Apple Intelligence Is Here: What Can It Do?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- ❤️ Check out Microsoft Azure AI and try it out for free:
azure.microsof...
Apple Intelligence: www.apple.com/...
📝 My earlier paper on brush stroke synthesis: users.cg.tuwie...
📝 My paper on simulations that look almost like reality is available for free here:
rdcu.be/cWPfD
Or this is the orig. Nature Physics link with clickable citations:
www.nature.com...
🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible:
Alex Balfanz, Alex Haro, B Shang, Benji Rabhan, Gaston Ingaramo, Gordon Child, John Le, Kyle Davis, Loyal Alchemist, Lukas Biewald, Martin, Michael Albrecht, Michael Tedder, Owen Skarpness, Richard Sundvall, Taras Bobrovytsky, Ted Johnson, Thomas Krcmar, Tybie Fitzhugh, Ueli Gallizzi.
If you wish to appear here or pick up other perks, click here: / twominutepapers
Thumbnail background design: Felícia Zsolnai-Fehér - felicia.hu
Károly Zsolnai-Fehér's research works: cg.tuwien.ac.a...
Twitter: / twominutepapers
#apple
It really shows that AI is here to uplift humans instead of replacing them
i wouldnt trust something like that honestly, they def gonna steal ur data lmao
yes for now
Tech companies just go the route that makes them the most money. If they think they can earn a lot of money by replacing a profession/craft with an AI trained on ethically dubious material, they will. (If we allow them to.)
@@llRoBoBinHoll The future sounds sterile for the Artistic World.
Sure...I mean what could go wrong.
“Sorry I failed to reply to your email for two weeks, the AI told me it wasn’t important” 😂
Hey ChatGPT: Can you give me keywords to put in my email to make Apple AI think it is very important?
@@UMosNyu important, urgent, immediate, [date that is very close to now], attention, requiring... you kind of get it now
should’ve gone for Centralized Intelligence of Apple.
Privacy concerns?
The AI is mainly on device. Also third party verifiable cloud compute. When it wants to use external services like OpenAI it asks for permission first
So research before asking
Apple is nearly the only company in the entire tech space who have made privacy a selling point, at least so far. Thus far they have a track record of being pretty good about not compromising on privacy even when pressured by governments. On top of that, it wouldn't entirely make sense for them to siphon off your data. For companies like Google, of course they'll take all of your data, they're an advertising company. Advertising is their #1 product. What's Apple's product? It's not advertising. Their money comes from iPhones and monopolizing the iPhone software market. If you went to Apple and said "I want to buy an ad" they wouldn't even know where to put it, I don't think. That's just not what they do.
Beyond even that, there are technical reasons it doesn't make sense. Apple has been making their own silicon for a bit now, and their chips include AI-accelerating cores. If Apple instead sent the data elsewhere to be operated on, there is a completely unavoidable cost that would be paid for that - latency. Latency is limited, even if everything else is perfect and infinitely fast, by the speed of light. For most applications, that doesn't matter a ton. But for anything you want to actively have a conversation with, or use interactively, it very quickly becomes a big deal. You can not have a comfortable conversation with latency more than 200ms. For close friends, the latency expected is even lower, and humans are extremely sensitive to this. For things like image generation and such, what would make the most sense would be pre-loading model weights with periodic updates. That would be for the more general stuff like 'what a tree looks like'. But for stuff that is very personalized, it would be too expensive for Apple to maintain personal models for each user (I would guess), that will almost certainly be done locally. What would be the point of the AI cores otherwise?
AI deep rooted in your system shouldn't be a thing. All of this should be opt in
All of this will most likely be opt in? What make you think this will be forced?
@@luipaardprint lol
Don’t download the iOS 18. Downloading iOS 18 is you opting in.
@@luipaardprint siri isnt opt in. car insurance isnt opt in if you want to drive a car
@@luipaardprintplanned obsolescence
You can be certain that apple cut a deal with OpenAI to hand over your data, for further training. Training data is running out, to the extent they are generating synthetic data. Apple obviously has a MASSIVE user base, that’s a ton of “free” data in exchange for this AI assistance.
