This is just the week before my final exams in my first year at STEM high schools and this video explains the last L.O and it's just on time. Edit: Thanks a lot for the video and the like ❤❤
Can someone please help me! My brain has died a thousand deaths trying to figure this one out. Assume 1.6m cable length and .087rad amplitude (140mm). The angular frequency and period I get using the small angle approximation is 2.47rad/s and 2.5s respectively. Would that not equate to an arc length per second of 3.952m/s? If I work out arc length per second from period and amplification (T/(A*4)), I get .1344m/s which seems waaaaaaaay more reasonable. How have I screwed this whole thing up? Are radians in angular frequency for simple harmonic motion referring to a different angular displacement than the radians for everything else? It consistently results in about 2pi radians per period no matter what i do with the numbers, which makes me think it is referring to the arc length of a period divided into 2pi segments... How did I get so far away from such a simple assumption?!
Your videos constantly make me have "aha" moments. You explain things super well. Thank you!
You are welcome!
This is just the week before my final exams in my first year at STEM high schools and this video explains the last L.O and it's just on time.
Edit: Thanks a lot for the video and the like ❤❤
You're the best teacher. Thanks a million 👍
Thank you! 😃
small angle approximation part helped me out so much thank you
I like your videos. Very much better and interesting.
Thanks for sharing. Not sure if you take requests from your subscribers but if you do, I would love to see some videos on operational amplifiers
What does " del T" mean while completing a table in simple harmonic motion .i know T is a period but that del confuse me
Can someone please help me! My brain has died a thousand deaths trying to figure this one out.
Assume 1.6m cable length and .087rad amplitude (140mm). The angular frequency and period I get using the small angle approximation is 2.47rad/s and 2.5s respectively. Would that not equate to an arc length per second of 3.952m/s?
If I work out arc length per second from period and amplification (T/(A*4)), I get .1344m/s which seems waaaaaaaay more reasonable. How have I screwed this whole thing up?
Are radians in angular frequency for simple harmonic motion referring to a different angular displacement than the radians for everything else? It consistently results in about 2pi radians per period no matter what i do with the numbers, which makes me think it is referring to the arc length of a period divided into 2pi segments... How did I get so far away from such a simple assumption?!
7:03 L = ds/dθ => L ^2 = (ds/dθ)^2
why u write L?
funny and in-depth. ty
please try to keep the simple,creative neumericals for nerds.
🎉🎉
bh