Professor Noam Chomsky explained about the intelectual Whit power the are no intelligent, so the are relatively primitive, is very interesting and complicate.... you are very good professor Chomsky...👍
Chomsky says, "I'm not trying to persuade you. I'm hoping that I will make you think for yourself." Chomsky made me a critical thinker. His book Manufacturing Consent explains the filters of media, and I started seeing what was going on. Before hearing about the propaganda model, I had thought that propaganda is explicit, but I realized that a core aspect of propaganda is usually what is left out rather than what's been said. You can become as wise as Chomsky, but you have to be open to question your own beliefs and to critically analyze everything. I've been infatuated by authoritarian leaders and by Neoliberalism and by many things that I now regard bad.
What I am saying below is that, despite Chomsky on numerous occasions saying that "you and I" are part of the blame for why rotten things happen due to our passivity, I think there are more active, cynical reasons for why masses are "passive" in the first place. The masses gain things from the status quo, and despite most people being perfectly moral when they have no authority, I wonder what they would do once in a position of authority.
Ben Kiernan has been published in French. Easily available in France. If you only consult English language sources you're missing a lot of information. If you don't consult them likewise.
Thanks Sam, no I wasn't aware of that debate. I'm a student of the natural sciences, but I will take a look at what others have said about this issue. Thanks.
What work are you referring to ? One way to turn off someone's interest in a speaker in some countries is to imply that what the man is saying is good for Russia.
I agree about the ego bit but I think the propaganda becomes the framework for the justification, like armor around the needs of ego. I wonder how conscious people truly are? Also I think Chomsky has always been clear, that we are all responsible for what our country does. He focuses on the elite because they form the framework of the debates and push the policies. They are perhaps the MOST to blame but we're all part of pushing change.
To read Chomsky's latest book for free, 'The Responsibility of Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and Others after 50 years', go to this link: @t
And yet Tony mass murderer Blair is welcomed back with open arms -the U.K. has a facade of accountability no more The wisdom and intellect of Chomsky is a gift to the world 💕
To read Chomsky's 2019 book for free, 'The Responsibility of Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and Others after 50 years', go to this link: discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10080589/1/The-Responsibility-of-Intellectua...
But I think it's a bit more complex than that: our societies are not a reflection of (produced by) these institutions; I'm afraid that these institutions are more likely to be a reflection of us. Hence, the problem isn't MERELY institutional, but rather deeply moral.
Right, but it is about ensuring that the intention of promoting 'normal' (controversy regarding financial institutions and their possible disproportionate weighting upon the business cycle) conduct in relation to the liquidity of currency, rather than assassinating the character of such institutions. I believe that banks facilitate and perpetuate the great advantage held by the very wealthy, but to simply be indignant as you are is no way to address the issue. Organisation is the bitter truth..
If’s it’s revealed in the anger of revenge, how’s the world community organization with peace living on the government organization of revenge on self opinion😨, my Father🙏🏻. How’s the next generation living with past awareness off on the government doing for the Warriors freedom😨, please🙏🏻?
Well issuing currency has become a highly politicized action... people are very wary of hyper inflation as encountered by the weimar republic, and the stagflation observed in the 70's. It also devalues the currency which offsets the advantages garnered from globalisation in its current form, namely that o cheap labour/resources acquired from developing countries. But QE is a low profile way of doing what you describe i think.
Well, I find the issue with the business model as a whole, which ofc is subject to the herd mentality. Short term manipulation of financial instruments makes up a notable part of the global economy, and is legal. You are talking of ethics, which are superseded by the chance of private enrichment. I agree with you that that is wrong, but to simply express it as a truism does no one real good. Unfortunately, it falls on individuals to alert their representatives of its toxic effect on society.
Perhaps even progressive leaning people would be atrocious (see Stalin - and no I don't want to open a discussion about how such people are really not progressive, which superficially is true). I feel that in Chomsky's mind, if we could manage to eliminate the institutions that are structured to produce ill decisions (I.e. the state, corps, etc.) then we would have a more moral society.
Rip, I don't think Chomsky has forgotten the animal nature of humans, and by no means does our animalistic nature give us a reasonable morality (which I'm sure you're not claiming). For example, one is hardly justified in raping merely bc many animals do, and humans may have some drive to, though it is clear that there are animal instincts that may drive one to such obscenities. Morality is all about being responsible and making responsible decisions despite despite urges to the contrary. .
