yes they can, because of this simple fact: the USA in the late 40s and early 50s irl was completely unstoppable. Even if the Soviets controlled the entirety of Europe they would eventually still lose. This becomes pretty clear when you look at the statistics of how quickly the USA was industrialising and the sheer number of new planes, tanks, and navy pieces the US pumped out during WWII. Besides this, I doubt Stalin would be very competent with his health deteriorating so rapidly by this point, not to mention the amount of resistance Europe would have to a giant communist occupier on their lands.
@@kniviritsyn he's right tho. Like paradox, I know you need the allies AI to he able to fight the germans somehow and i also know you need the german AI to be able to push the soviet in Barbarossa. But still. Thats doesn't mean you should buff the allies and nerf the soviets so much.
@@kniviritsyn the main problem is the AI the Soviet AI were designed so that they're only good at going on the offensive. Which is good... If you are not the one being attacked.
@@fitawiroyudho3988 I would say the Soviets definitely need their AI checked, although I think it is because the Soviets are _not_ good at doing offensives. They can hold out in their supply-less wastes for years, sometimes decades. But when it comes to counter-offensives, they are unable to push the Germans back--even if the Germans have barely any manpower, are actively being pushed in France and Italy, and are stretched from Arkhangelsk to Astrakhan
![Twenty One Pilots - The Line (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XCz7WUotXs8/mqdefault.jpg)
52 mins and no comments, Bro is literally in his downfall arc 💀
did he even gone up
bru the axis must have been thirsty for that sweet juicy oil. great vid btw
how always, unrealistic end. Soviet can't lose to allies with this setup that they had after ww2
yes they can, because of this simple fact: the USA in the late 40s and early 50s irl was completely unstoppable. Even if the Soviets controlled the entirety of Europe they would eventually still lose. This becomes pretty clear when you look at the statistics of how quickly the USA was industrialising and the sheer number of new planes, tanks, and navy pieces the US pumped out during WWII. Besides this, I doubt Stalin would be very competent with his health deteriorating so rapidly by this point, not to mention the amount of resistance Europe would have to a giant communist occupier on their lands.
russians dream
Что за бред ты написал?
The allies are unbalanced
What makes you say that?
@@kniviritsyn Because democracy is shithole.
@@kniviritsyn he's right tho. Like paradox, I know you need the allies AI to he able to fight the germans somehow and i also know you need the german AI to be able to push the soviet in Barbarossa. But still. Thats doesn't mean you should buff the allies and nerf the soviets so much.
@@kniviritsyn the main problem is the AI the Soviet AI were designed so that they're only good at going on the offensive. Which is good... If you are not the one being attacked.
@@fitawiroyudho3988 I would say the Soviets definitely need their AI checked, although I think it is because the Soviets are _not_ good at doing offensives. They can hold out in their supply-less wastes for years, sometimes decades. But when it comes to counter-offensives, they are unable to push the Germans back--even if the Germans have barely any manpower, are actively being pushed in France and Italy, and are stretched from Arkhangelsk to Astrakhan
What would happen if the USSR had 100 million workers in 1936???