Now that the feminists have gotten their foot in the door with that last 'whatever its supposed to be', if the boys got back together the film would be called sexist.
To the sexists that treat the 1984 version of Ghostbusters (and its sequel) like overrated mediocrity and praise the 2016 version like one of its directors (Paul Feig) was right to maturely (NOT! - Wayne Campbell) rage like "F*ck the haters. And haters, attack me all you want but when you attack and insult my cast, you've crossed the line. Grow up and leave my cast alone.”... m.ruclips.net/video/nc_LIR5ExIU/видео.html
@@Kee2Oz Corporate entities want us to argue about the gender stuff. The problem with the 2016 version isn't that the cast is female, the problem is that it is a hollow attempt to revive a franchise that was built on the talents of those that worked on the original. If you cast the film with male comedy film actors of the present it would have sucked just as much. Like other classic films, the original Ghostbusters cannot be duplicated.
I find it interesting that two middle aged guys in the 80s complained that there was not ENOUGH break dancing in a break dancing movie. A lot of parents back then would have rolled their eyes at the entire concept.
Siskel was in his late 30s and Ebert was in his early 40s... they still thought of themselves as young adults or cool dads. They were frequent guests and friends of Howard Stern... they would have never set foot in that show if they had an old guy mentality.
That's what made them beloved and set them apart from the other established critics of their time. Every film they looked at was discussed on the merits based off how it was promoted, what each story entailed (no matter how serious or ridiculous it may be) and if they were competently made, or at least entertaining. Films like these would often surprise them at either how bad they were or surprisingly good they could be. One of Ebert's favorite guilty pleasures was "Inframan", and Siskel was fond of "Species" and "The Delta Force" despite how trashed it was by his comrades including his television partner Roger Ebert.
I had never heard of Beat Street until just a few days ago when I saw it on TV. I liked it for its glimpse into the early Eighties hip-hop/breakdancing/graffiti culture in NY (I'm a fan, so...), but Roger's critique of it was also accurate.
Consider these two guys, man. They could have been stiff middle aged white dudes in the 80s, stubborn and stuck in their generation, opposed to new ideas and art forms, but they were not. They respected everyone from all walks of life and were open minded and accepting of all cultures and peoples. "I wish there was more breakdancing." Isn't that something? These guys were way ahead of their time and were true critics. They judged based on how good the story and movie was, not on whether or not they agreed or related to the time, place and unique background of the characters. A good example of this is their review of the seminal '91 masterpiece "Boys N The Hood" and their review of Spike Lee's "Do the Right Thing." I just adore them and am so happy to have these to watch.
In the clip for "They're Playing with Fire," the lines are practically identical to the lines for a scene in "The Teacher" (1974) starring Angel Tompkins.
The first two reviews dragged for me just wanted them to get to Ghostbusters! Ebert's review was spot-on. It still stands up today as one of the ulitmate Blockbusters.
Really didn't know that? Of course I disagree with that. But then we all have unpopular opinions like that. I'm not a big fan of either The Shining or 2001. Them disliking BR doesn't make them bad critics.
Here’s a fun fact.....bill murrays role was written for john belushi. He was actually writing a line for him when dan akkroyd got the news that he had passed. Could you imagine ghostbusters with belushi? I love Murray but you’ve gotta wonder
@@michaelblaine6494 He was named Egghead. Akkroyd originally planned this after Neighbors but after Belushi's passing teamed up with Murray, Ramis and Reitman after they finished Stripes.
I think with Belushi, the movie would have been less dry humor, more obviously laugh out loud humor. But, I think either version would have probably been very good.
i dont even know what to say about giving Breakin more credit than Beat Street. Breakin was a fun goofy film for what it is and i liked it back in the day. but Beat Street was far more realistic and had a lot more going on than just the dancing. i think Beat Street was at least really trying to tell a story and show the life some people were living, Breakin was just a basic story as an excuse to show the dancing.
I disagree with Ebert on this...It was more reality than Breakin and had a less Hollywood happy ending.....In Beat street it was about making it but at the end realizing your friends are who matter.
And there it is, The Cliffhanger of Siskel & Ebert, The 2 men along side the Rated K gang that led me to becoming a Reviewer. That's Something I need to add to the Arsenal of my own vids.
Not a chance. Watch the movies again. One is exclusively about dancing, the other isn't. Beat Street is still better. but MUCH less dancing for my taste, which disappointed me when I saw it.
Oh man, I saw Les compères with my French class! Hadn't thought about it in decades. I'm sure it was very educational... there was certainly nothing interesting going on in the plot to distract us from the language.
