thanks, this is helpful. BE CAREFUL, when you try to find literature like this, some of the references are not real. Please CHECK all the articles before you decide to use them.
Ok little update. If you ask to OPENAI chat why the listed papers don't exist it respond the he provide only a list of hypothetical and not actual papers. My question: "What do you mean with hypothetical paper? ", his response: "When I referred to hypothetical papers in my previous response, I meant papers that do not actually exist. I provided a list of hypothetical paper titles as an example of the types of titles that one might find on the topic of knowledge management in the context of top Italian firms. These titles were not intended to be actual titles of existing academic papers. I apologize if my previous response was unclear or misleading in any way. If you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to ask."
@@Gaskination It could be very interesting to share different experinces among researchers! Thank you very much for sharing this very interesting and really useful tool!
I realized the same thing afterwards. For some topics (such as workplace constructs), it does really well and produces well-known citations. For less mainstream topics, it tends to make things up. For most of my searches, it made up about half of the citations when the topic was more obscure.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Roc Steady (feat. Flo Milli) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HozPPyqW0dY/mqdefault.jpg)
thanks, this is helpful. BE CAREFUL, when you try to find literature like this, some of the references are not real. Please CHECK all the articles before you decide to use them.
Ok little update. If you ask to OPENAI chat why the listed papers don't exist it respond the he provide only a list of hypothetical and not actual papers. My question: "What do you mean with hypothetical paper? ", his response: "When I referred to hypothetical papers in my previous response, I meant papers that do not actually exist. I provided a list of hypothetical paper titles as an example of the types of titles that one might find on the topic of knowledge management in the context of top Italian firms. These titles were not intended to be actual titles of existing academic papers. I apologize if my previous response was unclear or misleading in any way. If you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to ask."
I agree. I experienced that
I tried to tell it to only include real published papers, but it still produced about half fake and half real... ChatGPT 2.0 will be awesome.
@@Gaskination It could be very interesting to share different experinces among researchers! Thank you very much for sharing this very interesting and really useful tool!
FANTASTIC! Only one question... do you know what kind of references does it uses? I mean.... only open access or everything?
Wow James thanks so much for sharing this video. Amazing!
Just WOOOOW ! Incredible !
Thank you for this amazing video
Amazing!
My guy have you seen The Office? You literally sound like Jim Halpert
haha
This is a good tool for students
We have the same first and last name
Wow! I've never met another James Gaskin.
Unfortunately often references don't exist 😭😭😭😭😭
I realized the same thing afterwards. For some topics (such as workplace constructs), it does really well and produces well-known citations. For less mainstream topics, it tends to make things up. For most of my searches, it made up about half of the citations when the topic was more obscure.
Since it's a learning model, I believe you need to specify a specific foundational article to guide the AI.
Thanks :)