CASTIGLIANO'S THEOREM in Just Over 10 Minutes!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 окт 2024

Комментарии • 37

  • @inkylion93
    @inkylion93 3 года назад +43

    I'm on my knees praising this

  • @rockerdude22
    @rockerdude22 3 года назад +15

    Thank you for the great video! You were able to explain this more effectively in 10 min than my professor did in 3 hours . . . well done!

  • @tuhinsuryachakraborty
    @tuhinsuryachakraborty Год назад +2

    Live saving video for my Advanced Engineering Mechanics semester exam.

  • @alexandresauve9215
    @alexandresauve9215 Год назад +4

    Incredibly well done! Thank you

    • @alexandresauve9215
      @alexandresauve9215 Год назад

      PS, curious if we are able to combine singularity and castiglianos. (Writing out a single moment equation, and it's partial derivative w.r.t. P across whole domain)

  • @tonyezekiel2819
    @tonyezekiel2819 2 года назад

    This channel is so underrated

  • @ReactionTest0
    @ReactionTest0 3 года назад +2

    Such a great video, we are also working on a video on Castigliano's theorem. But it has less calculatory explanation than this video does. Was wondering if we could tell our audience to refer to your video if they are interested in the nitty-gritty of it. Let me know what you think, and keep making such great videos.

    • @LessBoringLectures
      @LessBoringLectures  3 года назад +2

      Of course! Thanks for sharing!

    • @ReactionTest0
      @ReactionTest0 3 года назад +1

      @@LessBoringLectures Thank you

    • @ReactionTest0
      @ReactionTest0 3 года назад +2

      Hey there, It took longer than expected, but the video on Castigliano's theorem is finally out. Check it out and let me know what you think about it!

  • @matteocoda6368
    @matteocoda6368 Год назад

    Refreshing just in case. Thank you.

  • @georgebarros6095
    @georgebarros6095 3 года назад +2

    Keep this awesome work, bro

  • @saulramirez547
    @saulramirez547 3 года назад +3

    Bro this helped so much. Thanks.

  • @roeemt5829
    @roeemt5829 3 года назад +4

    Thank you so much, this is really helpful :)

  • @asif.a15
    @asif.a15 Год назад

    You are too good at explaining things!

  • @sameh465
    @sameh465 2 года назад

    Thank you for your perfect explain.
    may you tell me the program that you use in explain?

  • @talha3346
    @talha3346 9 месяцев назад

    Why not views in millions?

  • @ernstopll2009
    @ernstopll2009 2 года назад +1

    I believe in the last example after the integration it should be ()-PL^2/2EI instead of ()-PL^2/4EI, right?

    • @fabriceras9562
      @fabriceras9562 Год назад +1

      He forgot to carry the 2 from L/2 when he expanded the brackets

  • @shankylezapanta1464
    @shankylezapanta1464 11 месяцев назад

    @ 9:41 is macaulay bracket still applicable instead pf using normal piecewise function?? Thank youu

    • @shankylezapanta1464
      @shankylezapanta1464 11 месяцев назад

      So the integral term would just be 1 term in a case of bending moment consideration only

  • @clarkgriswold5842
    @clarkgriswold5842 3 года назад +1

    I don't see the link for more examples in the description...

    • @LessBoringLectures
      @LessBoringLectures  3 года назад +1

      The third section of the description below the video's title has them: _________________________________________________________________
      Examples:
      Example 1: ruclips.net/video/-IAaMWJwuzE/видео.html
      Example 2: ruclips.net/video/TV4-Adl-4Dk/видео.html
      Example 3: ruclips.net/video/7tcNJTDhzkE/видео.html

  • @AndrewBossert
    @AndrewBossert 8 месяцев назад

    You're my actual MoM professor, you just don't realize it 😂

  • @ofoz
    @ofoz 11 месяцев назад

    AWESOME

  • @jaydilworth1895
    @jaydilworth1895 3 года назад

    Awesome video, but doesn't the equation for torsion have an L in the numerator?

  • @YamatoSRebellion
    @YamatoSRebellion 3 года назад

    Amazing!!!

  • @samiru6521
    @samiru6521 Год назад +5

    everything is well organised. but the voice was a bit robotic . so it was hard to maintain attention. Hope you will improve that

  • @Hsuaaduxdh
    @Hsuaaduxdh Год назад

    great

  • @mechanicalengineerturbo
    @mechanicalengineerturbo 9 месяцев назад

    How to calculate this shit for a beam with 2 supports and multiple loads?

  • @broteendas1194
    @broteendas1194 11 месяцев назад +2

    good content... terrible voice acting... sounds like you are reading off of a script that you memorised (which is understandable) but I think your motonous way of speaking is really not cutting it. Try referring to *Veritasium* (please take this is a constructive criticism)

  • @jullianpaulcalapini5390
    @jullianpaulcalapini5390 10 месяцев назад

    Way ka pulos