Privacy just left the chat 🙂
nah, you mean anonymity. privacy is still as tight as you hand on your... (i say that in fun) the two words get swapped often, but privacy is not really the issue here, unless you want to film your hand tight on your....(i am not having a go, just riffing)
as if your data were secure without it lmao
Privacy left chat around 15 years ago, when Israel sold their spyware to US.
It’s done locally on devices.
@@johnschwalb
Except my device is now intelligent, and potentially sentient. So it's almost like a human assistant having access to my most private things.
It seems it still communicates with the apple servers - that means that this just turned into a privacy nightmare.
I only watched
Marques Brownlee's video on this (ruclips.net/video/qkYoBNdcXBU/видео.html) and he sounded rather positive (I think). But tbqh I have barely any idea of what is going on
Finally, AI can solve world hunger! Oh, wait.
Oh you don't need an AI for that. You just need humans to give a fuck about each other, instead of setting fire to the food they produced to maintain its market value
they just need uber eats in those countries
The paper clip maximizer AI is already here it is called the S&P 500 and DOW. Profits before helping poor people eat.
AI actually can help solve world hunger and improve the lives of everyone, that's how technology has always worked. The negative aspects are there as well, but that fault is on us, not on the technology.
I think that if there had been the will to solve it, it would have already been solved.
I love your short and concise summaries, every other RUclipsr is making a video that is 15 to 20 minutes long on the subject, such a waste of time to watch those videos!
this just feels like one huge security concern
Writing emails for us?? I hate that. There’s enough AI generated content flooding the internet. I don’t wanna be reading messages from businesses and friends that they didn’t even read
ask an AI to summarize them for you
To be frank, I’m not sure how that’s much different from the existing emails people write that they didn’t even think about.
Apple AI is cool, but it learns A LOT about you. This raises privacy concerns & could be used to influence your choices without you realizing it once it learns enough about you. The question is - should we trust our personal life and choice-making to Apple or any corporation? We wouldn't open our private emails to strangers, but it's Ok if it's Apple?
Agree that Apple's particular implementation is well-thought out and user-centric.
forget privacy
If everything happens on device (eg without going to Apple or OpenAI) it shouldn’t have any privacy issues.
We’re so screwed 😂
Impossible to run an huge AI like these in mobile @@benjaminlynch9958
@@benjaminlynch9958 yep totally we can trust apple on that
@@benjaminlynch9958 If it can access your online calendar, your mails, I don't see why it couldn't share your data with Apple.
How does integration of different projects deal with AI? Especially if this is vendor-locked? I think promoting such private software should be marked with a big "Ad" banner on the background
How long until we just give AI touch input?
When I were a lad, we had to type emails, and if we were lucky, a human would read those emails.
Walking 3 miles up the mountain through the snow and fording several rivers
@@TreesPlease42 Luxury!
Now it's uselessly changing the tone of the Email, just for an AI on the other end to sum it up for the receiver. Why bother with formality in the first place?
So I should be able to draw to use calculator?
Thats so cool, looks like no hope of a true competitive market for phones
Yes. Because all past Apple presentations were filled with real content.
Also all AI like companies have been pretty clear on the capabilities of their systems
What a time to be alive!
These guys in Appletino (Applefornia, United States of Apple) are just crazy to invent such thing as Apple Intelligence.
It was an impressive keynote speech. 1 thing I hope they eventually do with AI is lip reading. Sometimes I want to interact with Siri in quiet environments or places I don't want to be heard talking.
I was waiting for a reveal that you were actually being sarcastic the whole time and were actually skeptical of it
"Apple Intelligence" is right up there with "jumbo shrimp"
Why is there not an option yet to tell the AI to FIND a good REAL photograph of a real building? Instead of creating one that will for sure have some imperfections?
Definitely seems like the sorts of things AI is good for; I wonder if it could learn to write in my style rather than ChatGPT standard
yes it can. you simply need to domain train an AI on your writing style.
I don't care what it does. I won't be using it. I want to know:
Is it local to my machine?
Does it send my data anywhere?
If the answers are not yes, and no respectively, then it's time for me to go back to Linux.
That's the whole point of putting so much computing power in the new iPhones. It is supposed to run locally and offline, but other models are optional. If you want a private AI, run one on your own server. In the end you must trust the vendor when it comes to closed source software... So, privacy or easy?
