree the probability of 10 blacks in a row is 0.1%, that figure changes and becomes the exact same 0.75% of having 7 blacks to go come the 4th spin. If we followed your logic, then the probability of having one black in spin #10 would still be 0.1% while it would in fact be 50%. Thi is disingenuous
It is about 805 to 1 that 10 of the same even chance bets come out in a row on a single zero roulette wheel. But on the next spin it is still almost 50/50.
Very risky strategy! Last year I was gambling on an roulette table en there was 17 times black in a row. If I uses the margin system i lost all my money.😅
I like how a traget goal of say $30 dollars is when you stop playing. I always accept the fact that I will lose my bankroll while playing and then it's less of a blow when or if it does happen. If you have a larger bankroll starting with $10 and a Goal of $50 to say, then thatis also a pretty safe way of playing after a 3 hit. Good viedo and yes 10 hits of the same color do happen and it is scary lol.
I will try this, a casino near me has automatic roulette with a proper spinning wheel, so no one operating it to watch what I am doing. It starts from €0.50 per spin so can experiment with small amounts.
My friend John started betting at a $25 minimum roulette table because 7 reds in came out in a row. So he bet on black $25,50,100,200,400,800 then he quit. The results: first 7 reds then 7 more reds, then a black on the 15th spin. He lost $1575. He was not happy but his next bet would have been $1600 and he would have lost that too and he would not have been able to bet $3200 (which would have won) after that because the table limit was $2000.
Find the best casino for you by completing this short quiz: casinomatchmaker.com/quiz/
This is literally a textbook example of gamblers not understanding the concept of independent events. While it is far less likely to get 10 in a row than 7 in a row, when you see three in a row and start you have the exact same statistical chance of hitting 7 bad draws in a row that you would have if you started not knowing anything about the previous 3.
That’s why you do it in the stock market
😂@@billlumberg1043❤
But the probability of not getting 1 out of 4 is lower. 1/2 ^4
Beware. Long streaks of 15+ on any outside bet are not as rare as people think. Its quite common.
Yeah just cash out in time, I transformed 20 into 60 euro, then decided an hour later to play again witht the profit and lost 40 euro 😅
I agree, the Martingale strategy is a very tricky one and can easily wipe out your bankroll.
**green has entered the chat**
It was funny , my first time and final time ever of betting on a roulette was betting on a red , ball dropped on green 😂 never played again
You literally just used the gambler´s fallacy and made a strategy out of it. It doesn´t make the slightest difference if you enter a table just whenever you feel like it or if you wait for one single chance to hit 3 times before you enter. One in 127 runs will lose. The result of prior spins has no impact on the result of the next spin. As you win 126x your basic bet in the runs that win, while losing 127 basic bets when you lose, you simply can´t win. You can even enter a table after 6 red numbers in a row and bet on red and it won´t change the outcome.
Hit red 18 times in a row last time I was there. My friend lost $800 I won $400.
I’ve seen 14 black in a row
However over the long run all probability ends up evening out. So the myth of the gamblers fallacy doesn’t apply in the long term.
So even if the previous spins don’t dictate the next result, probability says it will eventually.
@@universalnetwork264 It almost never does in reality, Only in statistics. Just visit the homepage of any European casino, they offer you so-called "Permanences", which is the historic data of all their roulette tables, sometimes back for 30 years and more. You can check this real world data and just for fun, find out on how many single days you would have won by betting that the probablities will even out.
You are right, it will eventually, but nowhere does it state that it will on a single day or within the time when you still have money.
The gamblers fallacy is no myth, it´s the reason for a lot of lost fortunes.
Then why is the record 32 streak and not 33? It does matter, ofc chanche is the same, but the odds arent
I wait for a pattern of 6. Units are 100. Stop loss is at 1500. I only do 1 win per session. (Casino is 5 minutes away from me). Once I get one win, I leave. I go daily to the casino, sometimes twice a day earning me anywhere from 3,500 to 4,500 a month.
I put aside a Bankroll and pocket the rest. Also, i get tons of free play because of the amount of action i lay down. I have days where i hit my 100 quota with the free play.
