Astable Multivibrator Mode of the 555 Timer - brought to you by Solderstick Wire Connectors

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 сен 2024

Комментарии • 20

  • @learnelectronics
    @learnelectronics  Год назад

    Get solderstick at 20% OFF with discount code "LE20" at www.solderstick.com/sale

  • @keithcitizen4855
    @keithcitizen4855 Год назад +3

    The ratio difference between resistor value and duty cycle is interesting (1/3 -2/3 for equal resistors) - rough rule of thumb seems about 10 to 1( R1 - R2) to get nearer 50% duty cycle

  • @kychemclass5850
    @kychemclass5850 Год назад

    The curious streak inside of me has me interested in knowing the exact value of those resistors and the exact capacitance.
    Anyway. Nice videos.Much appreciated. Keep it up!

    • @learnelectronics
      @learnelectronics  Год назад +1

      Off hand, I don't remember but I always use multiples of 10 for resistors. In this case they were the same value. As for the cap...again I dont remember but you can use a 555 Astable calc to get your values. Here is one from Digikey: www.digikey.com/en/resources/conversion-calculators/conversion-calculator-555-timer

  • @shagreobe
    @shagreobe Год назад +3

    Great video once again. How about a video on how to use crystals? I can't recall seeing one anywhere

  • @markharrisllb
    @markharrisllb Год назад

    Thank you so much for these. I hope you’re doing well post-op.

  • @brucehanson4147
    @brucehanson4147 Год назад

    Thanks for the vid, nice explanation of operation.
    There are some nice online calculators that let you put in the value of the capacitor and resistors and they tell you the frequency and duty cycle of the output.

  • @sokoloft3
    @sokoloft3 10 месяцев назад

    I'm unsure if you've done this. However it'd be really neat for you to make a video on the 556. Timer 1 being in monostable, and timer 2 being in astable. Having the output of timer 1 activate timer 2 via a transistor.
    I'm doing that now to have a piezo beeper go off every second after a set amount of time. Anywhere from 0-6 hours using a 20k pot and 1000uf cap. For the astable side, I'll use a 2k resistor and another 1000uf cap.
    EDIT: Maybe I can't do this with the 556. Since both timers share the same VCC. So I'm unsure how I would activate timer 2 in astable mode once timer 1's output goes low

  • @tedbastwock3810
    @tedbastwock3810 2 месяца назад

    I can think of real life applications where I might use monostable and bistable modes. Other than pwm, when might we use astable multivibrator mode? For things like radio transmission and wireless communication ... what other things?

  • @michaelbradley7621
    @michaelbradley7621 Год назад +1

    Could someone explain the point in using these? A sinusoidal voltage over a diode accomplishes this same thing and comparators make cleaner square waves.

    • @learnelectronics
      @learnelectronics  Год назад +4

      I'm sure there's some point, after all, it is the most widely used integrated circuit in the history of electronics.

  • @daveoswald5375
    @daveoswald5375 Год назад

    Hi there. What is the purpose of the 10 nanofarad capacitor if we choose to use it? What would happen if it was not used? Also, what is your source voltage on VCC, 5vdc? thx.

    • @ralphj4012
      @ralphj4012 Год назад +1

      The capacitor reduces the chance of noise on the control voltage pin which is connected to one of the internal comparators used in the timing circuit (independently of the external resistors and capacitor). Any noise can shift the timing. There's an earlier video which explains (all about the pins on the 555 timer). I'll hazard a guess that Vcc is 6V (the scope shows 5.36V pp signal).

    • @daveoswald5375
      @daveoswald5375 Год назад

      @@ralphj4012 Thank-you for this explanation..

  • @SelectaBwoy
    @SelectaBwoy Год назад

    Is it possible to change the rate without it changing the frequency?

    • @peddlereffects
      @peddlereffects Год назад +1

      The rate is the frequency

    • @poykehmusic
      @poykehmusic Год назад

      @@peddlereffects No. The *Frequency* is _how many cycles in a second_ while the *rate* is _How long is one state compared to the other._

    • @peddlereffects
      @peddlereffects Год назад +1

      @@poykehmusic isn't that the duty cycle?

    • @poykehmusic
      @poykehmusic Год назад

      Well the *duty cycle* is the rate _(or ratio)_ of the pulse width to the total cycle _(or period)_ of the oscillation. So the correct name _should be_ *duty cycle,* but SelectaBwoy use the word "rate" so I thought he _meant_ duty cycle. In fact, *frequency* is kinda also a rate, since it's the number of oscillation per seconds. It gets confusing... 😀