It is local and it send your data to the server without containing it. I would not trust them though, just see the "pedo image on iCloud" case, to see that they watch your data even if it is said to be private
And you can do that, the average Joe can't. That's why you ultimately come to the conclusion to trust some company. You have to choose which company to trust, and they have their reputation and wallets to worry about. That's how Apple stays on top.
A lot will probably be on board, hence why they add more hardware into the iPhones as "AI Chips". But frankly if you are using Apple for self hosted things, where you cannot make the app and run it yourself without an Apple developer license, Apple isn't for you.
~ a Linux user of over a decade, who bought Apple products to simplify their life and focus on what matters
The way corporate law and "fiduciary duty" of being a CEO works is that if there is a legal way for the company to make money, it's a crime against investors not to do it. That means if they can sell your data to make a buck, they will and it's literally a crime for them not to sell it.
*MY PROOFREADER* has 3 young daughters and works very hard, she is a lovely person and gives me lots of helpful feedback on my books - I LOOK FORWARD TO FIRING HER...!!!
Obviously, I wont - but others will. which means the cost to me will double or triple per book. So my choice is BE E-V-I-L or pay 3 X the price - thanks AI
no no, just pay what you are already paying. Instead of sending the people to pasture.
Ah yes, supply and demand, where when demand goes down the prices increase
You will, some time later. I presume you are bying your shoes from the store, and not from the local shoemaker?
@@artemv3160 NO - I buy my shoes from the local shoemaker - Atelier Burgas
@@cystarkman I already pay her more than her advertised fee. She is very very good and looks after me very well.
ALIBABA INTELLIGENCE is the key motivation for APPLE INTELLIGENCE
Just to ensure the quality of the content, you should stick to covering research, not ads. As you mentioned, these we should take with a grain of salt.
Looks like Apple has discovered stable diffusion & controlnets.
Getting so close to having the USS Enterprise computer from Star Trek TNG, just minus the holo-deck. Not quite there on the whole materializing force fields and instant ray tracing graphics indistinguishable from reality 😂.
"it even takes your driver's license and apply credit cards for you. What a time to be alive!"
microsoft got slapped for recall lol
OMG, can't wait to see this in other OS
Great video Dr!
Agreed. What I saw WWDC keynote needs multiple different AI papers worth of tech.
All outdated tech
the name sounds so stupid, why cant they be normal and call things by what they are instead of putting their own names on it
also, this can already be done with ai's like phi or llama, it just requires some coding to allow the ai to access the data, and to force the ai to think before speaking
the only new thing that couldnt be done easily is the creation of emojis
hopefully people will realize that ai isnt completely useless, that its not just a chatbot, because ai can do a lot of things but only if given access to
What an Apple time to be an intelligence alive! 🎉
Samsung:
Nice try with someone else's patent 😅
This is already in Samsung Notes...
@@VariantAEC Samsung Internet also supports summaries since start of this year…
I don’t know man, I wasn’t that impressed with Apple Intelligence to be perfectly honest. I expected more from a company like Apple.
Apple knows this day would come, so they made unified memory for both CPU/GPU to take use of.
Therefore, even biggest AI model can fit in their machine easily 😂
AI: Apple Intelligence 😂
Apple Intelligence? Well that's a first 😆
What's still missing is that these AI's not only read the emails, but reply to them aswell. Or live my live for me.
I do see your point, but I would also bring in the fact that reading and replying to emails isn't really life.
@@niveketihw1897 I didn't mean to state that. But i think there's something spooky about that being likely to become a reality (replying) in which case an AI will make decisions for me. And the idea of AIs replying to each other to decide for me makes me somewhat obsolete/uncomfortable, because making decisions is what i think makes up a good part of being human.
@@Flavelius I hear ya and I agree it's a bit creepy. It's hard for me to think of times when I would be okay "trusting" an AI, especially one wholly-owned by E-Corp and subject to their whims and unannounced changes, to step in and act as if it were me.
Such hype. Much intelligence. Very Apple.
Why would I need any of these features... useless...
Actually agree. Oh okay, another dumb ass POS censored and hobbled AI to make stupid pictures of cartoon dinos, like I give a F. Its like Apple had no imagination, no ability to think and most just replicated what I can do in Edge Browser with Copilot.
