Libra Speciality Chemicals Ltd Assault | Update Video 🥊❌
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июн 2024
- This video is an update to what happened on this video - • Aggressive Managing Di...
Libra Speciality Chemicals Ltd, Brinell Dr, Irlam, Manchester M44 5LF.
We listen to the police take the statement over the phone and see the importance of keeping the raw video file for evidence.
We finish the video showing the emails from the police and the final result from the aggressor.
Enjoy!
_________________________________
Q - What is your email address?
A - djaudits@gmail.com
Q - Where Can I See All Your Links In 1 Place?
A - LinkTr.ee
My LinkTree - linktr.ee/djaudits
Q - What E-Bike Do You Use?
A - MiRiDER One (2022 Edition) Orange
My Referral Link - mirider.co.uk/?sld=djaudits
Q - What Drone Do I Use?
A - DJI MINI 4
My Referral Link - amzn.to/3SSN4hx
Q - Where Did You Get Drone Insurance From?
A - COVERDRONE
My Referral Link - quotes.coverdrone.com/awe/Con...
Q - What Bodycam Do I Use?
A - GoPro HERO12 Black
My Referral Link - amzn.to/3RJPmz9
Q - What Camcorder Do You Use To Zoom In?
A - Panasonic HC-V180 90x Optical Zoom
My Referral Link - amzn.to/3iglTNO
Q- What Powerbank Do You Use?
A - Charmast 23800mAh Quick Charge 3.0 PD 20W
My Referral Link - amzn.to/3rDCOL5
Good for you DJ! Slightly off topic, i was the victim of a really vile crime and had the screen / special measures put in place and if anyone reads this and is in a predicament whether to have them or not, for me personally it made the whole court proceedings a lot more doable and definetly helped with my anxiety not having to see my attacker!😊
💚
Great information for someone worrying about this them selves 👊
Well done DJ 😂
Was he/she, a police officer?
Pigs always on side of corps and government, that's why they now deserve the moniker...mind u they've never given us cause to show them respect have they..esp as u say if u were the victim. Makes u sick.
An apology under duress (fear of consequences) is not an apology.
A supposed apology that attempts to impose any terms, restriction or instructions is NOT an apology.
The apology was given to DJ, so it is now his property to do with as he wishes.
@markrobson2559 dumbass. It was NOT an apology. Any supposed apology that tries to impose any terms or conditions is NOT an apology. In addition its clear from the wording that the supposed apology letter was not done willingly but done solely to avoid prosecution and that they clearly still did not accept or even understand that they were in the wrong.
Womp womp
@markrobson2559 your clearly utterly gullible & not that bright. There was NO apology, what was given was NOT an apology.
Two tier policing... If it was the auditor that had done the assault, he'd have been in cuffs !!
💯👍🏻🤬!
Lol rightly so
So the police will give a violent thug a caution, but someone silently praying on the street is prosecuted.
This is why cops are hated.
🤡 world
A caution is creates a criminal record for life and appears on DBS checks.
@@markpaul1154 a caution will not show on a basic DBS check, as a caution is spent, but it will show up on standard and enhanced DBS checks.
@@markpaul1154 lasts a few months pal
@@afc431 A police caution shows for life on a dBS certificate.
Try knocking a pen and notebook out of a police officer's hand.
Conditional caution & letter of apology?
I think not.
His is what I always say " would they of done that to the police" answer NO
Assault of a police officer is a different crime, with harsher sentences. However, I'm sure that cautions are used in the circumstances you describe, especially if it's a first offence.
disappointed in the police here massively, if someone slapped somethinf out of a policemans hand, they would do time.
That would have been a great response. DJ replying well sergeant,if I try to launch your notebook clear across the road will youre using it. Will you just accept a note saying sorry. We all know the answer
Volound watches DJ audits?!
DJ audits, auditing britain, power to the proletariat. theyre all great. @@shaarapollo115
id do time cos i dont wear a shirt n tie
Police bottled it that was a clear assault and should have been dealt with by the courts. Disgrace police treat victims awful.
