The cry ratio increased because of me. Thank you for curating these wonderful souls and sharing them with all of us interconnected beings. Now I am going to go breathe with my garden. :)
Maybe its just me but that poem at the start just felt like random words strung together. I thought she was eventually going to stop and say that the poem was generated by GPT-1.
Can you elaborate (deeper explanation and concrete examples)? Because I see it as having part useful talks (like "birds are not real" joke showing how conspiracy theories spread) and part useless (telling in 10+ min what could be said in 2 sentences, the rest being filler).
@@copiumkiller He is right, TedTalk is decades old, when you travelbthrough the Ted Talks over the years tou notice it has taken a free fall downwards in the past 5 to 10 years from its original intentions. The Mantra was "Ideas worth sharing" about / in "Technology, Education & Design."
@@kamu747I am exploring the claim. What the OG commenter and you are doing is just stating opinion, but not backing up with data or logic chain. Let's take this video - the main idea was that creative people look from a different perspective (and giving various examples). IMO the most useful part was reusing stuff in a construction work, because had real life application. Somewhat in mental health it was "time machine" - to be more self-forgiving, by taking a bigger perspective, although could be much deeper dive in - like using cognitive behavioural therapy.
@@copiumkiller There are a thousand ways to skin a cat. If you want to disagree with what we are saying, that's fine, but you can't dismiss what we said as baseless. Just because the manner in which the OG's statement that TED has "lost the goal: to show case inportant research that is shaping our world" and mine that there's a marked drop in the quality of "ideas worth sharing" presented at the "Technology, education and design (TED) conferences" doesn't fit your view of how statements should be communicated, does not as a result make them invalid. Yes, you're stating the obvious that these are our opinions, as are most comments. What's the matter with that? What's your opinion? Any statement contrary to what we said is also an opinion since what we are expressing is a matter of taste and perceived value, which will definitely be subjective. Logic chain, in this case, doesn't prove anything. You can't prove otherwise without doing a thorough analysis of the thousands of presentations that span 40 years of TED conferences. If you found this video informative and intellectually stimulating, well and good, you're fortunate in this regard because I didn't.
@@kamu747 Your answer went into a tangent, which misses point of my comment - understand WHY you think what you think. But maybe it is a roundabout answer to that question - because you FEEL. You use your feelings, because deeply analysing thigs would be too exhausting. And if it is the case - it is K. I even made a video why people 95%+ time decide with emotons and justify with logic. If not, then what is the answer in your case?
The cry ratio increased because of me.
Thank you for curating these wonderful souls and sharing them with all of us interconnected beings.
Now I am going to go breathe with my garden. :)
Thankyou TED for bringing these awesome creative people together in one stage. Awesome experience. ❤❤❤...
Glad you enjoyed it!
Remember animatrix? We are in part 1 right now. Soon part 2 will follow.
Well explanation
Maybe its just me but that poem at the start just felt like random words strung together. I thought she was eventually going to stop and say that the poem was generated by GPT-1.
Great!
Great 🎉
Im from india
Best
Leave our descendants where they stand
What's with the comment section.. I'm so confused..
TED Talks have officially lost the goal.. this was to help people learn things.. sad.
Can you elaborate (deeper explanation and concrete examples)? Because I see it as having part useful talks (like "birds are not real" joke showing how conspiracy theories spread) and part useless (telling in 10+ min what could be said in 2 sentences, the rest being filler).
@@copiumkiller He is right, TedTalk is decades old, when you travelbthrough the Ted Talks over the years tou notice it has taken a free fall downwards in the past 5 to 10 years from its original intentions.
The Mantra was "Ideas worth sharing" about / in "Technology, Education & Design."
@@kamu747I am exploring the claim. What the OG commenter and you are doing is just stating opinion, but not backing up with data or logic chain. Let's take this video - the main idea was that creative people look from a different perspective (and giving various examples). IMO the most useful part was reusing stuff in a construction work, because had real life application. Somewhat in mental health it was "time machine" - to be more self-forgiving, by taking a bigger perspective, although could be much deeper dive in - like using cognitive behavioural therapy.
@@copiumkiller
There are a thousand ways to skin a cat.
If you want to disagree with what we are saying, that's fine, but you can't dismiss what we said as baseless.
Just because the manner in which the OG's statement that TED has "lost the goal: to show case inportant research that is shaping our world" and mine that there's a marked drop in the quality of "ideas worth sharing" presented at the "Technology, education and design (TED) conferences" doesn't fit your view of how statements should be communicated, does not as a result make them invalid.
Yes, you're stating the obvious that these are our opinions, as are most comments. What's the matter with that?
What's your opinion? Any statement contrary to what we said is also an opinion since what we are expressing is a matter of taste and perceived value, which will definitely be subjective. Logic chain, in this case, doesn't prove anything.
You can't prove otherwise without doing a thorough analysis of the thousands of presentations that span 40 years of TED conferences.
If you found this video informative and intellectually stimulating, well and good, you're fortunate in this regard because I didn't.
@@kamu747 Your answer went into a tangent, which misses point of my comment - understand WHY you think what you think. But maybe it is a roundabout answer to that question - because you FEEL. You use your feelings, because deeply analysing thigs would be too exhausting. And if it is the case - it is K. I even made a video why people 95%+ time decide with emotons and justify with logic. If not, then what is the answer in your case?