Do i wipe out? Yes. It happens. But it's worked out to where I've made up a bankroll and then some before wiping out.
For those who want to try this, start with 75, 5 units. Play for 5 wins. Per session. Stick to the rule of 6 patterns. When you get to 150, unit becomes 10. 225, unit=15, 300, unit=20, 375, unit=25 and continue the trend. Once you're at 25 unit, the one win per session rule kicks in.
Gamble responsibly.
Hey thanks for sharing your knowledge on this. When you say pattern of 6. Do you mean 6 of one colour?
may i ask if their is realy a difference instead of playing once a day to 2 times a day?
since yo only win for 100 per day. does that mean, youll have the second bankroll at day 15?.😅
I’ve lost all of my money doing this. Black hit 14 times in a row. It is a good system, but do not fool yourself into thinking that you will always win. The more patient you are tho, the better. Maybe wait until there is a pattern of seven or eight before playing.
I like the fibonacci dozens strategy.
Me too. I started with 2 units on 1-18 low numbers with 5 high numbers In a row, my bankroll got wiped out because the high numbers came out 12 additional times for a total of 17 high numbers in a row😢
outside bet, not limited to red and black. try even odd. this is more random than red black I think. or maybe 1-18 and 19-36. but this one sometimes hit a streak of 1 dozen so based on my experience I bet on even and odd. sometimes alternative. most profitable system for me is One up double down column. bet on 2nd or 3rd column. don't bet 1-3 dozen.
I play Martingale Red Black Red... Statistically,it shouldn't matter what method you use on outside bets but it seems to work in avoiding long same colour streaks.
I've hit a run of 9 even 10 straight, more than a few times which has sent me in fury about the house. And what makes it even worse is that the Table limit is $100 max bet, which makes it so much harder. It means you have to start at $1 and/or 50c and you'll lose a big chunk of money trying to save 50c/$1.
Crooked the house is. If they want your money.... they'll grab it when they want.
The Martingale strategy is the most common and used system.... I don't use it anymore. I ignore straight colour runs now, they're just a trick!
Oh man, with such a low max bet it's going to be really difficult to play the martingale system effectively.
What casino do you play at?
I've found some roulette tables with $1 minimum and $1,000 max.
Actually, its not a 50/50 chance when you have a zero or double zero. Also, you gotta be aware of chops in color (red, black, red, black, or vice versa). I have witnessed 20 blacks in a row.
Yes you are right, it's not completely 50/50 but it's pretty close.
I don't doubt that you have seen 20 black numbers in a row. It's very rare, but it does happen.
@@CasinoMatchmaker yep i have seen it personally but like you said, its rare
@@650Giantsfan can you send screenshoot of them ?
That's why follow the color works pretty good when see streaks happening.
@@jimt7003 its probably the easiest and best way. However, be aware of the chops
In roulette, with each spin start, the odds of falling into a box are always 1/37 (with a table with a zero), simply because when starting a new betting round, there is still only 1 marble and 37 cells, this will not change when starting with a new spin. Thus, the player is always at a disadvantage... Don't look for a strategy, it simply never exists. You have to believe it...
Exactly, there is only an illusion of a pattern.
Theres only a couple ways to consistently come out ahead in Roulette. 1) "Reverse" Martingale System. 2) Clocking Spins, which can takes years to become constantly accurate. 3) Find a "biased" tabe & only place bets on the top 5 or 6 #'s
What do you mean on the top 5 or 6s?
I'm going to do a video on reverse martingale system
reverse martingale so you lose
I always wait for 5 in a row before I start the martingale. Made a lot of money doing that BUT it has hit 12 in a row more than once so always hit and run
If you have the patience to wait for 5 in a row then yes your strategy is better.
You need to see multiple tables otherwise you could be waiting all day before placing a bet
I wait for 4
Never tried this system but, like you, I would need to see five in a row first. Three is a ridiculous risk because I often see ten in a row.
Want to know hit and run??? I do it every day!
@@Koenig-Rorik pull the other one.