What I was actually hoping for, was for Apple to bring out MS, Adobe, Black Magic, OpenAI, Google etc... and say, all these companies now run local AI code on our NPU and super fast. We have the largest install base of NPUs and we are the platform for AI. Instead we got a barely smarter Siri and some stupid email checkers.
Apple catching up with the rest of the world. Hope it works on spam emails
Microsoft: check out our amazing Recall.
Everyone: Booo, MS bad, invading our privacy.
Apple: check out our embedded AI OS.
Everyone: oh wow, this is a game changer. Bravo Apple.
The hypocrisy continues. 😂
Apple has more trust than Microsoft.
Not that this matters to me, I wouldn't trust either.
The thing is.... If i buy it it's mine. That's no longer the case with apple and microsoft.
@@MrMadalien they succeeded in the "Make apple image of Luxury" and now everything Apple is just justified and better without any testing.
It's local ai
@@WatchNoah so is Recall
This is the most underwhelming video theme so far, they just inserted chat gpt lite into the iOS and called it their own.
Oh so AI will be reading emails of apple users to shorten them, noice, safety first as I see.
Siri wasn’t good because Apple refused to train on our data. But I hope not we whined to the point that moma Apple now finally actually said “Fine! Have your Apple pie!”
Huge info that 2 tech giants are collaborating on a singular product with an AGI initiative
Where is the option to opt out? I have nothing wrong with AI. It is a tool…much like a table saw, or a hand plane, or a CNC router. My issue is that big tech companies are taking existing tools out of their suite and replacing them with AI counterparts. Just because a CNC router is cool and new doesn’t mean the hand plane has to go away…in fact, often times, that’s exactly what is needed for a job.
Finally we can stop thinking. And nobody will read our (ai generated) emails anymore, only the ai generated summary. Doesn't sound so glorious to me...
Some of the features they showed like the Vision OS 2 Image to sparcial image I was just Like WoW! papers are coming to lifeee!
This is the most useless shit that was ever created and one more reason I will never use Microsoft or Apple devices.
sent to the cloud {supposedly} private …
I wonder if it will employ the same tech glitch as Adobe …
Okay, but using AI to illustrate material possibly used for study is just the worst. Not only do AIs still have human biases (probably due to those who lable the training data) but because they sample all of their data, so they're ALWAYS inaccurate in some regard. Especially when it comes to more niche subjects. For example, by adding or deleting features from real life subjects.
In my opinion current image AI can only be used for very general subjects, keeping in mind that the generations are all fictional.
What Samsung is dreaming about.
I have absolutely no concerns about privacy or security. /As rewritten by my AI-powered Mac/
What about privacy??? Do they got ai model running on mobile ? Or some cloud service? If other than mobile it's big no no for apple , data will be shared for AI and guess what data can do, targetted advertising.
Please click "I agree" to allow an OPSEC nightmare
Seems like what siri was supposed to be.
Apple...just another CUSTOMER of Nvidia.
"The more you Buy, the more you Save" - Jensen Huang CEO of Nvidia
What Apple devices have nVidia silicon in them? And more to the point, what cell phone or light weight tablet from any OEM (akin to an iPad) has nVidia silicon?
@@benjaminlynch9958 "OpenAI and Apple announce partnership to integrate ChatGPT into Apple experiences" - So when MANY Millions of iPhones around the world connect to GPT-4o's (Omni) backend servers in huge data centers run no doubt by Apple, on what hardware will these AI Servers be running? If it's not Apple, they must pay someone for those AI servers. If it is OpenAI, they will have to buy more hardware from Nvidia to support Apple. The more ChatGPT (GPT-4o) gets integrated the more need for larger and larger numbers of backend AI servers (ie data center).
Now at some point, I have no doubt Apple might want to look at using AMD AI servers down the road...but that's not going to happen right away at scale.
"The OpenAI supercomputer for ChatGPT comprises over 285,000 AMD CPU cores and 10,000 NVIDIA GPUs with a total of petabytes of system memory.
It uses NVIDIA's latest H100 Tensor Core GPUs which offer up to 30x higher performance for inference and 4x higher for training compared to the previous A100 GPUs.
The GPUs are interconnected using NVIDIA Quantum-2 InfiniBand networking with up to 400 Gbps bandwidth per GPU for high throughput"
I understand you are thinking about it from an "on-device" perspective, but these days that's not where Nvidia is making most of it's $$$...instead it's on the backend in the data center, and while ChatGPT might be integrated into iOS it's still going to need a very significant AI server backend to support many millions of users.