Sibyl Danny. Wow. One good thing about Breakdancers is they clean up the floor pretty well. I agree with the Father, the son is going about in so many cases messing up the place. So no. 'A Paranormal Pest Control Service'. A very trite description of Ghostbusters. Ghostbusters is brilliant on all levels. A great script, great dialogue, great acting, great, effects and it all brilliantly fits together. I love Ghostbusters. It's rich with possibility too. I think I like less of the films that Siskel liked.
Don't expect Roger or Gene to understand hip hop. Breakin' was a goofy fun b-movie with fun music. Beat Street was a great depiction of Hip Hop in the 80s with a realistic story and not the corny fluff that breaking had.
Les Comperes is classic and it was regularly shown on TV in many countries - I guess Americans simply don't get it. Even as a kid I thought it was much superior to Ghostbusters. As to the other 2 films - no one has ever heard of them on this side of Atlantic.
They were right about Beat Street in that the camera was way too close to many of the moves and that Breakin' focussed much more on the love of dancing and how much it meant, although Breakin' is an inferior movie and much more bubble gum. For example, when they practice in the garage, go to the beach to show dancers loving it, etc. Then again, Beat Street did focus more on the graffiti, but that part was terrible.
Focused on graffiti with Ramo as the passionate graff writer, deejaying with Kenny climbing the ladder from house parties to big city discos, and Lee being part of a breaking crew rivaling another local breaking crew.
Fathers Day is better than Les Comperes because it's done less like a remake and by proper comedians like Billy Crystal and Robin Williams not Gerard Depardieu amd Pierre Bouchard and Directed by the same guy who directed Ghostbusters the great comedy director Ivan Reitman
I agree with ebert that Breaking was a better depiction of the break dance/hip hop culture and scene in the city.this was not a real as that films version.....
9:58 is why I loved Roger. He was always so open minded to new ideas, new forms of art, early champion of internet journalism. He will be missed.
Which Ebert-validated Internet journalism do you think was the most successful?
Ghostbusters was a masterpiece. Better than 1941. Those guys should do another sequel.
Now that the feminists have gotten their foot in the door with that last 'whatever its supposed to be', if the boys got back together the film would be called sexist.
To the sexists that treat the 1984 version of Ghostbusters (and its sequel) like overrated mediocrity and praise the 2016 version like one of its directors (Paul Feig) was right to maturely (NOT! - Wayne Campbell) rage like "F*ck the haters. And haters, attack me all you want but when you attack and insult my cast, you've crossed the line. Grow up and leave my cast alone.”...
m.ruclips.net/video/nc_LIR5ExIU/видео.html
@@Kee2Oz Corporate entities want us to argue about the gender stuff. The problem with the 2016 version isn't that the cast is female, the problem is that it is a hollow attempt to revive a franchise that was built on the talents of those that worked on the original. If you cast the film with male comedy film actors of the present it would have sucked just as much. Like other classic films, the original Ghostbusters cannot be duplicated.
Another sequel?
Surely not!
One of the worst ever considered ideas!
Can’t Harold Ramis and Ivan Reitman are dead.
Ghostbusters a great comedy and enjoyed beat street liked soundtrack on both movies. Summer 84 my favorite time at the movies.
Check out Summer of '42. One of the best.
Wasnt , revenge of the nerds summer of '84 also ?
I find it interesting that two middle aged guys in the 80s complained that there was not ENOUGH break dancing in a break dancing movie. A lot of parents back then would have rolled their eyes at the entire concept.
Siskel was in his late 30s and Ebert was in his early 40s... they still thought of themselves as young adults or cool dads.
They were frequent guests and friends of Howard Stern... they would have never set foot in that show if they had an old guy mentality.
That's what made them beloved and set them apart from the other established critics of their time. Every film they looked at was discussed on the merits based off how it was promoted, what each story entailed (no matter how serious or ridiculous it may be) and if they were competently made, or at least entertaining. Films like these would often surprise them at either how bad they were or surprisingly good they could be. One of Ebert's favorite guilty pleasures was "Inframan", and Siskel was fond of "Species" and "The Delta Force" despite how trashed it was by his comrades including his television partner Roger Ebert.
ghostbusters is a excellent film
Best of the 80's.
Best of the 80's.
*an
Unfortunately the trio didn't go on to make 6 more together.
A real piece of shit you mean!
The number of breakdance movies is so 80s. That is hilarious and it shows how the hip hop culture went from breakdancing to gangsta rap.
