Fuji 18-55 or Fuji 16-80 - What’s the BEST KIT LENS?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
- Fuji 18-55 or Fuji 16-80 - What’s the BEST KIT LENS? Trying to decide between the Fuji 18-55 or Fuji 16-80 kit lens? In this video, we'll help you determine which is the best kit lens for your photography needs. I attempt to break down both lenses and try to find out which one suits you best. I show examples for both lenses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affiliate Links below
ORDER THE NEW FUJI X-T5 AT ADORAMA
Fujifilm X-T5 Black Body - adorama.rfvk.net/e4mDm1
Fujifilm X-T5 Silver Body - adorama.rfvk.net/5b4R4b
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEBSITES - capeannphototours.com, krwphoto.com
WORKSHOPS - capeannphototours.com/photogr...
PHOTO BLOGS - capeannphototours.com/photo-b...
www.krwphoto.com/blog
INSTAGRAM: KR Williamson Photography - / krwilliamsonphoto
Affiliate Links below
More information about Fujifilm zoom lenses
Fujifilm XF 16-80 f4 OIS WR - amzn.to/3bWjG2D
Fujifilm XF 70-300 F4-5.6 - adorama.rfvk.net/gbPVmA
Fujifilm XF 50-140 f 2.8 - amzn.to/3mjEBCM
Fujifilm prime lenses
Fujifilm XF 16 f1.4 R WR - amzn.to/307Tw7C
Fujifilm XF 23 f2.0 R WR - amzn.to/3sJ7Fok
Fujifilm XF 35 f2 WR - adorama.rfvk.net/gb39Z2
Fujifilm XF 90 f2.0 LM WR - amzn.to/2NTwfE5
AMAZON Affiliate LINKS FOR GEAR I USE EVERYDAY
Fujifilm X-T3 - amzn.to/3uLaiaX
Fujifilm X-T30 - amzn.to/3e24XWE
Fujifilm XF 23 f2.0 R WR - amzn.to/3sJ7Fok
Fujifilm XF 16-80 f4 OIS WR - amzn.to/3bWjG2D
FUJIFILM XF 70-300 F4-5.6 - amzn.to/3bTnDW7
Fujifilm X-H1 - adorama.rfvk.net/e4ezED
Fujifilm X-T3 - amzn.to/3uLaiaX
Fujifilm X-T30 - amzn.to/3e24XWE
Fujifilm XF 10-24 f4 OIS - amzn.to/3uMGLxz
Fujifilm XF 16-80 f4 OIS WR - amzn.to/3bWjG2D
Fujifilm XF 55-200 f3.5/4.8 OIS - amzn.to/3uLgTlC
Fujifilm XF 100-400 f4.5/5.6 OIS WR - amzn.to/3b9UMO1
Fujifilm X-T3 & XF 16-80 Bundle - amzn.to/3kAvTOG
Backpack and tripod gear
Lowepro Flipside 400 AW - amzn.to/3r9VwZ5
Feisol CT 3401 - amzn.to/3075QoU
Feisol CB 40D ballhead - amzn.to/3r9We8H
Neweer Leveling base - amzn.to/3860fDI
Video Gear
Fuji X-H1 - amzn.to/3uQdAJR
Canon M50 - amzn.to/2NYrSaJ
DJI Osmo pocket - amzn.to/2NNXIqS
Benro Slim tripod - amzn.to/3bUQsBl
#fujiXf1855 #fujixf1680 #fujifilmxt5 
Хобби
With proper technique, the 16-80 is capable of delivering outstanding results in daylight conditions. It's incredibly sharp when you nail focus, and has very nice bokeh at 80mm f4 with the subject at 2-3 meters and good separation with the background. After using it for 3 years, I would say this lens is technically perfect. Pair it with a fast prime for night-time photography and you are golden.
Sergio - Agree with everything! Well said.
My deal breaker was its lack of any kind of parfocalness. I geddit, it's not a parfocal lens but neither is the 50-140 but you can do focus pulls with that lens quite easily. For a LM lens I expected much better results with this 16-80, starting at 80mm and having a subject walk towards you whilst pulling focus it is awful, constantly hunting with a extremely poor hit rate. The 50-140 in comparison kills it.