Considering the waste of time cases they actually put through the courts. Full video evidence is not enough to proceed to courts?
It’s because the police are fat lazy corrupt bastards!🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🥩🥩🥩
@@simonmockford7090 exactly this.
And what do you think the court would do?!!! Nothing. You think he’d get custodial sentence? 100% no. If his previous convictions, if he has any, deem it suitable then this is the correct way to deal with this.
@@jscooke70 who said custodial? You are literally arguing with yourself ha, a fine and community service with a conviction for assault is more than appropriate from a court, maybe wind your neck in lad lol.
You can assault someone now and just issue a apology? Never knew that.
😳😳😳😳😤😤😤🙏🙏🙏
He got a police caution which will be on his criminal record and show up on basic BDS checks for 6 years.
Not if you weren’t purposely trying to wind up people who are just working and breaking societal norms in doing so
@@5uper5kill3rz he didn’t try to wind them up you delusional fool. He can’t make you act like a dick. You do that on your own.
@@5uper5kill3rzthats irrelevant to the law
All depends on who you are
Just a half-hearted apology? No charges? That's outrageous!🤮If a person with a fan base(like DJ) experiences assault and the police take no action, it makes clear that an average John Doe stands no chance of receiving justice.
..... Well, it would appear that this helmets fan base doesn't include the Police does it? Now I wonder why that is?!!!!!!!!
Wrong, the average Joe wouldn’t be winding people up on purpose and if the bloke assaulted someone who was just walking his dog then he’d get charged, but w*nkers who purposely go about trying to wind people up are not real victims
@@501sqn3 maybe it does, can you not smell the bacon?
So basically the police are covering up for the manager, bet they wrote the apology
Well, a template anyway.
It wasn't an apology.
"If this happens again, I'll do it differently than I did before."
No where shows remorse for What he did only How he did it.
This Sergeant is a true disgrace to the public and should be investigated for bias.
Id be in jail if i did that so would most people defo anyone poor would.. I hate this place its done for
@@arkive11why would he show remorse? His only mistake was allowing himself to get wound up, the government now have official training for how to deal with auditors which they send out, I’ve done it at work, basically don’t treat them like a normal person who’s trying to wind you up because all they want is a reaction, don’t give them any reaction
It's an adult caution, everyone gets a caution for a first low level offence.
Lesson from this never bother calling police, they are incompetent.
" . . . and biased."
But definitely not lazy, stupid or corrupt. 👍
@@jonwyatt3694 This. They probably looked at it, thought what DJ does is annoying so won't pursue it very hard. Classic policing today unfortunately. Pot luck whether or not you get ones who actually care or take personal issues with one side or the other.
Hear Hear !!
@@DavidSmith-oy4ofwhat’s wrong with that? Most people would agree
It's not an apology if it's to be kept confidential. An apology must be public for obvious reasons.
The apology should be as public as the offence.
Is it an apology or just an admission of guilt?
@@capabilitybrown2323it was an apology without the admission of guilt, hence why it was stated "without prejudice".
DJ should reject the apology and demand a real apology is made or push for the conviction in-lieu of one as the guy clearly shows no remorse.
A supposed apology that attempts to impose any terms, restrictions or instructions is NOT an apology. It is a sign that a person is being forced to admit they were in the wrong but with them still not accepting or understanding that they were in the wrong.
Read the letter and can't actually see an apology, just acceptance that his behaviour was inappropriate. Total and utter nonsence and not in compliance with the conditional caution.
The apology is in there but not in a way that you would expect from such a letter. To hide it in the middle of an acceptance of his wrong doing is unacceptable. An apology letter should begin with the apology.
Read it again. He is only apologising because he overreacted. Not because he verbally and physically abused DJ.
Let's be honest, he's only sorry he got caught
@@mikef3324 If the verbal and physical assult is not the overreaction he apologised for, then what was the overreaction?
