Look how casuals and haters are talking about weight and height difference lol casuals there are weight classes and boxers fight within the rules so get a life and stop hating on people for other reasons and hiding behind other excuses
Used the happen a LOT with Nas. The apparent ‘British’ boxing fans hated him and would always support the opponent. Never happens if the boxer is unpigmented however arrogant they may be. The home boxer always gets the support, especially if they were as good as Nas was to watch. We know what that is.
So many casuals in the comments with the “weight bully” nonsense. Imagine if they grew up watching Boxing in the 80’s they’d be calling Tommy Hearn’s or Arguello cheats. LOL.
Really like him, hope he gets the W vs Carlos Adems, but as others have pointed out, he can be a sitting target at times - he needs to work on slipping out of range better.
Should of kept to his long jab more and slipped to the right ducking a little bit under his opponents left and come back with a straight right more but done very well go on my boy may Allah grant him easy victory in every fight.🎉😅😊
Williams is a goof boxer. He's obviously very well trained. Sheeraz is a more accomplished boxer though, longer reach and a harder hitter. The best man won on the night.
What was he doing standing in front of the taller fighter? He should have made him himself more elusive by moving around while utilizing his superior , it would have been a cake walk. He made himself easier to beat by staying in place and allow his opponent to punch down, which has a lot more force than it is going up. It also does not help when he threw no effective body punches instead of those shoe shine punches that went no where. He essentially set up his own defeat and that's just sad.
Wwhat blew my mind was when i looked at floyds record. Floyd had a monster reach for his divisions and the only people in his WHOLE career that had more reach than him were mgregory de la and Paul, and you saw how them went. Ducked anyone with reach like lara, margarito, Khan, Williams etc its no coincidence that fighters like floyd, izzy, jj etc hugely succesful, also had huge reach advantages vs their rivals and fought a reach merchant running style. Combat sport is littered with examples of the less skilled rangier fighter using reach to jab and hug and run to wins vs the more skilled smaller fighter. Recently aj vs ruiz, went to war and aj got whooped, then in the return, aj switched to jabbing hugging and running to an easy W. Usyk was too skilled for this. Usyk is goated. Duran vs Leonard 1, went to war, duran won Duran Leonard 2, Leonard used his reach advantage to run 🏃♂ to what was gonna be an easy victory until Duran quit as he wasn't there to play tag these fighters usually have boring fights because they fights a running defensive reach merchant fight, refusing to take any risk hiding behind reach to get the W. Anderson Silva was the same, Jon jones, great against the smaller guys with 85 reach, but when fighting his own size, like reyes gustaffson etc he arguably lost Its easier to fight defensively with a huge reach advantage but its much harder funking someone up taking a few risks. Speed power timing etc can be improved but reach cannot, and it can be decisive when paired with a defensive style. Khamzat was berated by his coach for going to war instead of using his reach adv to make it an easy fight. Smaller fighter needs to be more skilled than the longer fighter to be successful, like a usyk, pac, tank, dc, canelo mike tyson etc Reach advantage combined with a safety first running style is massively overlooked. Not saying fighters should change how they fight, but that we should recognise why some fighters had the success they did. Izzy is elite, but much of his success was due to his reach advantage vs his rivals. Got outstruck by Jan on the feet, Alex landed more than izzy in their fights, one time he abandoned his safety first reach merchant style vs gastelum and nearly got KOd by a B rated fighter. This is why when these type of fighters face someone their own size, they no longer look like the GOAT striker, they end up going life and death, like jj vs reyes, gustaffson, or izzy vs jan and alex. izzy, silva, gane etc usually stay on the end of their reach, refusing to take any risk. Breaking the shorter man down from where there is no threat of retaliation, before going in for the kill. The shorter fighter has to lunge in to connect and so are at a great disadvantage. Many fighters have had the success they had largely due to this advantage they had vs their rivals. The smaller fighter needs to be more skilled than the longer fighter to overcome this, and even then, e.g with Rob vs izzy, its still very hard Thankfully for us fans, not all fighters with reach fight like this, although they would be more successful if they did but the sport would be dead Izzy said it best himself when he said Costa will be easy as he has t rex arms and won't reach😮
The size and weight difference on fight night is mad, of course he's going to beat someone two weights below him on the night...... it's called weight bullying.