Such a shame because this would make it into my bag if it was up to the task. I do understand however my needs are niche and the lens likely not developed for this purpose. It is curious however, if it is LM then what is holding it back from doing this task well?
The 18-120 is likely a better lens for me.
I agree completely.
Definitely agree with Sergio. It's also fantastic in the studio. I use it a lot for casual photography and professional. And I pair it with the viltrox 27mm and 75mm f1.2, which are also fantastic, btw.
The 16-80 paired up with the 70-300 on my X-T5 makes a great combo. Some folks say the 16-80 isn’t quite a good at the 80 end….ok (it looks fine to me as I don’t pixel peep at 400% and obsess over every single pixel), then you can just pop on he 70-300 and use that for the 80mm part.
David I totally agree. I never worry about shooting 80. The 70-300 is such a gem.
I love them both. I use the 16-80 on my X-Pro2 and don't have any problems with it. In fact, it's superb! There is a new 'kit' lens coming from Fuji though. The XF 16-50 f2.8. Keep an eye out for it soon!
Tony - I put the 16-80 on the X-Pro3 and thought it worked great but I liked using the optical viewfinder so it got in the way. Actually the only lenses that don’t get in the way are the small primes. I decided not to get into the rumors with that one. And it’s not a straight 2.8. It’s a 2.8-4.8 so extremely slow at 50. Good news is that it is weather sealed, ois, and the biggie, internal zoom.
I have both lenses. I use them on the XT-5 and XT-3. I use the 16-80mm in combination with the 70-300mm for travel. And the 18-55mm for street photography and hiking with the 55-200mm. I’m an enthusiastic photographer.
Ruben - The perfect setup!
I love them both, 16-80 for range, 18-55 for compactness! Sharpness wise, it’s a close call! Always enjoy your videos Kirk!
Same here Bill I really enjoy both lenses because they are both good for certain things.
Good to see you Kirk. When I first got into digital cameras (after shooting film for over 35 years) I got an X-T2 with the XF18-55 (great lens which I still own), but when I “upgraded” to the X-T4 I got it with the XF16-80 simply for the extended focal range at both ends. Be well and stay safe.
Glad to hear from you Enrique! Basically the same for me and I love both these lenses for what they are and what I can use them for.
Kirk, it’s wonderful to connect with a fellow Fuji enthusiast. The Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS lens is indeed a gem. Let’s delve into some details about this versatile lens:
1. Compact and Well-Built: The XF 18-55mm lens strikes a balance between portability and performance. While it’s larger than some Micro Four Thirds zoom lenses, it pairs seamlessly with the Fujifilm X-E1 camera. Even when fully zoomed out, it doesn’t feel front-heavy1.
2. Optical Excellence: Covering an angle-of-view range similar to a 27-84mm lens in a 35mm system, this lens is a workhorse. It features a close-focus point of 30cm, a 7-blade iris diaphragm, and optical image stabilization (OIS) equivalent to 4 stops. The linear motor-driven focusing system locks onto subjects in a swift 0.1 second, making it ideal for capturing fast-moving scenes. Plus, it operates silently for video recording1.
3. Build Quality: The XF 18-55mm boasts a metal mount, high-grade metal barrel, and a non-rotating 58mm filter thread. The zoom ring is wide and has a ridged, rubberized grip. While zooming isn’t internal (the lens changes length as you zoom), it remains well-balanced on the X-E1. Both the zoom and focus rings offer smooth action without any looseness, and zoom creep is a non-issue1.
4. Aperture Control: The lens features a traditional aperture ring on the barrel, allowing you to set the aperture in 1/3 steps. Since it has a variable aperture throughout its range, aperture markings are displayed in the viewfinder or on the LCD screen of the camera body. aperture ring is nicely damped and provides a satisfying click as you adjust it1.
Kirk Thanks for sharing your review. Cheers.👍👍👍
Mike you did a better job than I did! I glossed over the details. However, This lens is all metal not plastic!
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography Kirk’ you’re right’ see I didn’t do a gouda job as you.🙏
I have the 16-80. I bought this lens because it gives me the same coverage as the 24-120 that I used on my full frame Nikon. That 24-120 was also an F/4 lens. So the 16-80 gave me the performance that I was already used to. I never have liked non-weather sealed lenses. I absolutely love this lens. It's used on my X-T3 and X-T5. It is the lens that I use for 90-95 percent of my images.