He apologised for over reacting to the situation, not hitting DJ, not striking the drone controller and not verbally abusing him.
It is a cleverly worded letter which is typical, another reason it is stated as being without prejudice which means it can't be used in legal precedings. Probably drafted by their solicitors.
@@mikef3324 The sergeant may have chosen the letter from a catalogue the police use to help friends and or masonic brothers, I doubt if the CEO was ever in the police station.
Why is the sergeant acting as judge? Surley his role is to gain evidence and pass on to the CPS who then make a decision as to the possibility of a successful prosecution. The letter of apology does not need to be accepted by the victim and the victim should have influence as to the progression of the case.
Has the CAA been informed of the crime of endangering the flight of an aircraft directly? In my opinion the CAA must directly prosecute as a test case for public (UAV flyers) interest. If they do not it leaves the law invalid and so opens up the capability of individuals to abuse the rights of responsible flyers.
Well done DJ for following this up and i hope it reaches a correct conclusion. 😎
That's not how it works. This is why there are so many criminals walking the streets.
I definitely agree with each point you make. As for reporting directly to the CAA, I think this is definitely a good shout as most pilots of any aircraft threatened by whatever means do not usually call the police, I would think. If I was DJ I would approach the CAA with the concerns that this man endangered the flight and so on......
Police apparently can do what they want
I’ve just been investigated for “harassment with threats of violence” against people who are actually harassing and stalking us - luckily I can prove the threats with violence bit was entirely made up. Chose not to give the evidence to the police thinking I’d be taken to court as they had three people apparently witness it but I did make it clear to the police I could prove my innocence so because the CPS wouldn’t charge me, they slapped a Community Protection Notice on me - little plebs can act as judge jury and executioner when they don’t have enough to go to court, fumin 🙄
Ah well, they’ve been making false allegations for two years so no doubt it’ll continue and I’ll get a day in court one day - either that or I pay 10’s of thousands for a private prosecution because the police have ignored my requests for help against them 😠
@@SuperFredc Completely agree with you and the original poster.
If private drone pilots start hassling the CAA you watch how quickly the laws will change and these machines will be outlawed or subjected to major clamp down.
Beware of scoring an own goal here.
The nice thing about cameras is that the auditor can review the video as many times as he wants, and the other party may have forgotten most of the confrontation after a couple of months. So the auditor always has the advantage. And not letting him get away with it is great.
Confirmation that the police prioritise big business. The public are definitely second class. Thanks for sharing this.
Hire a solicitor and file a law suit against him and his organisation as a civil claim. These emails and his poorly worded letter of 'apology' to get out of it prove an absolute admission of guilt on his part and make him personally liable to the claim as an act of battery on your person.
Be led by your lawyer after instructing them to make it a civil claim so he is held personally accountable in court. Still, not a bad result DJ - at least he has a caution on record now as a criminal offender so he better think twice before doing that again as the next time will not be a caution!
In civil though, he would not be able to get punitive damages, he would need to show some sort of loss. Otherwise he may end up with token payment of a pound or something
He can't use his letter in court. "Without Prejudice".
@@Gingerharry2011DJ could always claim that he would like to go back to the industrial estate one day but is worried about big Phil getting the boys out to try intimate DJ as we saw they have no problems with that. Or that he may arrange for someone with "no association with the company" may randomly harass or assault DJ. Also DJs just had some time off, this could have been to recoup and recover from the stress of the whole incident
@@Gingerharry2011 UK courts do award punitive damages if the claimant can show that physical harm was indeed used as is certainly the case here. Further more, the aggressive and intimidating act also led to DJ's RC being damaged and loss of income from the use of his drone - they are worth hundreds of pounds!