“Weight bullying” lol. Do you say the same for the likes of Tommy Hearn’s or Alexis Arguello? Absolute clown. The guy has a skinny frame, he can make the weight. Boxing is full of casuals these days.
@ Bro, that makes no sense. Adames has a 75% ko ratio to Ammo’s 70% and more experience. And Adames has the better resume. So, please explain to me how he is more powerful. Don’t just say things to say them.
👉 Jesus: The only true God is The Father! (john 17.3) 🤦 The Church: No! You're also a true god! 👉 Jesus: By myself I can do nothing! (john 5.30) 🤦 The Church: No! You can do everything! 👉 Jesus: The Lord our God is ONE! (mark 12.29) 🤦 The Church: No! The lord our god is three in one! 👉 Jesus: If you want eternal life then keep The Commandments! (Matt 19.17) 🤦 The Church: No! If you want eternal life then believe that Jesus died for your sins! 👉 Jesus: I cried and prayed to God PBTH to save me from the crucifixion and God heard my prayers! (Matt 26.36) 🤦 The Church: No! God didn't save him so we can be saved by his bl0u1d! 👉 Jesus: My Father is greater than I, my Father is greater than all! (John 14.28) 🤦 The Church: No! The Father is not greater than you, you're both co-equal! 👉 Jesus: I was sent ONLY to the lost sheep of Israel, not the g3.n.tiles! (Matt 15.23, 10.5) 🤦 The Church: No! You were sent to the entire world! 👉 Jesus : sir. Kmcise male children as God Commanded! (Luke 2.21) 🤦 The Church: No! Sir. Kumci.sion is unnecessary and will profit us nothing. This is what Paul said, the one you came to in a dream!..
GROSS: So Jesus saw himself as the messiah. What else did that mean in its time? EHRMAN: Well, a lot of Christians today have a wrong idea about what the messiah was supposed to be. The word messiah is a Hebrew word that literally means the anointed one. This was used in reference to the kings of Israel. The ancient kings of Israel, when they became king during the coronation ceremony, would have oil poured on their head as a sign of divine favor. And so the king of Israel was called God's anointed one, the messiah. There came a point at which there was no longer a king ruling Israel, and some Jewish thinkers began to maintain that there would be a future king of Israel, a future anointed one, and they called that one the messiah. And so the messiah for most Jews simply referred to the future king of Israel. And so when Jesus told his disciples that he himself was the messiah, he was saying that in the future, when God establishes the kingdom once more, I myself will be the king of that kingdom. And so it's not that the messiah was supposed to be God. The messiah was not supposed to be God. The messiah was a human being So did Jesus' earliest followers consider him to be God? EHRMAN: Well, what I argue in the book is that during his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God and that none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. The way it works is that you do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, our last Gospel. Jesus says things like: Before Abraham was, I am, and I and the father are one, and if you've seen me, you've see the father. These are all statements that you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier Gospels, and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things about him. I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make. So this is not an unusual view among scholars. It's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understand of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate. GROSS: Jesus was referred to as the king of the Jews. Did he call himself that, and what did that mean it is time? Do we know? Can we have any idea what that meant in its time? EHRMAN: Yeah, we do know, and actually to be a king of the Jews simply meant literally, being the king over Israel. It is a very difficult question to get to, what Jesus taught about himself because of the nature of our gospels, but one thing is relatively certain, that that the reason the Romans crucified Jesus was precisely because he was calling himself the king of Israel. Now, Jesus obviously was not the king. So what might he have meant by it? Well, what scholars have long thought is that Jesus was talking about not being put on the throne by means of some kind of political show of power, but that Jesus thought the world as he knew it was coming to an end and God was going to bring in a kingdom, a new kingdom in which there would be no more injustice or oppression or poverty or suffering of any kind. And in this kingdom, Jesus appears to have thought that he himself would be the future king. And so Jesus meant this not in the regular political sense but in a kind of apocalyptic sense, that at the end of the age, this is what was going to happen: he was going to be installed as king.