Same here Dave I love the lens for its wonderful range, weather sealing etc.
Loved the 16-80 on the XT3...was unhappy with it on the XT5....finally got the 16-55...what a beast in size...but a real gem in term of IQ....another level...not as good as the WR primes of course
I felt the same way when I rented that lens. Big, heavy, expensive, but awesome IQ. I don’t mind the 16-80 on my X-T5 use it all the time.
I only own the 18-55mm lens. I’ve never had the 16-80mm in my hands. For me, I don’t have a burning desire for the new kit lens. The 18-55mm lens quickly goes from f2.8 to 4.0 so I consider it a f4.0 lens. It comes down to cost. I don’t want to spend an additional $200 for the extra reach and weather sealing. In general, if it is raining I’m not outside. I’m satisfied with what I have.
Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)
Martin - My only real problem with the 18-55 was it is not wide enough for me. When I’m working for the paper I like having that 24 equivalent. Also at the other end a 120 equivalent much better as an all around lens.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography exactly my reasons originally with the X T120 and now the X T5. Paired with the 70-300 with additionally, the Viltrox 27mm f 1.2 which is now my jump from the bag lens. Likely if I was still working as a wedding pro I would use the 16-80 mm but at receptions etc. the Viltrox would be ideal and working at 7-8 feet from subjects it would be perfect much like using the 60 mm on the Hassy.
I have 16-80 on XT5 and I typically hike 15-20 miles per week, often on steep terrain. I've never used the 18-55 but the 16-80 is my most used lens due to the versatile FL. I often use it at 16 and occasionally at 80 so I really like the range. When I'm in an area with bigger vistas, I go for the 10-24 for the wider angle. Its nice that they both use the same filter size, I use the Kase magnetic and swap it between them. I do love the Fuji primes but for on the move, quick setups, its hard to beat the 16-80. Its a work horse for me.
Steven- Thanks for relaying your personal experience with the 16-80 as I love it just as much! It seems the haters of this lens are more prevalent online.
No kidding! Sure there are smaller primes that are better at their FL but that's to be expected. Sometimes a zoom is what you need.
I purchased the 18-55 when I got into the Fuji system back in 2014. I really loved the lens for just about everything. Then I got the 16-80 when it became available and it quickly became my go-to lens. I've used them on my X-T2 and X-T4. At one point the 16-55 2.8 appealed to me so I sold the 18-55. I have regretted that decision because the 16-55 is so big and bulky that I rarely use it. I been thinking about getting a used 18-55 again. Great video and comparison.
My feelings exactly!
Great video and pictures, Kirk. Most of my pics are taken within the medium zoom range. I have both of these lenses in the video but prefer the 16-55 2.8. It is heavier and doesn't have IBIS but my XT-5 does and the lens is very sharp. I have an XS-20 and use the 16-80 on that camera often.
I don’t disagree the 16-55 is an awesome lens! For me it’s too heavy for regular hand held use so I prefer the 16-80 on my XT5 and the 18-55 on my XT30
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography Coming from Nikons, I think the heaviness is built into my muscle memory. 🤣
Beautiful images and solid comparison. I had both and sold the smaller 18-55. The only thing I miss besides the small size is that 2.8. Sometimes a stop is everything, and in low light I used to treat that little lens like an 18 2.8 prime.
Yes the 18-55 can be used that way. I just love that little lens.
They both are excellent lenses. Thankyou for sharing.