@@whitedragonracing All the solicitor need do is ask the defendant, while under oath, if he assaulted DJ. If he says no in court knowing that he has already admitted it to the police and that there is raw video evidence to prove it then perjury will be committed. So while he may not directly use the letter "without prejudice" as a previous written and privileged communication the evidence of the assault is already there and any lawyer worth his or her salt will get that across.
You have to sue mate, he has no chance as he has admitted all, he can not control who has sight of a letter he sends you, go for £10k, settle for £8k, then sue his company for the same.
Not a lawyer, just a supporter
Yes sue he do not let him get away with it
Well said
The apology was provided "without prejudice", so it cannot be used as evidence against the perpetrator in a civil claim.
@@user-hm5ss4wu4e Matters not , he has the communication from the police confirming the caution, in addition if he goes to a lawyer for defence no one will represent him on sight of the letter as he is guilty
Is there an option of taking out a private prosecution of both offences? Maybe the legal costs involved would unfortunately rule this out.
Imagine if it was the other way around..?(DJ assaulting a worker…) He would be in nick, sharpish.
Yeah because the context is different, nobody expects to be harassed & wound up by some weirdo with a camera at work, it’s not socially acceptable to go around doing what DJ audits does and so of course people get angry as they’re not aware of auditors but luckily the government is now warning people and sending out training, basically tells you what not to say, but the no. 1 rule to do not react as then they won’t have any content
@@5uper5kill3rz you are super butt hurt 😂 all over the comments here! You must be one of the absolute tools in one of his videos. I have not seen someone cry this much before. 😢 hilarious
I would take this to civil court.
DJ your been shifted one by the Police & Mr Carson , I bet at Libra they all laughing , DJ thanks for sharing
The problem is that drone operators have all the responsibilities of a pilot but none of the protections 😞 CAA/UK-Police, be ashamed.
"Pilots" Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 😂🤣.
Because they ain’t real pilots
@DaleSykes-kr4lr that's not really the case. If a drone pilot also pilots aircraft, he still has to register and pay the CAA separately each year for each activity provide proof on request and abide by the same air laws. But if he's interrupted while in command of a plane, it's a crime, not so when in control of a drone. But the liability in the event of an accident is the same. The protections afforded were removed by excluding drones from the sections of the ANO quite recently.
Giving out a keyring while making your statement was brilliant 😂
🤣🤣🙌🙌🙌🙌
You should give him a keyring with his cell number on it 😜@@DJAUDITS
It's a criminal.offence to interfere with a drone pilot physically. So this is the police ignoring a filmed offence!
You sound surprised?
Had a similar experience last year . My brother and I were flying our drones when an irate guy came up and assaulted us,he also grabbed my brothers’ controller, causing the drone to crash and be lost.
Milton Keynes police sided with the assaulter, and told my brother to go buy another drone!
Reported all this to Professional Standards, no action taken against the sergeant we reported the assault to!
Typical police crap.
They even ignore their own footage, how many TV car chases end up with NFA due to lack of evidence, even if it is all caught on body worn and dash cameras?
Exactly
I was assaulted last year in Australia by some Chinese tourists.
Pushed to the ground, choked, kicked multiple times while on the ground.
All of it caught on security camera. Footage given to police.
NSW police response - "I will not be charging them as they didn't know they couldn't do that, so I educated them".
Officers seem to take public photography more seriously than an assault like this. It's unfortunate.
DJ giving out keyrings in the middle of a police interview .i got the giggles big time .
Send this to HNK im sure they will sue this individual and company for you. Im sure they will settle quite quickly
Indeed. That's the _criminal_ matter closed, but the criminal involved has just admitted to the crime, so it's really just a case of haggling over the payout.
@@rogerborg He can't use his letter in court. "Without Prejudice".
@@whitedragonracingthe apology can be used in court. Loads of such documents have been used in the PO inquiry. The without prejudice does not mean a huge amount.
@@TheSadButMadLad He can use the video, the judge 'should" place the letter in the bin.