Please forgive me if’s I don’t answer what’s your opinion on self search before, I have no condemned no self sided or successful on human lesser related reasons on harm of lawless🙏🏻, please. How’s truth lessers accept but accuse your rights in your manipulation, I don’t in your tracks, 🤥🌎🇺🇳.
If’s I found it’s the one of the war’s and arms sellers🤥😊, please 🙏🏻on lawlessness and satisfaction with the USA 🇺🇸 try🤥on the political propaganda wrongs doings, how’s freedom on self restricted 🚫 to develop , please .
"filtering systems", talk of rampant rationalization, is like reinventing the wheel. This subject has been looked into exhaustively by depth psychologists for 100 years, who call these things unconscious dynamics, complexes, and habitual thought processes. But Chomsky won't mention any of those thinkers or writers because he wants to appear novel. And he has no clue how to engage with such powerful, persistent tendencies. Logic and his thinking style of rationality will never do it. All the popular thinkers now are in this same boat: Pinker, Dennett, Dawkins, etc. Their only recourse is to push what they call rationality, which is a kind of thinking applied to social and political dimensions. Doesn't cut it.
Psychology is one of the biggest inheritors of 'rationality'. Its ontological/epistemological frameworks are based in individualism and structured by rational choice theory. What are you talking about?
The REAL, ' Responsibility of Intellectuals ', who know the, ' truth ', is ACTUALLY to PARTICIPATE in Policy-Making, give us the benefit of their superior wisdom, and show they can do a better job, themselves! -NOT spend their entire careers merely criticizing everyone ELSE from the sidelines, and with the great luxury of 20/20 Hindsight-Like Chomsky! smh
Being a good linguist and interesting philosopher does not make one good at public policy. I'd argue that the smartest men in history would make horrible leaders. Einstein, Tesla, Newton, ect. Plato was a genius but his views on a perfect society were pretty dystopian. Noam Chomsky is no doubt a smart man, but I'd rather have my cat in charge of government decisions. He has his head in the clouds.
This gentleman is very intelligent and I enjoy listening to him, but why is it every time he says something is bad he says like neo-liberal or something before it?
To read Chomsky's latest book for free, 'The Responsibility of Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and Others after 50 years', go to this link: @t
To read Chomsky's latest book for free, 'The Responsibility of Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and Others after 50 years', go to this link: @t
Well, qe can turn into what you describe, and ultimately i view it as such, but that doesn't really matter if the money received were to move around lending markets quickly, but low confidence negatively effects this to a significant degree. qe benefits those with greater assets, as found in the UK specifically, but considering the top down view of growth/supply side has largely dominated in the world since the 70's crises, this isn't surprising. qe issues currency in unconventional form btw.
thank you for bringing Mr. Noam Chomsky into my life. He is a wealth of truth and the examples of warmongering and greed are clearly explained..
+maximuscomfort So weird seeing that sentence come from Peter Griffin..
+doogdoogdoog he's my brother.
Startling likeness
Professor Noam Chomsky explained about the intelectual Whit power the are no intelligent, so the are relatively primitive, is very interesting and complicate.... you are very good professor Chomsky...👍
You're welcome mate, was surprised it hadn't already been uploaded. I'll get the next 4 up soon enough.
LOVE THESE TWO. ALPERT FOR PARTICIPATORY ECONOMICS , CHOMSKY FOR ALL HIS WORKS.
Can't get enough of this. Especially now.
I look at Chomsky and I would like to ask him -Mr. Chomsky, Sir, when you are no more, can you inherit your wisdom to me, Sir.
quetzalamaru It's why he's making these videos
Chomsky says, "I'm not trying to persuade you. I'm hoping that I will make you think for yourself."
Chomsky made me a critical thinker. His book Manufacturing Consent explains the filters of media, and I started seeing what was going on. Before hearing about the propaganda model, I had thought that propaganda is explicit, but I realized that a core aspect of propaganda is usually what is left out rather than what's been said.
You can become as wise as Chomsky, but you have to be open to question your own beliefs and to critically analyze everything. I've been infatuated by authoritarian leaders and by Neoliberalism and by many things that I now regard bad.
Noam "Checkmate, Everyone" Chosmky
Thanks a lot uploader! I've been looking for these sessions for a while now!
23:00 One simply doesn't interrupt Chomsky when he references early 4th century history to make a point. 🤣
he's old enough to remember
Thanks as well...a couple years ago these were all actually up and since then haven't been able to find them.