I do it 1st 12 and wait 8 spins without it landing on 1st 12 to play you make so much more money . For a bit more risk , i make 200 quid in about 20 minutes and stop
I sort of do this with Bitcoin futures trading. I always bet 1% of my trading account and take at 2% profit, but for every 1% BTC drop in value - I place an additional trade of 0.5% of my trading account starting at each 1% drop. When it does go back up then I get all those 0.5% trades plus the original and make quite a bit. Sometimes I can be waiting weeks though before I make anything, but as my trades are so low - I have not lost yet.
I double my losses and segregate the wins. So every time I get back to even if I win the next bet I segregate that win to the side. It’s a bit more of a grind.
But this strategy is pretty decent. Think about it, if we are playing heads or tails, and i use this strategy. Im basically saying all i need to do is win 1 out of 7 , so you pick tails and i pick heads. You have to get tails 7 times in a row to beat me , while i just need to win once outta 7 times to be profit. What side would you rather be on ?
Exactly that !!
By continuing to follow the martingale you are saying I bet I won't lost 7 even chance bets in a row
I calculated i included the chance of getting a 0 witch he did not in 10 tries you stil have 5.9 % of loss, if we go to 15 tries however that goes al the way down to 0.42% witch in my opinion is acceptable i also recomend not onlydoubleing the investion but tripling it every time so you can actualy profit lets say you stareed with 5 dolars u waited for 3 straight in a row black then you went in up to the 12th and last try you woul have invested 885 tousant dollars and all together to that point 1.330 milion dollars however if you win on the 15th you wil gain aproximetley 440 thousant dollars Withc is quite good in my opinion. Aslo please rather wait for 5 to hit in a row much safer option :)
What matters is that after 7 lost even bets of any kind, you hit the table limit. Skipping a roll doesn't do anything to the next rolls. And looking at the roulette wheel, it's clear that red and black are the most random bets ever, even with biased dealers. Therefore, betting on 10 consecutive rolls to not be all of the same color is meaningless.
In order to find a winning strategy, you should focus mainly on how much to bet, not on what. D'alembert is the best example of that.
This is trippy cause i found out this strategy after playing online casino where i can see 15+ tables at once and i wait until i see 5-7 red or 5-7 black and bet on the opposite. I don't play roulette much but this strategy has got me lots of profit. I made profit for 3 weekends straight, i thought i found a money printer but it is true. Eventually i seen 11 straight red plus 0 and another 8 red . I took a huge hit here and been scared to go back since lol many games i seen over 12+ red or black so it does happen
You are absolutely right it can happen but that's extremely unlucky.
What Casino do you play at where you can see 15+ tables?
Is that in a live casino or online?
The best casino to do this strat is 888 casino. I play from canada. 888 casino shows the outcome of all tables without actually joining the table, and they have the most selection of roulette tables compared to others. Good Luck@@CasinoMatchmaker
I just counted they have over 50+ roulette tables, most of switch our Live. I stay away from american roulette and any PC roulette tables. Real Dealers Only @@CasinoMatchmaker
Exactly what I was doing. However it works till it does not. Long streaks can and do happen. Its like hunting for those long steaks and you will see them more often by watching 20 tables.
@@XMR-Roulette Where do you play to watch 20 tables? I want to play there too !
I played for months like this example, and i saw many time streaks +17...
10 in row or more can happen, but it's more rare than 5 in a row happening, and even more than 3 in a row. I get that the chances are still there and there is no memory to the ball and it can land on black 100 times or green a hundred times, but will it? If it happens every now and then, that means you're screwed? I've done this strategy for years, I have a stop/restart limit, so when it rarely happens, my bank roll doesn't get eaten up. I recoup my losses on that, and carry the strategy forward. I made a lot of money with ties on Baccarat doing this. 10 cent minimum wait for 15 loses and then start the betting progression. I have 15 tries before I count my losses on it. I generally hit the tie between the 20th and 30th hands. 40 in a row with no tie is rare, but it happens. 50 is extremely rare and I just saw it the other day, but on average it looks like a tie happens within the first 15 from the last and no more than 30. That's what I play into, and it works reguardless of what the skeptics say. I know it does because I do it all the time.