A prophet is someone SENT by God, God is not a prophet by definition, they are mutually exclusive. If this man was GOD, he would never have claimed to be a prophet or called a prophet by those who saw him. Matthew 21:11 And the crowds were saying, “This is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth in Galilee.”
Luke 7:16 Fear gripped them all, and they began glorifying God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!” John 4:19 The woman *said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. Matthew 21:46 When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet. John 6:14 Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.” John 7:40 Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.” John 9:17 So they *said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.” Luke 24:19 And He said to them, “What things?” And they said to Him, “The things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people, Mark 6:15 But others were saying, “He is Elijah.” And others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.” Mark 8:28 They told Him, saying, “John the Baptist; and others say Elijah; but others, one of the prophets.” Luke 9:8 and by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen again. OK, so Jesus doesnt refute anybody calling him a Prophet, he reaffirms it😇 Luke 13:33 . . . . I must proceed on my way. For it wouldn’t do for a prophet of God to be kwil. Led except in Jerusalem. Mark 6:3-4 Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply off. nded and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A prophet is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family”. In the above two verses, Jesus called himself a prophet. There are also many verses indicating that during his lifetime on earth the people in Judea and Galilee regarded him as a prophet. Regarding the verses in which Jesus says that he is equal to God (mainly in the Gospel of John) most scholars believe that Jesus never said that. It was what people started saying about him after his deaff and put on his lips in the Gospels written at least 4 decades later.,
Jesus Christ not God. It is clear from the verses below that he was indeed 100% man. John 17.3...jesus says to the father...that they may know you, THE ONLY TRUE GOD and Jesus whom you sent. John 20.17 Jesus says....I am ascending to my father and your father, my God and your God. Acts 2:22 “Men of Israel, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know. 1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. Numbers 23:19 God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man… Numbers 23:19 (NRSV) God is not a human being, that he should lie, or a mortal… Hosea 11:9 For I am God, and not man- the Holy One among you..
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Look how casuals and haters are talking about weight and height difference lol casuals there are weight classes and boxers fight within the rules so get a life and stop hating on people for other reasons and hiding behind other excuses
They all saying this now because the Muslim was Victorious... Tyson fury... 6ft
9 fought pple 5ft 11 what a turd..
Used the happen a LOT with Nas. The apparent ‘British’ boxing fans hated him and would always support the opponent. Never happens if the boxer is unpigmented however arrogant they may be. The home boxer always gets the support, especially if they were as good as Nas was to watch. We know what that is.
@ oh yeah they Muslims innit so we gotta hate them lol typical haters
So many casuals in the comments with the “weight bully” nonsense. Imagine if they grew up watching Boxing in the 80’s they’d be calling Tommy Hearn’s or Arguello cheats. LOL.
Sheeraz looks the finished product but defense needs to be up... especially if he is to go up against someone like Janibek, who hits very hard
What a fight... amazing match up, both did good, but the best man won.
Sheeraz needs to work on his defence that's for sure.
Yeh, i remember when MIKE tyson used to tower over every person he ever fought....😅 weirdos who know nothing about boxing.🙄
Hamza needs better head movement
That was boxing 🥊
Really like him, hope he gets the W vs Carlos Adems, but as others have pointed out, he can be a sitting target at times - he needs to work on slipping out of range better.
Should of kept to his long jab more and slipped to the right ducking a little bit under his opponents left and come back with a straight right more but done very well go on my boy may Allah grant him easy victory in every fight.🎉😅😊
Muuuuuy bonita pelea deberian de pasarlas en Mexico tambien,saludos desde Navojoa Sonora Mexico 🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽.
Hamza smashed it fairplay cz !!!