Thanks
When I bought my X-S10 3yrs ago having returned to serious photography after a break of 20yrs I deliberated between the 18-55mm and 16-80mm. At the time the 18-55mm seem to get the better reviews but I decided I preferred the longer range of the 16-80mm albeit it was slightly larger in size. I have never regretted my decision and find it a very versatile travel lens and as you say sharp as a tack. I have recently added the 70-300mm which really complements the 16-80mm.I appreciate your down to earth lens comparison (especially as it confirms my thinking)
Thanks! I love both lenses. This week I’ll be talking about the Fuji Red Badge lenses and they are better than the black badge lenses. Are they really that much better? Umm 🤔
I had the 18-55 since 2015, then with X-T1. Several years later, I had X-T3, with 18-55. Superb combination, but GAS struck eventually, and I traded it for the 16-80. I had that lens for over a year, but never liked it. Far too harsh and contrasty for me. Not as nice as the 18-55. So I swopped back to the 18-55, and was very happy. For a while! Some time later, I got to thinking that perhaps I could have set up my camera better (differently). So I took advantage of Fujifilm UK free loan service, and borrowed a 16-80 for a few days. This enabled me to play about with my camera settings, which helped me produce images to my liking, and in many ways superior to any I could have obtained with the 18-55. Needless to say, I have sold the 18-55, and bought my own 16-80. Yes, it is a bit larger and heavier, but at closest I get bigger images, they are a tad sharper, the OIS is quicker, it has a real aperture ring, it is Weather Resistant, and has a greater range of focal lengths. What is not to like?
Yes I agree. Both lenses will appeal to different people at different times. I love both of them but on different cameras.
I bought 16-80 for aperture ring and focal length. It's my go to all around . I shoot general travel and events.
I agree Robert love the lens for both those things!
I went with the 16-80 for its weather resistance and the focal length suits me well. Can’t beat the 24-120.
Mark we needed this focal length back in the day! I enjoy it ever time I use it. I freelance for the GDT when Paul or Jim can’t do it and this lens is in use constantly.
Have both, like both. The 16-80 mostly on my X-T4 and the 18-55 on my oldy X-E2 😀
They work perfectly for those two cameras
I took the 16-80/4. It’s the lens I use in 90 of my pictures. Image quality is outstanding and when I travel I have all’ I need in one lens.
Thanks for letting us know how great the 16-80 is and I totally agree!
I also got introduced to Fujifilm and still use an X-T3 with the 18-55mm. I borrowed a 16-80 and loved it for the same reasons you covered but at the end of the day I stuck with the 18-55mm mostly because of the lower weight and the 2.8 aperture at the wide end. To me the 18-55 would be perfect if it was weather resistant like the X-T3. Their both great kit lenses, especially when you see the "kit" lens most other brands offer.
Bill totally agree. I use the 16-80 because of the weather sealing and the constant f4 aperture ring.
Great video!
Photography is my [expensive] hobby. I was undecided when I bought my X-T4, cause I wanted the 18-55mm but not having weather sealing made me choose the 16-80mm. I like it, but the size and weight usually make me choose to leave home with other lighter lenses.
Now with the release of the 16-50mm, I am thinking of getting it cause of internal zoom and about same size as 18-55m.
I'd like suggestions/recommendations on what to do. Sell the 16-80mm for the 16-50mm? Or sell it and go for the 18-55mm and not worry about water damage from rain? Or other light third party lenses with weather sealing?
I love the 16-80 and would not part with it. The 16-50 just does not cut it for me.
I bought the 18-55 because when I got into Fujifilm, that was the only option other than the larger, heavier and more expensive 16-55 f/2.8. I'm a prime lens snob, but after several outings with the 18-55, it was hard to justify carrying a cadre of the f/2 primes within the range of the zoom... the image quality from that so called kit lens was terrific within the constraints of the aperture range. I always keep one Fujicron with me for the option of a smaller, faster lens, but the zoom can do a lot on good light with no compromise in image quality.
My only complaint is the unmarked aperture ring, which is counter to my love of the old-school ergonomics that made me pick Fujifilm cameras. More than once, my set aperture drifted from what I set it to from simply carrying the camera, and until I brought it to my eye, I didn't know. I shoot aperture priority mostly so the unmarked aperture ring is not optimal.
When the 16-80mm was announced, I was excited until many initial reviews mentioned the long end of the zoom not being as sharp as it could be. If it was one review, I could ignore it, but that observation was made by multiple reviewers. I figured that I'd just keep using my 18-55 and I added the 55-200 to it for a comprehensive zoom kit.
Albert - the 18-55 is a great little lens and is so much better than other kit lenses. I agree about the aperture ring. I must have an outstanding copy of the 16-80 because it is sharp all the way around until you get to 80 when the corners get a little soft.
Great topic Kirk! I have both lenses having originally bought the 18-55 as a kit lens on my X-T1. I sold the X-T1 but kept the lens. I'm now using the X-T5 and use the 16-80 more often. In fact, the 16-80 is my travel lens when I'm forced to choose just one. That said, I still like the 18-55 and use it on occasion.
