ive found more success with 2 Arknoite Defense Crystals instead of the 2 Speaker Stompers. Its very awkward playing the stompers and they often end up your fizzle snap. By swapping them with the starship pieces you get infinite armor and something to put in the middle of the game that can stall well! THANK YOU CLARK!!! This deck is SO FUN!!! You always play varied and cool decks thats why i follow you!
Makes sense too, if you can play Ceaseless Expanse every turn, you don’t really need the disruption from Speaker Stomper to protect it. Inevitably they will run out of ways to clear it.
i was wondering, this might probably loose to a rogue starship with the hunter starship piece => infinity -> get twice 20/30 damage, meaning once on infinity, and once on you... It is also heavily loosing to DK Helya. knowing ladder is full of shaman and DK, mostly..
Regarding Sonya: I think it’s a little bit unfair that Sonya works on discounted cards but other cards which have a similar mechanic won’t do that. For example pet parrot in hunter does not repeat alien encounter when it’s reduced to 1 mana. I mean I couldn’t care less about pet parrot but it bothers me that this mechanic is inconsistent
When an effect happens when you play a card it counts mana paid - when it is something checking previously played cards it checks for original cost. So it does have its consistency and additionally I'd like to add that it is probably better that way because if these two events would check for the same variable then these two would execute (almost) the same, thus granting less variability and in turn being more boring due to seeing the same interactions even more. Well at least that is how I see it.
That makes sense or rather must be the correct explanation, thanks! I still think that the difference does not emerge from the wording on the cards properly. I believe pip the potent also copies discounted cards and thirsty drifter checks on previously played cards for the discount. I get the point with the variability but it still feels kinda inconsistent to me
technically its ceasless ceaselesses
The best kind of correct!
ive found more success with 2 Arknoite Defense Crystals instead of the 2 Speaker Stompers. Its very awkward playing the stompers and they often end up your fizzle snap. By swapping them with the starship pieces you get infinite armor and something to put in the middle of the game that can stall well!
THANK YOU CLARK!!! This deck is SO FUN!!! You always play varied and cool decks thats why i follow you!
I found out that Defense crystal can be a counter to dummy warrior! Great choice
Makes sense too, if you can play Ceaseless Expanse every turn, you don’t really need the disruption from Speaker Stomper to protect it. Inevitably they will run out of ways to clear it.
ok THIS deck is so fun what the heck?
Ceaseless Discharge
Keep up the good work, Clark
She cease on my less till' I expansed
Been having a ton of success with this super easy if you’re used to playing cycle
Now you need to tech in a miracle salesman to trade for the Snapshot lol
Beautiful ending :D
I get that you need hand space, but, why not fizzle while the snapshot is in hand?
Can't go infinite without shadow stepping fizzle and shadow step is in the snap shot
i was wondering, this might probably loose to a rogue starship with the hunter starship piece => infinity -> get twice 20/30 damage, meaning once on infinity, and once on you... It is also heavily loosing to DK Helya. knowing ladder is full of shaman and DK, mostly..
Another way to do it is amalgam with death growl
jajajajaaajajaj what an ending for the clip! ahhahahah genius! hahahahaa
Regarding Sonya: I think it’s a little bit unfair that Sonya works on discounted cards but other cards which have a similar mechanic won’t do that. For example pet parrot in hunter does not repeat alien encounter when it’s reduced to 1 mana. I mean I couldn’t care less about pet parrot but it bothers me that this mechanic is inconsistent
When an effect happens when you play a card it counts mana paid - when it is something checking previously played cards it checks for original cost. So it does have its consistency and additionally I'd like to add that it is probably better that way because if these two events would check for the same variable then these two would execute (almost) the same, thus granting less variability and in turn being more boring due to seeing the same interactions even more. Well at least that is how I see it.
That makes sense or rather must be the correct explanation, thanks! I still think that the difference does not emerge from the wording on the cards properly. I believe pip the potent also copies discounted cards and thirsty drifter checks on previously played cards for the discount. I get the point with the variability but it still feels kinda inconsistent to me
6:25 What is the Yogg-Starship interaction he mentions?
The hunter starship piece that attacks a minion when played.
@guitaraffa woah!!
Why so late, I have to wake in 5 hours😢
XDDDDDDDDD
1