Did not see any head movement from shiraz,
That was exactly I was thinking next time you teach him
Williams is a goof boxer. He's obviously very well trained. Sheeraz is a more accomplished boxer though, longer reach and a harder hitter. The best man won on the night.
Good fight! 👍🏻💪🏻
Superb fight
A saying in boxing " a good big un will beat a good little un"
💩 highlights. Missed the combination that hurt Williams right before the stoppage
Good fight that
I don't understand this editor...
Could have gone either way!
The weight and height difference paid off.
What was he doing standing in front of the taller fighter? He should have made him himself more elusive by moving around while utilizing his superior , it would have been a cake walk. He made himself easier to beat by staying in place and allow his opponent to punch down, which has a lot more force than it is going up. It also does not help when he threw no effective body punches instead of those shoe shine punches that went no where. He essentially set up his own defeat and that's just sad.
Skills pay the bills
And they had the wrong gameplan
Trying to exchange and bang with Sheeraz was a terrible idea
Wwhat blew my mind was when i looked at floyds record. Floyd had a monster reach for his divisions and the only people in his WHOLE career that had more reach than him were mgregory de la and Paul, and you saw how them went. Ducked anyone with reach like lara, margarito, Khan, Williams etc
its no coincidence that fighters like floyd, izzy, jj etc hugely succesful, also had huge reach advantages vs their rivals and fought a reach merchant running style.
Combat sport is littered with examples of the less skilled rangier fighter using reach to jab and hug and run to wins vs the more skilled smaller fighter.
Recently aj vs ruiz, went to war and aj got whooped, then in the return, aj switched to jabbing hugging and running to an easy W. Usyk was too skilled for this. Usyk is goated.
Duran vs Leonard 1, went to war, duran won
Duran Leonard 2, Leonard used his reach advantage to run 🏃♂ to what was gonna be an easy victory until Duran quit as he wasn't there to play tag
these fighters usually have boring fights because they fights a running defensive reach merchant fight, refusing to take any risk hiding behind reach to get the W. Anderson Silva was the same, Jon jones, great against the smaller guys with 85 reach, but when fighting his own size, like reyes gustaffson etc he arguably lost
Its easier to fight defensively with a huge reach advantage but its much harder funking someone up taking a few risks.
Speed power timing etc can be improved but reach cannot, and it can be decisive when paired with a defensive style.
Khamzat was berated by his coach for going to war instead of using his reach adv to make it an easy fight.
Smaller fighter needs to be more skilled than the longer fighter to be successful, like a usyk, pac, tank, dc, canelo mike tyson etc
Reach advantage combined with a safety first running style is massively overlooked. Not saying fighters should change how they fight, but that we should recognise why some fighters had the success they did.
Izzy is elite, but much of his success was due to his reach advantage vs his rivals. Got outstruck by Jan on the feet, Alex landed more than izzy in their fights, one time he abandoned his safety first reach merchant style vs gastelum and nearly got KOd by a B rated fighter.
This is why when these type of fighters face someone their own size, they no longer look like the GOAT striker, they end up going life and death, like jj vs reyes, gustaffson, or izzy vs jan and alex.
izzy, silva, gane etc usually stay on the end of their reach, refusing to take any risk. Breaking the shorter man down from where there is no threat of retaliation, before going in for the kill. The shorter fighter has to lunge in to connect and so are at a great disadvantage. Many fighters have had the success they had largely due to this advantage they had vs their rivals. The smaller fighter needs to be more skilled than the longer fighter to overcome this, and even then, e.g with Rob vs izzy, its still very hard
Thankfully for us fans, not all fighters with reach fight like this, although they would be more successful if they did but the sport would be dead
Izzy said it best himself when he said Costa will be easy as he has t rex arms and won't reach😮
Height, size, weight, style, fight, fairness. I get it. Similar size and weight?
The size difference? Gotta say Ammo did a really good job considering the difference in the weight.
That's why he had some success. Lighter guys are faster and throw more combos
Hamzah needs to up in weight.
