@@a.randomjack6661 10:29 where he discusses 'emulation'. He uses computer model generated data to test the validity of the parameters used to create the model. Which came first, the chicken computer model, or the egg data it generates?
@@a.randomjack6661 You should read Mototaka Nakamura's short treatise, The Global Warming Hypothesis is an Unproven Hypothesis. He criticizes climate modeling for the following reasons 1: historical temperature data is scant; 2: what data there is has been hopelessly corrupted through adjustments 3: modelers can't account for even a fraction of the variables that drive the entire system 4: computers lack the power to model such a complicated systems. www.technocracy.news/dr-mototaka-nakamura-the-sorry-state-of-climate-science/
@grindupBaker Global warming from rising carbon dioxide lives only in computer models. Where's the actuall warming? I've heard thirty years of predictions of an ice free arctic during summer in X many years and it never actually occurs. Twenty-five years ago, sea level rise was going to displace the innhabitants of the Maldives. Fast forward and since 2015 the Saudis have invested in five new airports there. Other predictions, endlless droughts, more frequent and intense hurrricanes and even THE END OF SNOW have been posited by a breathless media hyperventilating about the catastrophic threat to humanity. Meanwhile, the AGW "science" money train keeps rolling along, churning out more and more failed predictions, hyperbolic claims and endlessly unfalsifiable psuedo-science babble about the state of the world, based entirely on computer models. In the real world, demonstrate a physical experiment where that proves that CO2 traps longwave radiation.
Thanks! I'll be here for the next one.
When observable 'data' is churned out by computer models, physical experimentation and data collection become meaningless.
Clearly, you did not understand what is said. You probably didn't even listen to it. Just my basic Bayesian reasoning...
@@a.randomjack6661 10:29 where he discusses 'emulation'. He uses computer model generated data to test the validity of the parameters used to create the model. Which came first, the chicken computer model, or the egg data it generates?
@@a.randomjack6661 You should read Mototaka Nakamura's short treatise, The Global Warming Hypothesis is an Unproven Hypothesis. He criticizes climate modeling for the following reasons 1: historical temperature data is scant; 2: what data there is has been hopelessly corrupted through adjustments 3: modelers can't account for even a fraction of the variables that drive the entire system 4: computers lack the power to model such a complicated systems.
www.technocracy.news/dr-mototaka-nakamura-the-sorry-state-of-climate-science/
@grindupBaker Global warming from rising carbon dioxide lives only in computer models. Where's the actuall warming? I've heard thirty years of predictions of an ice free arctic during summer in X many years and it never actually occurs. Twenty-five years ago, sea level rise was going to displace the innhabitants of the Maldives. Fast forward and since 2015 the Saudis have invested in five new airports there. Other predictions, endlless droughts, more frequent and intense hurrricanes and even THE END OF SNOW have been posited by a breathless media hyperventilating about the catastrophic threat to humanity. Meanwhile, the AGW "science" money train keeps rolling along, churning out more and more failed predictions, hyperbolic claims and endlessly unfalsifiable psuedo-science babble about the state of the world, based entirely on computer models.
In the real world, demonstrate a physical experiment where that proves that CO2 traps longwave radiation.