I had never heard of Beat Street until just a few days ago when I saw it on TV. I liked it for its glimpse into the early Eighties hip-hop/breakdancing/graffiti culture in NY (I'm a fan, so...), but Roger's critique of it was also accurate.
Ebert later re-used the "cut up and made into ukulele picks" shot for his scathing review of MAD DOG TIME.
I'm unfamiliar with that terminology
I like Ebert's funky bob hairdo.
Ghostbusters is golden. So creative.
So stupid you mean!
I saw Ghostbusters ten times in the theater that summer
Consider these two guys, man. They could have been stiff middle aged white dudes in the 80s, stubborn and stuck in their generation, opposed to new ideas and art forms, but they were not. They respected everyone from all walks of life and were open minded and accepting of all cultures and peoples. "I wish there was more breakdancing." Isn't that something? These guys were way ahead of their time and were true critics. They judged based on how good the story and movie was, not on whether or not they agreed or related to the time, place and unique background of the characters. A good example of this is their review of the seminal '91 masterpiece "Boys N The Hood" and their review of Spike Lee's "Do the Right Thing." I just adore them and am so happy to have these to watch.
I can come up with a boatload of examples where that’s not true, especially if the film was by, about or for women.
I'm sure you can
❤️ watching these old reviews
In the clip for "They're Playing with Fire," the lines are practically identical to the lines for a scene in "The Teacher" (1974) starring Angel Tompkins.
I wish they could have reviewed Ghostbusters 2016
That movie is so bad.
The first two reviews dragged for me just wanted them to get to Ghostbusters! Ebert's review was spot-on. It still stands up today as one of the ulitmate Blockbusters.
but they both hated blade runner so that shows how good their opinion is
Really didn't know that? Of course I disagree with that. But then we all have unpopular opinions like that. I'm not a big fan of either The Shining or 2001. Them disliking BR doesn't make them bad critics.
Bored Now just watch their review on blade runner you will understand what i mean
@@borednow5838 The Shining is the best movie ever made, in my opinion. Did they shine it on?
@@kentclark6420 Well this is funny timing as I've just put up a review of The Shining on my youtube channel, cheap plug ha!
Ghostbusters is a timeless classic. The Ghostbusters themselves were / are funny as all h**l.
Here’s a fun fact.....bill murrays role was written for john belushi. He was actually writing a line for him when dan akkroyd got the news that he had passed. Could you imagine ghostbusters with belushi? I love Murray but you’ve gotta wonder
I love Belushi but I can't imagine anyone better as Venkman
Slimer is supposed to be the ghost of Belushi,of course he wasn’t called slimer at the time
@@michaelblaine6494 He was named Egghead. Akkroyd originally planned this after Neighbors but after Belushi's passing teamed up with Murray, Ramis and Reitman after they finished Stripes.
I think with Belushi, the movie would have been less dry humor, more obviously laugh out loud humor. But, I think either version would have probably been very good.
Harold Ramis as Egon Spengler: “I collect spores, molds, and fungus.” 😃
first movie looks great
DJ not record spinner...smile Love these guys!!
Hello I think I have seen almost every Siskel and Ebert episode on you tube are there anymore. Thanks and shalom
Huh?
Shalom? What kind of BBQ you eat?
Now I wanna see Ghostbusters...smile
Thanks for reposting this! The old dot org site is down for some reason. I hope these posts do not get taken down!
So that is where the son, Buzz, went after Mama's Family. He went to "polishing yachts".
trivia Les Comperes soon became FATHERS DAY wow :)
Which was directed by the same man who did Ghostbusters!
It is a stupid movie.
i dont even know what to say about giving Breakin more credit than Beat Street. Breakin was a fun goofy film for what it is and i liked it back in the day. but Beat Street was far more realistic and had a lot more going on than just the dancing. i think Beat Street was at least really trying to tell a story and show the life some people were living, Breakin was just a basic story as an excuse to show the dancing.
I disagree with Ebert on this...It was more reality than Breakin and had a less Hollywood happy ending.....In Beat street it was about making it but at the end realizing your friends are who matter.
I agree.
Beat Street is shit.
And there it is, The Cliffhanger of Siskel & Ebert, The 2 men along side the Rated K gang that led me to becoming a Reviewer. That's Something I need to add to the Arsenal of my own vids.
THERE WAS FAR MORE BREAK DANCING in Beat Street than Breakin
Not a chance. Watch the movies again. One is exclusively about dancing, the other isn't. Beat Street is still better. but MUCH less dancing for my taste, which disappointed me when I saw it.