That was a great fight by both guys awesome 👌
Are they in the same weight class?
Yes
They wouldn't be in the same ring otherwise, boxing is very strict on weight class.
Yes you casual clown
No any weight Can jump in and start a fight, this is back garden brawls. Welcome to boxing, do abit more research ull get their.
Yep, this can happen but not in tittle fight!! For a tittle, the both boxers have to have same wieght!!@@MrSidkhan1
looks Pacquaio vs Margarito.. except Margarito recieved a face massage.😂 17 pounds difference during fight night. but this one i don't know..
Add the weights in the gloves too.
Brother Hamza needs to more powerful, footwork and accurate.
Why? Did he lose the fight or something?
How did they weigh this? Looks Ammo's a featherweight fighting against a welterweight.
This was a middleweight bout
The size and weight difference on fight night is mad, of course he's going to beat someone two weights below him on the night...... it's called weight bullying.
Uneducated guy. You need to understand boxing is all about weight class and at least he made 160 at weight class not height u 🔔
The days of Ken Buchanan are long gone....today's best British boxers have names like Hamed, Yafai, Khan and Sheeraz. Get used to it.
Not really. Hes just taller. Ammo is a lot more muscle bounda than sheeraz.
You fool the weight is the same 😂
“Weight bullying” lol. Do you say the same for the likes of Tommy Hearn’s or Alexis Arguello? Absolute clown. The guy has a skinny frame, he can make the weight. Boxing is full of casuals these days.
Biased ammo Williams highlights
Bloody good fight!
ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلَّٰهِ
الله أكبر
لا إله إلا الله
Better not allow Adames to hit you like that though because it will be a different story.
Ammo much more powerful than Adames.
@ Bro, that makes no sense. Adames has a 75% ko ratio to Ammo’s 70% and more experience. And Adames has the better resume. So, please explain to me how he is more powerful. Don’t just say things to say them.
@@ekoflow77 It's not quite as simple as pulling out KO stats, bottomline Ammo is bigger and more explosive than the former 154lb Adames.
Hamzah sheetaz has no speed and is very slow
Hamzah smashed him haha
Who is Promoting These Ameature Boxing Card 👎👎
Your sister ❤
@mrraheel8875 Shut Up
@@mrraheel8875😂😂😂💀💀💀💀
Weight bully, hella lame
👉 Jesus: The only true God is The Father! (john 17.3)
🤦 The Church: No! You're also a true god!
👉 Jesus: By myself I can do nothing! (john 5.30)
🤦 The Church: No! You can do everything!
👉 Jesus: The Lord our God is ONE! (mark 12.29)
🤦 The Church: No! The lord our god is three in one!
👉 Jesus: If you want eternal life then keep The Commandments! (Matt 19.17)
🤦 The Church: No! If you want eternal life then believe that Jesus died for your sins!
👉 Jesus: I cried and prayed to God PBTH to save me from the crucifixion and God heard my prayers! (Matt 26.36)
🤦 The Church: No! God didn't save him so we can be saved by his bl0u1d!
👉 Jesus: My Father is greater than I, my Father is greater than all! (John 14.28)
🤦 The Church: No! The Father is not greater than you, you're both co-equal!
👉 Jesus: I was sent ONLY to the lost sheep of Israel, not the g3.n.tiles! (Matt 15.23, 10.5)
🤦 The Church: No! You were sent to the entire world!
👉 Jesus : sir. Kmcise male children as God Commanded! (Luke 2.21)
🤦 The Church: No! Sir. Kumci.sion is unnecessary and will profit us nothing. This is what Paul said, the one you came to in a dream!..
GROSS: So Jesus saw himself as the messiah. What else did that mean in its time?
EHRMAN: Well, a lot of Christians today have a wrong idea about what the messiah was supposed to be. The word messiah is a Hebrew word that literally means the anointed one. This was used in reference to the kings of Israel. The ancient kings of Israel, when they became king during the coronation ceremony, would have oil poured on their head as a sign of divine favor.