What an utter joke! The police in England don't take things seriously enough. I'm english and grew up in the black country and have seen how lenient the CPS are. I moved to Scotland 10 years ago and here we don't have the CPS. It's the Procurator Fiscal. Everything gets passed through them and it's either a fine or a court date. If he had committed that offence in Scotland then without a doubt he would have had at least a fine. Makes me angry how the police are strict with us drone pilots and making sure we are flying correctly or they seize drones and/or arrest us but someone can commit an offence to a drone pilot, endangering people and as long as they type an apology in an email then alls well!!
We're all growing up in the black country now
HNK private prosecution's he has admitted assault to the police. THE THUG
Phil Carson & his brotherhood of thugs should be sacked. Libra Speciality Chemicals Ltd should be ashamed having their employees behave in the manner they did. Where is your code of conduct & has your company any ethics. DISGRACE
DANGEROUS TO ALLOW AN IRATE MAN HIT YOUR CONTROLLER WHILE THE DRONE IS UP IN THE AIR. APPALLING. NOW YOU HAVE THE LETTER AND HE ADMITTED TO EVERYTHING SO TAKE THIS A STEP UP FURTHER. IF DJ DID THIS TO SOMEONE ELSE OR A COP HE WOULD BE IN JAIL.
I thought if the drone fell out of the sky there is no danger
This is pathetic police work, leaving it until the day of the interview to ask for the crucial video. Then, they ignore the air traffic endangerment offence. Well done DJ, for putting this insincere piece of bog roll substitute up for us to see. It must have taken the lardy bully boy's secretary a minute and a half to write. As for sergeant slime, all I can say is that he must be in the same lodge as lardy.
Absolutely correct.
Maybe you should join up and lead the way. Keep us informed. You can even apply from behind your computer 😂
😂😂😂
You are 'not allowed' to ask the CPS to consider something but they are allowed to ask you to keep an apology letter confidential?
They serve the people or at least they are supposed to.
DO NOT COMPLY.
you can ask cps to look into this, its was a criminal act and not upto police if it goes to court or not......
I've emailed him directly what a disgrace. How do these people get off with such anger and blatant law breaking. Unreal.
This is why I started auditing I had the same experience but with a police officer
This situation's not at all funny, but the fact that Libra Chemicals is listed on Google Maps as an 'adult day care centre' is absolutely hysterical 😂😂😂
had to check this, absolutely howling hahah
Google probably changed it after watching and subscribing to Dj's channel.
It's a boxing gym now 😂
@@PronStarKilluminati2 and it's listed as permanently closed. Did it shut down? Or they just trying to avoid the backlash in reviews?
Interesting, isn't it? How it's the police who are deciding what someone is charged with and what punishment they are to receive?
Who needs a judge?
Who needs a jury or a trial?
Who needs freedom?
Who needs justice?
You have cops, it's basically the same thing.
A glimpse of the future?
Based on experience, the police don't hand over bodycam footage, falsify statements and file bogus charges. Oh yes, it really happens. Allegedly.
Judge Dredd
Police siding with local, "importantc citizens over and out-of-towner.
40:00 that's actually a result. I know it's not very satisfying, but given the huge backlog in the court system I'm actually surprised that they performed a proper investigation. Well done for not letting this go unchallenged.
Agree great result 😊
Huge backlog? Says who? You are in court within two weeks of being arrested! There's no backlog. That's a myth.
It's a result for the CEO, he got a friendly sergeant to sweep it under the carpet, was the CEO ever in the police station?
I went there and a member of staff said they didn't care DJ was assaulted. Video is on my channel.
Don’t think the police will bother
Send it to the police then
I saw that video, they said they don’t care . Businesses all think they are above the law
And
@@FindingcupcakeLitterly said they didn't care 😮
So you assault someone but as long as you apologise by letter and not even in person that's alright is it? What an absolute farce.
Better stated as long as you give a “non-apology” everything is tied up.
Police received a brown envelope from Mr Carson?
Could be, looks like we don't need courts and or judges, just nip out and buy a sergeant, job done.
