logically, I get what you mean.... i'm just wondering about differences in the traffic that gets blocked at WAF vs network layer firewall.... can you give some examples?
I am also of the opinion that the WAF should be behind the Network Firewall. Unless the App is on some third-party server like AWS... If it is on-site, it will be behind the Network Firewall.
The WAF come usually after the NWF. Never saw WAF coming first ! From there, I won't trust personally this channel. Sounds a beginner summarizing his current skills
well, I do not agree with this flow. To me, it does not make any sense at all if we have to waste more resource to protect layer 7 and then to lower level. Security has to start from the lowest level, where the resource consumption and process can be performed faster and more efficiently. So to me, the traffic has to hit network firewall first and then WAF.
@dmezzio Thank you for your comment. In other words, the network won't be secured if we place WAF before traditional or network FW ? The I understand your approach is like saying both all network based traffic and web applications traffic will go thru NWF ( network Firewall ) First the both network traffic and applications traffic go through WAF in order to reach the server ? I think this channel explanation is simple . It's like his network architecture is designed in such a way that web applications user traffic go straight to waf first then that traffic goes to network firewall which in my opinion I don't see any security issues here unless you have one to share with us . Thanks
Hi, shouldn't WAF be behind the perimeter FW? Thanks
logically, I get what you mean.... i'm just wondering about differences in the traffic that gets blocked at WAF vs network layer firewall.... can you give some examples?
Shouldn't the WAF be behind the network firewall rather than in front of it?
The WAF works on layer 7 and a network firewall on layer 3,4.
I am also of the opinion that the WAF should be behind the Network Firewall.
Unless the App is on some third-party server like AWS... If it is on-site, it will be behind the Network Firewall.
Definitely waiting on more Cloud content from you, Thanks mate keep it going👏🏼👏🏼
New video coming soon!
what are the most affordable WAF's over there ?
It all depends on what features do you need in a WAF and your budget.
@@houseofsecurenetwork6597 need to scan the web site and remove all spam.
Thanks for the video and greets from Germany
Thanks for watching!
Hey nice presentation!
- hey can u give review bout waf hardware.. thxs best regards
Thanks, sure very soon!
Very simple and awesome explanation
Thank you!
Thank you
Good video.
The WAF come usually after the NWF. Never saw WAF coming first ! From there, I won't trust personally this channel. Sounds a beginner summarizing his current skills
Thanks for letting me know. There are multiple ways to design a network architecture. I hope you’re experienced enough to know that!
well, I do not agree with this flow. To me, it does not make any sense at all if we have to waste more resource to protect layer 7 and then to lower level. Security has to start from the lowest level, where the resource consumption and process can be performed faster and more efficiently. So to me, the traffic has to hit network firewall first and then WAF.
@dmezzio Thank you for your comment. In other words, the network won't be secured if we place WAF before traditional or network FW ?
The I understand your approach is like saying both all network based traffic and web applications traffic will go thru NWF ( network Firewall ) First the both network traffic and applications traffic go through WAF in order to reach the server ?
I think this channel explanation is simple . It's like his network architecture is designed in such a way that web applications user traffic go straight to waf first then that traffic goes to network firewall which in my opinion I don't see any security issues here unless you have one to share with us .
Thanks