And so the king of Israel was called God's anointed one, the messiah. There came a point at which there was no longer a king ruling Israel, and some Jewish thinkers began to maintain that there would be a future king of Israel, a future anointed one, and they called that one the messiah. And so the messiah for most Jews simply referred to the future king of Israel.
And so when Jesus told his disciples that he himself was the messiah, he was saying that in the future, when God establishes the kingdom once more, I myself will be the king of that kingdom. And so it's not that the messiah was supposed to be God. The messiah was not supposed to be God. The messiah was a human being
So did Jesus' earliest followers consider him to be God?
EHRMAN: Well, what I argue in the book is that during his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God and that none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. The way it works is that you do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, our last Gospel. Jesus says things like: Before Abraham was, I am, and I and the father are one, and if you've seen me, you've see the father.
These are all statements that you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier Gospels, and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things about him. I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make.
So this is not an unusual view among scholars. It's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understand of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate.
GROSS: Jesus was referred to as the king of the Jews. Did he call himself that, and what did that mean it is time? Do we know? Can we have any idea what that meant in its time?
EHRMAN: Yeah, we do know, and actually to be a king of the Jews simply meant literally, being the king over Israel. It is a very difficult question to get to, what Jesus taught about himself because of the nature of our gospels, but one thing is relatively certain, that that the reason the Romans crucified Jesus was precisely because he was calling himself the king of Israel.
Now, Jesus obviously was not the king. So what might he have meant by it? Well, what scholars have long thought is that Jesus was talking about not being put on the throne by means of some kind of political show of power, but that Jesus thought the world as he knew it was coming to an end and God was going to bring in a kingdom, a new kingdom in which there would be no more injustice or oppression or poverty or suffering of any kind.
And in this kingdom, Jesus appears to have thought that he himself would be the future king. And so Jesus meant this not in the regular political sense but in a kind of apocalyptic sense, that at the end of the age, this is what was going to happen: he was going to be installed as king.
A prophet is someone SENT by God, God is not a prophet by definition, they are mutually exclusive.
If this man was GOD, he would never have claimed to be a prophet or called a prophet by those who saw him.
Matthew 21:11
And the crowds were saying, “This is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth in Galilee.”
Luke 7:16
Fear gripped them all, and they began glorifying God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!”
John 4:19
The woman *said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet.
Matthew 21:46
When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet.
John 6:14
Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.”
John 7:40
Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.”
John 9:17
So they *said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.”
Luke 24:19
And He said to them, “What things?” And they said to Him, “The things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people,
Mark 6:15
But others were saying, “He is Elijah.” And others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.”
Mark 8:28
They told Him, saying, “John the Baptist; and others say Elijah; but others, one of the prophets.”
Luke 9:8
and by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen again.
OK, so Jesus doesnt refute anybody calling him a Prophet, he reaffirms it😇
Luke 13:33 . . . . I must proceed on my way. For it wouldn’t do for a prophet of God to be kwil. Led except in Jerusalem.
Mark 6:3-4 Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply off. nded and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A prophet is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family”.
In the above two verses, Jesus called himself a prophet. There are also many verses indicating that during his lifetime on earth the people in Judea and Galilee regarded him as a prophet.
Regarding the verses in which Jesus says that he is equal to God (mainly in the Gospel of John) most scholars believe that Jesus never said that. It was what people started saying about him after his deaff and put on his lips in the Gospels written at least 4 decades later.,
Jesus Christ not God. It is clear from the verses below that he was indeed 100% man.
John 17.3...jesus says to the father...that they may know you, THE ONLY TRUE GOD and Jesus whom you sent.
John 20.17 Jesus says....I am ascending to my father and your father, my God and your God.
Acts 2:22
“Men of Israel, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know.
1 Timothy 2:5
For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.
Numbers 23:19
God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man…
Numbers 23:19 (NRSV)
God is not a human being, that he should lie, or a mortal…
Hosea 11:9
For I am God, and not man- the Holy One among you..