Nice channel! I beg to differ about the improvement you suggest on the Martingale system, though. The odds of having 7 reds in a row is 128 to one (let's ignore the 0 for the sake of simplicity) and of having 10 reds in a row is 1024. However there is what we call conditioned probability: the odds of having 10 reds in a row given that 3 have already happened are the same of having 7 reds in a row from the beginning, assuming that reds and blacks are equally likely.
correct, but you will bet less times, hence lowering the risk. You will bet less times, instead than playing every single round, you will only play an average of 1 rounds every 8 rounds (2 power of 3, waiting for a series of 3 favorable results) so it works out but you will play less and so win less, but for sure also lose less
Was up 800 from 200 tried it on black then red hit 13 times in a row
the odds of Winning is even better if we wait until the same Black/red- even/ Odd an so om 4th or 5 times before playing…
You are right!
But that can take a long time before we see such a pattern.
There will be a lot of waiting around.
I use a pattern of 3 before I jump in but if you don't mind waiting and want to play it safe, you can wait for 3 or 4
Go on an ETG, wait 5, not 3. Have the patience for it.
I don’t trust online roulette. The other day I was playing roulette and noticed that odd numbers hadn’t come up for ten in a row (the sequence included two zeros). Suddenly they closed down the table with a message that it was temporarily closing. Was that because someone was using this method? Even though it was a well known site, the table was provided by a third party.
they use magnets
@@perfectgematriadecodesabc4259 they don't .
it is correct, doing so u will bet less times, instead than playing every single round, you will only play an average of 1 rounds every 8 (2 power of 3, waiting for a straight of 3 favorable results) so it works out but you will play less and so win less, but for sure also lose less
U can play other bets as u wait. Nothing wrong with playing a couple systems at a time
The biggest problem with this is: you can never have a winstreak right? Since after you win, you have to w8 again for 3 blacks in a row
So with 5 euro it can take very long, and the longer you play, the more time for the dealer to win
if black came 3 times in a row and you want to bet that that it won't come 10 times in a row even if you are correct you can still lose your whole stake. 6 blacks and one zero will wipe you out. that's why those zeroes are there - so you can't win in the long run.
Where as me hold 12 level and black came out 18 streak
Good strategy. An add on to this is hvar a targer profit and a stop loss. My stop loss would be 20% of my banktoll which also determines my unut bet. Would play 5 sessions targeing 0.5 to 1% of my bankroll. Do this everyday dor 30 days you will see results. Also this needs discipline Nd patience. Never chase lossws
Yea it's smart to have bankroll management as well.
Tomorrows video is about having a profit in mind before you lose it all
I would agree with you, but if your first lot of bets are losses.... you'd be chasing on the get go. You shouldn't give up. Sometimes the challenge will clear and you must focus... you will be proud that you didn't give in. Often, my friends and I have sweated it out to the extreme to save our dollars.
Dude talks about 10 in a row not being common, but I see it almost every time that I go to the casino. Or a dozen hit 12 times in a row. Or a column miss 22 times in a row. I don't play Martingale until at least 5-7 occurrences in a row. And I've still lost every once in awhile.....
If you have the patience to wait for 5 in a row then that's a smarter move.
But I've found you just end up sat waiting for most of your time
@@CasinoMatchmaker I'll use another strategy while I wait for a particular one to signal a go. That way I'm maximizing my time. Or if I'm on an ETG, I'll just wait a coupla spins, they go so fast.....
It’s actually .48 .48 on a European board abd even lower on an american
You are absolutely right.
I used 0.5 for ease but yes the true number is 0.48
Thank you man, I was down today and walked out to my car for some air, saw this video and went back in with $75 and a clear plan.
After a few wins on $2.5 and 5$ I could see this play out across 2 roulette screens and also sicbo!!
I was on fire there for a good half hour and made my money back.
Learning everyday I love it
Glad to hear this helped you get your money back Reece.
It's a good system but be careful not to overplay it.
