Thanks for this course seen many people teach without explaining the why but you do. Finally on my way to understanding and not just memorizing proofs.
subset sign with a line under it implies that both subsets can be equal(improper subset), Just a subset sign imposes that sets can not be equal. (proper subset).
As mentioned before these are between the few playlists on Real Analysis, I'll be looking forward to these videos. Is there any complimentary text-book to help understand? I bought a Spivak Calculus (4th edition) about 2 years ago, just waiting for the right time to start doing the problems and understand. Would Spivak work? Cheers from Bolivia
Hey there! Thank you for your support. I didn't use one textbook, instead I took from various books. I think that's one of the best ways to learn analysis. Every author can help provide a different perspective. I can recommend the notes my professor used: www.math.ualberta.ca/~bowman/m117/m117.pdf Thank you for your support! :)
![Unions of Sets, Intersection of Sets [Real Analysis]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q7TS6kRX97c/mqdefault.jpg)
![Unions of Sets, Intersection of Sets [Real Analysis]](/img/tr.png)
Thanks for this course seen many people teach without explaining the why but you do. Finally on my way to understanding and not just memorizing proofs.
Excellent video lecture.
subset sign with a line under it implies that both subsets can be equal(improper subset), Just a subset sign imposes that sets can not be equal. (proper subset).
17:52 how? How exactly? Why aren't brackets just an arbitrary way of denoting the list of elements? I don't get it
Thank you so much I wish you all the happiness in the world
Starting the Course, Thanks in advance
Great bro
@14:45 this is a good place to talk about what it means to be 'vacuously true'
Keep doing the good work man! Thanks! ❤
good work
As mentioned before these are between the few playlists on Real Analysis, I'll be looking forward to these videos. Is there any complimentary text-book to help understand? I bought a Spivak Calculus (4th edition) about 2 years ago, just waiting for the right time to start doing the problems and understand. Would Spivak work?
Cheers from Bolivia
Hey there! Thank you for your support. I didn't use one textbook, instead I took from various books. I think that's one of the best ways to learn analysis. Every author can help provide a different perspective.
I can recommend the notes my professor used: www.math.ualberta.ca/~bowman/m117/m117.pdf
Thank you for your support! :)
CosmicTutoring By Rancy Singh thanks I appreciate that.
A SET CANNOT be DEFINED!!!!!!!!!!!
Braces. The wiggly brackets are called braces.