Exactly where I started but with the X-T3. Like you I use the 16-80 with my X-T5 and love it.
What makes you reach for the 16-80 more? I am having such a difficult time deciding between the 16-80 and the 18-55mm for the XT-5. 😢
I'll be mostly using it for travel/street photography.
@@vaynovak For me it's a couple of things: 1. I like the ability to shoot a bit wider (16mm vs. 18mm). Good for landscape shooting and also street. I also like the ability to shoot a bit further (55mm vs. 80mm). 2. I like the fact that the lens is weather resistant so I don't have to think twice about putting it on my X-T3 or T5 in bad weather (I tested it and it works). In summary, I guess you could say it's just a bit more versatile than the 18-55.
@@SteveMcClanahan Thank you *so much* for taking the time to give me such a thorough rundown of why the 16-80 is a better choice for the lens kit. I truly appreciate it! It hasn't been an easy choice and your response has been truly helpful.😊
I swirched from Canon ASP-C to Fuji in the last year because I do most of my photography when I travel and wanted the smallest and lightest kit possible. I bought the 16-80 with the XT-5 to replace my Canon 15-85, which is a stellar lens, sharp corner to corner, but consderably bigger and heavier than the Fuji lens. After taking the 16-80 on a landscape shoot in the UK and to Lisbon for mostly street and architecture, if found that the 16-80 was fine for landscapes, but for city, where the photos included lots of well-defined edges and architectural details, it was often disappointing as many of the images shot at the wide end (16 -25 mm) were notcieably soft from the left and right edges and continuing about 20% of the way into frame. The problem could be masked to some extent with some extra sharpening and contrast in these areas, but not always. After my experience with the Canon 15-85, I have to say that Fuji's equivalent is quite inferior. The question is how nuch image quality am I prepared to sacrifice for portability. Jury's still out.
I have not had that problem at all with the 16-80 but I appreciate your experience with it. Other people including friends of mine have had bad luck with it. My copy must be better than most as at 16 it is outstanding because I shoot wide open a lot. At 80 it’s a little soft at the corners but in the center it’s very sharp. Thanks for sharing your experience.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography Yes, there seems to be QC issue. My results are like those reported by DP reviews. You seem to have lucked out with an exception. I saw your earlier review and some others before buying it and hoped for the best. Not sure what I can do at this point if I want to stay with Fuji and don't want to deal with "the brick" or a bag of primes, which would defeat my reason for switching. Curiously, I find my copy lens is acceptable near 80, but I shoot very few photos at the long end so don't worry too much anyway. However, i shoot a lot near the wide end. Hence my conundrum.
I use both with an X-T5, but I tend to use the 18-55 more often due to the size and weight. I mostly shoot street, family, and travel. And I have also started doing RUclips videos, which I find is better with the 18-55. For my use cases the 18-55 fits better. I use the 16-80 when I want something specific, like when I know I want to shoot wide or long outdoors in the daytime, or I plan to shoot in bad weather. I’d say 90% of the time, I pick up the 18-55 to take with me. Both are good lenses though, so just depends on how you plan to use them.
George I tend to agree that the 18-55 is a great gab and go lens. And its size is a big plus. The 16-80 is much larger and a bit heavier but for me the added width on the short end and length on the long end are a big plus for what I do.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotographyyup agreed! I’ve watched many of your videos and the 16-80 seem to fit better with what you tend to shoot. The main downsides with the 18-55 is the variable aperture and lack of weather resistance. The 16-80 definitely beats it in those regards. Every choice comes with trade offs! Thanks for the video.
Than you for the video!
I used the 18-55 on X-T2 for long time and I liked it. Now I got the X-T5 and I'm considering getting the 16-80, for the greater range. @Kirk R. Williamson Photography
Can you comment which one is better in terms of sharpness on the new 40mp sensor the 18-55 or the 16-80, as both are not in the recommended list ?
To be honest they are about the same. I use my 16-80 all the time and the 18-55 is up for sale. The range of the 16-80 is why I use it. 24-120 ff.