A joke of an apology letter. If he truly was sorry, he should've invited you to the company and shake your hand and apologize in person. Then just show you around the company and maybe some coffee or food. That would be a proper apology. I would accept that.
He would apologize in front of the same audience he assaulted you in front of.
An the police wonder why some take the law into their own hands what a joke are justice system is awful
Two tier policing. Its everywhere!
At times their correspondence made you sound like the perpetrator of the assault.
I agree especially the back and forth over the footage , Are the police tying to push the narrative that RUclips vids are not actual evidence of their conduct ?.
Can't be good for the company's reputation, can it...
They needed a witness statement even though they have the video with EVERYTHING that was said and done right there in front of them ? How much more useless can they get !?
Watch out. They'll take that as a challenge 😂.
It's a deliberate ploy to influence people into dropping the action.
That's exactly what I was thinking. So, they got DJ to recall the incident over the phone and PC Plod writes it down in a Word document in his words and this is the statement of facts. Pathetic, the video is the most accurate statement of facts.
That's easy, wait until the assaulter is in police reception to give their statement and realise you haven't even got the evidence ready.
Yes, because they need a statement written out for the criminal process. The officer could watch the video and make their own witness statement having seen it, but it is "best evidence" for it to come directly from the victim. The alternative is that you upload a video to the court, with the title, "trust me bro, there is a crime somewhere here", which the court doesn't have time to do.
What's the point in having a law if the police aren't interested in enforcing it? They'll happily use the Terrorist Act etc. against you. As for Laura Steele saying it is not for you to decide what crimes the CPS pursue, we'll that's just rude. The CPS won't pursue a crime that an individual hasn't been charged for, so what exactly is she saying here?
So they protect big business, ok then .
Also pass judgements down without a judge or trial, dictating who's guilty to what degree and what the suitable punishment is for the self admitted crime.
Apparently full Audio, Video as well as a full Confession of Guilt still isn't enough to pass onto the courts. At least not to this "Decision Maker."
How many women endured these "decisions" regardless of conclusive evidence?
@@arkive11 these so called decision makers all cover up for each other . Like you said , how many other injustices have been committed by those who are supposed to protect and serve .
Aren't they really their private security force?
@@JLajos they sure are , we see that time and time again
precisely, they work to protect the government and corporations
Hang on ,,,, *”A Police Decision Maker ?”* That’s not even a thing. There was a serious crime committed & admitted that could have resulted with severe harm 🤦🏻
Agreed, the decision maker only made an offer, it's his title that's the decoy, he ain't a Judge. One that got away.
@@MrSpudguncat well said
Search for his collar number and you can see him
cant argue with "police decision makers" its usualy a duty inspector or the cps will listen live to the interview
Another day when justice isnt done, I feare for our legal system these days. A very dramatyc statement DJ Lol
That is absolutely shocking keep up the good work dj
Carson is obviously friendly with the coppers.
Back h*****
[Freemasons]?
@@QuiteSimplyMyChoice That would be my guess.
So the knowledge gained from this experience is, that if the manager behaves like an aggressive tool he gets a slap on the wrist for being a naughty boy! but if he conducts himself in an appropriate manner, its ok for his staff to therefore behave like wankers?? mollycoddling the guilty means less paperwork but doesnt and wont prevent it from happening again, complete joke of an outcome!!
He got a police caution which will be on his DBS check for 6 years, it's not inconsquencial.
@@wtfisgoingon8587 He is a criminal and should be sentenced in court, his assault conviction should be on his record for life.
Love the commentary to the guy on phone. Could here the smile in his voice 😂😂
Cautions are a convieniant excuse for the police to dismiss incidents whilst pretending to serve justice to victims. A caution means absoultely nothing to the perpetrator. The attitude of the police is disgraceful but the courts would only fail you too anyway. Go and knock a pride flag out of someone's hand at an event and see what happens to you.