They probably got ~75% discount, still not 100% tho...
Anyone who thinks NVidia is winning is an idiot. They failed when they bought 3DFX - a Hx00 or x0x0 GPU burns so much fuel to work it is next to useless. Apple has gone the low power route and is winning (ATMoment) in the energy to compute result war.
The more you buy from Nvidia, the more your power bill becomes the killer. Nvidia has to completely flip their engineering model.
@@benjaminlynch9958 Your thinking about Nvidia on-device...I'm talking about Nvidia data center hardware (where they make all their $$$ these days). Hardware needed to fully support the MANY Millions of new ChatGPT/GPT-4o users...the part NOT integrated into iOS (ie. backend).
Ai butlers baby
Who wants someone reading their emails and messages? Those are private. If local to my device and guaranteed to be not shared, maybe. So scary. But please Write my email that is good as long as ai does not save it for future. Generating images while Notetaking is awesome
How the fuck do you run AI 24/7 on a phone without destrying battery life
Has someo a Nokia 3310 for me?
This AI is really going to think I need male enhancement products because those emails always sound extremely urgent.😅
iAi
If you send me an AI image of my likeness I'm blocking your number lmao
literally don’t need nor want any of this
I'm sorry I can't share your enthusiasm. This is a privacy nightmare from a megacorp with a massive incentive (some say fiduciary duty to investors) to monetize everything possible including people's private lives. It's practically illegal for them to not abuse this to the fullest extent the law allows and perhaps even further.
InB4 AI assistance hits dating apps 😂
hey siri, how can get up in that?
its already happened. I think Hinge announced that it will create AI instances of people on its system that then interact with each other... so they tell you who they want you to date.
Already happening
Looks to me just like ChatGPT integrated into a phone. So just stuff we have, put into stuff we have. So I am not that impressed. Also Google demonstrated how much you can trust AI presentations - or not.
No
so lame
When AI done right it can do so much for us day to day. Right now we see a lot of noise and speculations of what AI can do (trust me it’s not going to be a better search engine or gen AI images but actual useful things such as AI assistant, AI mentor for kids etc.). What a time to be alive. It takes Apple to come up with applications that make sense and integration to the ecosystem while keeping privacy in check.
Anyone else pretty underwhelmed by this?
The name is so dumb, why can't they call it Genisys.
Students and others who use AI too heavily to learn will probably find out why a butterfly must struggle out of its cocoon instead of being cut out.
Not really. Learning is far more efficient with AI, they'll likely know more than the pre-AI generations.
And it's like calculators and Google, it's not like you have to give them up when you graduate. A tool that's always at hand is not an unhealthy addiction. It's like relying on your hands to manipulate objects.
lemme guess, its half as powerful as the competition, but costs double, riiight?!
Yup, Apple Intelligence is merely 3 billion parameters, while llama3 is 8 billion parameters. It costs double because of Apple magic such as enhanced privacy!
Are you getting paid for making this video?
amazing...lol
I'm sure Google will do the same.
But, will require Google One subscription. Available to business accounts. Rest of people, will have just basic options to choose. And of course, announced features will be available in practice 4 years after announcement. Some, as always, will never make into final product.
Oh, yes. I forgot Google's most important bit - scrapping products.
Am I right, Google?
Name is cringe
Meh... gemini ftw. I hate apple
*"NO, YOU WILL NOT MAKE IT TO YOUR DAUGHTERS PERFORMANCE* on time - a Tesla Bro on FSD has inevitably crashed and set on fire, expect an 18-hour delay. I hope this was helpful."
Tesla vehicles have significantly lower fire rates compared to conventional gasoline vehicles, with one fire incident per 130-205 million miles traveled for Tesla, versus one per 18-19 million miles for gasoline vehicles. This makes Tesla vehicles approximately 10-11 times less likely to catch fire, thanks to their advanced safety features, software updates, and robust battery design. While no definitive link has been established between a fatal crash and Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology until the incident involving Hans von Ohain, the number of fatalities involving FSD is likely in the single digits over the entire course of the technology's history. Additionally, the likelihood of a fatal crash resulting in fire while using this technology is extremely unlikely.