You cannot help having a point of view because everyone sees the world through his eyeballs
Thanks for uploading these :) Chomsky shredding our necessary illusions at a ferocious speed as usual :)
What I am saying below is that, despite Chomsky on numerous occasions saying that "you and I" are part of the blame for why rotten things happen due to our passivity, I think there are more active, cynical reasons for why masses are "passive" in the first place. The masses gain things from the status quo, and despite most people being perfectly moral when they have no authority, I wonder what they would do once in a position of authority.
He knows almost everything about humanity, impressive............🤔.....👍❤️🌎🕊️🇲🇽
interviewer: ".. can you name the intellectuals who fail to be responsible? "
Pr. Chomsky: 9:40 :)
many thanks from brazil!
Thanks from Russia again. Keep up your work!)
Ben Kiernan has been published in French. Easily available in France. If you only consult English language sources you're missing a lot of information. If you don't consult them likewise.
Thanks Sam, no I wasn't aware of that debate. I'm a student of the natural sciences, but I will take a look at what others have said about this issue. Thanks.
What work are you referring to ? One way to turn off someone's interest in a speaker in some countries is to imply that what the man is saying is good for Russia.
@666head It's "La Jornada".
Sorry for arriving a year late
I agree about the ego bit but I think the propaganda becomes the framework for the justification, like armor around the needs of ego. I wonder how conscious people truly are? Also I think Chomsky has always been clear, that we are all responsible for what our country does. He focuses on the elite because they form the framework of the debates and push the policies. They are perhaps the MOST to blame but we're all part of pushing change.
Thank you
I love Mingus’s music
Haitian Fight Song by Charles Mingus
awsome! cheers mate!
How "Intellectuals" are created systematically. 28:15 - 32:25
"The notion of "Objectivity" Belongs In Graduate Philosophy Seminars". 44:30 - 45:15
I just bought his book on it, "It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and to expose lies." Not the best title though.
hell yeah, thank you!
To read Chomsky's latest book for free, 'The Responsibility of
Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and Others after 50 years',
go to this link:
@t
And yet Tony mass murderer Blair is welcomed back with open arms -the U.K. has a facade of accountability no more
The wisdom and intellect of Chomsky is a gift to the world 💕
To read Chomsky's 2019 book for free, 'The Responsibility of Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and Others after 50 years', go to this link: discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10080589/1/The-Responsibility-of-Intellectua...
What do they say at the end?? I wanted to hear that.
I think its in Noams home if im not mistaken, but I can easily be mistaken.
29:00 Filtering systems
33:00 Scholarship vs Journalism in propaganda
WHAT SONG PLAYS DURING THE INTRO?
Yeah, I like it, too!
Haitian Fight Song - Charles Mingus
tks sir
It's "Haitian Fight Song" (by Charles Mingus) performed by The Pentangle
Stairway to Chomsky
I was wondering this too
But I think it's a bit more complex than that: our societies are not a reflection of (produced by) these institutions; I'm afraid that these institutions are more likely to be a reflection of us. Hence, the problem isn't MERELY institutional, but rather deeply moral.
Check Chomsky vs. Buckley 1969. Chomsky is very clear. He say, "You and I"
Why does the video at 7:50 appear to be edited?
what's the opening song's title? I love it!
Right, but it is about ensuring that the intention of promoting 'normal' (controversy regarding financial institutions and their possible disproportionate weighting upon the business cycle) conduct in relation to the liquidity of currency, rather than assassinating the character of such institutions. I believe that banks facilitate and perpetuate the great advantage held by the very wealthy, but to simply be indignant as you are is no way to address the issue. Organisation is the bitter truth..
If’s it’s revealed in the anger of revenge, how’s the world community organization with peace living on the government organization of revenge on self opinion😨, my Father🙏🏻. How’s the next generation living with past awareness off on the government doing for the Warriors freedom😨, please🙏🏻?
Well issuing currency has become a highly politicized action... people are very wary of hyper inflation as encountered by the weimar republic, and the stagflation observed in the 70's. It also devalues the currency which offsets the advantages garnered from globalisation in its current form, namely that o cheap labour/resources acquired from developing countries. But QE is a low profile way of doing what you describe i think.
yes, but if you're talking of big issues to swing a bat at, then i think poverty has to be the one to aim at
I'd like to live on planed Chomsky
(as someone commented on some video with Pr. Chomsky).
Planed or planet?
GIS = Geographic Information System
and what of poverty, been around a lot longer and as of october last year 1/8th people are hungry
Sweet
Anyone noticed the dude doing the interview quite often sounds like Opey from Family Guy?