Multitable is a really good idea because it will stop you from getting bored and placing your bets before you need to.
Let me know if there's any other topics/systems you want me to cover and I'll be happy to investigate for you
I love this strategy, but having a chanche of losing 320 euro to win 5 euro makes me stressed xD
Haha so true!
This may seem like you are increasing your chances but in reality you are not there are literally no differences between hitting 7 blacks in a row and 3 blacks and 4 reds mathematically. Both of their chances are 1/128
yeah but have you seen 20 blacks in a row. like it is just safer you cant deny it. 5 blacks in a row is WAY more often then 10.
@@manlad6229 You probably havent gambled enough yet :)
@@manlad6229 If you say it is safer, you know nothing about math
Ty Ty Ty❤️❤️❤️
i got 14 time red so waht is the add bro lost 700
That's pretty silly. Perhaps before you arrived at the table, the wheel had landed on red 18 times.
Btw. The world record is 32 times red.
Proof!?
This is nonsense - every spin is a unique random event, the fact that you jump in after three black numbers in a row does in no way change the odds of the next seven numbers being black, they literally call this the gambler's fallacy
You are absolutely right that every event is a unique event. But if you decide to stick with the martingale system you are betting that the next 7 in a row won't be black.
The same way if you were to place a bet your going to flip 7 heads in a row... the probability would be 0.78% (It would happen less than 1 in 100 attempts)
Its not, when you in a plane the day after a plane crashed, and the day before that too, You think yours will crash? Ofc the chanches are the same, but the odds are near impossible
I’ve seen it land on red 13 times in a row. It’s hard to double up that many times.
I have a spreadsheet that statistically predicts the score of any football match in any league in the world.
Come share it with the community
I have seen 12 in a row same color.
whats your fave strategy for roulette? both with live dealer and ECG?
I like fibonnaci on the columns or Dalmbert on even chance bets.
What about yourself?
@CasinoMatchmaker just became aware of the fibonaci a couple weeks ago from another YT channel. I like it. Playing it on 2 dozens...prints money, lol
favorite column? @@CasinoMatchmaker
Nope …here is better way to play… win two 5$ bets martingale on red …then use the winner casino cash on dozens .. 5$first dozen 5$second dozen and you will go from 50% probability on red or black
to 4:6 probability …if lose dozens go back to martingale red black until you recover your 5$ and 5$ again … when you double or triple get out of the casino
Last time at the casino it hit red 18 times in a row.
Great way to go broke!
Lost 3k using this method lol havnt been back since😢
Oh man that is rough. Where are you playing?
Of course you're going to lose. The odds of winning is not 50/50. Each spin you have a 47.5% chance to win, or a 52.5% chance to lose. This is true regarless if you wait for 3 blacks in a row, or 10 blacks in a row. There is no system that will change the casino's edge.
Here's the problem with your embracing of Gamblers Fallacy. If you truly believe your odds are improved then simply take a look at an extreme case. If you wait on 20 Red hits before placing a single bet on Black do you really think your odds have dramatically increased?
I saw 14 times to 20 times in a row black or white and you lose your money martingale strategy or not better is to wait 10 times in a row and split your bankroll in 5 than you are 100 percent secure
Its definitely safer. However waiting for 10 even chance bets in a row could take a long time.
You will spend the majority of your time sat on the sidelines waiting to place a bet
You are correct. Waiting does not take away the casino's 5% edge.
0/00 kills you as well
dude once i saw 16 in a row xD
This is mathematically incorrect, in my opinion. This strategy has exactly the same odds as the regular martingale strategy. Waiting for 3 blacks in a row has no effect and does not improve your chances.
Wouldn't you agree the odds of 10 black numbers in a row is much lower than 7 black numbers in a row?
@@CasinoMatchmaker - Yes, but you're waiting until 3 blacks have ALREADY happened. Therefore, moving forward, only 7 consecutive blacks need to be achieved, not 10. Therefore, the odds are the same. 7 equals 7. 7 does NOT equal 10.
The problem with a system like this is the fallacious logic. Each spin is its own event.