A police caution will stay on his criminal record and show up on his DBS check for six years, it's not inconsquencial.
18727 Sergeant Hemmings shows their support of the physically violent and does their absolute best to make sure the man is not punished for a Documented, Admitted to assault~~
A victim should be able to decide if it's reasonable or not, not the guys drinking buddies.
Masonic brothers?
You know to stay safe you can always run away and hide from this kind of situation.
Absolute piss take - they had no intention of siding with a scummy RUclipsr - 2 tier policing in action! What if he had damaged your controller? What if it was in manual mode? Should be taken as seriously as if someone smashed the cockpit instruments to pieces in a jumbo jet!
They'll get on you about how many grams it is because of the "danger"
But refuse to acknowledge that assaulting someone (which he admitted to.) who's flying causes a much larger hazard.
It could go into a street or a no fly zone, forbid it actually hits anything.
If I grab the steering wheel of a car away from the driver is He still responsible for what happens?
Extremely concerning also is the fact that the police tried to gaslight you into not showing the apology when by their own admission this was the end of the matter and the investigation had concluded. They are protecting the aggressor and subtlety threatening the victim who should be the one getting the support. I think the police were embarrassed and wanted this to be all off social media but DJ saw through this I'm glad to see.
You don't know what the word gaslight means.
@@wtfisgoingon8587 psychological manipulation to question your own correct point of view. Thanks for the education attempt maybe school yourself next time 😂😂
Disgusting outcome , if he assaulted a police officer I wonder what the outcome would be 😡🤦
someone please pass this to blackbelt barrister, also on youtube. He has commented before about DJ.
I love that you’ve given this update. It’s very interesting to hear because I always wonder. Thanks.
I hope you'll get it sorted soon by court 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 DJ
Given the way Big Phil acted in the original vid, I fully expected the apology letter to be written in crayon and smeared with a suspicious brown stain.
From the way he acted, I believe crayons would be age inappropriate.Even crayola recommend a higher level of maturity than he showed.
@DJAudits
Do you know why he wrote "Without Prejudice" or what it means? If you do not know what it means, then Mr Carson has used it in the wrong context (both parties need to know why it has been stated).
It's a basic statement when the person/s are accepting their wrongdoings, it's to stop you, from taking him to a civil court and using it for financial damages against him.
Meaning he did something wrong and is admitting it, BUT you cannot use that admission, in a civil court, as an admission of guilt (even though it is).
A nice caveat to include in an admission of guilt, if done properly.
This outcome is unsatisfactory. This needs to be investigated
Why you were there and at what time, is irrelevant. It has nothing to do with the assault itself and are just trick questions to find something to get you on something. Never answer questions like that. And, here in The Netherlands we have an Ombudsman where we can go to if the outcome of a police investgation is not what you expect. They will review the case and correct or not correct the police decision. There's a onbudsman in the UK aswell.
Surely the most serious crime was that of endangering a pilot whilst flying. I believe that the sergeant got it wrong this time, and you should have been more vocal in pushing the point.
😂😂🤣🤣🤣😄😅🤣
Would the CAA be the ones to prosecute the drone law?
Thanks so much for the update DJ
A very interesting update, DJ. I'm not really surprised at the decision reached by the police. Although pretty traumatic for you at the time, it was a fairly low-level "assault"/incident. I think the MD realised straight away that he'd overreacted and did back off quickly. He has apologised and now received some much-deserved public comeuppance.
What I am surprised at, though, is the poor grammar used by two supposedly professional people in the update. PC Laura Steele wrote in her covering letter: "outside of" instead of outside, "libra chemicals" with no capitals, "Crime" which didn't need a capital and "Crime for assault" instead of Crime of assault.
And MD Phil Carlson used very amateur/annoying repetition in his letter of apology. Employing "interaction" twice in his two-line second paragraph. And "future" twice in his closing one-line paragraph/sentence. Doesn't the guy possess a thesaurus?
What's a secong?