Oh boy, I own both but use the 16-80 on my X-T30 exclusively. I found the 18-55 limited me in terms of reach. Going to 16 mm on the wide side of the range has been good photographing architecture (without any objectionable distortion) and the 80 mm reach on the telephoto end is also quite helpful. If you need one lens where different focal lengths are needed, it’s hard to beat the 16-80.
I do agree with everything you say about the 16-80. But for me I enjoy it on larger cameras than the X-T30 but that’s just me.
How do you find the 18 - 55 on the larger sensor of the XT5 Kirk?
Neville - Have not tried it yet or the 55-200 on the X-T5 I need to do that it might make a good video.
I was trying to decide between a used 18-55 or 16-80. I already had the 18-135 so opted for the 18-55 because the 18-135 covered everything the 16-80 had and they were actually very similar in weight. I wondered if I’d ever take the 16-80 out if I could take the 18-135 and have more reach. I went for the 18-55 in the end as it suits the x-t4 and x-t30 well but a part of me still likes the 16-80!!
So the reason you purchased the 18-55 was so you could have a smaller zoom I guess. I have heard so many bad things about the 18-135 I have never used it, actually never even seen one.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography I think they were a mixed lot!! Some not so good, some good. 55 wasn’t enough reach sometimes but I got the 18-135 as a used model and the camera shop I use were willing to take it back if I wasn’t happy, I’d did have some doubts but overall I was happy with the results on my last holiday. If I didn’t have that I’d have been tempted by the 16-80 as I really liked it when I tried it but it really didn’t make sense when I had it covered plus more. Was a lovely lens but I just knew I would’ve got the use from both and the 18-55. If I hadn’t wanted a lightweight, small lens I’d have chosen the 16-80 over the 18-55 but the point of that was size and weight, particularly on the x-t30. If you get a good version the 18-135 is a great lens to take out for the day. I was wanting to be able to zoom in to detail on Greek/roman ruins etc as well as wide so it was useful. I’ll be looking at which focal lengths I use most on a more regular basis after watching your prime lens video. It’s interesting to look back and see what’s used most often.
Which camera is better for videography and photography? Does the xs20 create noise when the ISO value increases in low light environments? I will be happy if you give me information
The video monster is the XH2s. It will out perform the XS20 in low light. Use fast glass with the XS20 to do better.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography The XH2s is really monster, but it exceeds my budget. Can't I do video work with xs20? Or is there a better camera I can buy in the xs20 price band? I am looking for a camera for promotional videos, events, concerts, corporate video shoots and product, model photography
is it 18-55 resolve the 40mp sensor?thx
I don’t think so but honestly I think the difference is negligible.
Since I bought the 16-80 I use the 10-24 much less and less. I think the 16-80 while beeing heavier and bigger is a good choise as long as the camera body is big enough. On my x-t30ii I use a L-braket to use it more comfortable.
A few years ago one of my photographers said that he sold his Nikon 16-35. When I quizzed him about it he said that he never used it since getting the 24-70. I thought about it and came to the same conclusion. How many times do you really need that 16-21 FF range. I rarely use my Fuji 10-24 anymore. It mostly gets used for video. So you have a very good point!
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography traded 3 lenses including a 10-24 which in the time I had it was used for a total of 4 images and would never have been purchased had the 16-80 been available. If I was still travelling, I would have kept the 18-135 as a preferred lens. Now if only there was a 16-135mm. I have the 70-300 but at full extension better put it on a tripod as I certainly can't hold that long a focal length hand held.
Also - the F2.8 at 18mm is astounding if I am walking around at night and need to open up the aperture.
Yes great lens
Went to test the 16-80 yesterday at the camera store. What really holds it back (for me) is it's terrible lack of resembling any kind of parfocalness. Nudge the zoom ring and the it needs to reaquire focus. Unlike the 50-140 which is excellent in this regard. A real shame because f4 and 16-80 is a super useful length and acceptable aperture for a lens this size and weight, and being LM I expected much better. If not zooming the lens is fast and snappy, but introduce a bit of zooming and it is trash. Missed opportunity by Fuji.