Let's say I am flipping a coin. I flip 10 heads in a row. What are the odds that my next flip is heads? Well, it's still a 50/50 chance that I flip heads again.
If you walk up to a roulette table and see 5 black numbers in a row, or 10 black numbers in a row, what are the odds that the next number will be black? The odds are still 50/50 (excluding 0 and 00 of course).
It is a different scenario if you are betting on what the outcome of the next 10 spins will be. If there was a bet for "will the next 10 spins be red/black" the odds will obviously shift dramatically. But the bets are being made one at a time, for each individual event. The outcome of the next spin has no correlation with any previous spin. You would get similar results if you alternated your increasing bets between red and black, or went from odd to black to even to red.
So you are absolutely right.
The ball has no memory, and it doesn't matter what the previous spin was....
However you mentioned in your last paragraph it's different if we are betting on the next 10 in a row.
And that's what the martingale system is.
It's making the bet that the next 7 bets will not be the same colour.
@@CasinoMatchmaker I understand what you are saying, and don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to trash you or anything like that. I guess my main point is that the system does not need to rely on choosing the same color for each bet. Therefore, the part of the system where you wait for 3 of the same spins in a row before you start betting doesn't make statistical sense.
If the person betting was alternating their bets between red and black, they would get the same results, statistically speaking. Each spin has a 50/50 chance of winning regardless (again, discarding 0's). It would be just like you flipping a coin, me making bets on the outcome, and making increasing bets trying to win my money back. I don't need to keep choosing heads, I just need to win one of the 50/50's.
What if u insteda of jumping on the 4th u jump on 6 or 7 now it’s pretty much guarantee right? Cus i never seen hitting the same colour 14 times in a row
the same colour has hit 25 times in a row
Then you havn't played much roullette.
@@perfectgematriadecodesabc4259 only one time in human history ....cmon
@@mray96 have you seen 14 in a row ? cmon now
@@perfectgematriadecodesabc4259 That's when you let it ride!!!
I like the maths to 0.78%
See I did this, but then I got 13 reds in a row. Fml.
Oh man that sucks
I created an odd way to reduce variability. I call it the Mayer Progression.
Use Red and Even. Or Black and Odd at the same time. Less long streaks because there are only 8 winning numbers and 10 losers(including 0,00). As opposed to betting just red or black and having 18 winning numbers and 20 losing numbers. Reducing variability reduces the length of streaks enabling you to survive the table max. I’m an accomplished inventor and have obsessed over a solution for the game for about 6 years. Give it a try 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
I play this exact system, just one odd thing though. It's actually better to start with 5 dollars rather than 1. You make too little profit with 1 dollar to recoop your money in an eventual loss.
Absolutely.
Most casinos will have minimum bets of $5 as well
The local tables here have a min. bet of 50c, which gets used, because believe it or not the max bet limit is $100 here (Sydney, Australia)... Absolutely crooked!
@Hedriks the Tables in Las Vegas are too expensive. They however have machines that play roulette with a live ball that sometimes start at 1 dollar and some places start at 5 dollars. I ran this play starting at 1 dollar and got demolished where as 5 dollar I still had money even taking eventual loss. I stop when my bets goes over 150 dollars.
Its really F up casinos expect you to rely on chance luck while their allowed to stack the deck in their favor the government allows American roulette a 00 giving an extra edge why do we put up with this
This makes no sense. Say you saw 5 black in a row and you think there is less chance to get a black again... it's wrong! there is again the same probability to get a black as there is to get red. Looking at probabilities of getting series of whatever you want ia fine as long as the series hasn't started yet.
In the case of a series of 5 black which just happened, what is the probability that the first is a black? 100% because it already occured. If you make probabilities, on the roulette odds, about future events, you must only take into consideration the future and not the past.
7 black streak is rare? you clearly dont play in casino.
Rarer than 6 yes
Anything with the word Martingale is a no no .
We risk hundreds of Euros just to earn 5 Euros...Too risky and don't forget the ZERO.
Think I'd rather just bet on zero. Zero seems always to come up when I've played roulette...