Eric Brown was in "Private Lessons" not "My Tutor".
Apparently they were forcing the viewer to sit through 1 ad break :(
Oh man, I saw Les compères with my French class! Hadn't thought about it in decades. I'm sure it was very educational... there was certainly nothing interesting going on in the plot to distract us from the language.
that playing with firer.... lol
I would love to see Roger drop to the floor and start breakdancing. He's so round he could spin better than any of those skinny kids in the movies.
🤣
To warm guild, Any S&E Reviews On Police Academy (1984)?
They both hated it.
Do you happen to have the February 27 1988 episode or at least the Roman Polanski "Frantic" portion?
"Frantic" is one of my favourite thrillers. I'd be interested to see their review of it.
That was a great film. I knew THE FUGITIVE (1993) was going to be a great film just from having seen FRANTIC (1988) in which Harrison Ford starred.
Sibyl Danny. Wow.
One good thing about Breakdancers is they clean up the floor pretty well.
I agree with the Father, the son is going about in so many cases messing up the place. So no.
'A Paranormal Pest Control Service'. A very trite description of Ghostbusters.
Ghostbusters is brilliant on all levels. A great script, great dialogue, great acting, great, effects and it all brilliantly fits together. I love Ghostbusters. It's rich with possibility too.
I think I like less of the films that Siskel liked.
Don't expect Roger or Gene to understand hip hop. Breakin' was a goofy fun b-movie with fun music. Beat Street was a great depiction of Hip Hop in the 80s with a realistic story and not the corny fluff that breaking had.
from Mama's Family?
Beat Street has nothing on Breakin 2: Electric Bogaloo.
watch Lucinda in Ninja 3 . frankie croft smales
Or the Documentary on Cannon films
0:14 - how the hell does that popcorn stay in place when he opens the briefcase? THAT'S NOT REAL POPCORN!!! :(
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Les Comperes is classic and it was regularly shown on TV in many countries - I guess Americans simply don't get it. Even as a kid I thought it was much superior to Ghostbusters. As to the other 2 films - no one has ever heard of them on this side of Atlantic.
Where you from
Where’s their review of Endagame?
They were right about Beat Street in that the camera was way too close to many of the moves and that Breakin' focussed much more on the love of dancing and how much it meant, although Breakin' is an inferior movie and much more bubble gum. For example, when they practice in the garage, go to the beach to show dancers loving it, etc. Then again, Beat Street did focus more on the graffiti, but that part was terrible.
Focused on graffiti with Ramo as the passionate graff writer, deejaying with Kenny climbing the ladder from house parties to big city discos, and Lee being part of a breaking crew rivaling another local breaking crew.
steeltownbrown52 that’s right, more hip hop as it was at the time.
No Aroma the Educated Skunk for the first film?
Oh, in the recap he was mentioned.
"oh no, I like you alot", as she holds him to her chest.
"how?"
that really IS ridiculous. _nobody's_ that stupid. not even in Hollowood.
You probably were at his age, if a lady like that threw herself at you
So that terrible Robin Williams movie a few years later was a rip off Les Comperes, what a surprise.
Fathers Day is better than Les Comperes because it's done less like a remake and by proper comedians like Billy Crystal and Robin Williams not Gerard Depardieu amd Pierre Bouchard and Directed by the same guy who directed Ghostbusters the great comedy director Ivan Reitman
@@dylanmorrissey7339 it’s perfectly fine, not great, but a great soundtrack, I love the Paul McCartney song
I agree with ebert that Breaking was a better depiction of the break dance/hip hop culture and scene in the city.this was not a real as that films version.....
holy crap it's buzz from Mama's family getting seduced!
I knew I recognized him
351 like
Never cared for this opening....looks like Gene and Roger are sneaking up to the balcony to smooch.
Haha. Why not footsie? I bet they can cover that center aisle like
It never occurred to me how suspect the intro is! Haha you made my day with this comment!
Ghostbusters bored the hell out of me!
Me too. It's over hyped.
GHOSTBUSTERS was already bad even in its time!
Ghostbusters was a weak freakin movie. It sucked then and stinks now (it has NOT aged well). What do I know, if S&E say it's good, Dammit it's good!
Jose Sanchez , weak?
Many of these other films have been long forgotten, while Ghostbusters (1984) is still talked about to this day.
Jose Sanchez Is this a joke?
It only matters how you feel. Any movie with Aykroyd and Murray has to be a riot, though.
Your wrong, ghostbusters was a great film.