Eddy - I don’t use the 16-80 for video so zooming and focusing at the same time is not something I care about unless it’s sports. That’s where the 100-400 and 50-140 which do focus while zooming are great. I use BB focus so reaquiring focus after zooming is not a big problem for still photography.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography I know, it just seems such a shame that this lens is not competent in this regard. People do buy zooms for the ability to focus pull in stills and video but it appears awful in this regard yet the 50-140 excellent. If both lenses carry same drive (LM) then what is the cause? 🤔
In my X-H1 the 16-80 it is perfect, much more used than the 10-24mm. I can use it in a X-E3 perfectly but normally big lenses are more useful in big cameras like X-H1 and small ones (primes) like 18mm f:2, 35mm f:1.4 or 14mm f:2.8 or a Viltrox 56mm f:1.4, personally I prefer this primes to a 18-55mm, never used that lens because 16-80 it is perfect so don’t need it.
I agree with you! I was so impressed with the 18-55 when a friend showed it to me that when I jumped into the Fuji system I got my X-T3 with it as the kit lens. I used it for a short bit until the 16-80 came out. I tend to only use it with larger cameras though. Smaller cameras I use the 18-55 or the Fujicrons.
the best part of 16-80 is the pairing with the 70-300. The 18-55 is a great pairing for the 50-200. But if you have the XT5 these two are both not the best.
Interesting but I have not used the 18-55 or the 55-200 on the X-T5. It reminds me I should give it a whirl. I too use the 16-80 and 70-300 the most on the X-T5.
The 16-80 and 70-300 is the combination I have. It's perfect for what I need.
16-80, it's great.
I agree Ronny!
I have just re-kindled my love affair with Fuji - after a year .. have owned XT1/2 / Xpro 1 / XH-1 and a variety of lenses - some Fuji some vintage -- long story short I sold everything Fuji and took a break from photography -- anyway I have just purchased an as new XH1 and I went with 16-80 as it covers most of what I need at I like F4 constant.. I am tempted to invest in one Prime lens - and its a toss between 23 and 35 and Voightlander seems interesting - but I also love Fuji 23 / 35.. and the AF makes life a little easier - Greetings from Ireland, Paul
Hi Paul, yes the Voigtlander lenses are interesting but they can be tricky to focus. The Fuji lenses are outstanding both old and new. I own the old 23 f1.4 and the 23 f2, 35 f2 love them all.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography Thank you for your reply Kirk.. regards and take care
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography check out the Viltrox 27mm f 1.2.
If xf 18-55mm is a very competent lens!
Yes very much agree!
In my experience the 18-55 is slightly sharper than the 16-80. I wouldn’t describe the latter as “sharp as a tack” personally
In my experience it is!
Food for thought, got both. XT1 + 18/55 Awesome bang for buck. XT5 + 16/80 monster, Mmmmm is it really worth it ££££££ ? Thanks Kirk
Alan - The 18-55 is perfect on my X-T30 and the 16-80 on my X-T5. Worth it both cases.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography The X T5 is certainly an amazing camera. What is cool is that my current vehicle (well, my wife drives it as my eyesight precludes that anymore) is a Cadillac SUV XT5 Platinum and likely both camera and vehicle will last as long as me or my wife.
I have a lot of great Fuji primes but I am always surprised at the image quality of the small, unassuming 18-55. A talented photographer could make a living with that lens alone (it depends on what you shoot, of course).
Victoria - I totally agree with you. As a retired photojournalist but still doing freelance I have used this lens on assignment. It’s a great little lens.
Dustin Abbott made me wanna sell it, after seeing his review. And... i love this lens. I'm trying to fault it, but i can't !
Both lenses are awesome!
The new 16-50mm 2.8/4.8 is coming soon as well.
I almost got into that a little bit honestly since it’s not out yet I would be speculating too much. On the 50 end 4.8 is way too slow. I like the internal zoom though.
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography Agree, sounds interesting but I feel the marvelous 18-55 will still hold it´s place amongst the best ones you can get today. I am pretty sure the 16-50 will be improved with video and resolution in mind but I still love the original one.
If you are a hybrid shooter - you would never choose the 16-80mm. It loses focus as you zoom - I had one and sold it within 2 weeks, and went straight back to my 18-55mm.
The new firmware for the XT5 has helped that situation
Some reviews say the 16-80mm is not tack sharp, not as sharp as the 18-55mm.
I have seen and read those too. my results show different with the 16-80! Yes the 18-55 is stellar optically
@@KirkWilliamsonphotography Thanks for your reply.