Well, I find the issue with the business model as a whole, which ofc is subject to the herd mentality. Short term manipulation of financial instruments makes up a notable part of the global economy, and is legal. You are talking of ethics, which are superseded by the chance of private enrichment. I agree with you that that is wrong, but to simply express it as a truism does no one real good. Unfortunately, it falls on individuals to alert their representatives of its toxic effect on society.
Guy giving the interview is lost.
Perhaps even progressive leaning people would be atrocious (see Stalin - and no I don't want to open a discussion about how such people are really not progressive, which superficially is true). I feel that in Chomsky's mind, if we could manage to eliminate the institutions that are structured to produce ill decisions (I.e. the state, corps, etc.) then we would have a more moral society.
well why not but these days its all about the funding
AP = Andhra Pradesh, India
Rip, I don't think Chomsky has forgotten the animal nature of humans, and by no means does our animalistic nature give us a reasonable morality (which I'm sure you're not claiming). For example, one is hardly justified in raping merely bc many animals do, and humans may have some drive to, though it is clear that there are animal instincts that may drive one to such obscenities. Morality is all about being responsible and making responsible decisions despite despite urges to the contrary. .
Which is the point: animal versus human nature are too often lazily conflated.
Anyone else get annoyed when he makes a claim, then says something like "I could give a dozen examples" in support, but then doesn't?
Please forgive me if’s I don’t answer what’s your opinion on self search before, I have no condemned no self sided or successful on human lesser related reasons on harm of lawless🙏🏻, please. How’s truth lessers accept but accuse your rights in your manipulation, I don’t in your tracks, 🤥🌎🇺🇳.
If’s I found it’s the one of the war’s and arms sellers🤥😊, please 🙏🏻on lawlessness and satisfaction with the USA 🇺🇸 try🤥on the political propaganda wrongs doings, how’s freedom on self restricted 🚫 to develop , please .
The interviewer is kind of bad. Sorry.
"filtering systems", talk of rampant rationalization, is like reinventing the wheel. This subject has been looked into exhaustively by depth psychologists for 100 years, who call these things unconscious dynamics, complexes, and habitual thought processes. But Chomsky won't mention any of those thinkers or writers because he wants to appear novel. And he has no clue how to engage with such powerful, persistent tendencies. Logic and his thinking style of rationality will never do it. All the popular thinkers now are in this same boat: Pinker, Dennett, Dawkins, etc. Their only recourse is to push what they call rationality, which is a kind of thinking applied to social and political dimensions. Doesn't cut it.
Psychology is one of the biggest inheritors of 'rationality'. Its ontological/epistemological frameworks are based in individualism and structured by rational choice theory. What are you talking about?
The REAL, ' Responsibility of Intellectuals ', who know the, ' truth ', is ACTUALLY to PARTICIPATE in Policy-Making, give us the benefit of their superior wisdom, and show they can do a better job, themselves!
-NOT spend their entire careers merely criticizing everyone ELSE from the sidelines, and with the great luxury of 20/20 Hindsight-Like Chomsky! smh
LOL! Hypocrisy was covered here yet you fall into the same trap…🙄
@@christopherhamilton3621 ,
????
Being a good linguist and interesting philosopher does not make one good at public policy. I'd argue that the smartest men in history would make horrible leaders. Einstein, Tesla, Newton, ect. Plato was a genius but his views on a perfect society were pretty dystopian. Noam Chomsky is no doubt a smart man, but I'd rather have my cat in charge of government decisions. He has his head in the clouds.
?
What were the names of the murdered Jesuits?
This gentleman is very intelligent and I enjoy listening to him, but why is it every time he says something is bad he says like neo-liberal or something before it?
To read Chomsky's latest book for free, 'The Responsibility of
Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and Others after 50 years',
go to this link:
@t
To read Chomsky's latest book for free, 'The Responsibility of
Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and Others after 50 years',
go to this link:
@t
if you don't understand the man sorry but you have some kind of an impairment....he could not be more straightforward as he is.....
Well, qe can turn into what you describe, and ultimately i view it as such, but that doesn't really matter if the money received were to move around lending markets quickly, but low confidence negatively effects this to a significant degree. qe benefits those with greater assets, as found in the UK specifically, but considering the top down view of growth/supply side has largely dominated in the world since the 70's crises, this isn't surprising. qe issues currency in unconventional form btw.
La Jornada.