FSD has driven over a billion miles so far, and it's proven to be far safer than manual driving. And it's improving fast, so only getting safer with time.
Google and Microsoft don’t know how to trust their own consumers to work with their hardware and software.
And I think Apple is going to help both of them on those very issues. If they can master their Apple Intelligence, then there is a chance that even Apple developers can connect their AI to other softwares and hardwares and AI
OpenAI should be in tandem with open AI. We need a super kernel to protect all softwares, codes and kernel for new hardwares to be made by the consumers and not just the manufacturers.
your voice is so weird, I can imagine you talking to your wife about dinner,
"Honey... would you like... some steak tonight..."
"Yes"
"This.. would be.. absolutely.. magical."
Android junkies incoming 😂
Did they go all in on AI, or did they go all in on OpenAI?
From what I can determine, they have their own model, which is already in use and improving. Open AI is simply the first company to run their model locally, Google and others are not prevented.
@@cystarkmanThey can run a 3B model locally on the iPhone 15 pro and up and then can query a 30B parameter model from the iCloud, then can query a 300B parameter model from OpenAI.
"Apple Intelligence" reminds me of a time Jack Ma talked about "Ali-Baba Intelligence" with Elon Musk
guess I aint alone lol
Lol I forgot about that
And he got ridiculed, while apple fanboys will praise them for being "original"
Obviously, this is crazy, but we should wait until it gets released to see how it really works. And let's see how will this performs in other languages, not just English.
I was thinking the same thing
Our boy seems a little... 'enthusiastic' about this one. Maybe AI helped in some way 😢
Translation tools are getting more and more accurate by the year. As soon as the translation tool (which is likely AI itself) is perfect, its effect will combine orthogonally with other tools, making everything work magically.
I think it is safe to say that useful between languages is but a small obstacle in the coming AI revelation.
will only be available for US English as far as I understood it , and will release as beta when they release it to everyone in iOS 18 later in the year
I like to think about what might become possible with AI, but I do not like the fact that it is almost exclusively under the control of big corporations like Apple, MS, NVIDIA, and so on. AI should be amplifying human effort, not replacing it.
I used to dream of having an autonomous AI buddy like Beezle in the Otherland series, always with my best interests in mind and working for me alone. What I forgot to take into account was that in the real world Beezle wouldn't be owned by me at all, I'd merely be subscribing to it by paying one of several big companies who are the real owners and whose interests the AI would be most interested in.
AI will amplify human effort when it's no longer under control of profit-driven corporations.
There are open source AIs you can even build and run on your own machine. Obviously they are worse, but they are there
It is all so great but what about privacy risks?
It runs locally, it’s not more a privacy risk than using a iPhone without it
@@johnschwalb You think it won't be harvesting all of your private information for them to sell? Unless there are laws preventing them, Apple harvests personal information and monetizes it.
Sadly, surveillance capitalism doesn't care about our privacy...
Caroly should’ve went into it but they built their whole infrastructure with privacy in mind using custom hardware and software. When the task is too complicated to run locally, it sends only relevant data to a private cloud compute. According to Apple, it is not stored, and not used to train. The system is designed to be independently verifiable by others to determine its adherence to privacy.
@@johnschwalb Running locally is best indeed. It is creepy to send so much info to the cloud
Max 5 years and we will be living in an unrecognizable world
Fr... I don't know whether to be exited or scared... I'm going with exited (:
I keep saying that to my wife and she thinks I'm crazy.
I got my comp TIA A+ certification.
Applied to over 600 entry level IT jobs.
Not one single call back or interview.
Plus I had a whole bunch of codeine experience.
I just feel like all warehouse work gone.
All call based work gone
@@hotrodhunk7389 Yeah, it seems work is being reduced in all industries to be honest, but that's not 100% AI, the economy has been shrinking, idk about you but I don't really spend money on anything unless it's truly necessary, I spend almost nothing on vanity or growth, if I assume most people are doing the same, you have massive industries downsizing very harshly
Nah... It might write all your boring work emails and organise your calendar. But it won't change a thing that really matters, like hiking, surfing, hanging out with friends irl.
I wont - I have a place in the woods in Bulgaria ready for when it becomes an unimaginable h-o-r-r-o--r show
meh.
I need an emoji to text converter.
just make it up in your head, the sender did
it's called alt text ;)