Risky
Not rare at all. I have been doing this strategy by myself and lost all my money. There were 14... I repeat FOURTEEN of the same colour. not once but 3 times in a row. on 3 different tables. It is not about strategy. Online casinos cheat.
It can happen but it shouldn't happen 3 times on 3 different tables that's incredible odds!
Where are you playing?
I've found 3 casinos that I've audited myself you can check them out on the website
casinomatchmaker.com/roulette-casinos/
This is BS strategy!! You just can’t simply beat the casino, I was actually waiting when 10 black or red hit then play. And I had $3000 bank roll, sometimes it goes up to 19-24 times. It’s not possible to beat the casino, nice to watch but it won’t work. You will win 1/2/3 days and you come back to loose it all and more. Good luck
For sure it's not a guaranteed winner everytime, but you have to get very unlucky to walk into 10 in a row.
I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but it's unlikely.
I agree with you, Like I Said in the video don't over use this strategy. Make some quick profit and leave before you run into trouble
@@CasinoMatchmaker if you are playing you are running into trouble. It’s that simple. I’ve seen comes 16 times red I’ve seen it come 24 times black, I’ve seen comes high that much. There is no strategy to beat roulette. If there is a way the casino would ban roulette, also you will only win to give it all back and some more. So In the end of the day you will go home broke whatever happens, not today. Not tomorrow but that day will come soon or later. If you play roulette on regular you know this by now 😉
only play live dealer table, any software-based game is rigged , I just recently ran from $130 to $1900 4 days , 8 hours per day.
@@OutcastVR Thats pretty good going.
What live dealer table do you use?
It is a BS strategy but it is not impossible to beat the casino. Thousands do so and are professional gamblers.
Went to the casino today with some friends. One guy kept betting on red. it was 9 blacks in a row....
Gross!
But 20 bucks profit is nothing .. when y say not overplay it
It's not much, but considering it took less than 10 minutes it's pretty good
@@CasinoMatchmaker i want thousand of dollars .
this "system" works for 1 spin, then what lol...
5 wins a day.
Soon adds up !
Which system do you like?
Any martingale is a loser. You can wait 4 or 5 then play and still hit the table limit. I have personally lost 12 times in a row but thankfully the bets were all $5 bets. So I lost $60 instead of the disastrous martingale of over $5000!
You are right, it's certainly a possibility that you can still hit the table limits.
But by being patient and waiting for the pattern of 3, you can reduce this dramatically.
@@CasinoMatchmakerthis is not correct. While I agree the probability of 10 blacks in a row is 0.1%, that figure changes and becomes the exact same 0.75% of having 7 blacks to go come the 4th spin. If we followed your logic, then the probability of having one black in spin #10 would still be 0.1% while it would in fact be 50%. Thi is disingenuous
It is about 805 to 1 that 10 of the same even chance bets come out in a row on a single zero roulette wheel. But on the next spin it is still almost 50/50.
whats the point of risking 40$ for 5$
To win $5
🤣@@CasinoMatchmaker
Very risky strategy! Last year I was gambling on an roulette table en there was 17 times black in a row. If I uses the margin system i lost all my money.😅
Wow that is unusual but yes It can happen !
I like how a traget goal of say $30 dollars is when you stop playing. I always accept the fact that I will lose my bankroll while playing and then it's less of a blow when or if it does happen. If you have a larger bankroll starting with $10 and a Goal of $50 to say, then thatis also a pretty safe way of playing after a 3 hit. Good viedo and yes 10 hits of the same color do happen and it is scary lol.
I will try this, a casino near me has automatic roulette with a proper spinning wheel, so no one operating it to watch what I am doing. It starts from €0.50 per spin so can experiment with small amounts.
the martingale is good
My friend John started betting at a $25 minimum roulette table because 7 reds in came out in a row. So he bet on black $25,50,100,200,400,800 then he quit. The results: first 7 reds then 7 more reds, then a black on the 15th spin. He lost $1575. He was not happy but his next bet would have been $1600 and he would have lost that too and he would not have been able to bet $3200 (which would have won) after that because the table limit was $2000.