Opportunity cost and comparative advantage using an output table | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 40

  • @sherrypruitt8116
    @sherrypruitt8116 5 лет назад +36

    It literally took me like two hours and I tried to read a chapter twice on this and got nowhere.. watched this 10 min video once and completely understand now what I’m supposed to do for my homework 😂

  • @jhinukbhattacharjee188
    @jhinukbhattacharjee188 5 лет назад +22

    What would I do without Khan Academy 😢 ? Thank you Mr Philanthropist for creating such a channel 😁

    • @basimsheikh2391
      @basimsheikh2391 4 года назад

      Can you please tell me why we are studying this topic again and again?

    • @blonm793
      @blonm793 4 года назад

      @@basimsheikh2391 because you are

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 3 года назад

      @@basimsheikh2391 This Channel here reminds me of Hbomberguy;
      my Favorite Place to learn and laugh wihile doing so.
      Well, that and Veritasium.

    • @randydiaz323
      @randydiaz323 2 года назад +1

      @@basimsheikh2391 maybe because people don't understand trade improving everyone's benefit, specifically from political groups on all sides being against free trade.
      Even if you are a smaller person/economy there is something you can add to the bigger person/economy

  • @zka9699
    @zka9699 Год назад

    Thank you for your explaination, i have been confused about how to calculate the OC of each part for long time. I just remembered it without really understand it. Thank you so much!!!

  • @abadahmedaijaz1292
    @abadahmedaijaz1292 4 месяца назад

    Thank you so much. After listening to your explanation i have finally understand it.

  • @Monica-jq4gy
    @Monica-jq4gy 3 года назад +2

    this guy rocks !!!

  • @speakyourself7920
    @speakyourself7920 5 лет назад +16

    In our university, they taught us that to get the opportunity cost, you divide the figure in the upper box by the figure in the lower box. In this sense, the opportunitu cost of producing 1 ball would be 8/6 socks. I'm really confused right now

    • @mattdathew2794
      @mattdathew2794 3 года назад +4

      box positions aren't constant, u can flip em' anytime

    • @redzodiac
      @redzodiac Год назад +2

      It doesn't work that way

  • @welearnbetter7466
    @welearnbetter7466 4 года назад +6

    Simple and useful like Sal usually is :)

  • @aswaaswanaik5549
    @aswaaswanaik5549 3 года назад +1

    Sir super explanation

  • @neonlight6771
    @neonlight6771 7 лет назад +7

    love you sal keep doing this!

  • @indiann871
    @indiann871 2 года назад

    Wow,what an explanation !

  • @mostafasaad1878
    @mostafasaad1878 7 лет назад +2

    Good Explaning! Thx!

  • @Anonymouse13
    @Anonymouse13 4 года назад

    I have to ask, our lecturer says we must deduct the OC from the net profit. Why oh why? Is the OC of say £1000 ACTUALLY deducted from the net profits, where does it go if so? Seems bonkers haha Please help

  • @abishekgupta1610
    @abishekgupta1610 Год назад

    what to do if opportunity cost for both countries is lower in producing basket balls?

  • @naa-idarfrancis109
    @naa-idarfrancis109 6 лет назад +1

    FANTASTIC

  • @randiaz95
    @randiaz95 6 лет назад

    What about the opportunity costs given a portfolio of 3 products? would we do this pairwise or should we make the something like 4b = 4s = 4h?

  • @jorgemoralesmeoqui5324
    @jorgemoralesmeoqui5324 7 лет назад +2

    The reformulation of Ricardo's numerical example in terms of opportunity costs by Gottfried von Haberler was based on a crucial misinterpretation. See:
    www.academia.edu/32214661/Ricardo_s_Numerical_Example_Versus_Ricardian_Trade_Model_A_Comparison_of_Two_Distinct_Notions_of_Comparative_Advantage

    • @akashp01
      @akashp01 3 года назад +1

      I found your link and has been reading through your other works, they're very insightful. I still haven't finished reading this paper totally before I was drawn to your other article concerning comparative advantage and the labour theory of value.
      Your articles have taken away the fog I so long had but I never knew,
      Your exposition of Sraffa and thorough reading of classical literature vis-a-vis its twisted modern counterpart has me thoroughly engaged.

    • @jorgemoralesmeoqui5324
      @jorgemoralesmeoqui5324 3 года назад

      @@akashp01 Thank you for your kind comment. I am very pleased to read that my papers were useful to you.

  • @mochinsaniimamutomo6195
    @mochinsaniimamutomo6195 7 лет назад

    damn i was learning this like 3 weeks ago

  • @TheGbelcher
    @TheGbelcher 7 лет назад

    If you were to extend the derivatives into an additional dimension it explains how Trumpism works.

  • @adr4130
    @adr4130 5 лет назад

    and "BASKETBALLS"

  • @bradendredge6809
    @bradendredge6809 3 года назад

    Notes

    • @bradendredge6809
      @bradendredge6809 3 года назад +1

      It's really interesting to see examples of how the absolute advantage is different than the comparative advantage. Even though one country could produce more shoes than the other per day, the first country would have no basketballs. So specialization would be much more favorable.

  • @libyanal-arab4168
    @libyanal-arab4168 7 лет назад +1

    First one 😁 it's weekend we don't need to watch this😑

  • @sriramnagarajanit
    @sriramnagarajanit 7 лет назад

    cost uh

  • @sriramnagarajanit
    @sriramnagarajanit 7 лет назад

    onumae puriyalae ulagathulae

  • @cj4216
    @cj4216 7 лет назад +1

    Omg lolololololol lolololol my teacher showed this videos in fourth grad and I can tell this isn’t very fun, omg hate

  • @sriramnagarajanit
    @sriramnagarajanit 7 лет назад

    onumae puriyalae ulagathulae

    • @rupasuhag8536
      @rupasuhag8536 4 года назад

      ????

    • @sriramnagarajanit
      @sriramnagarajanit 4 года назад

      @@rupasuhag8536 I couldn't understand anything in this world , it's jus our local phrase we utter when one couldn't understand.