Twas a typo, obviously.
Get in touch with the Police commissioner for GMP. Also email Andy Burnham as the mayor of Greater Manchester.
Absolutely.
Can't wait to hear this update!!!
Is this what they call two tier policing? I'm just bamboozled with this one and have never heard the police doing this sort of phone interview. I thought your response to the questions was so well handled. Keep up the good work. "How tall was staff member one?" - I only know anyone's height if they stand next to me and they are either shorter or taller than me . I've got to watch this in two hits and hope I haven't asked any stupid questions before it gets to the end.
Contact the police complaints commission, or better still, a solicitor
Bloody hell, they did everything they could to wriggle out of prosecuting that, then they (effectively) no-further-actioned it.
Now you have an admission of the crime, feel free to make a civil claim against the criminal.
That's what I was thinking too.
Why write a statement, when it is all on film.
It's how the police roll, all formalities.
Because it's passed around several people, and it's quicker to read a precis than watch a video.
Really? You need to ask that?
A statement is signed off as a legal document.
I must have been asleep and missed the announcement that a police Sargent can now consider himself to be a magistrate or judge and make a decision of what punishment is given for assault.
I very much appreciate this kind of follow up on videos and although it may require a bit more thought and attention than a pure video I think that it is a very useful extension to the Citizen Journalist/Auditor Service.
Please keep it up.
Can you imagine how long the prison sentence would be if someone slapped a drone controller out of a coppers hand ? Typical two tier policing in my opinion.
A very good point. I was always led to believe the police made a case file which was sent to the crown prosecution service to see if there was a case to answer. Now a police sergeant is judge and jury. Our Country England 🏴 needs a better judicial system
Appreciate the update on this 👍🏼 bloke was well out of order
Been waiting this video thank brother
Fascinating to hear. So good that you had the original footage.
Playing devils advocate, if he had no prior criminal history and he was honestly sorry for his actions, they could have given him a Community Resolution which would not have been recorded on the PNC...but a conditional caution is a step up from that and is recorded. So he will always have this on record and if he was to ever do something similar again it would be used against him. I think its a fair outcome and he will certainly have faced a lot of sleepless nights during the process.
He should get 15 years! No parole.
Indeed, you should think very long and hard before accepting a caution. I have little doubt that if this criminal had refused, then the police or the CPS would just have dropped it (or bungled it).
@@Charlie1776_😂 A 25 stretch!
Contravention of the air nab order is the bigger crime and totally ignored. This should have gone to trial.
Dude! Why did you have to give out a keyring on the phone! It made me crack up so much! Absolutely loved it! I half expected a “from abovvvvvveeee!” too.
They probably didn't want to deal with the air navigation order because it would mean involving the CPS, I don't think the CPS are involved in cautions. They also likely had no knowledge of the air navigation and were too lazy to do the research.
Cps are influenced by the police they are not independent they all p**s in the same pot. They share an office so they are all friends
Very poor result IMHO🤨
This really shocks me. As a father that has been through the family court I have lost every thing. My home of 16yrs my children my belongings my life.
With out any evidence any where near like u have( no real evidence in fact)
And u have to settle with an apology. This breaks me.
Thanks for the update Deej 🇦🇺🇦🇺
Well done not keeping it confidential.
Omg it’s the guy who assaulted DJ
🥉
Big up yourself DJ, as you said this needs to be made a precedent!
Keep strong DJ 💚🧠💪🤝🙋♂️.
now you have a sure civil court case win
Morning! 🇨🇦
Police are on the side of the cooperations
Hi DJ Audits 👋🏼
Private prosecution the only way to go.
Outstanding work DJ.
The truth is out there now.
If he was convicted of a criminal offence as a CEO. He would not be allowed to enter America on a Business visa, for international meetings. Including some other countries.
That may have been taken into account. Not to proceed to the courts. Show me the money
Thank you for your content as you defend your rights in accordance with the relevant laws.