Wavelength Accuracy || HPLC Calibration Series Part-2 ||

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 дек 2024

Комментарии • 13

  • @Rajesh-uh3gl
    @Rajesh-uh3gl 2 года назад +3

    Very useful for pharma quality guys... Good job

  • @pakanagesh4648
    @pakanagesh4648 10 месяцев назад +1

    Super sir

  • @appalaraju7467
    @appalaraju7467 3 месяца назад

    In uv detector above 300nm how to perform

  • @neerajrajpoot9227
    @neerajrajpoot9227 2 года назад +1

    Sir isme detector kon sa detector used karte h pda or uv

    • @PharmaPill
      @PharmaPill  2 года назад +1

      Neeraj mene UV detector ke hisab se kiya he explain

  • @saritasawji5635
    @saritasawji5635 2 года назад +1

    Thanks sir

  • @sunilshinde9287
    @sunilshinde9287 2 года назад +1

    In which guideline it is mentioned maxima should be ± 2nm plz suggest

    • @PharmaPill
      @PharmaPill  2 года назад

      sir please refer link of guideline EDQM Guideline
      www.edqm.eu/documents/52006/128968/omcl-quality-management-document-annex-1-qualification-of-hplc-equipment.pdf/026e275c-2867-c216-9576-1b62ac13ef4e?t=1628491788491

  • @dhanupavan6833
    @dhanupavan6833 2 года назад +1

    Sir actually our limit is 203-207 nm.but why we are doing 202-208 nm please explain

    • @PharmaPill
      @PharmaPill  2 года назад

      First of All thanks for such a brilliant question.
      If you see guideline General European OMCL Network (GEON) as per that we need to scan from 190 to 290 nm scan with 1 nm incremental. And if you scan from 190 to 290 with 1 nm incremental your analysis time will huge. That’s why HPLC vendors recommends to scan near 202 to 208nm. Rather than entire 190 to 290nm. Hope it’s clear to you now..